Women’s Court of Canada Act and Rules
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0996Mots-clés :
Constitutional rights, civil procedure, access to justiceRésumé
This paper explores the issue of how a feminist court could operate through the device of a model statute and rules for the Women’s Court of Canada. The Women’s Court of Canada is a feminist legal project bringing together academics, activists, and litigators to "rewrite" Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms equality jurisprudence. Over the course of more than a decade, the members of this virtual 'court' have reconsidered leading equality rights decisions, rendering alternative judgments with the aim of articulating fresh conceptions of substantive equality in judgment form. Here, the author takes a step away from the substance of equality rights law to focus on legal institutions and procedure.
Téléchargements
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 148
Références
Bengoetxea, J., and Jung, H., 2011. General Introduction: Autonomy and Heteronomy of the Judiciary in Europe. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 1 (9). Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1991696 [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Buckley, M., 2002. Towards Transformative Human Rights Practices [online]. PhD Thesis. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, Faculty of Law. Available from: https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0077514 [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Buckley, M., 2007. Symes v. Canada (2006). Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], vol. 18, 27-66 – Special Issue: Rewriting Equality (Women’s Court of Canada). Available from: https://www.thecourt.ca/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/womenscourt-symes.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Buckley, M., 2017. Reference re: Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia (Women’s Court of Canada). Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], 30 (2), 197-220. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.30.2.01 [Accessed 5 September 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.30.2.01
Canadian Bar Association, 2013. Reaching Equal Justice – an invitation to envision and act [online]. November. Ottawa: Canadian Bar Association. Available from: https://www.cba.org/CBAMediaLibrary/cba_na/images/Equal%20Justice%20-%20Microsite/PDFs/EqualJusticeFinalReport-eng.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Clear, T.R., and Karp, D.R., 1999. The Community Justice Ideal: Preventing Crime and Achieving Justice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Constitutions and Rules of Constitutional Courts/Supreme Courts in Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, India, Italy, Kosovo, and Latvia.
Dugard, J., 2016. Testing the transformative premise of the South African Constitutional Court: A comparison of High Courts, Supreme Court of Appeal and Constitutional Court socio-economic rights decisions, 1994–2015. The International Journal of Human Rights [online], 20 (8). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1227324 [Accessed 5 September 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1227324
Ferejohn J., and Pasquino P., 2003. Constitutional Courts as Deliberative Institutions: Towards an Institutional Theory of Constitutional Justice. In: W. Sadurski, ed., Constitutional Justice East and West - Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe in a Comparative Perspective. London: Kluwer Law International, 21-36.
Ginsburg, T., 2008. Constitutional Courts in East Asia: Understanding Variation. Journal of Comparative Law [online], 3 (2), 80-99. Available from: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5612&context=journal_articles [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Häberle, P., 2006. Role and Impact of Constitutional Courts in a Comparative Perspective. In: I. Pernice, J. Kokott and C. Saunders, eds., The Future of the European Judicial System in a Comparative Perspective. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Milieu Ltd., 2011. Comparative study on access to justice in gender equality and anti-discrimination law – synthesis report. Brussels: Directorate-General of Justice of the European Commission.
Muller, S., et al., 2013. Innovating Justice: Developing New Ways to Bring Fairness Between People. The Hague: HiiL.
OECD and Open Society Foundations, 2016. Understanding Effective Access to Justice – Workshop Paper [online]. 3-4 November. Paris: OECD. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/gov/Understanding-effective-access-justice-workshop-paper-final.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Somody B., and Vissy, B., 2012. Citizen’s Role in Constitutional Adjudication in Hungary: From Actio Popularis to the Constitutional Complaint. Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eot [online], vol. 53, p. 95. Available from: https://www.ajk.elte.hu/file/annales_2012_05_SomodyVissy.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Thiruvengadam, A., 2013. Swallowing a bitter PIL? Reflections on progressive strategies public Interest Litigation in India. In: O. Vilhena, U. Baxi and F. Viljoen, eds., Transformative Constitutionalism: Comparing the Apex Courts of Brazil, India and South Africa. Pretoria University of Law Press.
Vieira, M., and Annenberg, F., 2013. Remarks on the role of social movements and civil society organisations in the Brazilian Supreme Court. In: O. Vilhena, U. Baxi and F. Viljoen, eds., Transformative Constitutionalism: Comparing the Apex Courts of Brazil, India and South Africa. Pretoria University of Law Press.
Young, I.M., 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Melina Buckley 2018
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
