The Interplay Between Customary Law on Inheritance in Southern Cameroons and the Human Rights Principle of Gender Non-Discrimination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2419Parole chiave:
Women's rights, customary law, inheritance practices, property rights, legal pluralism, conflict of laws, gender non-discrimination, intersection of culture and rights, universal human rights normsAbstract
Cameroon’s plural legal system combines colonial French and British models, municipal legislation, human rights principles, and customary law. This coexistence generates persistent tension, particularly between discriminatory inheritance customs and egalitarian human rights norms. Customary law in Southern Cameroons remains highly patriarchal, treating women as legal minors restricted to usufruct rights, thereby excluding them from contracting, acquiring, or disposing of property. Such practices undermine women’s inheritance rights and perpetuate inequality. Ordinary courts attempt to curb these customs through the repugnancy and incompatibility tests under Section 27(1) of the Southern Cameroons High Court Law. Yet these measures have produced divergence rather than reform, as unofficial customary courts—widely relied upon in rural and poor urban areas—continue to enforce discriminatory norms. This article examines the interplay between customary inheritance law and the human rights principle of gender non-discrimination, urging proactive state intervention to dismantle stereotypes and translate egalitarian jurisprudence into lived reality.
Downloads
Metrics
Statistiche globali ℹ️
|
52
Visualizzazioni
|
45
Download
|
|
97
Totale
|
|
Riferimenti bibliografici
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Ratification Table: African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Cameroon ratified 20 June 1989).
African Union, 2009. Ratification Table: Maputo Protocol (Cameroon ratified 28 May 2009).
Baaboh, F.H., 2021. Cameroon Legal System. HG.ORG Legal resources [online]. Available at: https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/cameroon-legal-system-7155
Code Pénal [Cameroon], n° 67/LF/1, 12 June 1967. Journal Officiel [online], 12 June. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/54c221674.html
Enonchong, L.S., 2016. Applying International Standards in Enforcing the Right to Personal Liberty in Cameroon: Challenges and Prospects. Journal of African Law, 60(3), 389–417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855316000140
Ewang, A.S., 2001. The Place of Customary Law in Cameroonian Legal System. Fundamina, 7, 70-84.
Kane, M., Oloka-Onyango, J., and Tejan-Cole, A., 2005. Reassessing Customary Law Systems as a Vehicle for Providing Equitable Access to Justice for the Poor [online]. Conference paper. Arusha Conference,“New Frontiers of Social Policy” – December 12-15. Available at: https://landwise-production.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/2022/03/Kane_Reassessing-customary-law-systems-as-a-vehicle-for-providing-equitable-access-to-justice-for-the-poor_2005-1.pdf
Kiye, M.E., 2015a. Conflict Between Customary Law and Human Rights in Cameroon: The Role of the Courts in Fostering an Equitably Gendered Society. African Study Monographs [online], 36, 75-100. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/200274
Kiye, M.E., 2015b. The Repugnancy and Incompatibility Tests and Customary Law in Anglophone Cameroon. African Studies Quarterly [online], 15(2), 85-107. Available at: https://asq.africa.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/168/Volume-15-Issue-2-Kiye.pdf
Kiye, M.E., 2021. Customary Law in Anglophone Cameroon and the Repugnancy Doctrine: An Insufficient Complement to Human Rights. Ufahamu [online], 42(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5070/F742253947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/F742253947
Ndulo, M., 2001. African Customary Law, Customs, and Women’s Rights. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies [online], 18(1), 87–120. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijgls/vol18/iss1/5/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.18.1.87
Ngwafor, E.N., 1993. Family Law in Anglophone Cameroon. Regina University Press.
Ngwafor, E.N., 1995. Cameroon: The Law across the Bridge: Twenty Years (1972-1992) of Confusion. Revue générale de droit [online], 26(1), 69-77. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7202/1035848ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1035848ar
Ngwasiri, N.C., and Nje, Y.N., 1995. Advocacy for Separate Land Legislation for the Rural Areas of Cameroon. Yaounde: PVO-NGO/NRMS Cameroon Publication.
Njieassam, E.E., 2019. Gender Inequality and Land Rights: The Situation of Indigenous Women in Cameroon. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (PELJ) [online], 22(1), 1-33. Available at: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/pelj/article/view/216460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4907
Rebouche, R., 2006. Labor, land, and women’s rights in Africa: Challenges for the new protocol on the rights of women. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 19, 235–256.
Southern Cameroons High Court Law, (SCHL), 1955, Section 27(1).
Tapscott, R., 2012. Catalyzing Social Change: A Comprehensive Analysis of Female Genital Cutting and Breast Ironing. Feinstein International Center.
UN General Assembly, 1979. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (“CEDAW”), 18 December, A/RES/34/180.
UN Treaty Collection, 1994. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: Ratification by Cameroon. 23 August.
UN Treaty Collection, 2005. Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: Accession by Cameroon. 7 January.
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and International Bar Association, 2003. Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors and Lawyers [online]. New York/Geneva. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/training9Titleen.pdf
United Nations, 2012. Declaration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Rule of Law at the National and International Levels [online], 30 November. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/734369?v=pdf
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Mirabelle Chi Epse Okezie

Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence and it regulates how others can use your work. Further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.














