Accessing Court Files as a Feminist Endeavour
Reflections on ‘Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa - Te Rino: A Two-Stranded Rope’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0997Palavras-chave:
Feminist methodology, feminist judgments, rape trial process, access to court records, rape mythologyResumo
In this piece, we reflect on the significance of accessing court records for feminist endeavours. We discuss two examples that illustrate the value of accessing and critiquing court processes. Feminist judgment writing, as a feminist endeavour, demonstrates the significance of hearing women’s stories as well as the importance of nuanced factual analysis that takes account of the lived experiences of women. Access to the court file in one of the rewritten judgments exposed missing relevant facts in the appellate decision, and demonstrates how the appellant’s story was never fully reflected in the judgment or verdict. In our rape trial research, access to court records makes visible the complainant’s evidence and the response of the judge to her as a person. It also allows inquiry as to how the rules of evidence enacted for the protection of the complainant, such as non-disclosure of their occupation, are actually working in practice.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 221
Referências
ACT Government, 2009. A Rollercoaster Ride: Victims of sexual assault; their experiences with and views about the criminal justice process in the ACT [online]. Canberra: A.C.T. Government. Available from: https://www.victimsupport.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/793395/A_Rollercoaster_Ride-FINAL.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Bacik, I., Maunsell, C., and Gogan, S., 1998. The Legal Process and Victims of Rape [online]. The Dublin Rape Crisis Centre. Available from: http://www.drcc.ie/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rapevic.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Bazley, M., 2007. Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Police Conduct [online]. Wellington: Commission of Inquiry into Police Conduct. March. Available from: https://www.parliament.nz/resource/0000055162 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Bell, M., et al., 2013. Comparison of victims’ reports and court records of intimate partner violence perpetrators’ criminal case outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence [online], 28 (14), 2966–2977. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0886260513488693 [Accessed 14 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513488693
Benton-Greig., P., 2017. Judgment – R v S. In: E. McDonald et al., eds. Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 423-445.
Beri, S., 1997. Justice for women who kill: A new way? The Australian Feminist Law Journal, 8 (March), 113-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.1997.11077236
Burt, M., 1980. Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology [online], 38 (2), 217-230. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.474.5745&rep=rep1&type=pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.38.2.217
Capers, B., 2017. Rape, Truth, and Hearsay. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender [online], 40 (1), 183–228. Available from: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1890&context=faculty [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Chan, E., 2014. Women trailblazers in the law: The New Zealand Women Judges Oral History Project. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review [online], 45 (3), 407–436. Available from: http://www.gwnz.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Chan-Women-Trailblazers-in-the-Law-1.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v45i3.4954
Crimes Act 1961, section 128 [online]. Available from: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM329051.html [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Cunliffe, E., 2007. (This is not a) story: Using court records to explore judicial narratives in R v Kathleen Folbigg. The Australian Feminist Law Journal [online], 27 (1), 71–95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2007.10854386 [Accessed 14 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2007.10854386
D’Aoust, M.A., 2017. Sexual and gender-based violence in international criminal law: A feminist assessment of the Bemba case. International Criminal Law Review [online], 17 (1), 208-221. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01701006 [Accessed 14 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01701006
Doak, J., 2008. Victims’ Rights, Human Rights and Criminal Justice: Reconceiving the Role of Third Parties. Oxford: Hart.
Douglas, H., et al., eds., 2014. Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474201292
Enright, M., McCandless, J., and O’Donoghue, A., eds., 2017. Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges' Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart.
Evidence Act 1908 (NZ), section 23AA [online]. Available from: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1908/0056/latest/whole.html#DLM142791 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Evidence Act 2006 (NZ), section 88 [online]. Available from: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2006/0069/55.0/DLM393919.html [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Fernando, M., and Rundle, O., 2016. Love ‘em, keep ‘em, leave ‘em: (Non) application of de facto relationship laws to clandestine intimate relationships. Alternative Law Journal [online], 41 (2), 93–97. Available from: http://search.ror.unisa.edu.au/?redirect=http://researchoutputs.unisa.edu.au/11541.2%2f121813 [Accessed 14 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X1604100205
Gender Bias and the Law Project, 1996. Heroines of Fortitude: The Experience of Women in Court as Victims of Sexual Assault. Report. Woolloomooloo, NSW: Department for Women.
Gerger, H., et al., 2007. The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression (AMMASA) scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior [online], 33 (5), 422–440. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20195 [Accessed 14 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20195
Graycar, R., 1998. The gender of judgments: Some reflections on ‘bias’. University of British Columbia Law Review [online], 32 (1), 1-21. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1170622 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Hunter, R., and Tyson, D., 2017. The implementation of feminist law reforms: The case of post-provocation sentencing. Social & Legal Studies [online], 26 (2), 129-165. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0964663916666628 [Accessed 14 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663916666628
Hunter, R., et al., 2017. Introducing the feminist and mana wahine judgments. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 25-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509909766.ch-003
Hunter, R., McGlynn, C., and Rackley, E., eds., 2010. Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart.
Kebbell, M., O’Kelly, C., and Gilchrist, E., 2007. Rape victims’ experiences of giving evidence in English courts: A survey. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law [online], 14 (1), 111-119. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.14.1.111 [Accessed 14 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.14.1.111
Kingi, V., and Jordan, J. (with Moeke-Maxwell, T., and Fairbairn-Dunlop, P.), 2009. Responding to Sexual Violence: Pathways to Recovery [online]. Wellington: Ministry of Women’s Affairs. October. Available from: http://women.govt.nz/sites/public_files/pathways-to-recovery-pdf_0.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Kirkconnell-Kawana, L., and Sharratt, A., 2017. Commentary on R v Wang: Finding a plausible and credible narrative of self-defence. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 497-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509909766.ch-026
Konradi, A., 2007. Taking the Stand: Rape Survivors and the Prosecution of Rapists. Westport, CT: Praeger. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216022176
Lammasniemi, L., 2016. The benefit cap and the complexity of discrimination: R (SG and others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. Feminist Legal Studies [online], 24 (2), 215-221. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10691-015-9302-8 [Accessed 14 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-015-9302-8
Law Commission, 1999a. Justice: The Experiences of Māori Women, Te Tikanga o Te Ture: Te Mātauranga o ngā Wāhine Māori e Pa Ana Ki Tānei (NZLC R53) [online]. Report. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission. Available from: http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/default/files/projectAvailableFormats/NZLC%20R53.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Law Commission, 1999b. Women’s Access to Legal Services (NZLC SP1) [online]. Study paper. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission, 31 March. Available from: http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/default/files/projectAvailableFormats/NZLC%20SP1.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Law Commission, 2001a. Juries in Criminal Trials (NZLC R69 / E 3169) [online]. Report / Parliamentary paper. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission. Available from: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/nzlc/report/R69/R69.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Law Commission, 2001b. Some Criminal Defences with Particular Reference to Battered Defendants (NZLC R73 / E 3173) [online]. Report / Parliamentary paper. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission. Available from: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/nzlc/report/R73/R73.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Law Commission, 2008. Disclosure to Court of Defendants Previous Convictions, Similar Offending and Bad Character (NZLC R103) [online]. Report. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission. May. Available from: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/nzlc/report/R103/R103.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Law Commission, 2015. The Justice Response to Victims of Sexual Violence: Criminal trials and alternative processes (NZLC R136) [online]. Report. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission. December. Available from: http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/default/files/projectAvailableFormats/NZLC-R136-The-Justice-Response-to-Victims-of-Sexual-Violence.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Law Commission, 2016. Understanding Family Violence: Reforming the criminal law relating to homicide (NZLC R139) [online]. Report. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission. May. Available from: http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/default/files/projectAvailableFormats/R139%20Understanding%20Family%20Violence%20-%20Reforming%20the%20Criminal%20Law%20Relating%20to%20Homicide.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Majury, D., 2006. Introducing the Women’s Court of Canada. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], 18 (1), 1-26. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/230237 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Maxwell, A., 2017. The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980: The New Zealand courts’ approach to the grave risk exception for victims of domestic violence. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review [online], 48 (1), 81-106. Available from: https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=878393974814000;res=IELHSS [Accessed 16 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v48i1.4768
McDonald, E., and Tinsley, Y., eds., 2011. From ‘Real Rape’ to Real Justice: Prosecuting Rape in New Zealand. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
McDonald, E., et al., eds., 2017. Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509909766
McDonald, E., 1997a. Battered woman syndrome. New Zealand Law Journal, December, 436-438.
McDonald, E., 1997b. ‘Real rape’ in New Zealand: Women complainants’ experience of the court process. Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence, 1, 59-80.
McDonald, E., 1997c. Women offenders and compulsion. New Zealand Law Journal, November, 402-404.
McDonald, E., 2007. Complainants’ reputation in sexual matters. New Zealand Law Journal, 7 (August), 251-254.
McDonald, E., 2014. From ‘real rape’ to real justice? Reflections on the efficacy of more than 35 years of feminism, activism and law reform. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review [online], 45 (3), 487-508. Available from: https://www.victoria.ac.nz/law/research/publications/vuwlr/prev-issues/volume-45,-issue-4/McDonald.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v45i3.4947
McDonald, E., and Tinsley, Y., 2013. ‘The law as it should be’ when prosecuting sexual offences: The contribution of legal academics to law reform. New Zealand Universities Law Review [online], 25 (4), 758-779. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2546050 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Midson, B., 2017. Judgment – R v Wang. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: aTwo-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 504-509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509909766.ch-026a
Ministry of Justice, 2008. Improvements to Sexual Violence Legislation in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.
Mossman, E., et al., 2009a. Responding to Sexual Violence: A review of literature on good practice [online]. Wellington: Ministry of Women’s Affairs. October. Available from: http://women.govt.nz/sites/public_files/responding%20to%20sexual%20violence%20literature-review%20on%20best%20practice-pdf.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Mossman, E., et al., 2009b. Responding to Sexual Violence: Environmental scan of New Zealand agencies [online]. Wellington: Ministry of Women’s Affairs. October. Available from: http://women.govt.nz/sites/public_files/environmental-scan.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Mukhtar, N., 2017. A feminist critique of Quebec v. A.: Evaluating the Supreme Court's divided opinions on section 15 and common law support obligations. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 30 (1), 129-156.
Nicholas, L. (with Kitchin, P.), 2007. Louise Nicholas: My Story. Auckland: Random House.
Parkes, R., 2017. The Journeys of Complainant Witnesses for Sexual Violence Crimes in the New Zealand Justice System. PhD thesis under examination, University of Auckland.
Payne, S., 2009. Rape: The victim experience review [online]. London: Home Office. Available from: http://www.uknswp.org/wp-content/uploads/rape-victim-experience.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
R v Morgan [2016] NZHC 1422.
R v Wang [1990] 2 NZLR 529 (CA).
Ruka v Department of Social Welfare [1997] 1 NZLR 154 (CA).
Schultz, U., and Shaw, G., eds., 2013. Gender and Judging. Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/1866-377X-2013-3-133
Seuffert, N., 1997. Battered women and self-defence. New Zealand Universities Law Review, 17 (3), 292-328.
Stanchi, K., Berger, L., and Crawford, B., eds., 2016. Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316411254
Stephens, M., 2017. Judgment – Ruka v Department of Social Welfare. In: E. McDonald et al., eds. Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 94-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509909766.ch-006a
Taskforce for Action on Sexual Violence, 2009. Te Toiora Mata Tauherenga: Report of the Taskforce for Action on Sexual Violence incorporating the views of Te Ohaakii a Hine-National Network Ending Sexual Violence Together [online]. Wellington: Ministry of Justice. Available from: http://ndhadeliver.natlib.govt.nz/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE1332120&dps_custom_att_1=ilsdb [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Tautu v R [2017] NZCA 219.
Tolmie, J., 2012. New Zealand’s Jane Doe. In: E. Sheehy, ed., Sexual Assault in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women’s Activism. Toronto: University of Ottawa Press, 53-71.
Triggs, S., et al., 2009. Responding to Sexual Violence: Attrition in the New Zealand criminal justice system [online]. Wellington: Ministry of Women’s Affairs. September. Available from: http://women.govt.nz/sites/public_files/responding%20to%20sexual%20violence%20attrition-pdf.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Wright, F., 1998. The circumstances as she believed them to be: A reappraisal of section 48 of the Crimes Act 1961. Waikato Law Review: Taumauri, 6, 109-126.
Young, W., 1983. Rape Study: A Discussion of Law and Practice. Vol.1. Wellington: Department of Justice and Institute of Criminology, Victoria University.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2018 Elisabeth McDonald, Paulette Benton-Greig
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
