Merit-based recruitment in the prosecutor’s office system
The legal nature and procedural role of the interview in personnel decision-making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2775Keywords:
Alternative approaches, candidate evaluation, European standards, legal reform, selection and transfer of prosecutorsAbstract
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the interview as a stage in the selection and transfer of prosecutors to higher-level prosecution authorities in Ukraine. The aim is to identify mechanisms of subjectivity during the interview process. The research combines regulatory and legal analysis, comparative analysis of international practices, and empirical research through an expert survey (n=15). The findings indicate that the interview is the most vulnerable stage of prosecutor selection regarding subjective influence. A moderate correlation (r=0.62) was identified between subjectivity assessment and the significance of the first-impression factor, confirming the systemic impact of cognitive biases on candidate evaluation. The article substantiates the transition to a hybrid selection model combining standardized psychometric methods, automated testing, and situational tasks. Such tools, when properly validated, can reduce subjectivity, increase result reproducibility, and support more justified personnel decisions. The scientific novelty lies in integrating legal and psychological approaches, while practical significance concerns improving prosecution personnel policy and strengthening trust in the justice system.
Downloads
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
21
Views
|
1
Downloads
|
|
22
Total
|
|
References
Adamiv, Y., 2023. Aktualni pytannia kadrovoho potentsialu prokuratury Ukrainy [Current issues of the personnel potential of the prosecution of Ukraine]. Ukrainskyi Chasopys Konstytutsiinoho Prava [Ukrainian Journal of Constitutional Law] (online), 2, 51–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30970/jcl.2.2023.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30970/jcl.2.2023.5
Adams-Quackenbush, N. M., et al., 2019. Interview expectancies: Awareness of potential biases influences behaviour in interviewees. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law [online], 26(1), 150–166. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1485522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1485522
All-Ukrainian Conference of Prosecutors, 2024. Polozhennia pro poriadok roboty vidpovidnoho orhanu, shcho zdiisniuie dystsyplinarne provadzhennia [Regulation on the procedure for the work of the Prosecutor’s Qualification and Disciplinary Commission](as amended) [online]. Available at: https://kdkp.gov.ua/uploads/files/Polojennja_pro_porjadok_roboti_vidpovidnogo_organu_27.08.2024.pdf
Ashkenazi, T., and Fisher, R. P., 2022. Field test of the cognitive interview to enhance eyewitness and victim memory, in intelligence investigations of terrorist attacks. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition [online], 11(2), 200–208. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101871 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101871
Beek, M. V., Bull, R., and Chen, M., 2021. When the evidence is incorrect: an exploration of what happens when interviewers unwittingly present inaccurate information in interviews with suspects. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology [online], 36, 769–782. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09494-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09494-3
Begrich, L., Fauth, B., and Kunter, M., 2020. Who sees the most? Differences in students’ and educational research experts’ first impressions of classroom instruction. Social Psychology of Education [online], 23, 673–699. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09554-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09554-2
Bill, B., Schmitz-Wilhelmy, A., Heinzelmann, R., and Melchers, K. (2024). How do situational cues influence honest and deceptive impression management in selection interviews? A grounded theory study. Journal of Business and Psychology [online], 39, 1427–1447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09962-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09962-7
Blackman, M., 2017. Using interviewing in selection. In: H. W. Goldstein et al., eds., The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of recruitment, selection and employee retention [online]. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 182–201. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118972472.ch9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118972472.ch9
Bodnaruk, T. V., and Lapkin, A. O., 2020. Osnovni napriamy reformuvannia instytutu prokuratury na suchasnomu etapi [Main directions of reforming the institution of the prosecutor’s office at the current stage]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, Hospodarstvo i Pravo [Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law] (online), 12, 290–294. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2020.12.50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2020.12.50
Bowman, R., Lowrey-Kinberg, B., and Gould, J., 2024. An integrated model of prosecutor decision-making. Law & Society Review [online], 58(3), 452-480. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsr.2024.24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsr.2024.24
Dianiska, R. E., et al., 2021. Using disclosure, common ground, and verification to build rapport and elicit information. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law [online], 27(3), 341–353. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000313
Dipboye, R. L., 2017. The selection/recruitment interview: Core processes and contexts. In: A. Evers, N. Anderson and O. Voskuijl, eds., The Blackwell handbook of personnel selection [online]. Oxford: Blackwell, 119–142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164221.ch6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164221.ch6
France, G., 2019. Brazil: Setbacks in the legal and institutional anti-corruption frameworks [online]. São Paulo: Transparency International. Available at: https://files.transparencycdn.org/images/2019_Report_BrazilSetbacksAntiCorruptionFrameworks_English_191121_135151.pdf
Green, B. A., and Roiphe, R., 2020. When prosecutors politick: Progressive law enforcers then and now. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology [online], 110(4), 719–768. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7680&context=jclc
Kudeikina, I., and Kaija, S., 2022. Problems relating to judicial selection in the context of sustainable development of society. European Journal of Sustainable Development [online], 11(4), 115. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2022.v11n4p115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2022.v11n4p115
Luna, S., 2022. Defining coercion: An application in interrogation and plea negotiation contexts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law [online], 28(2), 240–254. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000345
Moscoso, S., 2000. Selection interview: A review of validity evidence, adverse impact and applicant reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 237–247. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00153
Mytrofanova, H. Y., and Hlukhyy, A. O., 2020. Dobir pratsivnykiv do orhaniv prokuratury: Kompetentnosti kandydativ [Selection of employees for prosecution bodies: Competencies of candidates]. Yevropeiskyi Vektor Ekonomichnoho Rozvytku [European Vector of Economic Development] (online), 1(28), 7–14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32342/2074-5362-2020-1-28-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32342/2074-5362-2020-1-28-9
Nordquist, C. Y., 2025. The weight of the bargain: Investigating prosecutors’ emotions in plea bargaining interactions in a United States criminal [online]. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Available at: https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1966984&dswid=6661
Oleszkiewicz, S., et al., 2023. Proximity-based evidence disclosure: Providing an operational purpose for disclosing evidence in investigative interviews. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law [online], 29(3), 302–319. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000396
Peck, J. A., and Levashina, J., 2017. Impression management and interview and job performance ratings: A meta-analysis of research design with tactics in mind. Frontiers in Psychology [online], 8, 201. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00201
Schmidt, F. T. C., Kaiser, A., and Retelsdorf, J., 2023. Halo effects in grading: An experimental approach. Educational Psychology [online], 43(2–3), 246–262. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593#abstract DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593
Shchokin R., Soloviov, O., and Tantsiura, I., 2023 Strengthening cooperation between the civilian and military sectors in the context of state security: benefits and challenges. Revista de Cercetare și Intervenție Socială [online], 83, 155-170. Available at: https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.83.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.83.11
Tisdale, C. N., and Votruba, A. M., 2023. Prosecutors’ considerations when initiating plea bargaining. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.168972483.30917497/v1
Vaughan, M., et al., 2022. Managing interviews in high-stake crime cases: Practice guidance for developing suspect interview strategies using a LOST WEBSITES framework. Journal of Forensic Practice [online], 24(4), 420–435. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-05-2022-0022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-05-2022-0022
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2014. Zakon Ukrainy № 1697-VII “Pro prokuraturu” [Law of Ukraine No 1697-VII “On the Prosecutor’s Office”] of October 14, 2014. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1697-18
Voloshanivska, T., et al., 2024. Reforming global criminal justice: addressing corruption’s impact on armed crime. Journal of Law and Legal Reform [online], 5(3), 1369-1404. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i3.4082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i3.4082
Wright, R. F., Levine, K. L., and Gold, R. M., 2021. Introduction: Understanding prosecutors in all their contexts. In: R. F. Wright, K. L. Levine and R. M. Gold, eds., The Oxford handbook of prosecutors and prosecution [online]. Oxford University Press, 23-26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190905422.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190905422.001.0001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marina Tsymbal, Volodymyr Zarosylo, Vasyl Kopcha, Vitaly Zarosylo, Vadym Vlad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies provides immediate open access to all its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and publishing rights are held by the authors of the articles. We do, however, kindly ask for later publications to indicate Sortuz as the original source.
