Próximo(s)

Anti-deforestation policy and supply chain governance

Perceptions by cattle ranchers and soy farmers in Brazil

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2223

Palavras-chave:

environmental law and policy, political economy of deforestation, soy and cattle supply chains, traceability, Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado

Resumo

Deforestation in the Amazon and Cerrado, Brazil's two largest and most biodiverse biomes, is largely driven by the advance of the agricultural frontier toward forestland. Most of the areas converted in the last 20 years became either monocrop plantations or cattle pasture. From a socio-legal standpoint, this raises the question of how to regulate supply chain relationships in order reduce land-use change associated with soy and beef production. Drawing on documental analysis and semi-structured interviews, this research sheds light on the governance structure and frames of thought sustaining the soy and cattle value chains that influence producer behavior and expectation toward anti-deforestation policy. The paper concludes that preventing deforestation while generating income also requires reverting the deterioration in the terms-of-trade. The short-sightedness of Brazilian landowners who are disinterested in industry and share a deep-seated identity centered around agriculture and livestock remains a major obstacle in the pursuit of development.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

        Metrics

Estatísticas globais ℹ️

Totais acumulados desde a publicação
12
Visualizações
3
Downloads
15
Total

Biografia do Autor

Carolina Stange, Federal University of Tocantins (UFT)

Professor at Arraias Law School in the Federal University of Tocantins, Brazil. She holds a PhD in Law from the University of São Paulo and a PhD in Social Sciences from Universität Osnabrück, Germany. Email: carolinastangeam@gmail.com 

Referências

Abiec, 2021. Beef report: Brazilian livestock profile 2020 [online]. Available at: https://abiec.com.br/publicacoes/beef-report-2020/

Amigos da Terra, 2021. TAC da Carne no Pará e Compromisso Público da Pecuária: a importância da rastreabilidade da carne na redução dos desmatamentos na Amazônia [online]. Available at: https://amigosdaterra.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/ADT-tac-compromissos_final.pdf

Assunção, J., Gandour, C., and Rocha, R., 2023. DETERring Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: Environmental Monitoring and Law Enforcement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics [online], 15(2), 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20200196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20200196

Azevedo-Ramos, C., 2001. A importância das florestas em pé na Amazônia. Brasília: IPAM.

Barreto, P., and Gibbs, H., 2015. Como melhorar a eficácia dos acordos contra o desmatamento associado à pecuária na Amazônia? Belém: Imazon/Madison: University of Wisconsin.

Becker, B., 2005. Geopolítica da Amazônia. Estudos Avançados [online], 19(53), 71-86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142005000100005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142005000100005

Blankenburg, E., 1984. Warum es so schwierig ist, die Wirksamkeit von Gesetzen zu erforschen. In: K. Plett and K. Ziegert, eds., Empirische Rechtsforschung zwischen Wissenschaft und Politik. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.

Capobianco, J.P., 2021. Amazônia, uma década de esperança. São Paulo: Estação Liberdade.

Castro, A., Randow, C., and Cardoso, M., 2019. Changes in the Amazon and Brazilian Cerrado’s water resources due to land use change in the last 40 years. Geophysical Research Abstracts [online], v. 21. Available at: http://mtc-m21c.sid.inpe.br/col/sid.inpe.br/mtc-m21c/2019/04.08.13.37/doc/EGU2019-10271.pdf

Coe, M., et al., 2017. The Forests of the Amazon and Cerrado Moderate Regional Climate and Are the Key to the Future. Tropical Conservation Science [online], 10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082917720671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082917720671

Gereffi, G., 1995. Global production systems and third world development. In: B. Stallings, ed., Global Change, regional response: the new international context of development [online]. Cambridge University Press, 100-142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174336.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174336.004

Gibbs, H., et al, 2015. Brazil’s Soy Moratorium. Science [online], 347(6220). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0181

Global Witness and Imazon, 2020. Beef, banks and the Brazilian Amazon [online]. Available at: https://gw.hacdn.io/media/documents/Beef_Banks_and_the_Brazilian_Amazon_EN_-_December_2020_medium_res.pdf

Gustafsson, M.T., Schilling-Vacaflor, A., and Lenschow, A., 2023. The politics of supply chain regulations: Towards foreign corporate accountability in the area of human rights and the environment? Regulation & Governance [online], 17(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12526 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12526

Imazon, 2013. A Amazônia em números (2013) [online]. 1 August. Available at: https://imazon.org.br/imprensa/a-amazonia-em-numeros/

Leech, B., 2002. Asking Questions: Techniques for Semistructured Interviews. PS: Political Science & Politics [online], 35(4), 665-668. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001129

Mapbiomas, 2023. Mapeamento inédito indica que Brasil estoca no solo o equivalente a 70 anos das emissões de CO2 do país [online]. 21 June. Available at: https://brasil.mapbiomas.org/2023/06/21/mapeamento-inedito-indica-que-brasil-estoca-no-solo-o-equivalente-a-70-anos-das-emissoes-de-co2-do-pais

Margulis, S., 2004. Causes of Deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. World Bank Paper no. 22 [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5691-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5691-7

Medina, G., and Ribeiro, G., 2016 Participação do capital brasileiro na cadeia produtiva da soja: lições para o futuro do agronegócio nacional. Revista de Economia e Agronegócio, 13(1), pp. 1-38.

Moulin, C., 2023. Deforestation between capacity building and policy dismantling: a socio-legal interpretation of the Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, 2004-2022 [online]. Doctoral thesis — University of São Paulo/Osnabrück University. Available at: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2139/tde-15042024-155853/publico/11180228DIO.pdf

Moutinho, P., et al., 2022. Destinação de Florestas Públicas: um meio de combate à grilagem e ao desmatamento ilegal na Amazônia [online]. Brasília: Amazônia 2030. Available at: https://doi.org/10.59346/report.amazonia2030.202202.ed30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59346/report.amazonia2030.202202.ed30

Neves, M., 2022. Symbolic Constitutionalization [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192857149.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192857149.001.0001

Pinto, O., et al. 2009. Mecanismos de controle da variação sazonal da transpiração de uma floresta de transição Amazônia Cerrado. Ciência e Natura, UFSM, 31(2), 95-106.

Pivetta, M., 2019. A floresta da chuva. Pesquisa FAPESP, 285, pp. 18-27.

Plano de Ação para Prevenção e Controle do Desmatamento e das Queimadas no Bioma Cerrado (PPCerrado): 4ª fase (2023 a 2027). [online] Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente e Mudança do Clima, 2023. Available at: https://www.gov.br/mma/pt-br/assuntos/controle-ao-desmatamento-queimadas-e-ordenamento-ambiental-territorial/controle-do-desmatamento-1/ppcerrado/ppcerrado_4fase.pdf

Plano de Ação para Prevenção e Controle do Desmatamento na Amazônia Legal (PPCDAm): 5ª fase (2023 a 2027) [online]. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente e Mudança do Clima. Available at: https://www.gov.br/mma/pt-br/assuntos/controle-ao-desmatamento-queimadas-e-ordenamento-ambiental-territorial/controle-do-desmatamento-1/amazonia-ppcdam-1/5a-fase-ppcdam.pdf

Rajão, R., et al., 2020. The rotten apples of Brazil’s agribusiness. Science [online], 369(6501), 246-248 [online]. Available at: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba6646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba6646

Ramsauer, L., 2024. The Efficacy Problem. Legal Theory [online], 30(4), pp. 255-272. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325225000035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325225000035

Santos, R., et al., 2020. Groundwater Recharge in the Cerrado Biome, Brazil—A Multi-Method Study at Experimental Watershed Scale. Water [online], 13(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010020

Scientific Panel for the Amazon, 2025. The Amazon Assessment Report 2025 [online]. New York: Science Panel for the Amazon, Sustainable Development Solutions Network. Available at: https://eng-ar25.sp-amazon.org/251111%20SPA%20AR2025%20Full%20Report_ENG.pdf

Scott, J., 2019. The Global Reach of EU Law. In: J. Scott and M. Cremona, eds., EU Law Beyond EU Borders: The Extraterritorial Reach of EU Law [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198842170.003.0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198842170.003.0002

Sturgeon, T., 2008. From Commodity Chains to Value Chains: Interdisciplinar Theory Building in an Age of Globalization. In: J. Bair, ed., Frontiers of Commodity Chain Research [online]. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804779760-008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804779760-008

Publicado

2026-01-08

Como Citar

Stange, C. (2026) “Anti-deforestation policy and supply chain governance: Perceptions by cattle ranchers and soy farmers in Brazil”, Oñati Socio-Legal Series. doi: 10.35295/osls.iisl.2223.

Edição

Seção

Artigos temáticos

Dados de financiamento