Law and justice in the society of economic inequality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1312Palavras-chave:
Inequality, institution, social justice, efficiencyResumo
In a comprehensive analysis of the concept of legal culture, legal systems are influenced by the impact of social forces. From the socio-legal perspective, the law reflects the morphology of existing social relations. If it is true that today’s society is characterized by forms of increasing economic inequality. In that case the parallel crisis of the State determines the weakening of the forms of intervention aimed at realizing social justice. In the contemporary age, collective decisions are the result of democratic procedures and the legitimate forms of intervention are realized through state law. However today there is a tendency to replace the classic parameter of social justice with that of economic efficiency, while forms of social reaction to the growth of inequality seem to be absent. Furthermore, the law has so far shown a certain weakness with respect to the economy: through a process of “juridification”, the juridical space has been used as an “infrastructure” to instrumentally spread the economic method. The law, therefore, risks being the product of a society in which political power does not exist by itself but is only a function of economic power.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
12_6_Marotta_OSLS (English) 231
XML_12_6_Marotta_OSLS (English) 1697
Referências
Ackerman, B.A., 1986. Law, Economics, and the Problem of Legal Culture. Duke Law Journal, 6, December, pp. 929–947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1372624
Barcellona, P., 1994. Dallo Stato sociale allo Stato immaginario: Critica della “ragione funzionalista”. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.
Bennet, O., 2001. Cultural Pessimism: Narratives of Decline in the Postmodern World. Edinburgh University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (with C. Rinaldi, ed.), 2017. La forza del diritto. Elementi per una sociologia del campo giuridico. Rome: Armando.
Catania, A., 2008. Metamorfosi del diritto. Rome/Bari: Laterza.
Crouch, C., 2004. Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
De Grauwe, P., 2017. The Limits of the Market: The Pendulum Between Government and Market. Oxford Scholarship Online. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198784289.001.0001
D’Eramo, M., 2020. Dominio. La guerra invisibile dei potenti contro i sudditi. Milan: Feltrinelli.
Esposito R., 2021a. Instituting Thought: Three Paradigms of Political Ontology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Esposito, R., 2021b. Istituzione. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Febbrajo, A., 2018. Cultura giuridica e vita del diritto. In: C. Pennisi et al., eds., Amministrazione, cultura giuridica e ricerca empirica. Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli.
Ferrone, V., 2012. Il problema Rousseau e i diritti dell’uomo. La pratica politica dei diritti tra natura e cultura, individuo e comunità, “stato di pura natura” e società civile. Studi Francesi. Rivista quadrimestrale fondata da Franco Simone [online], 167(61-2), pp. 221–256. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4000/studifrancesi.3931 [Accessed 20 May 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/studifrancesi.3931
Fraser, N., 2020. What Should Socialism Mean in the Twenty-First Century? Socialist Register, vol. 56. Beyond Market Dystopia. New Ways of Living.
Friedman, L.M., 1975. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Fumagalli, A., 2013. Lavoro male comune. Milan: Bruno Mondadori.
Galgano, F., 2005. La globalizzazione nello specchio del diritto. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Goldthorpe, J.H., 2000. On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives, and the Integration of Research and Theory. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198295716.001.0001
Hayek, F.A., 1982. Law, Legislation and Liberty: A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. London: Routledge.
Habermas, J., 1979. La crisi della razionalità nel capitalismo maturo. Rome/Bari: Laterza.
Hardt, M., and Negri, A., 2004. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. London: Penguin Books.
Luhmann, N., 1990. La positività del diritto come presupposto di una società moderna. In: N. Luhmann, La differenziazione del diritto. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Marotta, S., 2015. El derecho de la crisis entre justicia social y justicia del mercado. Soft Power. Revista euro-americana de teoría e historia de la política, 2/2, pp. 123-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17450/150208
Marx, K. (with M. Dobb, ed.), 1970. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Moscow: Progress.
Micciarelli, G., and D’Andrea, M., 2020. Music, Art, the Power and the Capital: a Theoretical Proposal for an Income of Creativity and Care. In: M.F. De Tullio, ed., Commons: Between Dream and Reality [online]. Creative Industry Košice. Available from: https://culturalfoundation.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Commons.-From-Dream-to-Reality.pdf [Accessed 20 May 2022].
Negri, T., 2017. Hamon e il reddito di cittadinanza. EuroNomade [online], 10 February. Available from: http://www.euronomade.info/?p=8790 [Accessed 20 May 2022].
Offe, C., 1977. Lo Stato nel capitalismo maturo. Milan: Etas Libri.
Piketty, T., 2014. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Piketty, T., 2017. Capitale e disuguaglianza: Cronache dal mondo. Florence/Milan: Bompiani.
Piketty, T., 2019. Capital and Ideology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Piketty, T., 2021. Un reddito di base e un’eredità per tutti. Internazionale [online], 5 June. Available from: https://www.internazionale.it/opinione/thomas-piketty/2021/06/05/reddito-base-eredita [Accessed 20 May 2022].
Pisani G., 2022. A justification of basic income beyond a theory of justice. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1265 [Accessed 20 May 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1265
Pistor, K., 2019. The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691189437
Polanyi, K. (with M. Cangiani, ed.), 2019. L’obsoleta mentalità di mercato. Scritti 1922-1957. Trieste: Asterios.
Rawls, J., 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605
Rinaldi, C., 2017. Una sociologia delle imposture legittimate. La costruzione del campo giuridico. In: P. Bourdieu (with C. Rinaldi, ed.), La forza del diritto: Elementi per una sociologia del campo giuridico. Rome: Armando, pp. 7–57.
Roncaglia, A., 2005. Il mito della mano invisibile. Rome/Bari: Laterza.
Rosanvallon, P., 2013. The society of equals. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674726444
Rousseau, J.J., 1755. Discours sur lʼorigine & les fondemens de lʼinégalité parmi les hommes.
Rousseau, J.J., 1762. Du contrat social ou principes du droit politique.
Rousseau, J.J., 2020. Il contratto sociale. Introduction: A. Burgio, Commented by A. Marchili, Trans.: J. Bertolazzi. Milan: Feltrinelli.
Sandulli, A., 2018. Il ruolo del diritto in Europa. Milan: Franco Angeli.
Sassen, S., 2007. A Sociology of Globalization. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Co.
Sen, A., 1995. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Russell Sage Foundation/Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198289286.001.0001
Sen, A., 1997. On Economic Inequality. Oxford University Press.
Sen, A., 2010. The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjnrv7n
Schiavone, A., 2019. Eguaglianza. Una nuova visione sul filo della storia. Turin: Einaudi.
Somma, A., 2018. Diritto e capitalismo. Leggi dello Stato e leggi del mercato nella costruzione della soggettività neoliberale. In: M.G. Bernardini and O. Giolo, eds., Le teorie critiche del diritto. Pisa: Pacini.
Stiglitz, J., 2012.The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Futures. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Stiglitz, J., 2015. The Great Divide. Unequal Societies and What We Can Do About Them. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Streeck, W., 2014. Buying Time. The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London/New York: Verso Books.
Supiot, A., 2007. Homo Juridicus: On the Anthropological Function of the Law. London/New York: Verso Books.
Teubner, G., 2008. La giustizia autosovversiva: formula di contingenza o di trascendenza del diritto? Naples: La Città del Sole.
Teubner, G., 2016. I rapporti precari tra diritto e teoria sociale. Annali dell’Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Storici, 28, 2014/2015. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Treves, R. (with A. Carrino, ed.), 1993. Il diritto come relazione. Saggi di filosofia della cultura. Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
Teubner, G., 2002. Breaking Frames: Economic Globalisation and the Emergence of Lex Mercatoria. European Journal of Social Theory [online], 5(2), 199–217. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=893143 [Accessed 20 May 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225414
Ursi, R., 2016. Le stagioni dell’efficienza. I paradigmi giuridici della buona amministrazione. Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli.
Van Parijs, P., and Vanderborght, Y., 2017. Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674978072
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Sergio Marotta
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
