Accessing Court Files as a Feminist Endeavour
Reflections on ‘Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa - Te Rino: A Two-Stranded Rope’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0997Palabras clave:
metodología feminista, sentencias feministas, proceso judicial por violación, acceso a archivos judiciales, mitología de la violaciónResumen
En este artículo, reflexionamos sobre el significado de acceder a archivos judiciales para objetivos feministas. Comentamos dos ejemplos que ilustran el valor de acceder a esos archivos y de criticar procesos judiciales. La redacción feminista de decisiones judiciales demuestra la importancia de escuchar los relatos de las mujeres, así como del análisis matizado de hechos que toma en consideración el relato de la experiencia vivida por las mujeres. En uno de los fallos reescritos, el acceso al archivo judicial puso de manifiesto hechos relevantes ausentes en la decisión en apelación, y cómo el relato de la recurrente nunca llegó a reflejarse del todo en la sentencia. En nuestra investigación sobre juicios por violación, el acceso a los archivos hace visibles las pruebas de la denunciante y la respuesta que, como persona, le dio el juez. También permite cuestionar cómo se lleva a la práctica el reglamento probatorio dictado para proteger a la denunciante, como la no revelación de su profesión.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 215
Citas
ACT Government, 2009. A Rollercoaster Ride: Victims of sexual assault; their experiences with and views about the criminal justice process in the ACT [online]. Canberra: A.C.T. Government. Available from: https://www.victimsupport.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/793395/A_Rollercoaster_Ride-FINAL.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Bacik, I., Maunsell, C., and Gogan, S., 1998. The Legal Process and Victims of Rape [online]. The Dublin Rape Crisis Centre. Available from: http://www.drcc.ie/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rapevic.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Bazley, M., 2007. Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Police Conduct [online]. Wellington: Commission of Inquiry into Police Conduct. March. Available from: https://www.parliament.nz/resource/0000055162 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Bell, M., et al., 2013. Comparison of victims’ reports and court records of intimate partner violence perpetrators’ criminal case outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence [online], 28 (14), 2966–2977. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0886260513488693 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Benton-Greig., P., 2017. Judgment – R v S. In: E. McDonald et al., eds. Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 423-445.
Beri, S., 1997. Justice for women who kill: A new way? The Australian Feminist Law Journal, 8 (March), 113-124.
Burt, M., 1980. Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology [online], 38 (2), 217-230. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.474.5745&rep=rep1&type=pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Capers, B., 2017. Rape, Truth, and Hearsay. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender [online], 40 (1), 183–228. Available from: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1890&context=faculty [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Chan, E., 2014. Women trailblazers in the law: The New Zealand Women Judges Oral History Project. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review [online], 45 (3), 407–436. Available from: http://www.gwnz.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Chan-Women-Trailblazers-in-the-Law-1.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Crimes Act 1961, section 128 [online]. Available from: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM329051.html [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Cunliffe, E., 2007. (This is not a) story: Using court records to explore judicial narratives in R v Kathleen Folbigg. The Australian Feminist Law Journal [online], 27 (1), 71–95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2007.10854386 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
D’Aoust, M.A., 2017. Sexual and gender-based violence in international criminal law: A feminist assessment of the Bemba case. International Criminal Law Review [online], 17 (1), 208-221. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01701006 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Doak, J., 2008. Victims’ Rights, Human Rights and Criminal Justice: Reconceiving the Role of Third Parties. Oxford: Hart.
Douglas, H., et al., eds., 2014. Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart.
Enright, M., McCandless, J., and O’Donoghue, A., eds., 2017. Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges' Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart.
Evidence Act 1908 (NZ), section 23AA [online]. Available from: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1908/0056/latest/whole.html#DLM142791 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Evidence Act 2006 (NZ), section 88 [online]. Available from: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2006/0069/55.0/DLM393919.html [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Fernando, M., and Rundle, O., 2016. Love ‘em, keep ‘em, leave ‘em: (Non) application of de facto relationship laws to clandestine intimate relationships. Alternative Law Journal [online], 41 (2), 93–97. Available from: http://search.ror.unisa.edu.au/?redirect=http://researchoutputs.unisa.edu.au/11541.2%2f121813 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Gender Bias and the Law Project, 1996. Heroines of Fortitude: The Experience of Women in Court as Victims of Sexual Assault. Report. Woolloomooloo, NSW: Department for Women.
Gerger, H., et al., 2007. The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression (AMMASA) scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior [online], 33 (5), 422–440. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20195 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Graycar, R., 1998. The gender of judgments: Some reflections on ‘bias’. University of British Columbia Law Review [online], 32 (1), 1-21. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1170622 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Hunter, R., and Tyson, D., 2017. The implementation of feminist law reforms: The case of post-provocation sentencing. Social & Legal Studies [online], 26 (2), 129-165. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0964663916666628 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Hunter, R., et al., 2017. Introducing the feminist and mana wahine judgments. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 25-48.
Hunter, R., McGlynn, C., and Rackley, E., eds., 2010. Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart.
Kebbell, M., O’Kelly, C., and Gilchrist, E., 2007. Rape victims’ experiences of giving evidence in English courts: A survey. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law [online], 14 (1), 111-119. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.14.1.111 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Kingi, V., and Jordan, J. (with Moeke-Maxwell, T., and Fairbairn-Dunlop, P.), 2009. Responding to Sexual Violence: Pathways to Recovery [online]. Wellington: Ministry of Women’s Affairs. October. Available from: http://women.govt.nz/sites/public_files/pathways-to-recovery-pdf_0.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Kirkconnell-Kawana, L., and Sharratt, A., 2017. Commentary on R v Wang: Finding a plausible and credible narrative of self-defence. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 497-503.
Konradi, A., 2007. Taking the Stand: Rape Survivors and the Prosecution of Rapists. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Lammasniemi, L., 2016. The benefit cap and the complexity of discrimination: R (SG and others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. Feminist Legal Studies [online], 24 (2), 215-221. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10691-015-9302-8 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Law Commission, 1999a. Justice: The Experiences of Māori Women, Te Tikanga o Te Ture: Te Mātauranga o ngā Wāhine Māori e Pa Ana Ki Tānei (NZLC R53) [online]. Report. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission. Available from: http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/default/files/projectAvailableFormats/NZLC%20R53.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Law Commission, 1999b. Women’s Access to Legal Services (NZLC SP1) [online]. Study paper. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission, 31 March. Available from: http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/default/files/projectAvailableFormats/NZLC%20SP1.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Law Commission, 2001a. Juries in Criminal Trials (NZLC R69 / E 3169) [online]. Report / Parliamentary paper. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission. Available from: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/nzlc/report/R69/R69.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Law Commission, 2001b. Some Criminal Defences with Particular Reference to Battered Defendants (NZLC R73 / E 3173) [online]. Report / Parliamentary paper. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission. Available from: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/nzlc/report/R73/R73.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Law Commission, 2008. Disclosure to Court of Defendants Previous Convictions, Similar Offending and Bad Character (NZLC R103) [online]. Report. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission. May. Available from: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/nzlc/report/R103/R103.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Law Commission, 2015. The Justice Response to Victims of Sexual Violence: Criminal trials and alternative processes (NZLC R136) [online]. Report. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission. December. Available from: http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/default/files/projectAvailableFormats/NZLC-R136-The-Justice-Response-to-Victims-of-Sexual-Violence.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Law Commission, 2016. Understanding Family Violence: Reforming the criminal law relating to homicide (NZLC R139) [online]. Report. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission. May. Available from: http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/default/files/projectAvailableFormats/R139%20Understanding%20Family%20Violence%20-%20Reforming%20the%20Criminal%20Law%20Relating%20to%20Homicide.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Majury, D., 2006. Introducing the Women’s Court of Canada. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], 18 (1), 1-26. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/230237 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Maxwell, A., 2017. The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980: The New Zealand courts’ approach to the grave risk exception for victims of domestic violence. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review [online], 48 (1), 81-106. Available from: https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=878393974814000;res=IELHSS [Accessed 16 May 2018].
McDonald, E., and Tinsley, Y., eds., 2011. From ‘Real Rape’ to Real Justice: Prosecuting Rape in New Zealand. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
McDonald, E., et al., eds., 2017. Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart.
McDonald, E., 1997a. Battered woman syndrome. New Zealand Law Journal, December, 436-438.
McDonald, E., 1997b. ‘Real rape’ in New Zealand: Women complainants’ experience of the court process. Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence, 1, 59-80.
McDonald, E., 1997c. Women offenders and compulsion. New Zealand Law Journal, November, 402-404.
McDonald, E., 2007. Complainants’ reputation in sexual matters. New Zealand Law Journal, 7 (August), 251-254.
McDonald, E., 2014. From ‘real rape’ to real justice? Reflections on the efficacy of more than 35 years of feminism, activism and law reform. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review [online], 45 (3), 487-508. Available from: https://www.victoria.ac.nz/law/research/publications/vuwlr/prev-issues/volume-45,-issue-4/McDonald.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
McDonald, E., and Tinsley, Y., 2013. ‘The law as it should be’ when prosecuting sexual offences: The contribution of legal academics to law reform. New Zealand Universities Law Review [online], 25 (4), 758-779. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2546050 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Midson, B., 2017. Judgment – R v Wang. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: aTwo-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 504-509.
Ministry of Justice, 2008. Improvements to Sexual Violence Legislation in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.
Mossman, E., et al., 2009a. Responding to Sexual Violence: A review of literature on good practice [online]. Wellington: Ministry of Women’s Affairs. October. Available from: http://women.govt.nz/sites/public_files/responding%20to%20sexual%20violence%20literature-review%20on%20best%20practice-pdf.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Mossman, E., et al., 2009b. Responding to Sexual Violence: Environmental scan of New Zealand agencies [online]. Wellington: Ministry of Women’s Affairs. October. Available from: http://women.govt.nz/sites/public_files/environmental-scan.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Mukhtar, N., 2017. A feminist critique of Quebec v. A.: Evaluating the Supreme Court's divided opinions on section 15 and common law support obligations. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 30 (1), 129-156.
Nicholas, L. (with Kitchin, P.), 2007. Louise Nicholas: My Story. Auckland: Random House.
Parkes, R., 2017. The Journeys of Complainant Witnesses for Sexual Violence Crimes in the New Zealand Justice System. PhD thesis under examination, University of Auckland.
Payne, S., 2009. Rape: The victim experience review [online]. London: Home Office. Available from: http://www.uknswp.org/wp-content/uploads/rape-victim-experience.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
R v Morgan [2016] NZHC 1422.
R v Wang [1990] 2 NZLR 529 (CA).
Ruka v Department of Social Welfare [1997] 1 NZLR 154 (CA).
Schultz, U., and Shaw, G., eds., 2013. Gender and Judging. Oxford: Hart.
Seuffert, N., 1997. Battered women and self-defence. New Zealand Universities Law Review, 17 (3), 292-328.
Stanchi, K., Berger, L., and Crawford, B., eds., 2016. Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stephens, M., 2017. Judgment – Ruka v Department of Social Welfare. In: E. McDonald et al., eds. Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 94-101.
Taskforce for Action on Sexual Violence, 2009. Te Toiora Mata Tauherenga: Report of the Taskforce for Action on Sexual Violence incorporating the views of Te Ohaakii a Hine-National Network Ending Sexual Violence Together [online]. Wellington: Ministry of Justice. Available from: http://ndhadeliver.natlib.govt.nz/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE1332120&dps_custom_att_1=ilsdb [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Tautu v R [2017] NZCA 219.
Tolmie, J., 2012. New Zealand’s Jane Doe. In: E. Sheehy, ed., Sexual Assault in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women’s Activism. Toronto: University of Ottawa Press, 53-71.
Triggs, S., et al., 2009. Responding to Sexual Violence: Attrition in the New Zealand criminal justice system [online]. Wellington: Ministry of Women’s Affairs. September. Available from: http://women.govt.nz/sites/public_files/responding%20to%20sexual%20violence%20attrition-pdf.pdf [Accessed 14 May 2018].
Wright, F., 1998. The circumstances as she believed them to be: A reappraisal of section 48 of the Crimes Act 1961. Waikato Law Review: Taumauri, 6, 109-126.
Young, W., 1983. Rape Study: A Discussion of Law and Practice. Vol.1. Wellington: Department of Justice and Institute of Criminology, Victoria University.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2018 Elisabeth McDonald, Paulette Benton-Greig
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
