The impact of Article 1131 of the Civil Code on individual bankruptcy in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2412Palabras clave:
Quiebra, código civil, activos del deudor, individualidad, artículo 1131Resumen
El proceso de quiebra de Indonesia no establece un plazo concreto para la venta de activos, incluidos los bonos de quiebra, que son responsabilidad del curador. Esta condición no tiene consecuencias legales adicionales para una sociedad de responsabilidad limitada, ya que, una vez declarada en quiebra, la persona jurídica se considera legalmente extinguida (rechtspersoon disbanded). A diferencia de los deudores individuales, que siguen siendo personas jurídicas pero no pueden desempeñar nuevas actividades comerciales durante el proceso de quiebra. Este estudio emplea un método jurídico normativo, que combina un enfoque estatutario y conceptual, para examinar las disposiciones del artículo 1131 del Código Civil, los principios jurídicos pertinentes y las doctrinas del derecho concursal. Este enfoque permite analizar la posibilidad de que los activos futuros se incluyan en la masa concursal, lo que podría obstaculizar la recuperación económica de los deudores individuales. Por lo tanto, es necesario regular aún más la norma mediante disposiciones adicionales en la Ley de Quiebras.
Descargas
Estadísticas globales ℹ️
|
47
Visualizaciones
|
17
Descargas
|
|
64
Total
|
|
Citas
Abdoeh, N. M., 2019. Hibah Harta pada Anak Angkat (Telaah Filosofis terhadap Bagian Maksimal Sepertiga). Millah [online], 18(2), 207–234. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol18.iss2.art2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol18.iss2.art2
Adjie, H., 2023. The loss of creditors’ droit de preference (priority principle) due to debtor’s corrupt offenses. International Journal of Latin Notary [online], 2(02), 169–178. Available at: https://doi.org/10.61968/journal.v2i02.45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61968/journal.v2i02.45
Afilia Dinda Dhiya Ulhaq, 2023. The Position of Creditors of Individual Collateral Holders In Insolvency Law. Yurisdiksi: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains [online], 19(1), 41–57. Available at: https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v19i1.173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v19i1.173
Agustia, D., Muhammad, N. P. A., and Permatasari, Y., 2020. Earnings management, business strategy, and bankruptcy risk: Evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon [online], 6(2), e03317. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03317
Amalia, W. S., Hariyani, I., and Prakoso, B., 2022. Restrukturisasi Utang Pt Garuda Indonesia, Tbk. Sebagai Upaya Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Kepada Kreditur. Mimbar Yustitia [online], 6(2), 108–117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.52166/mimbar.v6i2.3658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52166/mimbar.v6i2.3658
Ariqah, P., and Anisah, S., 2022. Arrangement of bankruptcy debt repayment toward employees in Indonesia and Germany. Indonesia Private Law Review [online], 3(1), 47–62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v3i1.2598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v3i1.2598
Basri, H., et al., 2024. Bankruptcy legal system reform in settlement of debtors’ debt according to the bankruptcy law. Nagari Law Review [online], 7(3), 567. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.7.i.3.p.567-577.2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.7.i.3.p.567-577.2024
Buckley, L., 2022. The foundations of governance: Implications of entity theory for directors’ duties and corporate sustainability. Journal of Management and Governance [online], 26(1), 29–53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09580-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09580-y
Cassandra, R., and Anggoro, T., 2024. Pengajuan Permohonan Pernyataan Pailit Terhadap Koperasi (Studi Kasus Pada Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Surabaya Nomor 5/Pdt.Suspailit/2022/Pn.Niaga Sby Juncto Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1382 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022). Indonesian Notary [online], 6(1), 86-104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21143/notary.vol6.no1.85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21143/notary.vol6.no1.85
Dachlan, A. A., et al., 2024. Nature of simple proof as a condition for application for postponement of debt payment obligations and bankruptcy against developers (developers) of apartments and/or flats after Supreme Court circular letter number 3 of 2023. Journal of Law, Politics and Humanities [online], 4(5), 1371–1378. Available at: https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.484
Daurrohmah, E. W., et al., 2022. Comprehensive model of bankruptcy and forensic accounting. Jati: Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia [online], 5(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.18196/jati.v5i1.12985 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jati.v5i1.12985
Dewi, P. E. T., 2021. The cross-border insolvency in the execution of bankrupt assets outside Indonesian jurisdiction: A comparative study with Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines. IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies [online], 5(1), 47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22146/ikat.v5i1.64157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ikat.v5i1.64157
Dwi Indriati, E., Ana, S., and Nugroho, N., 2022. Philosophy of law and the development of law as a normative legal science. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences [online], 3(1), 425–432. Available at: https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i1.293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i1.293
Fauzia, N., 2020. Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penolakan Pembayaran Utang Oleh Kreditor Pada Saat Permohonan Pailit Diajukan (Studi Kasus: Kepailitan PT. Hendratna Plymood). Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum [online], 12(1), 158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v12i1.199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v12i1.199
Gaffar, F., Sudiro, A., and Gunadi, A., 2024. Pattern of care for the bankruptcy trustee: Is transplantation to Indonesian law possible for SDGs? Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review [online], 4(1), e01631. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n00.pe01631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n00.pe01631
Gultom, E., and Disyon, H., 2022. The implementation of the going concern principle in bankruptcy and the suspension of payment to protect the economic rights of the parties. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) [online], 9(3), 343–364. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v9n3.a3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v9n3.a3
Guntoro, S., et al., 2023. Pengertian, ruang lingkup perbankan, latar belakang, prinsip dan sejarah perbankan syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Indragiri [online], 1(3), 215–223. Available at: https://doi.org/10.61069/juri.v1i3.39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61069/juri.v1i3.39
Harahap, P., 2021. Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Status Dari Boedel Pailit Yang Menjadi Barang Sitaan Negara (Studi Putusan Nomor 3 K/PDT.SUSPAILIT/2019) [Skripsi]. Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Indarto, A. F., Mahumdah, S., and Saptono, H., 2022. Analisis Yuridis Permohonan Pembatalan Putusan Perdamaian (Homologasi) Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Intidana (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor 14/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN Smg Jo. Nomor 10/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2015/PN.Niaga.Smg Jo. Nomor 1292 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020). Diponegoro Law Journal [online], 11(2), 1-14. Available at: https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/33603/26764
Jadiyappa, N., and Hickman, L. E., 2025. Creditors’ bankruptcy rights and accounting conservatism: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. The British Accounting Review [online], 101574. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101574
Jayaningrat, I. G. N. A.W., et al., 2024. Perlindungan Hukum atas Dua Putusan Pernyataan Pailit terhadap Debitor yang Sama. Notaire [online], 7(3), 421–444. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v7i3.57587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v7i3.57587
Jeremia, M. I., et al., 2024. Revolutionizing credit dispute resolution: Balancing creditors and debtors’ interests for greater efficiency. Nurani Hukum [online], 7(2), 189. Available at: https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v7i2.30921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v7i2.30921
Johan, S., 2021. Separatist creditors’ problems on postponement of debt payment obligations based on the Supreme Court’s decree number 30/KMA/SK/I/2020. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum [online], 15(3), 207–220. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no3.1956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no3.1956
Kamahayani, M., and Margono, S., 2020. Penerapan Asas Pari Passu Pro Rata Parte Terhadap Pemberesan Harta Pailit Pt Dhiva Inter Sarana Dan Richard Setiawan (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor: 169 PK/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2017). Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 3(1). 78–86.
Kartoningrat, R. B., and Krisharyanto, E., 2023. Principles of statutory duty and fiduciary duty in the responsibility of the bankruptcy curator. Media Iuris [online], 6(2), 205–230. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v6i2.37738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v6i2.37738
Kenting, Y. A., and Parulian, H. D., 2022. Kedudukan kreditor separatis terhadap rencana perdamaian dalam proses penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: Alethea [online], 5(2), 91–110. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24246/alethea.vol5.no2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/alethea.vol5.no2.p91-110
Lando, H., 2020. On consequential and normative analysis of law: A critical view of Alf Ross’s legacy. Kritisk Juss [online], 46(3), 193–207. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-4546-2020-03-04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-4546-2020-03-04
Manangi, I. C., and Wicaksana, A., 2024. Penerapan Asas Kelangsungan Usaha (Business Going Concern) Dalam Sistem Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia: Application of the Business Going Concern Principle in the Indonesian Bankruptcy Law System. Amicus Curiae [online], 1(2), 526–537. Available at: https://e-journal.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/amicuscuriae/article/view/19748
Mantili, R., and Dewi, P. E. T., 2020. Perlindungan kreditor konkuren dalam hukum kepailitan. Jurnal Akses [online], 12(2), 97–108. Available at: https://ojs.unr.ac.id/index.php/akses/article/view/681
Marda, G., and Dewangga, V., 2023. Pembuktian Hukum Acara Perdata Melalui Pengetahuan Hakim. Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36722/jmih.v8i2.2306
Ningsih, A. S., 2025. Creditor of fiduciary facing bankruptcy, what should they do?. Diponegoro Law Review [online], 10(1), 29-41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.10.1.2025.29-41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.10.1.2025.29-41
Pramono, H., 2023. Legal protection for creditors to ensure the fulfillment of state-owned enterprises (persero)’s liabilities in the Indonesian legal system. Prophetic Law Review [online], 5(2), 129–156. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol5.iss2.art1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol5.iss2.art1
Pratama, G. A., Zainab, N., and Siswanto, H., 2023. Legal remedies against bankruptcy decision following Constitutional Court decision no. 23/PUU-XIX/2021. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum [online], 7(2), 216–230. Available at: https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v7i2.1060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v7i2.1060
Priamsari, R. P. A., 2021. Exceptions of mediation procedure in bankruptcy cases according to Supreme Court regulation number 1 of 2016. Law Reform [online], 17(1), 13–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i1.37549 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i1.37549
Putra, F. R., 2021. Reform of plan termination in suspension of debt payment obligations (PKPU) in Indonesia. Yuridika [online], 36(3), 639. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v36i3.30295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v36i3.30295
Robert, R., Agustina, R., and Nasution, B., 2022. The rationalization of debt discharge policy for individual debtors in the Indonesian bankruptcy regime. Sriwijaya Law Review [online], 6(1), 101. Available at: https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss1.928.pp101-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss1.928.pp101-121
Rokhma, F. I., and Warka, M., 2023. Kewenangan kurator dalam pemberesan boedel pailit debitur yang masih dalam sengketa. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 3(3), 2784–2798.
Rusli, T., 2019. Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Lampung: Universitas Bandar.
Saifullah, A., 2022. Dampak Pandemi COVID-19 dalam Rangka Pengajuan Permohonan Pailit (Studi Kasus PT. Cowel Development). Jurist-Diction [online], 5(6), 2069–2084. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i6.40067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i6.40067
Sihotang, Z., 2021. Duties and authority of PKPU management based on law no. 37 of 2004 concerning bankruptcy and suspension of debt payment obligations. Journal of Law Science [online], 3(1), 15–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35335/jls.v3i1.1650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35335/jls.v3i1.1650
Silalahi, R., and Purba, O., 2020. Peran Dan Wewenang Kurator Dalam Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal Retentum [online], 2(2). 80-81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46930/retentum.v2i2.710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46930/retentum.v2i2.710
Silalahi, U., and Iskandar, L. K., 2024. Effectiveness of Indonesia’s simple proof test in comparison to the US code. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development [online], 12(1), e2421. Available at: https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2421
Simbolon, M. M., and Sitorus, Y. F., 2024. Ratio legis of bankruptcy and suspension of debt payment obligations to fulfil creditors’ rights. Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum [online], 4(1), 128-146. Available at: https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v4i1.46303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v4i1.46303
Siregar, D., 2025. Separatist creditors’ rights in handling bankruptcy assets. De’rechtsstaat [online], 11(1), 64–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v11i1.17098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v11i1.17098
Sunardi, A., et al., 2024. Krisis moneter 1997-1998: Akar penyebab, dampak ekonomi, dan kebijakan penanganan di indonesia. Sindoro: Cendikia Pendidikan [online], 5(7), 21–30. Available at: https://ejournal.warunayama.org/index.php/sindorocendikiapendidikan/article/view/4197
Suparji, 2018. Kepailitan. UAI Press.
Syamsuddin, M., and Putri, C. S., 2022. Proteksi Hukum Bagi Pemegang Polis Asuransi Terhadap Pailitnya Perusahaan Asuransi. Salam: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-I [online], 9(2), 491–502. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i2.25112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i2.25112
Talia, M. C., and Shubhan, M. H., 2022. Kewajiban Kreditor Separatis yang Menjual Benda Jaminannya Untuk Memberikan Hasilnya Kepada Kreditor Preferen. Jurist-Diction [online], 5(6), 2287–2310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i6.40129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i6.40129
Tan, D., and Joseline, J., 2022. Kajian hukum kepailitan di Indonesia: Studi Putusan Nomor 36/Pdt.SusPailit /2020/ PN Niaga Jkt.Pst. Maleo Law Journal, 6(1), 105–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56338/mlj.v6i1.1533
Tan, D., Sudirman, L., and Fiorentine, J., 2024. The urgency to renew bankruptcy law requirements and summary proof in Indonesia. Legal Spirit [online], 8(1), 113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i1.5081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i1.5081
Vellinda, F., 2022. Legal protection of debtors and creditors against transfer of receivables (cessie) in the event of bankruptcy related to the principle of justice. Pandecta Research Law Journal [online], 17(2), 237–244. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i2.37632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i2.37632
Wewo, J. A., 2024. Disparity in jurisprudence on breaking a marriage promise. Arena Hukum [online], 17(3), 545–565. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum2024.01703.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum2024.01703.4
Wicaksono, A., and Sudiro, A., 2025. Trademark sales study as boedel bankrupt by the curator. Journal of Law, Politics and Humanities [online], 5(2), 1171–1177. Available at: https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1085
Wiguna, I. N., et al., 2024. Legal protection for third parties in good faith on actio pauliana litigation in bankruptcy proceedings. Yuridika [online], 39(2), 181–210. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v39i2.56057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v39i2.56057
Wijantini, 2024. Strategy for recovery from Indonesian financially distressed companies in crisis. International Research Journal of Business Studies [online], 13(1), 49–62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.13.1.49-62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.13.1.49-62
Wijaya, G. P., and Hatiyanto, D. R. S., 2023. Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit: Bentuk Kewenangan Dan Perlindungan Kurator. Jurnal Kertha Semaya [online], 11(8). 1862-1874.
Wijayati, A., Nainggolan, A., and Krisnawati, Y. M., 2021. The legal position of workers as preferred creditors who become the applicant for bankruptcy against the company. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan [online], 10(2), 229. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.229-244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.229-244
Zuroidah, Z. N., and Prasetyo, D. I., 2024. Legal framework and creditor rights in bankruptcy: analyzing property collateral protection. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research [online], 71–83. Available at: https://doi.org/10.56943/jmr.v3i1.636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56943/jmr.v3i1.636
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Christopher Panal Lumban Gaol, Maidin Gultom
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies provee acceso abierto inmediato a todo su contenido, bajo el principio de que la investigación libremente disponible al público apoya un mayor intercambio global de conocimiento.
Todos los artículos son publicados bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional.
Los derechos de copyright, derechos de autor y de publicación pertenecen a las y los autores/as de los artículos. Sin embargo, solicitamos amablemente que publicaciones posteriores indiquen a Sortuz como la fuente original de las obras.
