Law as social science or humanity? Some notes on “academic determinism”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1731Palavras-chave:
Law, social sciences, humanities, academic determinism, ERC, PolanyiResumo
The European Research Council (ERC) funding scheme classifies law within the social sciences and humanities sector, identifying legal science as a social science. The paper presents the case-study of such a classification as a deterministic model of evaluation and assessment of legal research. This may impact on career opportunities of individuals as well as on scientific independence, tacitly predefining the selection of research topics and legal methodology. The paper argues that ERC encourages a successful trend of conducting legal research to obtain funding, through the application of indicators. Their aim is to show which process has been followed to achieve and measure results. Legal science then risks being reduced to the analysis of legal performance. In this context, re-reading some writings of Polanyi on social sciences as well as on the critique of economic determinism sheds light on forms of academic determinism that affect the way of carrying-out research.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
14(2)_Catanzariti_OSLS (English) 383
XML_14(2)_Catanzariti_OSLS (English) 379
Referências
Baier, C., and Gengnagel, V., 2018. Academic Autonomy Beyond the Nation-State. The Social Sciences and Humanities in the European Research Council Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie [online], 43, 65–92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-018-0297-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-018-0297-7
Cairns, H., 1935. Law as a Social Science. Philosophy of Science, 2(4), 1935, pp. 484-498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/286391
De Ridder-Symoens, H., ed., 1991. A history of the university in Europe [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511599507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511599507
Hoenig, B., 2018. Structures, mechanisms and consequences of Europeanization in research: how European funding affects universities, Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research [online], 31(4), 504–522. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1497479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1497479
Horwath, D., 2004. Is Law a Humanity (or is it more like Engineering)? Arts and Humanities in Higher Education [online], 3(1), 9-28. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022204039642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022204039642
Infantino, M., 2019. Numera et impera. Gli indicatori giuridici globali e il diritto comparato. Milan: Franco Angeli.
Kelley, D.R., 1990. The Human Measure. Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition [online]. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674181984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674181984
König, T., 2016. Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities at the European Level: The Experiences of the European Research Council. In: M. Ochsner, S. Hug and H.D. Daniel, eds., Research Assessment in the Humanities [online]. Cham: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_12
Kuhn, T.S., 1970. La struttura delle rivoluzioni scientifiche. Turin: Einaudi.
Luhmann, N., 1982. The differentiation of society [online]. New York: Columbia University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7312/luhm90862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/luhm90862
Luhmann, N., 2012-2013. Theory of society (2 vols.). Redwood City: Stanford University Press. (Originally published in 1997 as Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (2 vols.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).
Macey, J., 1997. Law and Social Sciences. Harward Journal of Law & Public Policy, 21(1), p. 171.
Michaels, R., 2009. Comparative Law by Numbers? Legal Origins Thesis, Doing Business Reports, and the Silence of Traditional Comparative Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law [online], 57(4), pp. 765-796. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2008.0022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2008.0022
Polanyi, K., 1947a. On belief in economic determinism. The Sociological Review [online], a39(1), 96-102. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1947.tb02267.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1947.tb02267.x
Polanyi, K., 1947b. Our Obsolete Market Mentality. Civilization Must Find a New Thought Pattern. Commentary, 3, p. 109.
Polanyi, K., 1957. The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origin of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
Polanyi, K., 1971. Carl Menger’s Two Meanings of “Economic”. Studies in Economic Anthropology, AS7, pp. 16-24.
Polanyi, K., 1977. The two meanings of economic. In: H.W. Pearson, ed., The livelihood of man. New York: Academic Press, pp. 19-21.
Polanyi, K., 2014a. Economics and the Freedom to Shape Our Social Destiny. in G. Resta and M. Catanzariti (eds.) For a New West. Essays 1919-1958, Cambridge, Polity Press, p. 33.
Polanyi, K., 2014b. How to Make Use of the Social Sciences. In: G. Resta and M. Catanzariti, eds., For a New West. Essays 1919-1958. Cambridge: Polity Press, p. 109.
Polanyi, K., 2014c. The Contribution of Institutional Analysis to Social Sciences. In: G. Resta and M. Catanzariti, eds., For a New West. Essays 1919-1958. Cambridge: Polity Press, p. 55.
Rorty, R., 1981. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton University Press.
Roux, T.R., 2015. The Incorporation Problem in the Interdisciplinary Legal Research. Some Conceptual Issues and a Practical Illustration. Erasmus Law Review [online], n. 2. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000039
Samuel, G., 2008. Is Law truly a Social Science? A View from Comparative Law. The Cambridge Law Journal [online], 67(2), pp. 288-321. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197308000378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197308000378
Teubner, G., 2014. Law and Social Theory. Three Problems. Ancilla Iuris (anci.ch) [online], p. 183. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2432631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2432631
Weber, M., 2003. Il metodo delle scienze storico-sociali. Turin: Einaudi.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Mariavittoria Catanzariti
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
