Humanitarian action at Europe’s borders
Ambivalence, contestation and domestication under the European Pact on Migration and Asylum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2596Palavras-chave:
Humanitarianism, Border governance, borderwork, European Pact on Asylum and migration, Domestication, criminalisationResumo
This article examines the ambivalent role of professional humanitarian action at Europe’s borders, particularly along the EU’s southern Mediterranean border. It argues that recent developments associated with the European Pact on Migration and Asylum mark a qualitative shift in the governance of humanitarian action. Humanitarian organisations have become embedded within border regimes while simultaneously facing academic and normative critique, instrumentalisation and criminalisation, and growing constraints on humanitarian autonomy. Situating these developments within a governance environment structured by crisis, emergency and exception, the article traces the expansion, ambivalences and contestation of humanitarian practices at European borders. It argues that processes of instrumentalisation and criminalisation increasingly culminate in forms of regulated incorporation that I conceptualize as domestication. Domestication exposes the limits of humanitarian neutrality where humanitarian need is produced by deliberate policy choices, placing humanitarian actors in the position of providing care-based intervention and the defense of migrants’ rights.
Downloads
Metrics
Estatísticas globais ℹ️
|
31
Visualizações
|
12
Downloads
|
|
43
Total
|
|
Referências
Agamben, G., 2005. State of exception. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226009261.001.0001
Agier, M., 2011. Managing the undesirables: Refugee camps and humanitarian government. Cambridge: Polity Press.
ALNAP, 2022. The state of the humanitarian system. 7 September. ALNAP Study. London: ALNAP/ODI.
Ambrosini, M., 2024. Humanitarian help and refugees: De-bordering solidarity as a contentious issue. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies [online], 22(3), 513–530. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2022.2059823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2022.2059823
Andersson, R., 2017. Rescued and caught: The humanitarian-security nexus at Europe’s frontiers. In: N. De Genova, ed., The borders of “Europe”: Autonomy of migration, tactics of bordering [online]. Durham/London: Duke University Press, 64–94. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822372660-003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smr05.6
Apatzidou, V., 2025. Bordering asylum: Examining the EU’s border procedures under the Asylum Procedures Regulation (EU) 2024/1348. International Journal of Refugee Law [online], 37(2), 201–218. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeaf014
Ataç, I., Rygiel, K., and Stierl, M., 2016. Introduction: The contentious politics of refugee and migrant protest and solidarity movements: Remaking citizenship from the margins. Citizenship Studies [online], 20(5), 527–544. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2016.1182681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2016.1182681
Basilien-Gainche, M.-L., 2021. Limits at the limes. Diffracting sovereignty at borders. Political Anthropology Research on International Social Sciences (PARISS), 2(2), 205–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/25903276-bja10026
Bello, V., 2022. The spiralling of the securitisation of migration in the EU: from the management of a ‘crisis’ to a governance of human mobility? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies [online], 48(6), 1327–1344. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1851464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1851464
Bigo, D., 2002. Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives [online], 27(1, Special Issue), 63–92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754020270S105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754020270S105
Bird, G., 2022. Constructing vulnerability and victimhood at the EU border. Polity [online], 54(4), 874-881. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/721564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/721564
Bousiou, A., 2022. Peripheralisation and externalisation of the EU asylum regime: implications for the right to seek asylum on the southeastern EU border islands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies [online], 48(19), 4586–4602. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2097063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2097063
Brambilla, Ch. and Jones, R., 2019. Rethinking borders, violence, and conflict: From sovereign power to borderscapes as sites of struggles. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(3), 550-560. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819856352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819856352
Brandáriz, J. A., 2024. Crimigración: los riesgos del uso creciente del derecho migratorio en el marco del sistema penal. Revista Derecho Penal y Criminología, 45(119), 145-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18601/01210483.v45n119.07
Brković, Č., De Lauri, A., and Hess, S., 2021. Grassroots Responses to Mass Migration in Europe. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics [online], 7(2), 1-12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v7i2.897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v7i2.897
Calhoun, C., 2008. The imperative to reduce suffering: Charity, progress, and emergencies in the field of humanitarian action. In: M. Barnett and T. Weiss, eds., Humanitarianism in question: Politics, power, ethics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 73–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801461538-005
Campesi, G., 2018. Crisis and the consolidation of the EU border control regime. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies [online], 4(3), 196-221. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMBS.2018.093891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMBS.2018.093891
Cantat, C., 2016. Rethinking mobilities: Solidarity and migrant struggles beyond narratives of crisis. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics [online], 2(4), 11–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v2i4.286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v2i4.286
Carrera, S., 2020. Whose Pact? The cognitive dimensions of the new EU Pact on Migration and Asylum. CEPS Policy Insight, No. 2020-22. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
Carrera, S., Colombi, D., and Cortinovis, R., 2023. Policing search and rescue NGOs in the Mediterranean: Does justice end at sea? [online] CEPS In-Depth Analysis Paper. February. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies. Available at: https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/policing-search-and-rescue-ngos-in-the-mediterranean
Carrera, S., et al., 2016. Fit for purpose? The Facilitation Directive and the criminalisation of humanitarian assistance to irregular migrants [online]. Brussels: European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs (PE 536.490). Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/536490/IPOL_STU(2016)536490_EN.pdf
Cassarino, J., and Marin, L., 2022. The pact on migration and asylum: Turning the European territory into a non-territory?. European Journal of Migration and Law [online], 24(1), 1-26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340117
Chouliaraki, L., and Georgiou, M., 2017. Hospitability: The communicative architecture of humanitarian securitisation. Journal of Communication [online], 67(2), 159–180. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12291
Chumir Foundation for Ethics in Leadership and Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG) and ODI, 2019. Research report for the World Commission on Forced Displacement. New York: Chumir Foundation for Ethics in Leadership.
Cusumano, E., 2017. Emptying the sea with a spoon? Non-governmental providers of migrants’ search and rescue in the Mediterranean. Marine Policy [online], 75, 91–98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.10.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.10.008
Cusumano, E., 2021. United to rescue? Humanitarian role conceptions and NGO–NGO interactions in the Mediterranean Sea. European Security [online], 30(4),547–568. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1893698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1893698
Cusumano, E., and Gombeer, K., 2018. In deep waters: The legal, humanitarian and political implications of closing Italian ports to migrant rescuers. Mediterranean Politics [online], 25(2), 245–253. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2018.1532145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2018.1532145
Cuttitta, P., 2018a. Delocalisation, humanitarianism, and human rights: The Mediterranean border between exclusion and inclusion. Antipode [online], 50(3), 783–803. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12337
Cuttitta, P., 2018b. Repoliticisation through search and rescue? NGOs and humanitarian migration management in the Central Mediterranean. Geopolitics [online], 23(3), 632–660. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1344834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1344834
Cuttitta, P., 2019. The Central Mediterranean border as a humanitarian space. In: N. N. Sørensen and S. Plambech, eds., Global perspectives on humanitarianism: When human welfare meets the political and security agendas. Danish Institute for International Studies, 15-28.
Dadusc, D., and Mudu, P., 2022. Care without control: The humanitarian industrial complex and the criminalisation of solidarity. Geopolitics [online], 27(4), 1205–1230. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1749839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1749839
Danish Refugee Council, 2017. Fundamental rights and the EU hotspot approach [online]. Copenhagen: Danish Refugee Council. Available at: https://drc.ngo/resources/documents/fundamental-rights-and-the-eu-hotspot-approach/
Davitti, D., 2019. Biopolitical borders and the state of exception in the European ‘Refugee Crisis’. European Journal of International Law [online], 29(4), 1173–1196. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy065
De Bono, D., 2019. Plastic hospitality: The empty signifier at the EU’s external border. Migration Studies [online], 7(3), 340–361. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnz015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnz015
De Genova, N., 2017. The borders of “Europe”: Autonomy of migration, tactics of bordering [online]. Durham: Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822372660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smr05
De Genova, N., and Tazzioli, M., eds., 2021. Europa/crisis. Nuevas palabras clave en la 'crisis' en y de 'Europa'. Madrid: Los Libros de la Catarata.
De la Orden Bosch, G., 2025. No aid without surveillance: The facilitators package and the expansion of crimmigration towards civil society. In: F. Gómez Isa and G. Urrutia Asua, eds., Human rights defenders under siege. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, 198-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035355921.00022
De Lauri, A., ed., 2016. The Politics of humanitarianism: Power, ideology, and aid. London: I.B.Tauris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755620043
Dijstelbloem, H., and van der Veer, L., 2021. The multiple movements of the humanitarian border: The portable provision of care and control at the Aegean islands. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 36(3), 425-442. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2019.1567371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2019.1567371
Dimitriadi, A. (2017). Governing irregular migration at the margins of Europe: The case of hotspots on the Greek islands. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 1, 75–96.
European Commission, 2015. European agenda on migration. Communication COM(2015) 490 final. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission, 2023. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council — Annual report on European Union humanitarian aid operations financed in 2022 (COM(2023)500 final). Brussels: European Commission.
European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), 2016. The implementation of the hotspots in Italy and Greece. Brussels: ECRE.
European Court of Auditors, 2017. EU response to the refugee crisis: the ‘hotspot’ approach. Special Report No 06/2017. Luxembourg: European Court of Auditors.
European Court of Auditors, 2019. Asylum, relocation and return of migrants: Time to step up action to address disparities between objectives and results. Special Report No. 24/2019. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Parliament, 2023. The hotspot approach in Greece and Italy. EPRS Briefing PE 754.569. Brussels: European Parliament.
European Union, 2008. Joint statement by the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the European Commission. Official Journal of the European Union, C 25, 1–12.
Fassin, D., 2012. Humanitarian reason: A moral history of the present. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520950481
Fassin, D., and Pandolfi, M., eds., 2010, Contemporary states of emergency: The politics of military and humanitarian intervention. New York: Zone Books.
Fekete, L., 2018. Migrants, borders and the criminalisation of solidarity in the EU. Race and Class [online], 59(4), 65-83. Available at: https://doi-org.proxy-oceano.deusto.es/10.1177/0306396818756793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818756793
Fernández-Bessa, C., and Mendiola, I., 2024. Criminalisation of solidarity and production of fear at the border: The case of the French Basque Country border area. In: A. Di Ronco and R. Selmini, eds., Criminalisation of dissent in times of crisis. Critical criminological perspectives [online]. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75376-3_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75376-3_4
Franko, K., 2020. Crimmigrant Other: Migration and Penal Power. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351001441
Garelli, G., and Tazzioli, M., 2017. The humanitarian war against migrant smugglers at sea. Antipode [online], 50(3), 685–703. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12375
Gerbaudo, M., (2022). The European Commission’s Instrumentalization Strategy: Normalising Border Procedures and De Facto Detention. European Papers [online], 7, (2), 615–628. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/582
Gkliati, M., and Kilpatrick, J., 2021. Crying wolf too many times: The impact of the emergency narrative on transparency in FRONTEX joint operations. Utrecht Law Review [online], 17(4), 57–72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.770
Gordon, E., and Larsen, K. H., 2021. The violent inaction of the state and the camp as site of struggle: The perspectives of humanitarian actors in Moria Camp, Lesvos. European Journal of International Security [online], 6(4), 418–438. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2021.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2021.9
Guild, E., et al., 2015. Enhancing the common European asylum system and alternatives to Dublin. Centre for European Policy Studies, 332.
Hameršak, M. 2021. Between supporting and reporting: Grassroots textual responses to the pushbacks at the fringes of EU. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics. 7 (2), 49–72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v7i2.752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v7i2.752
Heller, C., and Pezzani, L., 2016. Death by Rescue: The lethal effects of the EU’s policies of non-assistance at sea [online]. Forensic Oceanography Report. London: Forensic Architecture/Goldsmiths, University of London. Available at: https://content.forensic-architecture.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/2016_Report_Death-By-Rescue.pdf
Jansen, B., 2025. The humanitarian border as a violence-producing environment. Disasters [online], 49(2), e12679. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12679 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12679
Jumbert, M. G., and Pascucci, E., eds., 2021. Citizen humanitarianism at European borders. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003094852
Kapoor, I., 2012. Celebrity humanitarianism: The ideology of global charity [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203082270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203082270
Little, A., and Vaughan-Williams, N., 2017. Stopping boats, saving lives, securing subjects: humanitarian borders in Europe and Australia. European Journal of International Relations [online], 23(3), 533-556. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116661227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116661227
Luyten, K., and Orav, A., 2020. Hotspots at EU external borders: State of play [online]. European Parliamentary Research Service Briefing, PE 652.090. Brussels: European Parliament. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2020)652090
Mann, I., and Mourão Permoser, J., 2022. Floating sanctuaries: The ethics of search and rescue at sea. Migration Studies [online], 10(3), 442–460. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnac007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnac007
Marchetti, C., 2020. (Un)deserving refugees: Contested access to the ‘community of value’ in Italy. In: E. M. Goździak, I. Main and B. Suter, eds., Europe and the refugee response: A crisis of values? London: Routledge, 236–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429279317-15
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), 2021. Activity Report 2021: Greece. Athens: Médecins Sans Frontières.
Mora-Gámez, F., 2020. Beyond citizenship: the material politics of alternative infrastructures. Citizenship Studies, 24(5), 696–711. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2020.1784648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2020.1784648
Moreno-Lax, V., 2018. The EU humanitarian border and the securitisation of human rights: The “rescue-through-interdiction/rescue-without-protection” paradigm. Journal of Common Market Studies [online], 56(1), 119–140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12651
Moreno-Lax, V., 2024. Crisis as (asylum) governance: The evolving normalisation of non-access to protection in the EU. European Papers [online], 9(1), 179–208. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/752 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4719772
Nielsen, S.S., 2021. Producing vulnerability in asylum procedures. Social Anthropology [online], 29(2), 360–374. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12934
Novak, P., 2025. Re-producing the humanitarian border. Geopolitics [online], 30(1), 46–67. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2105699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2105699
Pallister-Wilkins, P., 2015. The humanitarian politics of European border policing: Frontex and border police in Evros. International Political Sociology [online], 9(1), 53–69. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12076
Pallister-Wilkins, P., 2017. Humanitarian borderwork. In: C. Günay and N. Witjes, eds., Border politics. Cham: Springer, 85–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46855-6_6
Pallister-Wilkins, P., 2018. Hotspots and the geographies of humanitarianism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space [online], 36(3), 490–509. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818754884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818754884
Pallister-Wilkins, P., 2022. Humanitarian borders: Uneven geographies of humanitarianism and migration. London: Verso.
Papoutsi, A., et al., 2019. The EC hotspot approach in Greece: creating liminal EU territory. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies [online], 45(12), 2200–2212. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1468351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1468351
Parker, N., and Vaughan-Williams, N., 2012. Critical border studies: Broadening and deepening the ‘lines in the sand’ agenda. Geopolitics, 17(4), 727–733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2012.706111
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, 2018. Human rights impact of the “external dimension” of European Union asylum and migration policy: out of sight, out of rights? Resolution 2228. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Peterson, J., 2015. Introduction. In: J. Peterson and R. McGinty, eds., The Routledge companion in humanitarian action. London: Routledge, 1-13.
Pinelli, B., 2018. Control and abandonment: The power of surveillance on refugees in Italy, during and after the Mare Nostrum operation. Antipode [online], 50(3), 725-747. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12374
Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM), 2025. Criminalisation of migration and solidarity in the EU: 2024 report [online]. Brussels: PICUM. Available at: https://picum.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Criminalisation-of-migration-and-solidarity-in-the-EU-2024-report.pdf
Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM), 2023. More than 100 people criminalised for acting in solidarity with migrants in the EU in 2022 [online]. Briefing. Brussels: PICUM. Available at: https://picum.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/More-than-100-people-criminalised-for-acting-in-solidarity-with-migrants-in-the-EU-in-2022_EN.pdf
Porras Ramírez, J. M. (2024). Blindar las fronteras de la Unión Europea para garantizar la libre circulación. El refuerzo del enfoque securitario en el nuevo Pacto sobre Migración y Asilo. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 205, 57-90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.205.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.205.03
Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing border procedures for asylum and return. Official Journal of the European Union, L series.
Regulation (EU) 2024/1356 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a screening of third-country nationals at the external borders. Official Journal of the European Union, L series.
Rozakou, K., 2016. Socialities of solidarity: Revisiting the gift taboo in times of crises. Social Anthropology, 24(2), 185–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12305
Sales, R., 2002. The deserving and the undeserving? Refugees, asylum seekers and welfare in Britain. Critical Social Policy [online], 22(3), 456–478. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/026101830202200305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018302022003293
Salvagno, M., and Jachetti, A., 2024. Non-governmental organisations involvement on search and rescue operations in the Mediterranean Sea: friend or foe? Frontiers in Public Health [online], 12, 1362214. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1362214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1362214
Sandri, E., 2018. ‘Volunteer humanitarianism’: Volunteers and humanitarian aid in the jungle refugee camp of Calais. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies [online], 44(1), 65–80. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1352467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1352467
Smith, A., 2017. Uncertainty, alert and distress: The precarious position of NGO search and rescue operations in the Central Mediterranean. Paix et Sécurité Internationales [online], (5), 29–70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25267/Paix_secur_int.2017.i5.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25267/Paix_secur_int.2017.i5.02
Solodoch, O., 2021. Regaining control? The political impact of policy responses to refugee crises. International Organisation [online], 75(3), 735–768. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818321000060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818321000060
Spanish Ministry of Inclusion, Social Security and Migration, 2024. National implementation plan for the European pact on migration and asylum. Madrid.
Stepka, E., 2018. Humanitarian securitisation of migration in the EU. European Security, 27(3), 415–437.
Stierl, M., 2018. A fleet of Mediterranean border humanitarians. Antipode [online], 50(3), 704–724. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12320
Stumpf, J., 2006. The crimmigration crisis: Immigrants, crime and sovereign power. American University Law Review, 56(2), 367–419.
Ticktin, M., 2011. Casualties of care: Immigration and the politics of humanitarianism in France. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520950535
Ticktin, M., 2016. Thinking beyond humanitarian borders. Social Research, 83(2), 255–271. Availabel at: https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2016.0030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2016.0030
Tsourdi, E. L., 2022. The New Pact and EU agencies: a tale of two tracks of administrative integration and unsatisfactory embedding. In: D. Thym, ed., Reforming the common European asylum system: Opportunities, pitfalls, and downsides of the commission proposals for a new pact on migration and asylum [online]. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 113–128. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748931164-113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748931164-113
Tsourdi, E., Ott, A., and Vankova, Z., 2022. The EU’s shifting borders reconsidered: Externalisation, constitutionalisation, and administrative integration. European Papers – A Journal on Law and Integration, 7(1), 87–108/European Papers – A Journal on Law and Integration [online], 7(1), 549–583. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/549
UNHCR, 2016. Greece factsheet, 1–31 May 2016. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
Vaughan-Williams, N., 2015a. Europe’s border crisis: Biopolitical security and beyond. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747024.001.0001
Vaughan-Williams, N., 2015b. “We are not animals!” Humanitarian border security and zoopolitical spaces in Europe. Political Geography [online], 45, 1–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.09.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.09.009
Walker, P., and Maxwell, D., 2009. Shaping the humanitarian world. London: Routledge.
Walters, W., 2011. Foucault and frontiers: Notes on the birth of the humanitarian border. In: U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann and T. Lemke, eds., Governmentality: Current issues and future challenges. London: Routledge, 138–164.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Cristina Churruca Muguruza
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence and it regulates how others can use your work. Further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
