Women’s Court of Canada Act and Rules

Melina Buckley

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0996

Autores/as

Melina Buckley Camp Fiorante Matthews Mogerman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0996

Palabras clave:

derechos constitucionales, procedimiento civil, acceso a la justicia

Resumen

El presente artículo profundiza en la cuestión de cómo podría funcionar un tribunal feminista mediante unos estatutos tipo y unas normas para el Tribunal de Mujeres de Canadá. El Tribunal de Mujeres de Canadá es un proyecto jurídico feminista que reúne a académicas, activistas y abogadas, quienes "reescriben" la jurisprudencia sobre igualdad de la Carta Canadiense de los Derechos y las Libertades. Durante más de una década, los miembros de este "tribunal" virtual han cuestionado sentencias con el objetivo de articular concepciones nuevas de igualdad sustantiva en forma de sentencia. La autora de este artículo se distancia de lo sustantivo de las leyes sobre derecho a la igualdad y se centra en las instituciones jurídicas y el procedimiento.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Metrics

Views 353
Downloads:
PDF (English) 145

Citas

Bengoetxea, J., and Jung, H., 2011. General Introduction: Autonomy and Heteronomy of the Judiciary in Europe. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 1 (9). Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1991696 [Accessed 5 September 2018].

Buckley, M., 2002. Towards Transformative Human Rights Practices [online]. PhD Thesis. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, Faculty of Law. Available from: https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0077514 [Accessed 5 September 2018].

Buckley, M., 2007. Symes v. Canada (2006). Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], vol. 18, 27-66 – Special Issue: Rewriting Equality (Women’s Court of Canada). Available from: https://www.thecourt.ca/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/womenscourt-symes.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2018].

Buckley, M., 2017. Reference re: Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia (Women’s Court of Canada). Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], 30 (2), 197-220. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.30.2.01 [Accessed 5 September 2018].

Canadian Bar Association, 2013. Reaching Equal Justice – an invitation to envision and act [online]. November. Ottawa: Canadian Bar Association. Available from: https://www.cba.org/CBAMediaLibrary/cba_na/images/Equal%20Justice%20-%20Microsite/PDFs/EqualJusticeFinalReport-eng.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2018].

Clear, T.R., and Karp, D.R., 1999. The Community Justice Ideal: Preventing Crime and Achieving Justice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Constitutions and Rules of Constitutional Courts/Supreme Courts in Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, India, Italy, Kosovo, and Latvia.

Dugard, J., 2016. Testing the transformative premise of the South African Constitutional Court: A comparison of High Courts, Supreme Court of Appeal and Constitutional Court socio-economic rights decisions, 1994–2015. The International Journal of Human Rights [online], 20 (8). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1227324 [Accessed 5 September 2018].

Ferejohn J., and Pasquino P., 2003. Constitutional Courts as Deliberative Institutions: Towards an Institutional Theory of Constitutional Justice. In: W. Sadurski, ed., Constitutional Justice East and West - Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe in a Comparative Perspective. London: Kluwer Law International, 21-36.

Ginsburg, T., 2008. Constitutional Courts in East Asia: Understanding Variation. Journal of Comparative Law [online], 3 (2), 80-99. Available from: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5612&context=journal_articles [Accessed 5 September 2018].

Häberle, P., 2006. Role and Impact of Constitutional Courts in a Comparative Perspective. In: I. Pernice, J. Kokott and C. Saunders, eds., The Future of the European Judicial System in a Comparative Perspective. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Milieu Ltd., 2011. Comparative study on access to justice in gender equality and anti-discrimination law – synthesis report. Brussels: Directorate-General of Justice of the European Commission.

Muller, S., et al., 2013. Innovating Justice: Developing New Ways to Bring Fairness Between People. The Hague: HiiL.

OECD and Open Society Foundations, 2016. Understanding Effective Access to Justice – Workshop Paper [online]. 3-4 November. Paris: OECD. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/gov/Understanding-effective-access-justice-workshop-paper-final.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2018].

Somody B., and Vissy, B., 2012. Citizen’s Role in Constitutional Adjudication in Hungary: From Actio Popularis to the Constitutional Complaint. Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eot [online], vol. 53, p. 95. Available from: https://www.ajk.elte.hu/file/annales_2012_05_SomodyVissy.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2018].

Thiruvengadam, A., 2013. Swallowing a bitter PIL? Reflections on progressive strategies public Interest Litigation in India. In: O. Vilhena, U. Baxi and F. Viljoen, eds., Transformative Constitutionalism: Comparing the Apex Courts of Brazil, India and South Africa. Pretoria University of Law Press.

Vieira, M., and Annenberg, F., 2013. Remarks on the role of social movements and civil society organisations in the Brazilian Supreme Court. In: O. Vilhena, U. Baxi and F. Viljoen, eds., Transformative Constitutionalism: Comparing the Apex Courts of Brazil, India and South Africa. Pretoria University of Law Press.

Young, I.M., 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press.