Balancing Interests or Promoting Competition? Swedish Policies on Former Public Officials Joining the Private Sector

Heraclitos Muhire

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl.2313

Autori

Heraclitos Muhire Sociology of Law Department, Lund University https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8051-0724

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2313

Parole chiave:

Public officials, Private sector, Conflict of interests, Neoliberal governmentality, Restrictions

Abstract

As one of the last countries in the OECD, Sweden enacted the Restrictions Act (2018:676) in 2018, restricting ministers and state secretaries from joining private sector entities for up to 12 months. The present study employs Bacchi & Goodwin’s (2016) policy analysis What’s the Problem Represented to be (WPR) and finds that policies on public officials joining the private sectors after public service represent the problem through the lens of neoliberal governmentality. The policies’ conflicts of interest problematization does not seek to protect the public sector and enforce clear boundaries between public and private interests. Instead, ensuing advantages for former officials and their new employers and consequentially, potential distrust in public institutions, is represented as akin to a competitive imbalance (a demerit as far as neoliberalism is concerned), which accordingly necessitates self-regulatory remedies such as self-reporting, media scrutiny and ethical provisions rather than enforceable legal sanctions.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Metrics

Statistiche globali

31 Visualizzazioni	14 Download
45 Totale

Biografia autore

Heraclitos Muhire, Sociology of Law Department, Lund University

Heraclitos Muhire is a PhD student in sociology of law at Lund University, researching the transitions from public office to the private sector of former high-ranking public officials and politicians in Sweden. He holds a master’s degree in sociology and a bachelor’s degree in criminology from Lund University. Email: heraclitos.muhire@soclaw.lu.se

Riferimenti bibliografici

Alfonsi, C., 2020. Taming Tech Giants Requires Fixing the Revolving Door. Student Policy Review [online]. Harvard Kennedy School. Available at: https://studentreview.hks.harvard.edu/taming-tech-giants-requires-fixing-the-revolving-door/.

Allern, S., and Pollack, E., 2017. Svängdörrarnas förlovade land. Lobbyismens betydelse för klassamhällets eliter. Klass i Sverige, rapport 7, Nr: 46 [online]. Katalys – institut för facklig idéutveckling. Available at: https://www.katalys.se/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/No-7.-Sv%C3%A4ngd%C3%B6rrarnas-f%C3%B6rlovade-land.pdf

Andersson, S., and Erlingsson, G., 2012. New Public Management and Risks for Corruption: The Case of Sweden. In: D. Tänzler, K. Maras and A. Giannakopoulos, eds., The Social Construction of Corruption in Europe. Farnham: Ashgate.

Bacchi, C., and Goodwin, S., 2016. Poststructural Policy Analysis. A Guide to Practice. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.

Bacchi, C.L., 2009. Analysing policy : what’s the problem represented to be? London: Pearson.

Baturo, A., and Arlow, J., 2018. Is there a ‘revolving door’ to the private sector in Irish politics? Irish Political Studies [online], 33(3), 381-406. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2017.1365709

Blach-Ørsten, M., Mayerhöffer, E., and Willig, I., 2020. From Government Office to Private PR: Career Patterns of Special Ministerial Advisers and the Privatization of Politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics [online], 25(2), 301-319. Available at: https://forskning.ruc.dk/en/publications/from-government-office-to-private-pr-career-patterns-of-special-m/

Blanes i Vidal, J., Draca, M., and Fons-Rosen, C., 2012. Revolving Door Lobbyists. American Economic Review [online], 102(7). Available at: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.102.7.3731

Cerrillo i Martínez, A., 2017. Beyond Revolving Doors: The Prevention of Conflicts of Interests through Regulation. Public Integrity [online], 19(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2016.1225479

Dagens arena, 2015. Så påverkas politiken av svängdörrar till pr-branschen. Dagens arena [online], 20 February. Available at: https://www.dagensarena.se/innehall/sa-paverkas-politiken-av-svangdorrar-till-pr-branschen/

Etzion, D., and Davis, G., 2008. Revolving Doors? A Network Analysis of Corporate Officers and U.S. Government Officials. Journal of Management Inquiry [online], 17(3), 157-161. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492608316918

Expressen, 2016. Stoppa svängdörren till näringslivet. Expressen [online], 3 November. Available at: https://www.expressen.se/ledare/stoppa-svangdorren-till-naringslivet.

Foucault, M., 1988. Technologies of the self : a seminar with Michel Foucault. University of Massachusetts Press.

Foucault, M. (with J.D. Faubion, ed.), 2000. Power. Essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Vol 3. Trans: R. Hurley et al. New York: The New Press.

Foucault, M., 2007. Security, territory, population : lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78. Pbk. ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Foucault, M. (with M. Senellart, ed.), 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-79. Trans.: G. Burchell. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gane, M., 2008. Foucault on Governmentality and Liberalism. Theory, Culture & Society [online], 25(7–8), 353–363. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276408097812

Gane, N., 2012. The governmentalities of neoliberalism: panopticism, post-panopticism and beyond. The Sociological Review [online], 60(4), 611–634. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02126.x

Göteborgsposten, 2015. Regler för sidbyten dröjer. Göteborgsposten [online], 2 September. Available at: https://www.gp.se/nyheter/sverige/regler-for-sidbyten-drojer.50fe5dcc-1eac-4a81-8f69-03b3d51f66a5.

Hache, É., 2007. Is responsibility a tool of neo-liberal governmentality? Raisons politiques [online], 28(4), 49-65. Available at: https://shs.cairn.info/article/E_RAI_028_0049?lang=en

Hamann, T.H., 2009. Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and Ethics. Foucault Studies [online], 6, 37-59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i0.2471

Hong, S., and Lim, J., 2016. Capture and the bureaucratic mafia: does the revolving door erode bureaucratic integrity? Public Choice [online], 166(1/2), 69–86. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/48719647

Hong, S.H., and Allard-Huver, F., 2019. Governing governments? Discursive contestations of governmentality in the transparency dispositif. In: P. McIlvenny, J.Z. Klausen and L.B. Lindegaard, eds., Studies of Discourse and Governmentality. New perspectives and methods [online]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 149-176. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.66

Hough, D., 2013. Corruption, anti-corruption and governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Johansson, B., 2014. Regeringen vill ha karantän för politiker. Sveriges Radio [online], 11 December. Available at: https://www.sverigesradio.se/artikel/6042816.

Kinderman, D., 2017. Challenging varieties of capitalism’s account of business interests: Neoliberal think-tanks, discourse as a power resource and employers’ quest for liberalization in Germany and Sweden. Socio-Economic Review, 15(3), 587–613.

Lauri, M., 2016. Narratives of Governing: Rationalization, Responsibility and Resistance in Social Work [online]. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Political Science, Research report 2016:2. Umeå University. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10464.70400

Lee, S., and Rhyu, S.Y., 2008. The political dynamics of informal networks in South Korea: the case of parachute appointment. The Pacific Review [online], 21(1), 45–66. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740701868823?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate

Lemke, T., 2001. ‘The birth of bio-politics’: Michel Foucault‘s lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society [online], 30(2), 190-207. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03085140120042271

Lindström, E., and Bruun, N., 2012. Svängdörr i staten – en ESO-rapport om när politiker och tjänstemän byter sida. Rapport till Expertgruppen för studier i offentlig ekonomi, 2012:1, (ESO 2012:1) [online]. Regeringskansliet, Finansdepartementet. Available at: https://eso.expertgrupp.se/rapporter/20121-svangdorr-i-staten-en-eso-rapport-om-nar-politiker-och-tjansteman-byter-sida/

Mathisen, D., 2015. Sätt riksdagen i karantän – en rapport om svängdörren mellan politik och påverkansindustri [online]. May. Stockholm: Arena Idé. Available at: https://arenaide.se/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/05/satt-riksdagen-i-karantan-20150511.pdf

Morrison, A., 2017. The Responsibilized Consumer: Neoliberalism and English Higher Education Policy. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies [online], 17(3), 197–204. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616672675

Mulgan, R., 2021. Regulating the post-employment of public officials: Australian experience in an international context. Australian Journal of Public Administration [online], 80, 201–216. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12466

Nicholls, C., et al., 2024. Corruption and Misuse of Public Office. Oxford University Press.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2010. Post-Public Employment. Good Practices for Preventing Conflict of Interest [online]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2010/08/post-public-employment_g1gh9fe8/9789264056701-en.pdf#page14.

Pons-Hernández, M., 2022. Power(ful) Connections: Exploring the Revolving Doors Phenomenon as a Form of State-Corporate Crime. Critical Criminology [online], 30(2), 1–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-022-09626-z

Pressfeldt, V., 2024. Imagining the Neoliberal State: Assar Lindbeck and the Genealogy of Swedish Neoliberalism [online]. Doctoral thesis (monograph), History. Lund University. Available at: https://lucris.lub.lu.se/ws/portalfiles/portal/194235394/Victor_Pressfeldt_-_PhD_-_Imagining_the_Neoliberal_State.pdf

Pyysiäinen, J., Halpin, D., and Guilfoyle, A., 2017. Neoliberal governance and ‘responsibilization’ of agents: reassessing the mechanisms of responsibility shift in neoliberal discursive environments. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory [online], 18(2), 215-235. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2017.1331858

Ridderstolpe, E., 2002. Björn Rosengren får nytt jobb. Sveriges Radio [online], 2 December. Available at: https://www.sverigesradio.se/artikel/154532.

Ryner, J.M., 2002. Capitalist restructuring, globalisation, and the third way. Lessons from the Swedish model. London: Routledge.

Scott, I., and Leung, Y.H., 2008. Managing Integrity: The Regulation of Post Public Employment in Britain and Hong Kong. Public Organization Review [online], 8(4), 365–380. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-008-0067-2

Selling, N., 2015. The Revolving Door in a Post Corporatist State: The Case of Sweden. Paper presented at annual conference of the European Consortium for Political Research.

Selling, N., and Svallfors, S., 2019. The Lure of Power: Career Paths and Considerations among Policy Professionals in Sweden. Politics and Policy, 47(5), 984-1012–1012.

Shin, J.Y, et al., 2017. The effects of politically connected outside directors on firm performance: Evidence from Korean chaebol firms. Corporate Governance International Review [online], 26, 23–44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12203

Shughart, W.F., and Thomas, D.W., 2019. Interest Groups and Regulatory Capture. In: R.D. Congleton, B. Grofman and S. Voigt, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice, Vol. 1. Oxford University Press.

Sima, J., 2016. Filippa Reinfeldt är vår dyraste politiker. Aftonbladet [online], 6 September. Available at: https://www.aftonbladet.se/ledare/a/m6e2LL/filippa-reinfeldt-ar-var-dyraste-politiker.

Sunnercrantz, L., 2017. Hegemony and the Intellectual Function: Medialised Public Discourse on Privatisation in Sweden 1988-1993 [online]. Doctoral Thesis (monograph), Sociology. Lund University. Available at: https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/35264503/e_spik_Liv_S.pdf

Svallfors, S., and Tyllström, A., 2018. Resilient privatization: the puzzling case of for-profit welfare providers in Sweden. Socio-Economic Review [online], 16(3), 745–765. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy015

SvD Näringsliv, 2014. Här är politikerna som gick till näringslivet. SvD Näringsliv [online], 23 January. Available at: https://www.svd.se/har-ar-politikerna-som-gick-till-naringslivet.

Swedish National Audit Office, 2020. Finansinspektionens arbete för att motverka intressekonflikter (RiR 2020:18) [online]. 15 October. Available at: https://www.riksrevisionen.se/granskningar/granskningsrapporter/2020/finansinspektionens-arbete-for-att-motverka-intressekonflikter.html.

Tyllström, A., 2021. More than a revolving door: Corporate lobbying and the socialization of institutional carriers. Organization Studies [online], 42(4), 595–614. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619848014

Valverde, M., 2017. Michel Foucault. London: Routledge.

Vauchez, A., and France, P., 2021. The Neoliberal Republic - Corporate Lawyers, Statecraft, and the Making of Public-Private France. Cornell University Press.

Zaring, D., 2013. Against Being Against the Revolving Door. University of Illinois Law Review [online], 2013(2). Available at: https://www.illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/ilr-content/articles/2013/2/Zaring.pdf

Zheng, W., 2015. The Revolving Door. Notre Dame Law Review [online], 90(3). Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol90/iss3/7/