Gobernanza de la Ciencia: Reflexiones Jurídicas en Perú y Colombia

Juan Carlos Alcazar-Gonzales; Berly Simon Alcántara-Asencios

doi:10.35295/sz.iisl.2403

Autores

Juan Carlos Alcazar-Gonzales Universidad Catolica de Santa Maria https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4571-8938
Berly Simon Alcántara-Asencios Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizan https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6336-6495

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2403

Palavras-chave:

derecho a la ciencia, gobernanza, monitoreo, política pública, CTI

Resumo

Este artículo realiza un análisis comparado del deber estatal en materia de ciencia, tecnología e innovación (CTI) en Perú y Colombia, partiendo de sus fundamentos constitucionales y normativos. Se identifica que, pese a marcos legales robustos, ambos países enfrentan baja inversión en I+D, coordinación institucional débil y ausencia de reconocimiento explícito del derecho a la ciencia. Colombia sobresale por contar con un ministerio especializado y un fondo estable de financiamiento, mientras que en Perú las iniciativas están en fase de fortalecimiento, con propuestas de reforma institucional. A partir de experiencias internacionales exitosas, se proponen cinco líneas de mejora: coherencia normativa, recursos presupuestales protegidos, gobernanza inclusiva y descentralizada, equidad territorial y sectorial, y profesionalización del monitoreo y la rendición de cuentas. Estas recomendaciones buscan transformar la CTI en un bien público estratégico que impulse el desarrollo sostenible y la equidad social.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Estatísticas globais

57 Visualizações	30 Downloads
87 Total

Referências

Acosta, A., 2014. El Buen Vivir, más Allá del Desarrollo. In: G.C. Delgado Ramos, ed., Buena Vida, Buen Vivir: imaginarios alternativos para el bien común de la humanidad. Ciudad de México: Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 21-60.

Allen, J., 2008. A Theory of Adjudication: Law as Magic. Suffolk University Law Review, 41(4), 773-831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/clh.2008.2008.9.831

Alvarez-Nakagawa, A., 2019. Law as Magic. Some Thoughts on Ghosts, Non-Humans, and Shamans. German Law Journal, 18(5), 1247-1276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S207183220002232X

Alvarez-Nakagawa, A., 2024. The Magico-Juridical Hypothesis. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 13(2), 172-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwae033

Benda-Beckmann, F. von, 1989. Scape-Goat and Magic Charm: Law in Development Theory and Practice. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 21(28), 129–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1989.10756410

Bonilla Maldonado, D., 2023. Global Legal Pluralism and the Rights of Nature. Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law Research Paper Series, 23(15), 1-42.

Bonilla Maldonado, D., Michaels, R., and Zalamea Fajardo, P., 2022. Los derechos de la naturaleza: diálogos entre el derecho y las artes. Naturaleza y Sociedad. Desafíos Medioambientales, 4, 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53010/nys4.00

Boyd, D.R., 2017. The Rights of Nature: A Legal Revolution That Could Save the World. Toronto: ECW Press.

Cohen, F.S., 1935. Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach. Columbia Law Review, 35(6), 809-849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1116300

Cordovez, M., Romo-Leroux Chacón, R., and Villegas Pérez, M., 2021. Un acercamiento al estado plurinacional y el estado constitucional de derechos: dicotomías entre justicia indígena y ordinaria. USFQ Law Review, 8(1), 119-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18272/ulr.v8i1.2180

de Sutter, L., 2017. On the Magic of Law. Law Text Culture, 21(1), 123-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14453/ltc.734

Dietrich, M.C., et al., 2024. Stories of Systemic Failure? Landscaping the Rights of Nature in Europe. Journal of Legal Anthropology, 8(1), 46-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/jla.2024.080103

Fitz-Henry, E., 2023. The ‘rights of nature’ in an age of white supremacy?. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 41(6), 1166-1182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544231164508

Frank, J., 1930. Law and the Modern Mind. New York: Coward-McCann, Inc.

García Ruales, J., Eslava, L., and Morales Naranjo, V., 2025. Legal “heartfelt thinking”: How “Mingas” Help Evolving the Law. Verfassungsblog [online], 7 February. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/mingas-rights-of-nature/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.59704/5335c5b776a69349

García Ruales, J., forthcoming 2025. Corazonando from the Amazon. In: S. Chao, C. Winter and D. Schlosberg, eds. Worlds Beyond Bios: The Life of Matter and the Matter of Life. Durham: Duke University Press.

Gilbert, J., et al., 2023. Understanding the Rights of Nature: Working Together Across and Beyond Disciplines. Human Ecology, 51, 363–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-023-00420-1

Green, L., 1928. The Duty Problem in Negligence Cases. Columbia Law Review, 28, 1014-1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1112919

Greenwood, S., 2009. The Anthropology of Magic. Oxford: Berg.

Gutmann, A., and García Ruales, J., 2024. Von Flüssen und Dieselabgasen: Rechte der Natur am LG Erfurt. Verfassungsblog [online], 18 June. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/rechte-der-natur-rio-machangara-dieselskandal/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.59704/6dd944881e76b817

Halifax, J., 1979. Shamanic Voices: a survey of visionary narratives. New York: Arkana. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-3692(16)34892-9

Hanschel, D., and Mehlhorn, A., forthcoming 2026a. Law and Anthropology – An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Rights of Nature, Special Report for the Conference of the International Association of Comparative Law (IACL) in Asunción, Paraguay, October 2022. In: D. Bonilla Maldonado and R. Michaels, eds., Rights of Nature and Global Legal Pluralism. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 20.

Hanschel, D., and Mehlhorn, A., forthcoming 2026b. Rights of Nature – A Critical Dialogue on Law and Environmental Anthropology. In: E. Shoreman-Ouimet, J. Fredlund and H. Kopnina, eds., Routledge International Handbook of Environmental Anthropology: 2nd Routledge Handbook of Environmental Anthropology. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.

Hubert, H., and Mauss, M., 2006. Esquisse d’une théorie générale de la magie. L’Année sociologique, 7, 1–146. (Originally published in 1902, reprinted in M. Mauss, Sociologie et anthropologie Gurvitch G ed. 11th ed 1-142, Paris).

Kirksey, E., and Chao, S., 2022. Introduction Who Benefits from Multispecies Justice?. In: S. Chao, K. Bolender and E. Kirksey, eds., The Promise of Multispecies Justice. Durham: Duke University Press, 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478023524-002

Lemaitre, J., 2007. Legal Fetishism at Home and Abroad. Unbound, 3, 6-18.

Lemaitre, J., 2008. Legal Fetishism: Law, Violence, and Social Movements in Columbia. Revista Juridica Universidad de Puerto Rico, 77(2), 331-344.

Marshall, V., 2019. Removing the Veil from the ‘Rights of Nature’: The Dichotomy between First Nations Customary Rights and Environmental Legal Personhood. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 45(2), 233-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2019.1802154

Mehlhorn, A., 2024. Zwischen Recht und Magie: die Natur als Person. Zeitschrift für Menschenrechte, 18(1), 132-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46499/2362.3132

Murray, T., and Martínez-Moscoso, A., 2025. The Search for Standards: A Jurisprudential Analysis of the Ecuadorian Rights of Nature. Baku State University Law Review, 18(1), 1-51.

O’Donnell, E., et al., 2020. Stop Burying the Lede: The Essential Role of Indigenous Law(s) in Creating Rights of Nature. Transnational Environmental Law, 9(3), 403–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102520000242

Orford, A., 2006. Human Rights after Faith – an Introduction to the ‘Cultures of Human Rights’ Symposium. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 7(1), 1-10

Petel, B., 2024. The Illusion of Harmony: Power, Politics, and Distributive Implications of Rights of Nature. Transnational Environmental Law, 11(3), 437–460.

Ramos, A.R., 1994. The Hyperreal Indian. Critique of Anthropology, 14(2), 153-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X9401400203

Rawson, A., and Mansfield, B., 2018. Producing juridical knowledge: “Rights of Nature” or the naturalization of rights? Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1-2), 99-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618763807

Redford, K.H., 1991. The Ecologically Noble Savage. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 15(1), 46.

Rodríguez Garavito, C., and De Bona, M., 2024. Are rights of nature working? The impact of the Los Cedros ruling in Ecuador. Verfassungsblog [online], 8 August. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/rights-of-nature-implementation/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.59704/7bd6f8c268de163a

Tambiah, S.J., 1990. Magic, Science, Religion, and the Scope of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tănăsescu, M., 2020. Rights of Nature, Legal Personality, and Indigenous Philosophies. Transnational Environmental Law, 9(3), 429-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102520000217

Vargas Roncancio, I., 2021. Conjuring Sentient Beings and Relations in the Law: Rights of Nature and a Comparative Praxis of Legal Cosmologies. In: K. Anker et al., eds., From Environmental to Ecological Law. London/New York: Routledge, 119-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001256-12

Viaene, L., 2024. La moda de los derechos de la naturaleza: consideraciones críticas. Revista de Estudios Politicos, 204, 299-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.204.10

Whitaker, J.A., Lewy, M., and Janik, T., eds., 2025. Sorcery in Amazonia: A Comparative Exploration of Magical Assault. Berlin: Biblioteca Antropológica Americana. Ibero-Amerikanisches Institut.

Williams, P.J., 1987. Alchemical notes: Reconstructing ideals from deconstructed rights. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 22(2), 401-434.