La constitución, el estado de derecho y los autoritarismos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2332Palavras-chave:
constitución, estado de derecho, democracia, autoritarismo, cultura jurídicaResumo
En su concepción original la constitución distribuye el poder político y pone límites a quienes lo ejercen y, a la vez, garantiza los derechos de los ciudadanos. Para un conjunto de países esto ha dado lugar al desarrollo del estado de derecho y la democracia. Por lo contrario, los regímenes autoritarios concentran el poder en una persona o grupo por diversos motivos y la constitución cumple otras funciones, aunque el texto constitucional puede ser similar en ambos regímenes. El autoritarismo tiene también consecuencias en el funcionamiento del aparato estatal, del sistema y la cultura jurídicas.
Downloads
Estatísticas globais ℹ️
|
52
Visualizações
|
15
Downloads
|
|
67
Total
|
|
Referências
Abrahamian, E., 2008. A history of modern Iran [en línea]. Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182348
Albertus, M., y Menaldo, V., 2014. The political economy of autocratic constitutions. En: T. Ginsburg y A. Simpser, eds., Constitutions in authoritarian regimes [en línea]. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107252523.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107252523.006
Al-Faad, A., 2005. “Ornamental constitutionalism”: The Saudi Basic Law of Governance. Yale Law Journal of International Law, 30.
Alvarado Andrade, J.M., 2012. Introducción a la idea y concepto de constitución (desde la Antigüedad hasta el constitucionalismo moderno. Politeia, 35.
Alvear García, H., y Frankenberg, G., 2022. Authoritarian structures and trends in consolidated democracies. En: A. Sajó, R. Uitz y S. Holmes, eds., Routledge handbook of illiberalism [en línea]. Londres: Routledge. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367260569-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367260569-14
Applebaum, A., 2025. The Hungarian model. Foreign Affairs, May.
Banakar, R., y Ziaee, K., 2018. The life of law in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iranian Studies [en línea], 51(5). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/00210862.2018.1467266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00210862.2018.1467266
Banakar, R., y Ziaee, K., 2020. Iran: a clash of two legal cultures. En: R. Abel et al., eds., Lawyers in 21st century societies [en línea]. Oxford: Hart. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509915170.ch-029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509915170.ch-029
Barros, R., 2002. The constitution of dictatorship [en línea]. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606298
Ben-Porat, G., y Turner, B.S., eds., 2011. The contradictions of Israeli citizenship: land, religion, and state [en línea]. Londres: Routledge. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817186
Berman, H.J., 1976. Justice in the USSR. An interpretation of Soviet law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 4ª impr.
Bogoch, B., y Holzman-Gassit, Y., 2008. Mutual bonds: media frames and the Israeli High Court of Justice. Law & Social Inquiry [en línea], 33(1). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00094.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00094.x
Cappelletti, M., 1990. Le pouvoir des juges. Presses Universitaires de Aix-en-Provence.
Constant, B., 1963. Liberalismo y democracia. Universidad Central de Venezuela.
Corrales, J., 2016. Autocratic legalism in Venezuela. En: L. Diamond, M.F. Plattner y C. Walker, eds., Authoritarianism goes global. The challenges to democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dahl, R.A., 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Denoix de Saint Marc, R., 2008. Histoire de la loi. Toulouse : Privat.
Diamant, N., Lubman, S., y O’Brian, K., eds., 2005. Engaging the law in China: state, society, and the possibilities for justice [en línea]. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804779289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804779289
Dimitrijevic, N., 2022. Illiberal regime types. En: A. Sajó, R. Uitz y S. Holmes, eds., Routledge handbook of illiberalism. Nueva York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367260569-11
Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T., y Melton, J., 2014. The content of authoritarian constitutions. En: T. Ginsburg y A. Simpser, eds., Constitutions in authoritarian regimes [en línea]. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2427794
Feeley, M., 2012. Judge and company: courts, constitutionalism and the legal complex. En: T. Halliday, L. Karpik y M. Feeley, eds., Fates of political liberalism in the Bristish post-colony: the politics of the legal complex [en línea]. Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139002981.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139002981.019
Fernández Sarasola, I., 2010. La idea de constitución “real” en Gran Bretaña. Fundamentos. Cuadernos Monográficos de Teoría del Estado, 6.
Ferrajoli, L., 1998. Más allá de la soberanía y la ciudadanía: un constitucionalismo global. Isonomía, 9.
Friedrich, C., 1963. Man and his government: an empirical theory of politics. Nueva York: McGraw Hill.
Ginsburg, T., y. Simpser, A., 2014. Introduction: Constitutions in authoritarian regimes. En: T. Ginsburg y A. Simpser, eds., Constitutions in authoritarian regimes [en línea]. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2427794 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2427794
Halliday, T., Karpik, L., y Feeley, M., eds., 2007. Fighting for political freedom. Oxford: Hart.
He, X., 2012. The party leadership as a living constitution. Hong Kong Law Journal, 42.
He, X., 2025. The judicial system of China. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198927815.001.0001
Hendley, K., 2011. Varieties of legal dualism: making sense of the role of law in contemporary Russia. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 29(2), 233-259.
Hobbes, T. (con A. Cromartie y Q. Skinner, eds.), 2005. A dialog between a philosopher and a student of the common laws of England [en línea]. Oxford University Press. (Originalmente publicado en 1681). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198237020.book.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198237020.book.1
Kendall-Taylor, A., y Frantz, E., 2014. How autocracies fall. The Washington Quarterly [en línea], 37(1). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2014.893172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2014.893172
Krupskiy, M., 2025. Discrimination à l’encontre des “agents étrangers” en Russie: dynamique d’une législation répressive. La Revue des Droits de l’Homme [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4000/13u2j DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/13u2j
Lambert, E., 1921. Le gouvernement des juges et la lutte contre la législation sociale aux États-Unis : la expérience américaine du contrôle de la constitutionalité des lois. Paris. Giard.
Law, D., y Versteeg, M., 2014. Constitutional variations among strains of authoritarianism. En: T. Ginsburg y A. Simpser, eds., Constitutions in authoritarian regimes [en línea]. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107252523.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107252523.011
Levitsky, S., y Ziblatt, D., 2018. How democracies die. Nueva York: Crown.
Li, L., 2012. The “production” of corruption in China’s courts: judicial politics and decision making in a one-parti state. Law and Social Enquiry [en línea], 37(4). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01285.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01285.x
Linz, J.J., 2000. Authoritarian and authoritarian regimes [en línea]. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685850043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685850043
Linz, J.J., y Stepan, A., 1996. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Liu, S., 2016. Criminal defense in China: the politics of lawyers at work [en línea]. Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316677230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316677230
Liu, S., y Halliday, T., 2011. Political liberalism and political embeddedness: understanding politics in the work of Chinese criminal defense lawyers. Law and Society Review [en línea], 45(4). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00458.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00458.x
Lubman, S., 1999. The bird in a cage: legal reform in China after Mao. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Lubman, S., 2012. The evolution of law reform in China: an uncertain path [en línea]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784713904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784713904
Milani, A., 2016. Iran’s paradoxical regime. En: L. Diamond, M.F. Plattner y C. Walker, eds., Authoritarianism goes global. The challenges to democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Miller, J., 1997. Judicial review and constitutional stability: a sociology of the U.S model and its collapse in Argentina. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 21.
Moccia, L., 1988. Legislatore del “diritto comune” continentale (secc XVI-XVIII) nell’opera de Gino Gorla. En: A. Giuliani y N. Piccardi, eds., Modelli di legislatore e scienza della legislazione. Perugia: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.
Mommsen, M., 2012. Russia’s political regime: Neo-Soviet authoritarianism and patronal presidentialism. Londres: Routledge.
Mustafa, T., y Ginsburg, T., 2008. Introduction: the function of courts in authoritarian politics. En: T. Ginsburg y T. Mustafa, eds., Rule by law. The politics of courts in authoritarian regimes. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814822
Naimark, N., 2010. Stalin’s genocides. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400836062
Parkin, J., 1999. Hobbes in the late 1660: Daniel Seargill and Samuel Parker. The Historical Journal [en línea], 42(1). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X98008127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X98008127
Pereira Menaut, A.C., 2003. Rule of law o estado de derecho. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Pribáñ, J., 2015. Soberania e pós-soberania: uma perspectiva a partir dos sistemas autopoiéticos. En: G. Schwartz, J. Pribáñ y L.S. Rocha: Sociologia sistêmico-autopoiética das constituições. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado.
Qiaoan, R., y Teets, J., 2020. Responsive authoritarianism in China. A review of responsiveness in Xi and Hu administrations. Journal of Chinese Political Science [en línea], 25. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-019-09640-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-019-09640-z
Sánchez-Urribarri, R., y Capriles, V., 2024. Venezuela’s (un)rule of law under Nicolás Maduro. En: J. Polga-Hecemovich y R. Sánchez Urribarri, eds., Authoritarian consolidation in times of crisis [en línea]. Abingdon: Routledge. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003457886-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003457886-7
Schmitt, C., 1928. Teoría de la constitución. Madrid: Alianza
Sharlet, R., 1977. Stalinism and the Soviet legal culture. En: R. Tucker, ed., Stalinism: Essays in historical interpretation. Nueva York: Norton.
Skinner, Q., 1966. The ideological context of Hobbes political thought. The Historical Journal [en línea], 9(3). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X66000014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X66000014
Solomon, P.H., 2008. Judicial power in authoritarian states: the Russian experience. En: T. Ginsburg y T. Mustafa, eds., Rule by law. The politics of courts in authoritarian regimes. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Su, Y., y He, X., 2010. Street as a courtroom: state accommodation of labor protest in South China. Law and Society Review [en línea], 44(1). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00399.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00399.x
Tate, C.N., y Vallinder, T., eds., 1995. The global expansion of the judicial power. New York University Press.
Thio, L.A., 2012. Constitutionalism in illiberal politics. En: M. Rosenfeld y A. Sajó, eds., The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law [en línea]. Oxford University Press, 133–152. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0007
Uprimny, R., 2011. Las transformaciones constitucionales recientes en América Latina: tendencias y desafíos. En: C. Rodríguez Garavito, ed., El derecho en América Latina: un mapa para el pensamiento jurídico del siglo XXI. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno.
Villey, M., 1962. Leçons d’histoire de la philosophie du droit. París : Dalloz.
Villey, M., 1968. La formation de la pensée juridique moderne. París : Montchrestien.
Villey, M., 1969. Seize essais de philosophie de droit. París : Dalloz.
Vitoria, F., 1967. La libertad de los indios. Madrid : Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. (Originalmente publicado en 1538.)
Wehrey, F., 2016. Saudi Arabia’s anxious autocrats. En: L. Diamond, M.F. Plattner y C. Walker, eds., Authoritarianism goes global. The challenges to democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
White, D., 2018. State capacity and regime resilience in Putin’s Russia. International Political Science Review [en línea], 39(1). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117694481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117694481
Yanes, F.J., 2011. Manual politico del Venezolano. Caracas: Academia Nacional de la Historia, Universidad Metropolitana. (Originalmente publicado en 1939).
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Rogelio Pérez Perdomo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies provides immediate open access to all its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and publishing rights are held by the authors of the articles. We do, however, kindly ask for later publications to indicate Sortuz as the original source.
