Ethical change, legal normativity and social legitimacy
Organizational transformation as a socio-legal process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2565Palabras clave:
Cambio organizativo, teoría sociojurídica, ética empresarial, sociología jurídicaResumen
Este artículo examina el cambio organizativo en las empresas como un proceso sociojurídico, más que como una transformación puramente técnica o de gestión. Basándose en la sociología del derecho y la ética empresarial, explora cómo las normas jurídicas, las expectativas éticas y las presiones institucionales determinan la legitimidad del cambio organizativo. El análisis adopta un enfoque teórico interdisciplinar, que se nutre de los trabajos de Luhmann, Bourdieu, Cotterrell, Habermas y la teoría institucional. Las empresas se conceptualizan como actores sociales integrados en entornos jurídicos, culturales y normativos más amplios, en los que el discurso ético funciona tanto como mecanismo de control como fuente de legitimidad. El artículo sostiene que el cambio organizativo implica procesos de legitimación moral y jurídica a través de los cuales las empresas negocian la aceptación social y la continuidad institucional. Al enmarcar la transformación organizativa como un fenómeno sociojurídico, contribuye a los estudios sobre derecho y sociedad al demostrar cómo las estructuras jurídicas y las normas éticas configuran conjuntamente las condiciones en las que el cambio organizativo se vuelve legítimo, socialmente inteligible y sostenible.
Descargas
Estadísticas globales ℹ️
|
10
Visualizaciones
|
0
Descargas
|
|
10
Total
|
|
Citas
Banakar, R., and Travers, M., eds., 2013. Law and social theory. 2nd ed. Oxford: Hart, 1–26.
Boltanski, L., and Thévenot, L., eds., 2006. On justification: Economies of worth [online]. Princeton University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400827145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400827145
Bourdieu, P., 1987. The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal, vol. 38, 805–853.
Bourdieu, P., 1991. The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. In: P. Bourdieu, In other words: Essays toward a reflexive sociology [online]. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 805–853. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621558
Burnes, B., 2004. Managing change: A strategic approach to organisational dynamics. 4th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
Choudhury D., and King T., 2019. Corporate constitutionalism: Legal and ethical dimensions of corporate power. London: Routledge.
Cotterrell, R., 1995. Law’s community: Legal theory in sociological perspective [online]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 296–310.
Cotterrell, R., 2006. Law, culture and society: Legal ideas in the mirror of social theory Farnham: Ashgate.
Cotterrell, R., 2018. Sociological jurisprudence: Juristic thought and social inquiry [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167527-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167527
Cotterrell, R., 2024. Jurisprudence and socio-legal studies. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003340324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003340324
Crozier, M., 1964. The bureaucratic phenomenon. University of Chicago Press.
D’Cruz, P., et al., 2022. Technology, megatrends and work: Thoughts on the future of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics [online], 180, 879–902. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05240-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05240-9
DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W., 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review [online], 48(2), 147–160. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Dunphy, D., and Stace, D., 1993. The strategic management of corporate change. Human Relations [online], 46(8), 905–920. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600801 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600801
Flytzanis, G., 2021. I Koinoniologia tou Dikaiou os Kritiki Koinoniki Theoria [The sociology of law as critical social theory]. Eterologies [online]. Available at: https://eterologies.com/2021/07/03/social-theory/
French, P. A., 1979. The corporation as a moral person. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16(3), 207–215.
Gephart, W., 2010. Einleitung. In: W. Gephart and S. Hübinger, eds., Max Weber. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Die Wirtschaft und die gesellschaftlichen Ordnungen und Mächte. Nachlaß – Max Weber Gesamtausgabe, Abt. I: Schriften und Reden, Bd 22/3. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1–135.
Habermas, J., 1984. The theory of communicative action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J., 1991. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J., 1996. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001
Intzesiloglou, N., 2012. Koinoniologia tou Dikaiou [Sociology of Law]. 2nd ed. Athina: Sakkoulas.
Kalligeri, E., 2017. Ithiki stin Politiki kata ton Habermas [Ethics in politics according to Habermas]. LLM Thesis. Athens.
Kolovou, M. X., 2018. Diacheirisi Allagis se Epicheiriseis kai Organismous [Change Management in Enterprises and Organizations]. LLM Thesis. Athens, 1–120.
Luhmann, N., 1984. Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N., 1995. Social systems. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. (Originally published in 1984).
Luhmann, N., 2004. Law as a social system. Trans.: K. Ziegert. Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1984).
Mandali, A. S., 2021. I theoria tou Koinoniakou Syntagmatismou kai i rythmisi ton koinonikon scheseon sto diadiktyo [The theory of social constitutionalism and the regulation of social relations on the internet] (online). LLM Thesis. Panepistimio Athinon. Available at: https://pergamos.lib.uoa.gr
Meyer, J. W., and Rowan, B., 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology [online], 83(2), 340–363. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/226550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Michalos, A. C., 1995. A pragmatic approach to business ethics. London: Sage.
Montana, P. J., and Charnov, B. H. (with S. Katsantoni and G. Katsantonis), 1993. Management: Oikonomia kai Epicheirisi [Management: Economy and enterprise]. Athina: Kleidarithmos.
Nelken, D., 1998. Blinding insights? The limits of a reflexive sociology of law. Journal of Law and Society [online], 25, 407–426. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00098
Ntolας, N., 2008. From subject-centred ethics to the ethics of communication: A path from idealist orientations to J. Habermas’s ethics of universalisation. Athens: Metaichmio.
Rawls, J., 1999. A theory of justice. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rendtorff, J. D., 2020. The concept of business legitimacy: Learnings from Suchman: Integrating sociological, ethical and critical perspectives. In: J. D. Rendtorff, ed., Handbook of business legitimacy: Responsibility, ethics and society [online]. Cham: Springer, 3–30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14622-1_74 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14622-1_74
Scott, W. R., 2001. Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. London: Sage.
Scott, W. R., 2014. Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities [online]. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.172.0136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.172.0136
Suchman, M. C., 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review [online], 20(3), 571–610. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/258788 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Thanopoulos, A., 2003. Epicheirimatiki Ithiki kai Deontologia [Business ethics and deontology]. Athina: Faidimos.
Timmons, J. A., and Spinelli, S., 2007. New venture creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st century. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tsirakis, T. O., 2021. I Theoria tou Politismikou Kefalaiou tou Pierre Bourdieu: To Evros kai ta Oria tis [The theory of Pierre Bourdieu’s cultural capital: Its scope and limits]. LLM Thesis, Thessaloniki.
Tsiros, N., 2014. Koinoniologikoi Anastochasmoi gia to Politiko kai to Dikaio – I Systematiki Theoria tou Niklas Luhmann [Sociological reflections on politics and law – The systems theory of Niklas Luhmann]. Athina: Papazisis.
Weber, M., 1978. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Weber, M., 2006. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism [online]. Trans.: T. Parsons. London: Routledge. (Originally published in 1930). Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203995808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203995808
Wellmer, A., 1993. Freiheitsmodelle in der modernen Welt. In: A. Wellmer, ed., Endspiele: Die unversöhnliche Moderne. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 15–53.
Werhane, P. H., 2008. Corporate moral responsibility: The role of moral imagination. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 437–457.
Werhane, P. H., and Moriarty, B., 2009. Moral imagination and management decision making, business roundtable, institute for corporate ethics. Bridge Paper. Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics, p. 3 ff.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Georgia Chioni

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies provee acceso abierto inmediato a todo su contenido, bajo el principio de que la investigación libremente disponible al público apoya un mayor intercambio global de conocimiento.
Todos los artículos son publicados bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional.
Los derechos de copyright, derechos de autor y de publicación pertenecen a las y los autores/as de los artículos. Sin embargo, solicitamos amablemente que publicaciones posteriores indiquen a Sortuz como la fuente original de las obras.










