“I Make an Oath and Say as Follows”:  Yolngu Judicial Discourse on Sacred Art and Copyright

Riccardo Mazzola

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1135

Autores/as

Riccardo Mazzola Università degli Studi di Milano

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1135

Palabras clave:

Yolngu, ley de propiedad intelectual, malversación cultural, arte indígena

Resumen

La principal afirmación de este estudio es que hay un repertorio dinámico de conductas lingüísticas y estrategias judiciales indígenas en los casos de malversación de obras de arte yolngu (Australia) que se presentaron en juzgados australianos. El análisis de esos repertorios ayuda a esclarecer las perspectivas indígenas sobre la propiedad de arte sagrado. Este artículo –que cubre un campo casi inédito en la literatura sobre propiedad intelectual indígena– arroja luz sobre las estrategias judiciales de los Yolngu como respuesta al dilema entre el peligro de una pérdida de su identidad cultural y la posible ventaja derivada de un reconocimiento del Estado de los derechos de propiedad intelectual indígenas. Nuestro estudio se basa principalmente en las declaraciones juradas de miembros del pueblo Yolngu y de otras personas. Dichas declaraciones se realizaron durante cinco casos judiciales significativos de los años 90. Las declaraciones juradas demuestran la naturaleza dual del discurso judicial de los Yolngu sobre arte sagrado y derechos de autor, insistiendo simultáneamente en, a la vez que (implícitamente) rechazando una interpretación de las pinturas indígenas como “propiedad intelectual”.

Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1135

Note: This article has been updated on 27 September 2022 to include the following footnote by the author:

"While this article concerns a topic that the author took on in Mazzola (2018, ch. 5)[Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Conceptual Analysis. Milan: Franco Angeli], that topic is here recontextualized and analyzed in a deeper and more analytical way. Section 3 of this article reproduces portions (also and mostly quoting directly from judicial documents) of the historical reconstruction provided in the aforementioned chapter".

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Metrics

Views 621
Downloads:
PDF (English) 157

Biografía del autor/a

Riccardo Mazzola, Università degli Studi di Milano

Post-doctoral researcher, Department of Legal Studies "Cesare Beccaria", University of Milan

ORCID: 0000-0002-4897-2103

Citas

Agamben, G., 1995. Homo sacer: Il potere sovrano e la nuda vita. Milan: Einaudi.

Anderson, J.E., 2009. Law, Knowledge, Culture: The Production of Indigenous Knowledge in Intellectual Property Law [online]. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848447196 [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Anker, K., 2014. Declarations of Interdependence: A Legal Pluralist Approach to Indigenous Rights. Farnham: Ashgate.

Barron, A., 1997. No Other Law? Author-ity, Property and Aboriginal Art. In: L. Bently and S. Maniatis, eds., Intellectual Property and Ethics. London: Sweet & Maxwell, pp. 39-86.

Carneiro da Cunha, M., 2009. “Culture” and Culture: Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Rights. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Carroll, L., 1872. Through the Looking-Glass. Raleigh: Hayes Barton Press.

Coleman, E.B., 2001. Aboriginal Painting: Identity and Authenticity. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism [online], 59, pp. 385-402. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8529.00040 [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Coleman, E.B., 2010. Repatriation and the concept of inalienable possession. In: P. Turnbull and M. Pickering, eds., The Long Way Home: The Meaning and Values of Repatriation. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 82-96.

Descola, P., 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture [online]. Trans.: J. Lloyd. The University of Chicago Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226145006.001.0001 [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Drahos, P., 2014. Intellectual Property, Indigenous People and their Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.

Dumont, L., 1966. Homo hierarchicus: Essai sur le système des castes. Paris: Gallimard.

Farley, C.H., 1997. Protecting Folklore: Is Intellectual Property the Answer? Connecticut Law Review, 30(1), pp. 1-37.

George, A., 2012. Constructing Intellectual Property [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035361 [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Godelier, M., 1999. The Enigma of the Gift. Trans.: N. Scott. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Graham, N., 2011. Lawscape: Property, Environment, Law [online]. London: Routledge-Cavendish. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847169 [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Groth, S., 2012. Negotiating Tradition: The Pragmatics of International Deliberations on Cultural Property [online]. Göttingen University Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.gup.608 [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Hardie, M., 2015. What Wandjuk Wanted? In: M. Rimmer, ed., Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research [online]. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 155-176. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781955901.00015 [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Janke, T., 2003. Minding Culture: Case Studies on Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions [online]. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization. Available from: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/tk/781/wipo_pub_781.pdf [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Johnson, V., 1996. Copyrites: Aboriginal Art in the Age of Reproductive Technologies. Sydney: National Indigenous Arts Advocacy Association/Macquarie University.

Keen, I., 1988. Yolngu Religious Property. In: T. Ingold, D. Riches and J. Woodburn, eds., Property, Power and Ideology in Hunting and Gathering Societies. London: Berg, pp. 272-291.

Keen, I., 1994. Knowledge and Secrecy in an Aboriginal Religion: Yolngu of North-East Arnhem Land. Cambridge University Press.

Keen, I., 2011. The Language of Property: Analyses of Yolngu Relations to Country. In: Y. Musharbash and M. Barber, eds., Ethnography and the Production of Anthropological Knowledge: Essays in Honour of Nicolas Peterson. Canberra: Australian National University E Press, pp. 101-119.

Keen, I., 2013. The language of possession: Three case studies. Language in Society [online], 42(2), pp. 187-214. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404513000043 [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B., 1998. Destination Culture: Tourism, Museums, and Heritage. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lowe, B, 2004. Yolngu-English Dictionary. Winnellie: Aboriginal Resource & Development Services.

Magowan, F., 1997. Waves of Knowing: Polymorphism and Co-Substantive Essences in Yolngu Sea Cosmology. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 29(1), pp. 22-35.

Mazzola, R., 2018. Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Conceptual Analysis. Milan: Franco Angeli.

Mazzola, R., 2019. La prova culturale: Tra epistemologia e antropologia giuridica. Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica, 1, pp. 211-226.

Meggitt, M.J., 1962. Desert People: A Study of Walbiri Aborigines of Central Australia. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.

Mohr, R., 2002. Shifting Ground: Context and Change in Two Australian Legal Systems. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law [online], 15, pp. 1-24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015000128505 [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Morphy, F., 1983. Djapu, a Yolngu Dialect. In: R.M.W. Dixon and B.J. Blake, eds., Handbook of Australian Languages (vol. III). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3-7.

Morphy, F., 2007. Performing Law: The Yolngu of Blue Mud Bay Meet the Native Title. Process. In: B.R. Smith and F. Morphy, eds., The Social Effects of Native Title: Recognition, Translation, Coexistence [online]. Canberra: Australian National University E Press, pp. 31-58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22459/SENT.10.2007.02 [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Morphy, F., 2008. Enacting Sovereignty in a Colonized Space: The Yolngu of Blue Mud Bay Meet the Native Title Process. In: D. Fay and D. James, eds., The Rights and Wrongs of Land Restitution: “Restoring What Was Ours”. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 31-57.

Morphy, H., 1983. “Now You Understand”: An Analysis of the Way Yolngu Have Used Sacred Knowledge to Retain Their Autonomy. In: N. Peterson and M. Langton, eds., Aborigines, Land and Land Rights. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, pp. 110-133.

Morphy, H., 1991. Ancestral Connections: Art and an Aboriginal System of Knowledge. University of Chicago Press.

Munn, N., 1970. The Transformation of Subjects into Objects in Walbiri and Pitjantjatjara Myth. In: R.M. Berndt, ed., Australian Aboriginal Anthropology. Nedlands: University of Western Australia Press, pp. 141-162.

Oguamanam, C., 2004. Localizing Intellectual Property in the Globalization Epoch: The Integration of Indigenous Knowledge. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies [online], (11)2, pp. 135-69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2004.11.2.135 [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Radin, M.J., 1993. Reinterpreting Property [online]. University of Chicago Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702292.001.0001 [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Rimmer, M., ed., 2015. Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

Rose, C.M., 1994. Property & Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory and Rhetoric of Ownership. Boulder: Westview Press.

Schebeck, B., 1968. Dialect and Social Groupings in North East Arnhem Land. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS).

St Clair, W., 2010. Metaphors of Intellectual Property. In: R. Deazley, M. Kretschmer and L. Bently, eds., Privilege and Property: Essays on the History of Copyright [online]. Cambridge: OpenBook, pp. 369-395. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0007.15 [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Stanner, W.E.H., 1967. Reflections on Durkheim and Aboriginal Religion. In: M. Freedman, ed., Social Organisation: Essays Presented to Raymond Firth. Chicago/New York: Aldine-Class, pp. 217-240.

Stanner, W.E.H., 1979. The Yirkkala Land Case: Dress-rehearsal. In: W.E.H. Stanner, ed., White Man Got No Dreaming: Essays 1938-1973. Canberra/Norwalk: Australian National University Press, pp. 324-355.

Weiner, A.B., 1992. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving [online]. Berkeley: University of California Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520076037.001.0001 [Accessed 29 April 2020].

Williams, N.M., 1987. The Yolngu and Their Land: A System of Land Tenure and the Fight for Its Recognition. Stanford University Press.

Williams, N.M., 2008. Stanner, Millirpum, and the Woodward Royal Commission. In: M. Hinkson and J. Beckett, eds., An Appreciation of Difference: WEH Stanner: Anthropology and Aboriginal Australia. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press, pp. 198-216.

World Intellectual Property Organization, 2008. The Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions: Draft Gap Analysis (WIPO/GRTKF/IC/13/4(B) REV) [online]. Geneva: WIPO, 11 October. Available from: www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=109673 [Accessed 16 September 2019].

World Intellectual Property Organization, 2010. List and Brief Technical Explanation of Various Forms in which Traditional Knowledge may be Found (WIPO/GRTKF/IC/17/INF/9) [online]. Geneva: WIPO, 5 November. Available from: https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=147152 [Accessed 16 September 2019].