The Corporate Citizen and the Sovereign Exception: from 'homo sacer' to 'homo supra'
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0937Keywords:
Corporate citizen, citizenship, state of exception, corporations, regulation, Ciudadano corporativo, ciudadanía, estado de excepción, corporaciones, regulaciónAbstract
This paper is concerned with a concept that has permeated discussions about the corporation in the early 21st century: the “corporate citizen”. The paper uses the liberal understanding of citizenship that involves responsibilities and duties owed to the state on one hand, and the rights guaranteed by the state on the other as its starting point, and applies this dualism to the corporate citizen. Yet the rights and duties applied to corporations are not strictly analogous to the corresponding rights and responsibilities of real flesh and blood citizens. Corporate citizenship implies a set of exceptional powers and privileges that combine to produce homo supra, a paradigmatic “supra-sovereign” subject that is empowered to enjoy sovereign protections and rights far-exceeding those that any ordinary citizen could expect. The paper thus shows how the process of ascribing corporate citizenship has become a key mechanism through which unequal power relations (and attendant privileges of class, gender and race etc.) is guaranteed.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF 316
References
Abrahamsen, R., 2001. Disciplining Democracy: Development Discourse and Good Governance in Africa. London: Zed.
Agamben, G., 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans.: D. Heller-Roazen. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, G., 2005. State of Exception. Trans.: K. Attell. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226009261.001.0001
Alvarez, J., et al., 2001. The Multinational Enterprise as Global Corporate Citizen: symposium. New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law, 21 (1), 1-39.
Anderson, M., 2002. Transnational corporations and environmental damage: Is tort law the answer? Washburn Law Journal [online], 41 (3), 399-426. Available from: http://contentdm.washburnlaw.edu/utils/getdownloaditem/collection/wlj/id/5272/filename/5273.pdf/mapsto/pdf [Accessed 27 July 2018].
Arlen, J., and Weiss, D., 1995. A Political Theory of Corporate Taxation. The Yale Law Journal [online], 105 (2), 325-391. Available from: http://works.bepress.com/deborah_weiss/4 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/797124
Asante, S.K.B., 1979. United Nations: international regulation of transnational corporations. Journal of World Trade Law, 13 (1), 55–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/TRAD1979005
Atiles, J., 2016. Apuntes para abandonar el derecho: estado de excepción colonial en Puerto Rico. Cabo Rojo: Educación Emergente.
Bartelsman, E., and Beetsma, R., 2003. Why pay more? Corporate tax avoidance through transfer pricing in OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics [online], 87 (9–10), 2225-2252. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00018-X [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00018-X
Bell, E., 2016. From Marshallian Citizenship to Corporate Citizenship: the Changing Nature of Citizenship in Neoliberal Britain. French Journal of British Studies [online], 31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4000/rfcb.850 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rfcb.850
Bernat, I., and Whyte, D., 2017. State-corporate crime and the process of capital accumulation: mapping a global regime of permission from Galicia to Morecambe Bay. Critical Criminology [online], 25 (1), 71–86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-016-9340-9 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-016-9340-9
Bittle, S., and Snider, L., 2013. Examining the Ruggie Report: can voluntary guidelines tame global capitalism? Critical Criminology, 21, 177–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-013-9177-4
Bowers, S., 2016. Google pays €47m in tax in Ireland on €22bn sales revenue. The Guardian [online], 4 November. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/nov/04/google-pays-47m-euros-tax-ireland-22bn-euros-revenue [Accessed 27 July 2018].
Burchell, J., and Cook, J., 2006. Confronting the “corporate citizen”: Shaping the discourse of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy [online], 26 (3/4), 121-137. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330610657188 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330610657188
Carroll, A., 1998. The Four Faces of Corporate Citizenship. Business and Society Review [online], 100-101 (1), 1–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/0045-3609.00008 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0045-3609.00008
Carson, W.G., 1979. The Conventionalization of Early Factory Crime. International Journal for the Sociology of Law, 7, 37-60.
Carver, T., 1998. Sexual citizenship: gendered and de-gendered narratives. In: Carver, T., and Mottier, V., eds., Politics of Sexuality: Identity, Gender, Citizenship. London: Routledge.
Castles, S., 2005. Nation and Empire: Hierarchies of Citizenship in the New Global Order. International Politics [online], 42 (2), 203–224. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800107 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800107
Chang, H.J., 2011. 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism. London: Penguin.
Ciampi, A., 2017. SLAPPs and FoAA rights (by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association) [online]. Info note. Geneva: United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/ycs2c5e2 [Accessed 27 July 2018].
Ciocchini, P., and Khoury, S., 2018 (in this issue). Investor State Dispute Settlement: Institutionalising “Corporate Exceptionality”. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 8 (6), 976-1000. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3194643 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0970
Clausing, K., 2009. Multinational Firm Tax Avoidance and Tax Policy. National Tax Journal [online], 62 (4), 703-725. Available from: https://www.ntanet.org/NTJ/62/4/ntj-v62n04p703-25-multinational-firm-tax-avoidance.pdf [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2009.4.06
Coleman, D., 2003. The United Nations and transnational corporations: from an inter-nation to a “beyond-state” model of engagement. Global Society [online], 17 (4), 339–357. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360082032000132135 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360082032000132135
Coleman, R., Tombs, S., and Whyte, D., 2005. Capital, Crime Control and Statecraft in the Entrepreneurial City. Urban Studies [online], 42 (13), 2511-2530. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080%2F00420980500380428 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500380428
Council of Europe, 1950. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14 [online]. Rome, 4 November. Available from: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf [Accessed 12 April 2018].
Dawkins, C., 2002. Corporate Welfare, Corporate Citizenship, and the Question of Accountability. Business and Society [online], 41 (3), 269-291. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0007650302041003002 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650302041003002
Demsetz, H., and Lehn, K., 1985. The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences. Journal of Political Economy [online], 93 (6), 1155-1177. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1833178?origin=JSTOR-pdf [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261354
Devereux, M., Lockwood, B., and Redoano, M., 2008. Do countries compete over corporate tax rates? Journal of Public Economics [online], 92 (5–6), 1210-1235. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.09.005 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.09.005
Dewey, J., 1926. The Historic Background of Corporate Legal Personality. Yale Law Journal [online], 35 (6), 655-673. Available from: http://rci.rutgers.edu/~tripmcc/phil/dewey-historic_background_of_corporate_legal_personality.pdf [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/788782
Eberhardt, P., and Olivet, C., 2012. Profiting from injustice: How law firms, arbitrators and financiers are fuelling an investment arbitration boom [online]. Brussels / Amsterdam: Corporate Europe Observatory and the Transnational Institute. Available from: https://www.tni.org/files/download/profitingfrominjustice.pdf [Accessed 27 July 2018].
Edwards, J., 1984. The 1984 Corporation Tax Reform. Fiscal Studies [online], 5 (2), 30-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.1984.tb00385.x [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.1984.tb00385.x
Emberland, M., 2006. The Human Rights of Companies: Exploring the Structure of ECHR Protection. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289837.001.0001
Farand, C., 2016. Six British multinationals “did not pay any UK corporation tax in 2014”. The Independent [online], 31 January. Available from: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/six-british-multinationals-including-shell-vodafone-lloyds-banking-group-did-not-paid-any-a6844676.html [Accessed 27 July 2018].
Farnsworth, K., 2015. The British Corporate Welfare State: public provision for private business, SPERI Paper no. 24 [online]. Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute. Available from: http://speri.dept.shef.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/SPERI-Paper-24-The-British-Corporate-Welfare-State.pdf [Accessed 27 July 2018].
Ferguson, J., 2005. Seeing Like an Oil Company: Space, Security, and Global Capital in Neoliberal Africa. American Anthropologist [online], 107 (3), 377-382. Available from: https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.377 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.377
Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 2011. A Charter for Business [online]. London: Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 1 February. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/35438/business-charter.pdf [Accessed 27 July 2018].
Francis, D., 1999. Mercenary Intervention in Sierra Leone: Providing National Security or International Exploitation? Third World Quarterly, 20 (2), 319-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599913785
Gaffney, M., 2018. Corporate Power and Expansive U.S. Military Policy. American Journal of Economics and Sociology [online], 77 (2), 331-347. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12222 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12222
Glasbeek, H., 2012. Contortions of Corporate Law: James Hardie reveals cracks in liberal law’s armour. Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 27, 132–168.
Glasbeek, H., 2017. Class Privilege: How Law Shelters Shareholders and Coddles Capitalism. Toronto: Between the Lines.
Gravelle, J., 2009. Tax Havens: International Tax Avoidance and Evasion. National Tax Journal, 62 (4), 727-753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2009.4.07
Hawkins, B., and Holden, C., 2016. A Corporate Veto on Health Policy? Global Constitutionalism and Investor-State Dispute Settlement. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law [online], 41 (5), 969-995. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1215%2F03616878-3632203 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-3632203
Helgesson, K.S., and Mörth, U., eds., 2013. The Political Role of Corporate Citizens: an interdisciplinary approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026828
Hilson, C., 2016. Environmental SLAPPs in the UK: threat or opportunity? Environmental Politics [online], 25 (2), 248-267. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1105176 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1105176
Ikelegbe, A., 2005. The Economy of Conflict in the Oil Rich Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Nordic Journal of African Studies [online], 14 (2), 208–234. Available from: http://www.njas.helsinki.fi/pdf-files/vol14num2/ikelegbe.pdf [Accessed 27 July 2018].
International Labour Office Bureau for Workers’ Activities, 2014. Trade Union Manual on Export Processing Zones [online]. Geneva: International Labour Organization. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---actrav/documents/publication/wcms_324632.pdf [Accessed 27 July 2018].
International Labour Organization, 1998. Labour and social issues relating to export processing zones [online]. Report for discussion at the Tripartite Meeting of Export Processing zones-Operating Countries. Geneva: International Labour Office. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---actrav/documents/publication/wcms_114918.pdf [Accessed 27 July 2018].
Janoski, T., 1998. Citizenship and Civil Society: A Framework of Rights and Obligations in Liberal, Traditional, and Social Democratic Regimes. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174787
Jansa, J., and Gray, V., 2014. The Politics and Economics of Corporate Subsidies in the 21st Century. APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper [online]. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2452332 [Accessed 27 July 2018].
Khoury, S., and Whyte, D., 2017. Corporate Human Rights Violations: Global Prospects for Legal Action. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620145
Krannich, J., 2005. The Corporate “Person”: A New Analytical Approach to a Flawed Method of Constitutional Interpretation. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal [online], 37 (1), 61-109. Available from: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol37/iss1/4 [Accessed 27 July 2018].
Lemke, T., 2005. A Zone of Indistinction – A Critique of Giorgio Agamben’s Concept of Biopolitics. Outlines. Critical Social Studies [online], 7 (1), 3-13. Available from: https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/2107 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v7i1.2107
Mann, M., 1987. Ruling Class Strategies and Citizenship. Sociology [online], 21 (3), 339-354. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0038038587021003003 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038587021003003
Marshall, T.H., and Bottomore, T., 1997. Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto.
Marx, K., 2008. On the Jewish Question [online]. First published in Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher. Proofed and corrected by A. Blunden, M. Grant and M. Carmody. Available from: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/jewish-question/ [Accessed 27 July 2018] (Originally published in 1844).
McGrattan, E., and Prescott, E., 2005. Taxes, Regulations, and the Value of U.S. and U.K. Corporations. The Review of Economic Studies [online], 72 (3), 767–796. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2005.00351.x [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2005.00351.x
Mintz, J., 1995. The Corporation Tax: a survey, Fiscal Studies [online], 16 (4), 23-68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.1995.tb00232.x [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.1995.tb00232.x
Musah, A.F., and Fayemi, J., 1999. Mercenaries: an African Security Dilemma. London: Pluto.
Nader, R., and Smith, W., 1996. No Contest: Corporate Lawyers and the Perversion of Justice in America Hardcover. New York: Random House.
Newman, A., 2013. The Green Corporate Citizen – Renovating the Corporation to Institutionalise Environmental Sustainability. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 15 (1), 125-145.
Nigeria Export Processing Zones Act 1992 CAP N107 LFN 2004. Official Gazette of the Federal Republic of Nigeria [online], 79 (67), of 21 December 1992. Available from: http://www.nepza.gov.ng/images/NEPZA631992.pdf [Accessed 27 July 2018].
Nkrumah, K., 1967. Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism. Science and Society, 31 (1), 78-81.
O’Connor, J., 1993. Gender, Class and Citizenship in the Comparative Analysis of Welfare State Regimes: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. The British Journal of Sociology [online], 44 (3), 501-518. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/591814 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/591814
Ong, A., 2006a. Mutations in Citizenship. Theory, Culture & Society [online], 23 (2–3), 499–531. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0263276406064831 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406064831
Ong, A., 2006b. Neoliberalism as Exception: mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham, NC / London: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822387879
Patton, M., 2015. A Brief History of the Individual and Corporate Income Tax. Forbes [online], 31 October. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/2015/10/31/a-brief-history-of-the-individual-and-corporate-income-tax/#7bc8549c66b5 [Accessed 27 July 2018].
Pérez-Rocha, M., 2016. Free Trade’s Chilling Effects. NACLA Report on the Americas [online], 48 (3), 233-238. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.2016.1228169 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.2016.1228169
Perrone, N., forthcoming 2018. UNCTAD’s World Investment Reports 1991–2015: 25 Years of Narratives Justifying and Balancing Foreign Investor Rights. Journal of World Investment & Trade [online], final draft posted on 21 September 2017. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3040028 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340070
Pocock, J.G.A., 1992. The Ideal of Citizenship since Classical Times. Queen’s Quarterly, 99 (1), 33-52.
Prior, D., Stewart, J., and Walsh, K., 1995. Citizenship: Rights, Community Participation. London: Pitman.
Rankin, J., 2017. EU to find ways to make Google, Facebook and Amazon pay more tax. The Guardian [online], 21 September. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/sep/21/tech-firms-tax-eu-turnover-google-amazon-apple [Accessed 27 July 2018].
Rawls, J., 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Romero, A.T., 1995. Labour Standards and Export Processing Zones: Situation and Pressures for Change. Development Policy Review [online], 13 (3), 247-276. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.1995.tb00093.x [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.1995.tb00093.x
Saiia, D., and Cyphert, D., 2003. The Public Discourse of the Corporate Citizen. Corporate Reputation Review [online], 6 (1), 47–57. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540189 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540189
Shaxson, N., 2012. Treasure Islands: Tax Havens and the Men who Stole the World. London: Vintage.
Singh, A.M., 2005. Private Security and Crime Control. Theoretical Criminology [online], 9 (2), 153–174. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362480605051638 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480605051638
Slemrod, J., 2004. Are Corporate Tax Rates, or Countries, Converging? Journal of Public Economics, 88 (6), 1169-1186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00061-6
Spencer, R., 2004. Corporate Law and Structures: Exposing the Roots of the Problem [online]. Oxford: Corporate Watch. Available from: https://corporatewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/corporate_structures.pdf [Accessed 27 July 2018].
Springer, S., 2013. Violent Accumulation: A Postanarchist Critique of Property, Dispossession, and the State of Exception in Neoliberalizing Cambodia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers [online], 103 (3), 608-626. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.628259 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.628259
Stangis, D., and Valvoda Smith, K., 2017. The Executive’s Guide to 21st Century Corporate Citizenship: How your Company Can Win the Battle for Reputation and Impact. Somerville, MA: Emerald. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/9781786356772
Tombs, S., 2016. Social Protection After the Crisis: regulation without enforcement. Bristol: Policy press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447313755.001.0001
Tombs, S., and Whyte, D., 2007. Safety Crimes. Cullompton: Willan.
Tombs, S., and Whyte, D., 2015. The Corporate Criminal: Why Corporations Must Be Abolished. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869406
Turner, B., 1986. Citizenship and Capitalism: the Debate over Reformism. London: Allen and Unwin.
Turner, B., 1993. Contemporary Problems in the Theory of Citizenship. In: B. Turner, ed., Citizenship and Social Theory. London: Sage.
Venator Santiago, C., 2006. From the insular cases to camp x-ray: Agamben’s state of exception and United States territorial law. In: A. Sarat, ed. Studies in Law, Politics and Society. Somerville, MA: Emerald.
Waitzer, E.J., and Jaswal, J., 2012. The Good Corporate Citizen. In: T. Hebb, ed., The Next Generation of Responsible Investing. Advances in Business Ethics Research (A Journal of Business Ethics Book Series), vol. 1. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2348-1_8
Whyte, D., 2003. Lethal Regulation: State-Corporate Crime and the UK Government’s New Mercenaries. Journal of Law and Society [online], 30 (4), 575-600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2003.00271.x
Whyte, D., 2009. Naked Labour: putting Agamben to work. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 31, 57-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2009.10854427
Whyte, D., 2010a. The Neo-liberal State of Exception in Occupied Iraq. In: W. Chambliss, R. Michalowski and R. Kramer, eds. State Crime in the Global Age. Cullompton: Willan.
Whyte, D., 2010b. An Intoxicated Politics of Regulation. In: H. Quirk, T. Seddon and G. Smith, eds., Regulation and Criminal Justice. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760983.008
Whyte, D., 2013. Market Patriotism: the liberal mask slips. In: R. Fisher, ed. Managing Democracy, Managing Dissent. London: Corporate Watch.
Whyte, D., 2015a. The Neo-Colonial State of Exception in Occupied Iraq. In: F. Cante and H. Quehl, eds., Handbook of Research on Transitional Justice and Peace Building in Turbulent Regions. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9675-4.ch015
Whyte, D., 2015b. Introduction: a very British Corruption. In: How Corrupt is Britain? London: Pluto. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt183p7g4
Whyte, D., 2018. Death to the Corporation: a modest proposal. In: L. Panitch and G. Albo, eds., The World Turned Upside Down: Socialist Register 2019. London: Merlin.
Yuval-Davis, N., 1997. Women, Citizenship and Difference. Feminist Review [online], 57 (1), 4–27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/014177897339632 [Accessed 27 July 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/014177897339632
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 David Whyte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence and it regulates how others can use your work. Further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
