What does change of the law change?
Prostitution and the law in action: National regulation and local practices of public health policy in Germany
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0938Palavras-chave:
Prostitution, governance, policy, Germany, law in action, street-level bureaucracy, public health, actor-centred institutionalism habitus, Bourdieu, morality politicsResumo
This paper presents key findings from a qualitative-empirical research on prostitution governance that examined the professional habitus of governmental and nongovernmental frontline actors, such as police and public-order officers as well as social workers and employees of public-health services, in Germany. It has been carried out after fundamental changes within German prostitution policy. The paper focuses on the public-health sector to demonstrate exemplarily how and to what extent professionals’ patterns of perception, thought and action have a crucial impact on the implementation of prostitution policy, up to the point that their everyday practices counteract the “law in books”. To provide a better understanding of this, the empirically grounded and refined concept of professional habitus will be outlined and illustrated by a contrastive case comparison. Moreover, against the background of the current policy change reversal, the article takes up the concept of “morality politics” and relates it theoretically to the concept of “professional habitus”.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 423
Referências
Amesberger, H., 2014. Sexarbeit in Österreich. Ein Politikfeld zwischen Pragmatismus, Moralisierung und Resistenz. Vienna: New Academic Press.
Bogner, A., and Menz, W., 2009. The theory-generating expert interview: Epistemological interest, forms of knowledge, interaction. In: A. Bogner, B. Littig and W. Menz, eds., Interviewing Experts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 43–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276_3
Bourdieu, P., 1987. Sozialer Sinn. Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft. Trans.: G. Seib. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Bourdieu, P., 1990. The Logic of Practice. Trans.: R. Nice. Cambridge: Polity. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621749
Bourdieu, P., 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Brehm, J., and Gates, S., 1997. Working, Shirking, and Sabotage. Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.15149
Di Nicola, A., et al., 2005. Study on National Legislation on Prostitution and Trafficking in Woman and Children. Milan: Transcrime. Joint Research Center on Transnational Crime, European Parliament.
Frommel, M., 2015. Prostitution: Beyond an Infantilising Feminism. Research Project Germany [online], 4 January. Available from https://researchprojectgermany.wordpress.com/2015/01/04/prostitution-beyond-an-infantilising-feminism/ [Accessed 12 November 2018].
Froschauer, U., and Lueger, M., 2009. Expert Interviews in Interpretive Organisational Research. In: A. Bogner, B. Littig and W. Menz, eds., Interviewing Experts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 217–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276_11
Galen, M. von, 2004. Rechtsfragen der Prostitution. Das ProstG und seine Auswirkungen. Munich: C.H. Beck.
Goffman, E., 1974. Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jackson, G., 2009. Actors and Institutions. University of Bath, School of Management, Working Paper Series [online], July. University of Bath, School of Management. Available from: http://www.bath.ac.uk/management/research/pdf/2009-07.pdf [Accessed 12 November 2018].
Jantzen, G., 2010. A Place of Springs. Eds.: O. Carretti and M., Joy. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203870792
Kastl, J.M., 2007. Habitus. In: R. Schützeichel, ed., Handbuch Wissenssoziologie und Wissensforschung. Constance: UVK.
Lipsky, M., 1980. Street-Level Bureaucrats. The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1288305
Mattson, G., 2016. The Cultural Politics of European Prostitution Reform: Governing Loose Women. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137517173
May, P.J., and Winter, S.C., 2007. Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: Influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory [online], 19 (3), 453–476. Available from: https://oied.ncsu.edu/selc/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Politicians-Managers-and-Street-Level-Bureaucrats-Influences-on-Policy-Implementation.pdf [Accessed 12 November 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum030
Mayntz, R., 1997. Soziologie der öffentlichen Verwaltung. 4th revised ed. Heidelberg: UTB.
Mayntz, R., and Scharpf, F.W., 1995. Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus. In: R. Mayntz and F.W. Scharpf, eds., Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 39–72.
Meuser, M., and Nagel, U., 1991. ExpertInneninterviews – vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht: Ein Beitrag zur qualitativen Methodendiskussion. In: D. Garz and K. Kraimer, eds., Qualitativ-empirische Sozialforschung. Konzepte, Methoden, Analysen. Opladen: Westdeutscher, 441–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97024-4_14
Meuser, M., and Nagel, U., 1994. Expertenwissen und Experteninterview. In: D. Hitzler, A. Honer and C. Maeder, eds., Expertenwissen. Die institutionalisierte Kompetenz zur Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit. Opladen: Westdeutscher, 180–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90633-5_12
Meuser, M., and Nagel, U., 2009. The expert interview and changes in knowledge production. In: A. Bogner, B. Littig and W. Menz, eds., Interviewing Experts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 17–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276_2
Olsen, J.P., 2005. Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. Public Administration Research and Theory [online], 16 (1), 1–24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui027 [Accessed 12 November 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui027
Östergren, P., 2017. From zero tolerance to full integration. Rethinking prostitution policies. DemandAT [online], Working Paper No. 10. Available from https://www.demandat.eu/publications/zero-tolerance-full-integration-rethinking-prostitution-policies [Accessed 12 November 2018].
Schutz, A., 1962. The Problem of Social Reality: Collected Papers I. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schwingel, M., 2000. Pierre Bourdieu. Zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.
Steffan, E., Rademacher, M., and Kraus, M., 2002. Gesundheitsämter im Wandel. Die Arbeit der Beratungsstellen für SODs und AIDS vor dem Hintergrund des neuen Infektionsschutzgesetzes (IfSG). Berlin: SPI-Forschung.
Valverde, M., 2003. Law’s Dream of a Common Knowledge. Princeton University Press.
Vorheyer, C., 2006. Zur Bedeutung individueller Wahrnehmungs- und Handlungsmuster in der Rechtsanwendung. Das Beispiel der Verwaltung von Prostitution. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 27 (2), 275–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfrs-2006-0210
Vorheyer, C., 2010. Prostitution und Menschenhandel als Verwaltungsproblem. Eine qualitative Untersuchung über den beruflichen Habitus [online]. Bielefeld: Gender Studies, transcript. Available from: https://www.transcript-verlag.de/978-3-8376-1412-1/prostitution-und-menschenhandel-als-verwaltungsproblem/ [Accessed 12 November 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839414125.fm
Wagenaar, H., and Altink, S., 2012. Prostitution as morality politics or why it is exceedingly difficult to design and sustain effective prostitution policy. Sexuality Research and Social Policy [online], 9 (3), 279–292. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-012-0095-0 [Accessed 12 November 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-012-0095-0
Weber, M., 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Oakland: University of California Press
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2018 Claudia Vorheyer
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
