Rethinking Consumer Vulnerability in the Legal Services Sector
The Case for the Universal Practice Approach (UPA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2402Palavras-chave:
Universal Practice Approach, Vulnerability, Lived expertise, Inclusive design, Access to justiceResumo
Vulnerability remains a contested concept in legal services, with traditional models often reinforcing stigma through risk-based identification. This article introduces the Universal Practice Approach (UPA), which reframes vulnerability as a universal, dynamic experience, and calls for proactively inclusive legal services grounded in universal access, trust based provider-user relationships, and the integration of lived expertise. Based on an extensive evidence review and qualitative research with relevant parties, including lived experts, in England, the UPA is built on six mechanisms: (1) inclusive and proactive service design, (2) co-development with lived experts, (3) empowering provider-user interviews, (4) embedding lived experts and community partners in service provision, (5) training of legal practitioners, and (6) iterative feedback loops, aligning with regulatory aims such as those of the Solicitors Regulation Authority. By centring universal access and collaborative practice, the UPA offers a transformative path towards a more just and equitable legal system.
Downloads
Metrics
Estatísticas globais ℹ️
|
15
Visualizações
|
3
Downloads
|
|
18
Total
|
|
Referências
Ashton, K., Bellis, M., and Hughes, K., 2016. Adverse childhood experiences and their association with health‑harming behaviors in the Welsh adult population: a national cross‑sectional survey. Journal of Public Health, 38(4), 507–517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32257-7
Bar Standards Board, 2018a. Identifying and assessing vulnerability and clients’ needs [online]. Available at: https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/uploads/assets/0d03cfc3-138f-4307-993d69b899792b57/factsheet2.pdf
Bar Standards Board, 2018b. Vulnerability good practice guide: Immigration clients [online]. Available at: https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/uploads/assets/196ca72c-464d-4b59-9d3f95ef4569b233/immigrationvulnerabilityguidance2018.pdf
Bellis, M.A., et al., 2017. Does continuous trusted adult support in childhood impart life‑course resilience against adverse childhood experiences? A retrospective study on adult health‑harming behaviours and mental well‑being. BMC Psychiatry [online], 18, 110. Available at: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-017-1260-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1260-z
Bradley, K., 2009. The Bradley Report: Lord Bradley’s review of people with mental health problems or learning disabilities in the criminal justice system. London: Department of Health.
Braun, V., and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brennan, C., et al., 2017. Consumer vulnerability and complaint handling: Challenges, opportunities and dispute system design. International Journal of Consumer Studies [online], 41(6), 638–646. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12377
British Society of Criminology, 2015. Statement of ethics [online]. Available at: https://www.britsoccrim.org/documents/BSCEthics2015.pdf
British Standards Institution, 2022. Helping organizations to deliver fair, flexible and inclusive services [online]. Available at: https://www.bsigroup.com/globalassets/documents/about-bsi/nsb/cpin/bsi_cpin-consumer-vulnerability-brochure_digital2.pdf
Brown, K., 2011. “Vulnerability”: Handle with care. Ethics and Social Welfare [online], 5(3), 313–321. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2011.597165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2011.597165
Brown, K., Ecclestone, K., and Emmel, N., 2017. The many faces of vulnerability. Social Policy & Society, 16(3), 497–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746416000610
Bryan, K., Freer, J., and Furlong, C., 2007. Language and communication difficulties in juvenile offenders. International Journal of Language and Communication Difficulties [online], 42(5), 505–520. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820601053977 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820601053977
Burgstahler, S., and Cory, R.C., 2015. Universal Design in Higher Education: From Principles to Practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Burstein, N., et al., 2004. Moving toward inclusive practices. Remedial and Special Education, 25(2), 104–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250020501
Burton, M., 2018. Justice on the line? A comparison of telephone and face-to-face advice in social welfare legal aid. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 40(2), 195–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2018.1444444
Business Matters, 2025. Half of Brits would trust AI for legal advice, survey finds – but experts urge caution. Business Matters Magazine [online], 9 June. Available at: https://bmmagazine.co.uk/in-business/half-of-brits-would-trust-ai-for-legal-advice-survey-finds-but-experts-urge-caution/
Citizens Advice, 2014. Tackling consumer vulnerability: regulators’ powers, actions and strategies [online]. Available at: https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/Global/Migrated_Documents/corporate/tackling-consumer-vulnerability.pdf
Community Research, 2022. Social acceptability of technology in legal services Research with lawyers and the public March 2022 [online]. Available at: https://legalservicesboard.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Acceptability-of-technology-in-legal-services-research-report-FINAL-March-2022.pdf
Coppack, M., 2020. From consultation to inclusive design – the power of lived experience. Payment Systems Regulator [online], 29 July. Available at: https://www.psr.org.uk/news-and-updates/thought-pieces/thought-pieces/from-consultation-to-inclusive-design-the-power-of-lived-experience/
Cowan, S., and Hewer, R., 2020. Vulnerability, victimhood and sexual offences. In: C. Ashford and A. Maine, eds., Research Handbook on Gender, Sexuality and The Law [online]. Gloucestershire: Edward Elgar, 341–360. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788111157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788111157.00034
Dempsey, K., no date. Motivational interviewing as a trauma informed approach [online]. California Institute for Behavioural Health Solutions. Available at: https://www.traumainformedny.org/wp-content/uploads/Motivational-Interviewing-as-a-TI-Approach-1.pdf
Enang, I., et al., 2019. Defining and assessing vulnerability within law enforcement and public health organisations: a scoping review. Health and Justice [online], 7(2). Available at: https://healthandjusticejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40352-019-0083-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-019-0083-z
Fineman, M.A., 2008. The vulnerable subject: anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20(1), 1–23.
Fineman, M.A., 2014. Vulnerability, resilience, and LGBT Youth. Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review [online], 101–122. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2434246
Florian, L., 2002. Inclusive practice: What, why and how? In: L. Florian, R. Rose and C. Tilstone, eds., Promoting inclusive practice. London: Routledge, 13–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203005620
Gilson, E.C., 2016. Vulnerability and victimization: rethinking key concepts in feminist discourses on violence. Journal of Women in Culture and Society [online], 42(1), 71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/686753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/686753
Hamilton-Shaw, H., 2019. A matter of trust and reputation. Solicitors Journal, 162(9).
Harrison, M., and Sanders, T., 2006. Vulnerable people and the development of “regulatory therapy.” In: A. Dearling, T. Newburn and P. Somerville, eds., Supporting Safer Communities: Housing, Crime and Neighborhoods. Coventry: CIH, 155–168.
Hermann, E., Williams, G.Y., and Puntoni, S., 2024. Deploying artificial intelligence in services to AID vulnerable consumers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science [online], 52, 1431–1451. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-023-00986-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-023-00986-8
Institute of Customer Service, 2023. Trust is key to maintaining customer spending through the cost of living crisis [online]. Press release. 1 November. Available at: https://www.instituteofcustomerservice.com/trust-pr
Jones, R., and Brown, L., 2019. Stigma and discrimination: How fear of being labelled as vulnerable affects help-seeking behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 75(4), 1021–1038.
Langdell, C., 2025. AI in the Free Legal Advice Sector: Navigating Opportunities and Challenges [online]. London Legal Support Trust. Available at: https://londonlegalsupporttrust.org.uk/ai-in-the-free-legal-advice-sector-navigating-opportunities-and-challenges/
Legal Ombudsman, 2024. Legal Ombudsman 2023/24 annual complaints data and insight [online]. Available at: https://www.legalombudsman.org.uk/information-centre/data-centre/complaints-data/
Legal Services Board, 2020. The state of legal services 2020: reflecting on a decade of independent regulation [online]. Available at: https://legalservicesboard.org.uk/state-of-legal-services-report-2020
Legal Services Board, 2021. Consumer vulnerability in legal services: Rapid review of existing literature October 2021 [online]. Available at: https://legalservicesboard.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Consumer-vulnerability-in-legal-services-rapid-literature-review-FINAL-27.10.21-1.pdf
Legal Services Consumer Panel, 2023. Legal Services Consumer Panel Tracker Survey 2023: How consumers are choosing legal services [online]. Available at: https://www.legalservicesconsumerpanel.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/How-consumers-are-choosing-legal-services-report.pdf
Levenson, J., 2017. Trauma-informed social work practice. Social Work [online], 62(2), 105–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swx001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swx001
LexisNexis, 2023. Generative AI and the Legal Profession: Consumer and Practitioner Perspectives [online]. Available at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/pdf/generative-ai-and-the-legal-profession-report.pdf
Macfadyen, J., and Pierpoint, H., in preparation. Consumers’ Use of AI Technology within Legal Services. Report commissioned by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., and Dodds, S., 2014. Introduction: What is vulnerability, and why does it matter for moral theory? In: C. Mackenzie, W. Rogers and S. Dodds, eds., Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. New York: Oxford Academic, 1–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199316649.003.0001
National Audit Office, 2017. Vulnerable consumers in regulated industries: Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General [online]. 31 March. Available at: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Vulnerable-consumers-in-regulated-industries.pdf
Scottish Legal Complaints Commission Consumer Panel, 2017. Legal complaints in Scotland: Consumers at risk of vulnerability [online]. Available at: https://www.scottishlegalcomplaints.org.uk/media/q0hjgq4w/consumers-at-risk-of-vulnerability.pdf
Smith, A., Johnson, M., and Thompson, H., 2018. Barriers to disability disclosure in the workplace: The role of stigma. Disability Studies Quarterly, 38(2), 45–60.
Solicitors Regulation Authority, 2016. Providing services to people who are vulnerable [online]. Available at: https://www.sra.org.uk/globalassets/documents/solicitors/freedom-in-practice/vulnerable-people.pdf?version=49931c
Solicitors Regulation Authority, 2023a. Risk Outlook: The Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Market [online]. Available at: https://www.sra.org.uk/sra/research-publications/artificial-intelligence-legal-market
Solicitors Regulation Authority, 2023b. SRA Code of Conduct for Firms [online]. Available at: https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/standards-regulations/code-conduct-firms/
Solicitors Regulation Authority. 2023c. SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs and RFLs [online]. Available at: https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/standards-regulations/code-conduct-solicitors/
Statista, 2024. Satisfaction with legal service delivery in the UK [online]. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1266111/satisfaction-with-legal-services-uk
Tamanaha, B.Z., 2004. On the rule of law: History, politics, theory. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812378
The Law Society, 2022. Meeting the needs of vulnerable clients [online]. 19 August. Available at: https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/client-care/meeting-the-needs-of-vulnerable-clients#enabling
Turner, B.B., 2006. Vulnerability and Human Rights. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
UK Government, 2007. Legal Services Act 2007: c. 29 [online]. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/29
UK Government, 2010. Equality Act 2010, c. 15 [online]. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15
UK Government, 2023. Access to vital legal support extended to millions of vulnerable people: Over 6 million more people now eligible for legal aid advice and representation [online]. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/access-to-vital-legal-support-extended-to-millions-of-vulnerable-people
University of South Wales, 2024. Ethics Policy 2024: For research and investigation-based work. Available at: https://www.southwales.ac.uk/media/university-of-south-wales/site-assets/documents/research/usw-research-ethics-policy-2024.pdf
Wallbank, J., and Herring, J., 2014. Vulnerabilities, Care and Family Law. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203797822
Wishart, G., 2003. The sexual abuse of people with learning difficulties: Do we need a social model approach to vulnerability? Journal of Adult Protection, 5(3), 14–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14668203200300021
YouGov., 2019. Reasonable adjustments in the provision of legal services: A report for the Solicitor’s Regulation Authority [online]. October. Available at: https://www.sra.org.uk/globalassets/documents/sra/research/reasonable-adjustments.pdf?version=4a87e4:
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Paolo Baffero, Harriet Pierpoint

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence and it regulates how others can use your work. Further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.














