Introducing an Interdisciplinary Frontier to Judging, Emotion and Emotion Work
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1095Gako-hitzak:
Judging, emotion, emotion workLaburpena
This special issue of Oñati Socio-legal Series, titled Judging, Emotion and Emotion Work, is the result of presentations and discussions during an interdisciplinary workshop at the International Institute for the Sociology of Law (IISL) held in May 2018. This issue builds on the growing critique of the dispassionate ideal of judicial work, combining original theoretical insights with imaginative empirical analyses to extend the understanding of emotion in judging. Fifteen articles are presented in four themes: Theoretical, cultural and historical perspectives; Tensions of the dispassionate ideal; Social dynamics of emotion in judging; and Research methods, empirical insights and [changing] judicial practice. The international diversity of contributions recognises similarities and differences in the structure and organization of courts and the judiciary, and socio-cultural variations in emotional experience and expression.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 210
Erreferentziak
Barbalet, J., 2011. Emotions beyond regulation: Backgrounded emotions in science and trust. Emotion Review [online], 3 (1), 36-43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910380968 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910380968
Bergman Blix, S., and Wettergren, Å., 2018. Professional Emotions in Court: A Sociological Perspective. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315306759
Collins, R., 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851744
Maroney, T.A., 2011. The persistent cultural script of judicial dispassion. California Law Review [online], 99(2), 629–681. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38K98M [Accessed 9 January 2019].
Roach Anleu, S., and Mack, K., 2017. Performing Judicial Authority in the Lower Courts. London: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52159-0
##submission.downloads##
Argitaratuta
##submission.howToCite##
Zenbakia
Atala
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
