Between mandate and reality

The implementation gap in acid attack victim compensation in India after Laxmi v Union of India

Egileak

  • Vaibhav Shrivastava Oriental University, Indore
  • Trapti Aggarwal Oriental University, Indore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2747

Gako-hitzak:

Acid attack, victim compensation, law-in-action, implementation gap, socio-legal studies

Laburpena

In 2014, the Supreme Court of India, in the case of Laxmi vs. Union of India, had instructed all the state governments to provide a minimum compensation of Rs. 3 lakhs to the acid attack survivors. This article examines the requirement and questions its fulfilment. The article highlights the ongoing gap in the implementation of State Victim Compensation (SVC) schemes across four Indian states (Delhi, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal) over the past decade (2014-2025) by systematically analysing 37 reported cases, SVC scheme schedules, and NALSA disbursal data. Based on the socio-legal theories of Pound, Galanter, and Felstiner et al. and a brief comparative analysis with the United Kingdom and Bangladesh, the paper concludes that the difference is due to a structural deficiency of legal institutionalization. Three proposals for targeted reforms are put forward.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Global Statistics ℹ️

Cumulative totals since publication
9
Views
2
Downloads
11
Total

Author Biographies

Vaibhav Shrivastava, Oriental University, Indore

Vaibhav Shrivastava is a Research Scholar at Oriental University, Indore, M.P., India, where he is pursuing his doctorate in law. His research lies at the intersection of criminal law, socio-legal studies, and victim rights, with a particular focus on the implementation of judicial directives, victim compensation regimes, and gender justice in the Indian legal system. He has participated in relevant conferences and scholarly engagements. For correspondence regarding this article, please contact Vaibhav Shrivastava at vshri.2709@gmail.com.

Trapti Aggarwal, Oriental University, Indore

Dr. Trapti Aggarwal is an Assistant Professor at Oriental University, Indore, M.P., India. Her research interests encompass criminal law, socio-legal theory, and gender studies. She has contributed to academic scholarship in law and has been involved in research and teaching in the field of legal studies.

Erreferentziak

Acid Survivors Trust International (ASTI), 2017. Annual report 2016–2017. London: ASTI.

Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., and Sarat, A., 1981. The emergence and transformation of disputes: naming, blaming, claiming. Law and Society Review [online], 15(3–4), 631–654. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053505

Galanter, M., 1974. Why the “haves” come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change. Law and Society Review [online], 9(1), 95–160. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023

Galligan, D. J., 2007. Law in modern society. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199291830.001.0001

Grover, V., 2019. Why victims of sexual violence still don’t get the compensation they deserve. The Wire [online], 16 March. Available at: https://thewire.in/women/sexual-violence-victim-compensation

Halliday, S., and Scott, C., 2010. A cultural analysis of administrative justice. In: M. Adler, ed., Administrative justice in context. Oxford: Hart, 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0021

Kalantry, S., and Kestenbaum, J. G., 2011. Combating acid violence in Bangladesh, India, and Cambodia [online]. New York: Avon Global Center for Women and Justice/Cornell Law School. Available at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/avon_clarke/1/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1861218

Mannan, A., et al., 2006. Epidemiology of burns in the oldest old: survivors of acid violence in Bangladesh. Burns, 32(1), 93–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2005.08.027

Miers, D., 2014. Offender and state compensation for victims of crime: two decades of development and change. International Review of Victimology [online], 20(1), 91–108. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758013508683 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758013508683

National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), 2023. Crime in India 2022: statistical report. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs.

National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), 2018. Compensation scheme for women victims/survivors of sexual assault/other crimes. New Delhi: NALSA.

National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), 2023. Annual report 2022–23. New Delhi: NALSA.

Ojal, I., and Kaur, V., 2025. Towards equal justice: addressing the disparity in victim compensation across Indian states. Social Sciences & Humanities Open [online], 11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101436

Pound, R., 1910. Law in books and law in action. American Law Review, 44(1), 12–36.

Sarangi, B. P., 2019. Victim compensation in India: a critical appraisal. Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice, 8(2), 174–186.

Sathe, S. P., 2002. Judicial activism in India: transgressing borders and enforcing limits. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Argitaratuta

2026-10-29

How to Cite

Shrivastava, V. eta Aggarwal, T. (2026) «Between mandate and reality: The implementation gap in acid attack victim compensation in India after Laxmi v Union of India», Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies, 16(2), or. 688–704. doi: 10.35295/sz.iisl.2747.

Zenbakia

Atala

Bakarkako artikuluak