Two tiers of judicial officers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1755Keywords:
Judges’ work, magistrates, coping, “toxic emotional overload”Abstract
In this article I reflect on the conception, methodology and findings of a study of judicial officers’ psychological wellbeing undertaken by a team comprised of two psychology and two law researchers. I am one of the lawyers. The article unpicks the unexpected significance of court hierarchy for those on the bench and the ethical challenges arising from judges’ revelations of their exposure to potentially lethal degradation and abuse. Law, and I as a lawyer, view the adjudication process as outcome oriented. Judges are less visibly ‘human’ than parties, lawyers and witnesses. Instead, judges present and perform the Law. This lawyer anticipated judges’ tasks of deploying legal knowledge at high levels, confronting graphic evidence and high profile unfair public criticism would be prominent triggers to invoking judicial stress. My psychology colleagues drew on psychological trauma literature that suggests that unlike first responders, judges are high-achieving professionals exercising authority in complex, highly visible, but isolating environments. The study’s findings were surprising, debunking my expectation of relatively homogeneous judicial experiences. Instead, they showed that the impact and nature of magistrates’ exposure to workplace trauma is sui generis.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
13(S1)_Hunter_OSLS 251
XML_13(S1)_Hunter_OSLS 28
References
Australian Institute of Judicial Administration (AIJA), 2022. Judicial Gender Statistics: Number and Percentage of Women Judges and Magistrates at 30 June 2022 [online]. Sydney. Available at: https://aija.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/2022-Judicial-Gender-Statistics-_2022-09-14.pdf
Bride, B.E., 2007. Prevalence of secondary traumatic stress among social workers. Social Work, 52(1), 63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/52.1.63
Carlen, P., 1976. Magistrates’ Justice. London: Martin Robertson.
Chamberlain, J., and Miller, M.K., 2009. Evidence of secondary traumatic stress, safety concerns, and burnout among a homogeneous group of judges in a single jurisdiction. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 37(2), 214–224.
District Court of New South Wales, 2022. Annual Review 2021 [online]. Haymarket. Available at: https://districtcourt.nsw.gov.au/documents/reports/2021DistrictCourtAnnualReview.pdf
Edwards, C.P., and Miller, M.K., 2019. An assessment of judges’ self-reported experiences of secondary traumatic stress. Juvenile & Family Court Journal [online], 70(2), 7–29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12134
Flores, D.M., et al., 2009. Judges’ perspectives on stress and safety in the courtroom: An exploratory study. Court Review, 45(3), 76–89.
Golder, H., 1991. The Making of the Modern Magistracy. Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society, 77(3), 3.
Harris, D., et al., 2001. Violence in the judicial workplace: one State’s experience. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science [online], 576(1), 38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620157600104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716201576001004
Heilpern, D., 2017. Lifting the judicial veil – vicarious trauma, PTSD and the judiciary: A personal story [YouTube clip]. Tristan Jepson Memorial Foundation [online], 27 October. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGamhSkYn1I
Heilpern, D., 2020. Retired Magistrate David Heilpern Critical of NSW Drug Driving Laws. ABC, Law Report [online], 16 June. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/lawreport/david-heilpern-critical-nsw-drug-driving-laws/12757356
Hunter, J., et al., 2021. A fragile bastion: UNSW judicial traumatic stress study. Judicial Officers Bulletin [online], 33(1). Available at: https://www.judicialcollege.vic.edu.au/resources/fragile-bastion-unsw-judicial-traumatic-stress-study
Jaffe, P.G., et al., 2003. Vicarious trauma in judges: The personal challenge of dispensing justice. Juvenile & Family Court Journal [online], 54(4), 1–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.2003.tb00083.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.2003.tb00083.x
Lee, J.H., et al., 2017. Duty-Related Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Professional Firefighters. Journal of Traumatic Stress [online], 30(2), 133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22180
McBarnet, D., 1981. Magistrates’ Courts and the Ideology of Justice. British Journal of Law and Society, 8(2), 181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1409720
McBarnet, D., 1983. Conviction: Law, the State and the Construction of Justice. London: Macmillan Press, p. 123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05142-7_7
McGorry, P., 2005. “Every me and every you”: responding to the hidden challenge of mental illness in Australia. Australian Psychiatry, 13, 3-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1665.2004.02143.x
Miller, M.K., et al., 2018. Judicial stress: the roles of gender and social support, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(4), 602-618. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1469436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1469436
Morgan, A.J., Wright, J., and Reavley, N.J., 2021. Review of Australian initiatives to reduce stigma towards people with complex mental illness: what exists and what works? International Journal of Mental Health Systems [online], 15(10). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00423-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00423-1
NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR), 2022. NSW Criminal Court Statistics (January 201-December 2022) [BOCSAR Report] (online). Available at: https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Pages/bocsar_publication/Pub_Summary/CCS-Annual/Criminal-Court-Statistics-Dec-2022.aspx
O’Sullivan, K., et al., 2022. Judicial Work and Traumatic Stress: Vilification, Threats, and Secondary Trauma on the Bench. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law [online], 28(4), 532–545. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000363 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000363
Resnick, A., Myatt, K.A., and Marotta, P.V., 2011. Surviving bench stress. Family Court Review [online], 49(3), 610–617. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01396.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01396.x
Roach Anleu, S., and Mack, K., 2005. Magistrates’ Everyday Work and Emotional Labour. Journal of Law & Society, 32(4), 590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2005.00339.x
Roach Anleu, S., and Mack, K., 2014. Job satisfaction in the judiciary. Work, Employment and Society [online], 28(5), 683–701. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017013500111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017013500111
Roach Anleu, S., and Mack, K., 2017. Performing judicial authority in the lower courts [online]. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52159-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52159-0
Roach Anleu, S., and Mack, K., 2021. Judging and emotion: A socio-legal analysis [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180045
Rossouw, E., and Rothmann, S.I., 2020a. Job demands and job resources and well-being of judges in South Africa. Journal of Industrial Psychology [online], 46(1), 1–13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v46i0.1801 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v46i0.1801
Rossouw, E.A., and Rothmann, S., 2020b. Work beliefs, work-role fit, and well-being of judges in South Africa: Effects on intention to leave and organisational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Psychology in Africa [online], 30(4), 277–288. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2020.1777032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2020.1777032
Schrever, C., Hulbert, C., and Sourdin, T., 2019. The psychological impact of judicial work: Australia’s first empirical research measuring judicial stress and wellbeing. Journal of Judicial Administration, 28(3), 141–168.
Schrever, C., Hulbert, C., and Sourdin, T., 2022. Where stress presides: Predictors and correlates of stress among Australian judges and magistrates. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law [online], 29(2), 290-322. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1904456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1904456
Supreme Court of New South Wales, 2022. Annual Review 2021 [online]. Available at: https://supremecourt.nsw.gov.au/documents/Publications/Annual-Reviews-+-Stats/Annual_Review_2021.pdf
Swenson, D., et al., 2020. Stress and resiliency in the U.S. Judiciary. American Bar Association.
Thomas, C., 2015. 2014 Judicial Attitude Survey: England and Wales and UK Tribunals [online]. Report. 4 February. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/jac-2014-results.pdf
Thomas, C., 2017. 2016 UK Judicial Attitude Survey: England and Wales and UK Tribunals [online]. Report. 7 February. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/jas-2016-england-wales-court-uk-tribunals-7-february-2017.pdf
Thomas, C., 2021. 2020 UK Judicial Attitude Survey: England and Wales and UK Tribunals [online]. Report. 4 February. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/JAS-2020-EW-UK-TRIBS-8-Feb-2021-complete.pdf
Thomas, C., 2023. 2022 UK Judicial Attitude Survey [online]. Report. 28 March. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/England-Wales-UK-Tribunals-JAS-2022-Report-for-publication.pdf
Zimmermann, I., 1981a. Personal burnout prevention plan (Notes). The Judges’ Journal, 20(4), 8–8.
Zimmermann, I., 1981b. Stress: What it does to judges and how it can be lessened. The Judges’ Journal, 20(3), 5–8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jill Hunter
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
