Decolonising Legal Pluralism, Decentring Epistemological Paradigms
An introduction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2159Palavras-chave:
Decolonisation, legal pluralism, coloniality, customary law, epistemological pluriversalityResumo
This special issue advocates for critically examining the epistemological foundations of different arrangements of legal pluralism, particularly “classical” culture- or custom-based legal pluralism. It addresses conceptual colonial legacies and path-dependencies to further “epistemological disobedience” and socio-political decolonisation. The individual contributions highlight and challenge the rigidification of collective identities entrenched in binary logics reaching back to the European Enlightenment, and other dimensions of coloniality embedded in hegemonic modernist, Anglo-Eurocentric legal frameworks. Decentring dominant normative and identitarian paradigms and emphasising dialogical engagement with diverse normative rationalities, all six contributions to the special issue examine the potential of legal pluralism to foster pluriversal approaches to law. They foreground various kinds of interplay between plural legal orders and illustrate distinct colonial power dynamics in different locales that have continued until the present day. Collectively, they call for reimagining legal pluralism as a tool for emancipation, transcending (post)colonial statist epistemologies to advance decolonial, pluriversal futures.
Downloads
Metrics
Estatísticas globais ℹ️
|
62
Visualizações
|
54
Downloads
|
|
116
Total
|
|
Referências
Barreto, J.M., 2013. Introduction. In: J.M. Barreto, ed., Human Rights from a Third World Perspective: Critique, History and International Law. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 1-42.
Baxi, U., 2005. Postcolonial Legality. In: H. Schwarz and S. Ray, eds., A Companion to Postcolonial Studies [online]. Hoboken: Blackwell, 540–555. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470997024.ch29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470997024.ch29
Benda-Beckmann, F., 2002. Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law [online], 34(47), 37-82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2002.10756563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2002.10756563
Benda-Beckmann, K., and Turner, B., 2020. Anthropological Roots of Global Legal Pluralism. In: P.S. Berman, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism [online]. New York: Oxford University Press, 67–142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197516744.013.18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197516744.013.18
Chakrabarty, D., 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.
Comaroff, J.L., and Comaroff, J., 2012. Theory from the South: Or, How Euro-America is Evolving Toward Africa [online]. New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2012.694169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2012.694169
Darian-Smith, E., 2013. Postcolonial Theories of Law. In: R. Banakar and M. Travers, eds., Law and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart, 247–264.
Friedman, L.M., 1975. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Griffiths, J., 1986. What Is Legal Pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism & Unofficial Law [online], 4(1), 1-55. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
Latour, B., 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Trans.: C. Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mignolo, W.D., 2007. Delinking. Cultural Studies [online], 21(2-3), 449-514. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647
Mignolo, W.D., 2018. On Pluriversality and Multipolar World Order: Decoloniality after Decolonization–Dewesternization after the Cold War. In: B Reiter, ed., Constructing the Pluriverse: The Geopolitics of Knowledg, 90-116e. Durham: Duke University Press, 90-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478002017-006
Querejazu, A., 2022. Cosmopraxis: Relational methods for a pluriversal IR. Review of International Studies [online], 48(5), 875–890. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000450 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000450
Quijano, A., 2000. Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South [online], 1(4), 533-580. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
Raiser, T., 1995. Das lebende Recht. Rechtssoziologie in Deutschland. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Rorty, R., 1991. Inquiry as Recontextualization: An Anti-Dualist Account of Interpretation. In: D.R. Hiley, J.F. Bohman and R. Shusterman, eds., The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
Santos, B.S., 1987. Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law. Journal of Law and Society [online], 14(3), 279-302. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1410186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1410186
Stein, S., et al., 2020. Gesturing Towards Decolonial Futures: Reflections on Our Learnings Thus Far. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE) [online], 4(1), 43–65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3518
Theurer, K., and Kaleck, W., eds., 2020. Dekoloniale Rechtskritik und Rechtspraxis [online]. Bonn: bpb. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748903628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748903628
Woodman, G.R., 1996. Legal Pluralism and the Search for Justice. Journal of African Law [online], 40(2), 152-167. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855300007737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855300007737
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Martin Ramstedt, Katrin Seidel
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence and it regulates how others can use your work. Further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
