The talented Mr. Girardi

Applying the Neo-Weberian conception of professional monopolies to American legal professional discipline

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl/2005

Palabras clave:

disciplina de los abogados, profesionales del derecho, neoweberiano, monopolio profesional, regulación profesional, Thomas Girardi

Resumen

Este ensayo analiza el caso de Thomas Girardi para ilustrar las deficiencias del sistema contemporáneo de disciplina de los abogados estadounidenses; en particular, su priorización de la privacidad de la reputación del abogado sobre la protección pública. El empleo de un marco neoweberiano, que se ajusta a la estructura de la profesión jurídica estadounidense, revela cómo el ámbito jurídico ha establecido un monopolio sobre la disciplina de los abogados y está controlado por sus propios miembros. Esta autorregulación crea un proceso disciplinario predominantemente privado que socava los objetivos declarados del proceso de fomentar la confianza pública y salvaguardar el interés público. Al examinar de cerca el caso de Girardi y los procedimientos dentro del proceso disciplinario, el ensayo aboga por una mayor publicidad en la disciplina de los abogados para alinear mejor el sistema con sus objetivos de responsabilidad y protección pública.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Estadísticas globales ℹ️

Totales acumulados desde su publicación
128
Visualizaciones
74
Descargas
202
Total

Biografía del autor/a

Kendall Gail, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law

Legal Assistant at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, Email: kendall.gail@law.nortwestern.edu

Citas

Abel, R., 1989. American Lawyers. Oxford University Press.

Abel, R., 2008. Lawyers in the Dock. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374230.001.0001

Abel, R., 2011. Lawyers on Trial: Understanding Ethical Misconduct. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199760374.001.0001

Alsharif, M., and Chen, T., 2025. Tom Girardi, former ‘Real Housewives’ husband, sentenced to 7 years for stealing millions from clients. NBC News [online], 3 June. Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tom-girardi-former-real-housewives-husband-sentenced-7-years-prison-rcna210590

Berenson, S., 2001. Is It Time for Laywer Profiles? Fordham Law Review [online], 70(3), 645-690. Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3768&context=flr

Brown, C., 2025. Girardi Appeals Conviction for Stealing Millions From Clients. Blomberg Law [online], 6 June. Available at: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/girardi-appeals-conviction-for-stealing-millions-from-clients

Ellis, M., 2024. Proposed New Rule 9.33 Relating to Expungement of Attorney Discipline [online]. State Bar of California. Available at: https://calbar.primegov.com/api/compilemeetingattachmenthistory/historyattachment/?historyId=2fa19f80-5f8c-4af3-82a0-3b291995b7b8

Gillers, S., 2013. How to Make Rules for Lawyers: The Professional Responsibility of the Legal Profession. Pepperdine Law Review [online], 40(2), 365-422. Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol40/iss2/4

Hamilton, M., and Ryan, H., 2020. The legal titan and the “Real Housewife”: The rise and fall of Tom Girardi and Erika Jayne. Los Angeles Times [online], 17 December. Available at: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-12-17/tom-girardi-erika-jayne-rhobh-divorce

Hamilton, M., and Ryan, H., 2021. “Real Housewives” attorney Tom Girardi used cash and clout to forge political connections. Los Angeles Times [online], 6 March. Available at: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-03-06/tom-girardi-used-cash-clout-seek-political-favors

Johnstone, Q., 1996. Bar Associations: Policies and Performances, Yale Law Policy Review [online], 15, 193-243. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/16825

Lazar, A., 2021. Report and Analysis of Audited Girardi Files. State Bar of California [online]. Available at: https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/reports/Lazar-Report-and-Attachment-Redacted.pdf

Levin, L., 2007. The Case for Less Secrecy in Lawyer Discipline. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics [online], 20(2007). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1109&context=law_papers

Levin, L., 2021. Ordinary Clients, Overreaching Lawyers, and the Failure to Implement Adequate Client Protection Measures, American University Law Review [online], 71, 447-499. Available at: https://aulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Levin.to_.Printer.pdf

Macdonald, K.M., 1999. Sociological analysis of the professions. In: K.M. Macdonald, ed., The sociology of the professions. London/California/New Delhi: Sage, 1-35.

May, A., 2023. Independent Investigation for the State Bar of California Report of Investigation [online]. 4 February. Available at: https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/reports/May-Report-and-AddendumRedacted.pdf

Miller, F., 1990. If You Can’t Trust Your Lawyer...? University of Pennsylvania Law Review [online], 138(3), 785-793. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3312267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3312267

National Conference of Bar Examiners, no date. Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination [online]. Available at: https://www.ncbex.org/exams/mpre/about-mpre

Rhode, D.L., 1994. Institutionalizing Ethics, Case Western Reserve Law Review [online], 44(2), 665-736. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol44/iss2/9/

Rhode, D.L., 2015. The Trouble with Lawyers. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rhode, D.L., and Woolley, A., 2012. Comparative Perspectives on Lawyer Regulation: An Agenda for Reform in the United States and Canada. Fordham Law Review [online], 80(6), 2761-2790. Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol80/iss6/15

Rozema, K., 2024. Hiding Lawyer Misconduct: Evidence from Florida. Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper No. 24-15, Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 24-23 [online]. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4916420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4916420

Saks, M., 2016. A Review of Theories of Professions, Organizations and Society: The Case for Neo-Weberianism, Neo-institutionalism and Eclecticism, Journal of Professions and Organization [online], 3(2), 170-187. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jow005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jow005

Saks, M., and Adams, T.L., 2019. Neo-Weberianism, Professional Formation and the State: Inside the Black Box. Professions and Professionalism [online], 9(2), 1-14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.3190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.3190

Settlement [online]. Legal Information Institute. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/settlement

State Bar of California, 2023. State Bar of California Releases Reports Detailing Past Unethical Conduct in Handling Girardi Complaint [online]. News release. 10 March. Available at: https://www.calbar.ca.gov/About-Us/News/News-Releases/State-Bar-of-California-Releases-Reports-Detailing-Past-Unethical-Conduct-in-Handling-Girardi-Complaints

State Bar of California, 2024. Board of Trustees Approves Record Expungement Plan for Nondisbarment Attorney Discipline [online]. News release. 17 May. Available at: https://www.calbar.ca.gov/About-Us/News/News-Releases/board-of-trustees-approves-record-expungement-plan-for-nondisbarment-attorney-discipline

Thomas, D., 2024. Lawyer Tom Girardi Found Competent to Face Criminal Fraud Trial. Reuters [online], 3 January. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/lawyer-tom-girardi-found-competent-face-criminal-fraud-trial-2024-01-02/

Wolfram, C., 1989. Lawyer Turf and Lawyer Regulation -- The Role of the Inherent-Powers Doctrine, University of Arkansas Little Rock Law Review [online], 12(1), 1-23. Available at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview/vol12/iss1/1

Publicado

2025-11-10

Cómo citar

Gail, K. (2025) «The talented Mr. Girardi: Applying the Neo-Weberian conception of professional monopolies to American legal professional discipline», Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies, 15(2), pp. 483–502. doi: 10.35295/sz.iisl/2005.