“I Make an Oath and Say as Follows”
Yolngu Judicial Discourse on Sacred Art and Copyright
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1135Mots-clés :
Yolngu, Intellectual Property Law, Cultural Misappropriation, Indigenous ArtRésumé
The main claim of this study is that a dynamic repertoire of Indigenous linguistic conducts and judicial strategies exists in Yolngu (Australia) artworks misappropriation cases discussed before Australian courts, and that its examination helps to clarify Indigenous perspectives on the property of sacred art. This essay – covering an almost untouched field in the literature on “Indigenous intellectual property” – enlightens Yolngu judicial strategies as their answer to the conundrum between the risk of a loss of their cultural identity and the advantage potentially deriving from a state recognition of Indigenous “intellectual property” rights. This study mainly relies on Yolngu and other subjects’ affidavits released throughout five significant 1990s lawsuits. Affidavits clearly show the two-folded nature of Yolngu judicial discourse on sacred art and copyright, simultaneously insisting on and (implicitly) dismissing an interpretation of Indigenous paintings as “intellectual property”.
Téléchargements
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 122
Références
Agamben, G., 1995. Homo sacer: Il potere sovrano e la nuda vita. Milan: Einaudi.
Anderson, J.E., 2009. Law, Knowledge, Culture: The Production of Indigenous Knowledge in Intellectual Property Law [online]. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848447196 [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Anker, K., 2014. Declarations of Interdependence: A Legal Pluralist Approach to Indigenous Rights. Farnham: Ashgate.
Barron, A., 1997. No Other Law? Author-ity, Property and Aboriginal Art. In: L. Bently and S. Maniatis, eds., Intellectual Property and Ethics. London: Sweet & Maxwell, pp. 39-86.
Carneiro da Cunha, M., 2009. “Culture” and Culture: Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Rights. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Carroll, L., 1872. Through the Looking-Glass. Raleigh: Hayes Barton Press.
Coleman, E.B., 2001. Aboriginal Painting: Identity and Authenticity. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism [online], 59, pp. 385-402. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8529.00040 [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Coleman, E.B., 2010. Repatriation and the concept of inalienable possession. In: P. Turnbull and M. Pickering, eds., The Long Way Home: The Meaning and Values of Repatriation. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 82-96.
Descola, P., 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture [online]. Trans.: J. Lloyd. The University of Chicago Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226145006.001.0001 [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Drahos, P., 2014. Intellectual Property, Indigenous People and their Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Dumont, L., 1966. Homo hierarchicus: Essai sur le système des castes. Paris: Gallimard.
Farley, C.H., 1997. Protecting Folklore: Is Intellectual Property the Answer? Connecticut Law Review, 30(1), pp. 1-37.
George, A., 2012. Constructing Intellectual Property [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035361 [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Godelier, M., 1999. The Enigma of the Gift. Trans.: N. Scott. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Graham, N., 2011. Lawscape: Property, Environment, Law [online]. London: Routledge-Cavendish. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847169 [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Groth, S., 2012. Negotiating Tradition: The Pragmatics of International Deliberations on Cultural Property [online]. Göttingen University Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.gup.608 [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Hardie, M., 2015. What Wandjuk Wanted? In: M. Rimmer, ed., Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research [online]. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 155-176. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781955901.00015 [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Janke, T., 2003. Minding Culture: Case Studies on Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions [online]. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization. Available from: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/tk/781/wipo_pub_781.pdf [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Johnson, V., 1996. Copyrites: Aboriginal Art in the Age of Reproductive Technologies. Sydney: National Indigenous Arts Advocacy Association/Macquarie University.
Keen, I., 1988. Yolngu Religious Property. In: T. Ingold, D. Riches and J. Woodburn, eds., Property, Power and Ideology in Hunting and Gathering Societies. London: Berg, pp. 272-291.
Keen, I., 1994. Knowledge and Secrecy in an Aboriginal Religion: Yolngu of North-East Arnhem Land. Cambridge University Press.
Keen, I., 2011. The Language of Property: Analyses of Yolngu Relations to Country. In: Y. Musharbash and M. Barber, eds., Ethnography and the Production of Anthropological Knowledge: Essays in Honour of Nicolas Peterson. Canberra: Australian National University E Press, pp. 101-119.
Keen, I., 2013. The language of possession: Three case studies. Language in Society [online], 42(2), pp. 187-214. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404513000043 [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B., 1998. Destination Culture: Tourism, Museums, and Heritage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lowe, B, 2004. Yolngu-English Dictionary. Winnellie: Aboriginal Resource & Development Services.
Magowan, F., 1997. Waves of Knowing: Polymorphism and Co-Substantive Essences in Yolngu Sea Cosmology. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 29(1), pp. 22-35.
Mazzola, R., 2018. Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Conceptual Analysis. Milan: Franco Angeli.
Mazzola, R., 2019. La prova culturale: Tra epistemologia e antropologia giuridica. Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica, 1, pp. 211-226.
Meggitt, M.J., 1962. Desert People: A Study of Walbiri Aborigines of Central Australia. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.
Mohr, R., 2002. Shifting Ground: Context and Change in Two Australian Legal Systems. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law [online], 15, pp. 1-24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015000128505 [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Morphy, F., 1983. Djapu, a Yolngu Dialect. In: R.M.W. Dixon and B.J. Blake, eds., Handbook of Australian Languages (vol. III). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3-7.
Morphy, F., 2007. Performing Law: The Yolngu of Blue Mud Bay Meet the Native Title. Process. In: B.R. Smith and F. Morphy, eds., The Social Effects of Native Title: Recognition, Translation, Coexistence [online]. Canberra: Australian National University E Press, pp. 31-58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22459/SENT.10.2007.02 [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Morphy, F., 2008. Enacting Sovereignty in a Colonized Space: The Yolngu of Blue Mud Bay Meet the Native Title Process. In: D. Fay and D. James, eds., The Rights and Wrongs of Land Restitution: “Restoring What Was Ours”. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 31-57.
Morphy, H., 1983. “Now You Understand”: An Analysis of the Way Yolngu Have Used Sacred Knowledge to Retain Their Autonomy. In: N. Peterson and M. Langton, eds., Aborigines, Land and Land Rights. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, pp. 110-133.
Morphy, H., 1991. Ancestral Connections: Art and an Aboriginal System of Knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
Munn, N., 1970. The Transformation of Subjects into Objects in Walbiri and Pitjantjatjara Myth. In: R.M. Berndt, ed., Australian Aboriginal Anthropology. Nedlands: University of Western Australia Press, pp. 141-162.
Oguamanam, C., 2004. Localizing Intellectual Property in the Globalization Epoch: The Integration of Indigenous Knowledge. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies [online], (11)2, pp. 135-69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2004.11.2.135 [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Radin, M.J., 1993. Reinterpreting Property [online]. University of Chicago Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702292.001.0001 [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Rimmer, M., ed., 2015. Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Rose, C.M., 1994. Property & Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory and Rhetoric of Ownership. Boulder: Westview Press.
Schebeck, B., 1968. Dialect and Social Groupings in North East Arnhem Land. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS).
St Clair, W., 2010. Metaphors of Intellectual Property. In: R. Deazley, M. Kretschmer and L. Bently, eds., Privilege and Property: Essays on the History of Copyright [online]. Cambridge: OpenBook, pp. 369-395. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0007.15 [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Stanner, W.E.H., 1967. Reflections on Durkheim and Aboriginal Religion. In: M. Freedman, ed., Social Organisation: Essays Presented to Raymond Firth. Chicago/New York: Aldine-Class, pp. 217-240.
Stanner, W.E.H., 1979. The Yirkkala Land Case: Dress-rehearsal. In: W.E.H. Stanner, ed., White Man Got No Dreaming: Essays 1938-1973. Canberra/Norwalk: Australian National University Press, pp. 324-355.
Weiner, A.B., 1992. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving [online]. Berkeley: University of California Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520076037.001.0001 [Accessed 29 April 2020].
Williams, N.M., 1987. The Yolngu and Their Land: A System of Land Tenure and the Fight for Its Recognition. Stanford University Press.
Williams, N.M., 2008. Stanner, Millirpum, and the Woodward Royal Commission. In: M. Hinkson and J. Beckett, eds., An Appreciation of Difference: WEH Stanner: Anthropology and Aboriginal Australia. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press, pp. 198-216.
World Intellectual Property Organization, 2008. The Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions: Draft Gap Analysis (WIPO/GRTKF/IC/13/4(B) REV) [online]. Geneva: WIPO, 11 October. Available from: www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=109673 [Accessed 16 September 2019].
World Intellectual Property Organization, 2010. List and Brief Technical Explanation of Various Forms in which Traditional Knowledge may be Found (WIPO/GRTKF/IC/17/INF/9) [online]. Geneva: WIPO, 5 November. Available from: https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=147152 [Accessed 16 September 2019].
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Riccardo Mazzola 2020
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
