Could traditional dispute resolution mechanisms be the solution in post-colonial developing countries – particularly in Africa?
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1145Mots-clés :
Too much litigation, traditional dispute resolution, Africa, impact on litigation, integration into formal justice, challengesRésumé
This paper deals with the possible role that traditional dispute resolution mechanisms can play in reducing the burden of too much litigation in post-colonial countries – particularly in Africa. The importance of such mechanisms has been recognized by the United Nations and by the constitutions and laws of many African countries. The paper addresses the issue of the effect a paucity of lawyers in African countries might have on the litigation in such countries. The approach and methods of traditional dispute resolution in Africa are discussed and the question raised whether such traditional dispute resolution mechanisms can be integrated into the Western approach to dispute resolution in order to reduce litigation. The challenges facing such integration are also addressed. The article concludes that traditional methods of dispute resolution are already reducing the burden of too much litigation, but further research using statistical and empirical data should be undertaken to substantiate this.
Téléchargements
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 1669
XML (English) 12041
Références
Aiyedun, A., and Ordor, A., 2016. Integrating the traditional with the contemporary in dispute resolution in Africa. Law Democracy and Development [online], vol. 20, p. 1. Available from: http://doi.org/10.4314/ldd.v20i1.8 [Accessed 2 March 2020]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ldd.v20i1.8
Ajayi A.T., and Buhari, L.O., 2014. Methods of Conflict Resolution in African Traditional Society. African Research Review [online], 8(2), p. 138. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v8i2.9 [Accessed 27 February 2020]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v8i2.9
Allott, A., 1970. New Essays in African Law. London: Butterworths.
Bennett, T., 2004. Customary Law in South Africa. Cape Town: Juta & Co. Ltd.
Bennett, T., 2012. Access to Justice and human rights in the traditional courts of sub-Saharan Africa. In: T. Bennett et al., eds., African Perspectives on Tradition and Justice. Antwerp: Intersentia, p. 19.
Cappelletti, M., and Garth, B., 1978. Access to justice: The worldwide movement to make rights effective, a general report. In: M. Cappelletti and B. Garth, eds., Access to Justice: A World Survey (vol. 1). Milan: Giuffré, p. 268.
Dewar, D., 2011. Too many attorneys? Oversubscription to the attorney’s profession. De Rebus, 509(6), p. 23.
Elias, T.O., 1956. The Nature of African Customary Law. Manchester University Press.
Gabagambi, J.J., 2018. A Comparative Analysis of Restorative Justice Practices in Africa. New York: Hauser Global Law School.
Hinz, M.O., 2006. Legal pluralism in jurisprudential perspective. In: M.O. Hinz (with H.K. Patemann), ed., The Shade of New Leaves: Governance in Traditional Authority: A Southern African Perspective. Munster: LIT, p. 51.
Holleman, J., 1974. Issues in African Law [online]. The Hague: Mouton. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111414560 [Accessed 27 February 2020]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111414560
Holomisa, N.S.P., 2009. According to Tradition: A Cultural Perspective on Current Affairs. Somerset West: Essential Books.
Iruoma, O.O., 2005. Eradicating Delay in the Administration of Justice in African Courts: A Comparative Analysis of South African and Nigerian Courts. Unpublished LLM Thesis. University of the Western Cape.
Kegoro, S., 2012. Contribution of Traditional Justice System in Resolving Conflict: A Case Study of Nyamira Division, Kenya. Unpublished Master’s Thesis in Peace and Conflict Studies. University of Kampala.
Masina, N., 2000. Xhosa practices of Ubuntu for South Africa. In: I.W. Zartman, ed., Traditional Cures for Modern Conflicts: African Conflict “Medicine”. London: Lynne Rienner, p. 181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626371231-012
McQuoid-Mason, D., 2011. Challenges in Increasing Access to Justice in the Next Decade. In: M. Carnelley and S, Hoctor, eds., Law, Order and Liberty: Essays in Honour of Tony Mathews. Pietermartizburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, p. 169.
McQuoid-Mason, D., 2013. Access to Justice in South Africa: Are there Enough Lawyers? Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 3(3), p. 561. Available from: http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/214 [Accessed 27 February 2020].
McQuoid-Mason, D., 2018. Challenges when drafting legal aid legislation to ensure access to justice in African and other developing countries with small numbers of lawyers: Overcoming obstacles to include the use of non-lawyers to assist persons in conflict with the law. African Human Rights Law Journal [online], 18(2), p. 486. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2018/v18n2a3 [Accessed 27 February 2020]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2018/v18n2a3
Nhlapo, T., 2005. The judicial function of traditional leaders: a contribution to restorative justice? [online]. Paper presented at the Conference of the Association of Law Reform Agencies of Eastern and Southern Africa, Cape Town, 14–17 March. Available from: http://restorativejustice.org/rj-library/the-judicial-function-of-traditional-leaders-a-contribution-to-restorative-justice/6073/#sthash.DGHyfbTR.dpbs [Accessed 27 February 2020].
Obarrio, J., 2011. Traditional justice as the rule of law in Africa: An anthropological perspective. In: C.L. Sriram, O. Martin-Ortega and J. Herman, eds., Peacebuilding and the Rule of Law in Africa: Just Peace? London: Routledge.
Olaoba, O.B., 2005. Ancestral focus and the process of conflict resolution in traditional African societies. In: A.O. Albert, ed., Perspectives on Peace and Conflict in Africa: Essays in Honour of General (Dr) Abdul Salam A Abubakar. Ibadan: John Archers Ltd, p. 220.
Otieno, H.J., 2016 The Effectiveness of Traditional Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Facilitating Women’s Access to Justice in Land Disputes [online]. LLB Research Dissertation. University of Nairobi, pp. 19–20. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/37557024/THE_EFFECTIVENESS_OF_TRADITIONAL_DISPUTE_RESOLUTION_MECHANISM_IN_FACILITATING_WOMENS_ACCESS_TO_JUSTICE_IN_LAND_DISPUTES [Accessed 30 April 2019].
Roberts, S., 1979. Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology. London: St. Martin’s.
Taiwo, O.O., 1998. Traditional versus Modern Judicial Practices: A Comparative Analysis of Dispute Resolution among the Yoruba of South West Nigeria. Africa Development [online], 23(2), pp. 209–226. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43658024 [Accessed 2 March 2020].
Sone, P.M., 2016. Relevance of Traditional Methods of Conflict Resolution in Justice Systems in Africa. Africa Insight [online], 46(3), pp. 51–54. Available from: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ai/article/view/154169 [Accessed 2 March 2020].
United Nations Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor, 2008. Making the Law Work for Everyone: Report of the Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor. New York: United Nations Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor/United Nations Development Programme.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), 2011. Access to legal aid in criminal justice systems in Africa: Survey Report [online]. Vienna: UNODC. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/Survey_Report_on_Access_to_Legal_Aid_in_Africa.pdf [Accessed 27 February 2020].
World Prison Brief, 2019. World Prison Brief data [online]. Available from: https://www.prisonstudies.org/world-prison-brief-data [Accessed 2 March 2020].
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés David McQuoid-Mason 2021
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
