The Rights of Nature: Three Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2309Palavras-chave:
Extension Model, All-Encompassing Model, Co-Dependence Model, rights of natureResumo
This article considers whether an approach to the rights of nature (RoN) that reproduces rights and legal personality (which we will call the Extension Model) can achieve the goal of profoundly transforming our relationship with nature. The paper argues, first, that some of the ways in which Ecuador and New Zealand have implemented RoN suggest that the Extension Model carries an in-built risk of duplicating existing frameworks of subordination and objectification of nature. Second, the paper explores alternative forms of constitutional organisation to materialise RoN’s objectives: the All-Encompassing Model, where the preservation of nature would become the governing principle of the constitutional order; and the Co-Dependence Model, which would require awarding nature and humans equal consideration to ensure their mutual self-preservation. Overall, the paper shows that the recognition of rights or legal personality should not act as a conversation stopper; and that critical inquiries on how to prompt RoN’s pursued paradigm shift need to be continued.
Downloads
Estatísticas globais ℹ️
|
193
Visualizações
|
73
Downloads
|
|
266
Total
|
|
Referências
Adenitire, J.O., and Fassel, R., 2025. Animals and the Constitution: Towards Sentience-Based Constitutionalism [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198910534.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198910534.001.0001
Atapattu, S., 2002. The right to healthy life or the right to die polluted: the emergence of human right to healthy environment under international law. Tulane Environmental Law Journal [online], 16(1), 65–126. Available at: https://journals.tulane.edu/elj/article/view/2083
Barber, N.W., 2018. The Principles of Constitutionalism [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198808145.003.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198808145.003.0001
Bennett, J., 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things [online]. Durham: Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623
Berry, T., 1999. The Great Work, Our Way into the Future. New York: Bell Tower.
Bétaille, J., 2019. Rights of Nature: Why it Might Not Save the Entire World. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law [online], 16(1), 35–64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01601004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01601004
Bosselmann, K., 2010. Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law. Sustainability [online], 2(8), 2424–2448. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su2082424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su2082424
Bosselmann, K., and Taylor, P., 2017. Ecological Approaches to Environmental Law [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785362675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785362675
Chibber, V., 2024. The Flight from Materialism. Catalyst: A Journal of Theory & Strategy, 8(3), 8–39.
Cochrane, A., 2013. From Human Rights to Sentient Rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(5), 655-675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2012.691235
Colón-Ríos, J.I., 2012. Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the Question of Constituent Power [online]. Abingdon: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203120132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203120132
Colón-Ríos, J.I., 2020. Constituent Power and the Law [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785989.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785989.001.0001
Crutzen, P.J., 2006. The ‘Anthropocene’. In: E. Ehlers and T. Krafft, eds., Earth System Science in the Anthropocene [online]. Berlin: Springer, 13–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26590-2_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26590-2_3
Cullinan, C., 2011. Wild Law: A Manifesto for Earth Justice. London: Bloomsbury.
Cullinan, C., 2021. Earth jurisprudence. In: L. Rajamani and J. Peel, eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198849155.003.0014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198849155.003.0014
de Lucia, V., 2013. Towards an ecological philosophy of law: a comparative discussion. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment [online], 4(2), 167–190. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2013.02.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2013.02.03
Donaldson, S., and Kymlicka, W., 2013. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford University Press.
Douzinas, C., 2019. The Radical Philosophy of Rights [online]. Abingdon: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775388 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775388
Eckersley, R., 2004. The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty [online]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3364.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3364.001.0001
Fyock, C., 2025. The Treadmill of Production, Sustainable Development Goals and International Investment Law: The Irreducibility of Growth and Environmental Regulation. Berkeley Journal of International Law [online], 43(1). Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4807319
Gilbert, J., et al., 2023. The Rights of Nature as a Legal Response to the Global Environmental Crisis? A Critical Review of International Law’s ‘Greening’ Agenda. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law [online], 52, 47-74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-587-4_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-587-4_3
González-Serrano, M.X., 2024. Rights of Nature, an Ornamental Legal Framework: Water Extractivism and Backbone Rivers with Rights in Colombia. The Journal of Peasant Studies [online], 52(2), 322–342. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2024.2349228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2024.2349228
Grear, A., 2017. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulucene: Re-encountering environmental law and its ‘subject’ with Haraway and New Materialism. In: L. Kotzé, ed., Re-Imagining Environmental Law and Governance for the Anthropocene. Oxford: Hart, 77–79.
Gudynas, E., 2012. Estado compensador y nuevos extractivismos: las ambivalencias del progresismo sudamericano. Nueva Sociedad [online], 237, 128-146. Available at: https://www.nuso.org/articulo/estado-compensador-y-nuevos-extractivismos-las-ambivalencias-del-progresismo-sudamericano/
Jefferson, T., 1999. Political Writings. Cambridge University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164351
Jones, E., 2021. Posthuman International Law and the Rights of Nature. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment [online], 12, 76-101. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2021.00.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2021.00.04
Kahui, V., Armstrong, C.W., and Aanesen, M., 2024. Comparative analysis of Rights of Nature (RoN) case studies worldwide: Features of emergence and design. Ecological Economics [online], 221, 1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108193
Kalyvas, A., 2018. Constituent power. In: J.M. Bernstein, A. Ophir and A.L. Stoler, eds., Political Concept: A Critical Lexicon. New York: Fordham University Press.
Kauffman, C.M., and Martin, P.L., 2021. The Politics of Rights of Nature: Strategies for Building a More Sustainable Future [online]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13855.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13855.001.0001
Killean, R., Gilbert, J., and Doran, P., 2024. Rights of Nature on the Island of Ireland: Origins, Drivers, and Implications for Future Rights of Nature Movements. Transnational Environmental Law [online], 13(1), 35–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102523000201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102523000201
Kim, R.E. and Bosselmann, K. (2015), Operationalizing Sustainable Development. Rev Euro Comp & Int Env Law, 24, 194-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12109
Kotzé, J., and Kim, R.E., 2019. Earth System Law: The Juridical Dimensions of Earth System Governance. Earth System Governance [online], 1, 1-12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2019.100003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2019.100003
Kotzé, L.J., 2016. Global Environmental Constitutionalism in the Anthropocene [online]. Oxford: Hart. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12662/2447-6641oj.v13i17.p398-439.2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12662/2447-6641oj.v13i17.p398-439.2015
Kotzé, L.J., Du Toit, L., and French, D., 2021. Friend or Foe? International Environmental Law and Its Structural Complicity in the Anthropocene’s Climate Injustices. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 11(1), 180–206. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1140
Krämer, L., 2023. Rights of Nature in Europe: The Spanish Lagoon Mar Menor Becomes a Legal Person. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law [online], 20, 5–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-20010003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-20010003
Kramm, M., 2025. A Tale of Two (and More) Models of Rights of Nature. Environmental Ethics [online], 47(2), 159-180. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics20252696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics20252696
Kurki, V.A.J., 2019. A Theory of Legal Personhood [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198844037.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198844037.001.0001
Kurki, V.A.J., 2022. Can Nature Hold Rights? It’s Not as Easy as You Think. Transnational Environmental Law [online], 11(3), 525–552. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102522000358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102522000358
Latour, B., 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lostal, M., and Colón-Ríos, J.I., 2025. Diagnóstico comparado de la puesta en práctica de derechos de la Naturaleza. In: R. Martinez Dalmau and A. Pedro Bueno, eds., Las Políticas Ecológicas en el Contexto de la Globalización. Valencia: Piero.
Luke, T.W., 1995. On Environmentality: Geo-Power and Eco-Knowledge in the Discourses of Contemporary Environmentalism. Cultural Critique [online], 31, 57–81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1354445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1354445
M’Gonigle, M., 2008. Green Legal Theory. Ecological Economics [online], 23(4), 34–38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14512/oew.v23i4.594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/oew.v23i4.594
Magaña, P., 2022. The Political Representation of Nonhuman Animals. Social Theory and Practice [online], 48(4), 665-690. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract2022811171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract2022811171
Merchant, C., 1989. Ecological Revolutions: Nature, Gender and Science in New England. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Moore, J.W. ed., 2016. Anthropocene or Capitalocene?: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. PM press.
Newton, E., and Killean, R., 2024. Global rights of nature movements. In: R.C. Brears and J. Lindley, eds., The Palgrave Handbook of Environmental Policy and Law [online]. London: Palgrave, 1–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30231-2_4-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30231-2_4-1
Nixon, R., 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor [online]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061194
Paine, T., 1824. Address to the Addressers. In: P.S. Foner, ed., The Political Writings of Thomas Paine, Vol. II. Charlestown: George Davidson.
Paine, T., 1953. The Rights of Man. In: F.N. Adkins, ed., Common Sense and Other Writings. New York: The American Heritage Series.
Pelizzon, A., 2025. Ecological Jurisprudence: The Law of Nature and the Nature of Law [online]. Cham: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0173-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0173-8
Putzer, A., Cook, J., and Pollock, B., 2025. Putting the Rights of Nature on the Map. A Quantitative Analysis of Rights of Nature Initiatives across the World – Second Edition. Journal of Maps [online], 21(1), 89–96. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2024.2440376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2024.2440376
Rawson, A., and Mansfield, B., 2018. Producing Juridical Knowledge: ‘Rights of Nature’ or the Naturalization of Rights? Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space [online], 1(1–2), 99–119. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618763807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618763807
Reeves, J.A., and Peters, T.D., 2021. Responding to anthropocentrism with anthropocentrism: the biopolitics of environmental personhood. Griffith Law Review [online], 30(3), 474–504. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2022.2037882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2022.2037882
Sartori, G., 1962. Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion. American Political Science Review [online], 56(4), 853-864. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1952788 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1952788
Shaji George, A., Hovan George, A., and Gabrio Martin, A.S., 2023. The Environmental Impact of AI: A Case Study of Water Consumption by Chat GPT. Partners Universal International Innovation Journal [online], 1(2), 97–104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7855594
Sieyès, E., 2003. What is the Third Estate? In: M. Sonenscher, ed., Sieyès. Political Writings. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Stone, C., 1972. Should trees have standing? Towards legal rights for natural objects. Southern California Law Review, 45, 450–501.
Stutzin, G., 1984. Un imperativo ecológico: Reconocer los Derechos a la Naturaleza. Ambiente y desarrollo, 97–114.
Tănăsescu, M., 2022. Understanding the Rights of Nature: A Critical Introduction. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Tănăsescu, M., et al., 2024. Rights of Nature and Rivers in Ecuador’s Constitutional Court. The International Journal of Human Rights [online], 1–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2314536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2314536
Tienhaara, K., 2018. Regulatory Chill in a Warming World: The Threat to Climate Policy Posed by Investor-State Dispute Settlement. Transnational Environmental Law [online], 7(2), 229–250. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000309
Turner, S., 2014. A Global Environmental Right [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203070154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203070154
UN General Assembly, 2024. Report of Secretary-General: Harmony with Nature. A/79/253, 29 July [online]. Available at: https://docs.un.org/en/A/79/253
Watts, J., 2024. UK government can never accept idea nature has rights, delegate tells UN. The Guardian [online], 22 February. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/feb/22/uk-government-can-never-accept-idea-nature-has-rights-delegate-tells-un
Witze, A. 2024. Geologists reject the Anthropocene as Earth’s new epoch — after 15 years of debate. Nature [online], v. 627. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-376520242024962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00675-8
World Bank, 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future [online]. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/e1399ed3-ebe2-51fb-b2bc-b18a7f1aaaed
Yilmaz Vastardis, A., 2024. The inherent incompatibility of international investment law with a just green transition. In: B. Choudhury, ed., Global Corporations and Sustainability [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4958858 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4958858
Zewe, A., 2025. Explained: Generative AI’s environmental impact. MIT News [online], 17 January. Available at: https://news.mit.edu/2025/explained-generative-ai-environmental-impact-0117
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Joel Colon Rios, Dr Marina Lostal
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies provides immediate open access to all its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and publishing rights are held by the authors of the articles. We do, however, kindly ask for later publications to indicate Sortuz as the original source.
