Is there a “compensation culture” in contemporary Russia?
The role of liability insurance, non-pecuniary damages, and legal profession in personal injury litigation
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1141Mots-clés :
Personal injury, liability insurance, Soviet tort law, compensation culture, non-pecuniary damagesRésumé
This article explores current trends in personal injury litigation in Russia compared with the common law countries (the UK and US). In contrast to the British and American situation, there is no concern about the problem of “compensation culture” or “litigious behaviour” in Russian public discourse. The number of personal injury cases considered by Russian courts is not particularly high despite the growing number of accidents. This state of affairs can be explained by the influence of the Soviet culture of tort law. The most visible areas of the Soviet impact addressed in the article are liability insurance, non-pecuniary damages, and the legal profession. The article demonstrates the specificity of the Russian approach to these issues. The research is based on the analysis of judicial decisions on personal injury cases, court statistics, and expert interviews with personal injury lawyers. The findings are discussed from a historical and comparative perspective.
Téléchargements
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 808
XML (English) 914
Références
Abel, R., 2006. General damages are incoherent, incalculable, incommensurable, and inegalitarian (but otherwise a great idea). DePaul Law Review [online], 55(2), 253. Available from: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol55/iss2/3/ [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Ajani, G., 2002. Formalism and anti-formalism under socialist law: The case of general clauses within the codification of civil law. Global Jurist Advances [online], 2(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.2202/1535-1661.1074 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Association of Russian Lawyers and Financial University of the Government of the Russian Federation, 2020. Analiticheskij Otchet po rezul'tatam Issledovanija ocenki sud'jami RF razmera spravedlivoj kompensacii moral'nogo vreda pri prichinenii vreda zhizni ili zdorov'ju [Analytical Report by the Results of the Study of Russian Judges’ Estimations of Fair Compensation for Pain and Suffering in Personal Injury and Fatal Accident Cases] [online]. Available from: https://zakon.ru/Tools/DownloadFileRecord/24384 [Accessed 23 June 2020].
Atiyah, P.S., 1987. Tort law and the alternatives: Some Anglo-American comparisons. Duke Law Journal [online], nº 6, 1002. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/1372595 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Baker, T., 2001. Blood money, new money, and the moral economy of tort law in action. Law & Society Review [online], 35(2), 275–319. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3185404 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Banakas, S., 2015. Non-Pecuniary Loss in Personal Injury: Topography Architecture and Nomenclature in the European Landscape. Journal of Comparative Law [online], 10(2), 291. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/reader/41993142 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Barry, D.D., 1979. Soviet Tort Law and the Development of Public Policy. Review of Socialist Law [online], 5(1), 229. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1163/157303579X00172 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Blankenburg, E., 1997. Civil Litigation Rates as Indicators for Legal Culture. In: D. Nelken, ed., Comparing Legal Cultures. London: Routledge, 41–68.
Brüggemeier, G., 2011. European civil liability law outside Europe. The example of the big three: China, Brazil, Russia. Journal of European Tort Law [online], 2(1), 1–22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl.2011.1 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Bussani, M., and Infantino, M., 2015. Tort Law and Legal Cultures. The American Journal of Comparative Law [online], 63(1), 77–108. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2015.0003 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Cane, P., 2018. Atiyah's Accidents, Compensation and the Law. Cambridge University Press.
Cotti, A., et al., 2004. Road traffic accidents and secondary victimisation: the role of law professionals. Medicine and Law [online], 23(2), 259. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15270469/ [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Darby, J.J., 1984. The Influence of Marxian Socialism on the Soviet Law of Torts. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 23, 373.
Davydenko, D., 2013. Mediation in Russia: Regulation and Practice. In: K.J. Hopt and F. Steffek, eds., Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press.
Dingwall, R., and Cloatre, E., 2006. Vanishing trials: an English perspective. Journal of Dispute Resolution [online], nº 1, 51. Available from: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2006/iss1/7 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Engel, D.M., 2016. The Myth of the Litigious Society: Why We Don't Sue. University of Chicago Press.
Erdelevskiy, A., 2013. Kompensacija moral'nogo Vreda [Compensation of moral damage] (online). Consultant Plus legal database. Available from: http://www.consultant.ru [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Fedtke, J., 2012. The Culture of German Tort Law. Journal of European Tort Law [online], 3(2), 183. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2012-0183 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Felstiner, W.L., Abel, R.L., and Sarat, A., 1980–1981. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming... Law & Society Review [online], 15(3–4), 631–654. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053505 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Fleishits, E.A., 1951. Obyazatelstva iz Prichinenia Vreda i iz Neosnovatelnovo Obogashchenia. [Obligations for Causing Injury and for Unjust Enrichment]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat.
Fogelson, Y., 2012. Strahovoe pravo: teoreticheskie osnovy i praktika primenenija [Insurance Law: Theoretical Grounds and Practice of Applying]. Moscow: Norma.
FOM, 2018. Sudy: predostavlenija ob ih spravedlivosti, nezavisimosti, lichnyj opyt. (Report). FOM [online], 5 August. Available from: https://fom.ru/Bezopasnost-i-pravo/14080 [Accessed 23 June 2020].
Galanter, M., 1974. Why the “haves” come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & Society Review [online], 9(1), 95–160. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Golubev, K., and Narizhniy, S., 2017. Kompensatsiya Moral'nogo Vreda Kak Sposob Zashchity Neimushchestvennykh Blag [Compensation for Moral Harm as a Way of Protecting Immaterial Interests]. Legal Centre Press.
Gray, W., 1964. Soviet Tort Law: The New Principles Annotated. University of Illinois Law Forum [online], 180. Available from: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/751 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Harris, D., et al., 1984. Compensation and Support of Illness and Injury. Oxford University Press.
Hazard, J.N., 1952. Personal Injury and Soviet Socialism. Harvard Law Review [online], 65(4), 545. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/1336761 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Hendley, K., 2007. Are Russian Judges Still Soviet? Post-Soviet Affairs [online], 23(3), 240–274. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.23.3.240 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Hendley, K., 2012. The puzzling non-consequences of societal distrust of courts: explaining the use of Russian courts. Cornell International Law Journal [online], 45, p. 517. Accessed from: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol45/iss3/1 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Hendley, K., 2014. Judges as gatekeepers to mediation: The Russian case. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution [online], vol. 16, 423. Available from: https://media.law.wisc.edu/m/fdd3z/hendley_judges_as_gatekeepers.pdf [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Hendley, K., 2017. Everyday Law in Russia. Cornell University Press.
Ilan, J., 2011. The commodification of compensation? Personal injuries claims in an age of consumption. Social & Legal Studies [online], 20(1), 39–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663910379490 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Judicial College, 2019. Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases. 15th edition. Oxford University Press.
Kantorovich, Y.A., 1928. Osnovnye idei grazhdanskogo prava. [The main ideas of civil law]. Kharkov: NKYu USSR.
Karapanou, V. and Visscher, L., 2010. Towards a better assessment of pain and suffering damages. Journal of European Tort Law [online], 1(1), 48–74. Available from: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/31474/jetl.2010.48.pdf [Accessed 6 July 2020]
Khudyakov, A., 2010. Teorija strahovanija [The theory of insurance]. Moscow: Statut.
Korobkin, R., and Guthrie, C., 1997. Psychology, economics, and settlement: A new look at the role of the lawyer. Texas Law Review, 76, 77.
Kotlobovsky, I., 2006. The Prospects for Motor Insurance in Russia. Journal of Risk Management and Insurance [online], 11(1). Available from: https://jrmi.au.edu/index.php/jrmi/article/view/85 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Koziol, H., and Zhu, Y., 2010. Background and key contents of the new Chinese Tort Liability Law. Journal of European Tort Law [online], 1(3), 328–361. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1515/JETL.2010.328 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Kozkina, A., 2019. “Lichno mne v soveshhatel'nuju komnatu Ol'ga Egorova ne zvonila”. Byvshij sud'ja (i izbrannyj deputat Mosgordumy) Sergej Savost'janov — o sebe i o sisteme, iz kotoroj on ushel. Mediazona [online], 9 September. Available from: https://zona.media/article/2019/09/09/savostianov [Accessed 23 June 2020].
Kritzer, H.M., 1991. Propensity to sue in England and the United States of America: blaming and claiming in tort cases. Journal of Law and Society [online], 18(4), 400–427. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/1410316 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Kritzer, H.M., 2004. Disappearing trials? A comparative perspective. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies [online], 1(3), 735–754. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00022.x [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Kritzer, H.M., 2011. The Antecedents of Disputes: Complaining and Claiming. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 1(6). Available from: http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/viewFile/53/225 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Lee, J., 2014. Two Defining Features of Russian Tort Law: Their Rationale and Legal Effect. Review of Central and East European Law [online], 39(2), 109–143. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-00000015 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Lenta, 2019. “Deshevle novykh rodit'” Pochemu zhizn', zdorov'ye i svoboda rossiyan stoyat tak malo [Why Do the Life, Health and Liberty of Russians Cost So Little?]. Lenta [online], 17 June. Available from: https://lenta.ru/articles/2019/06/17/zhizn [Accessed 23 June 2020].
Lewis, R., and Morris, A., 2012. Tort Law Culture: Image and Reality. Journal of Law and Society [online], 39(4), 562–592. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00600.x [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Lewis, R., Morris, A., and Oliphant, K., 2006. Tort personal injury claims statistics: is there a compensation culture in the United Kingdom? Torts Law Journal [online], 14(2), 158–175. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.892981 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Lewis, R.K., 2014. Compensation culture reviewed: incentives to claim and damages levels. Journal of Personal Injury Law [online], 4, 209–225. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2467110 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Markovits, I., 1989. Law and Glasnost’: Some Thoughts about the Future of Judicial Review under Socialism. Law & Society Review [online], 23(3), 399. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053828 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Novitsky, I.B., and Luntz, L.A., 1950. General Doctrine of Obligations [Obshhee uchenie ob objazatel'stve]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat.
O’Connell, J., and Carpenter, K., 1983. Payment for Pain and Suffering Through History. Insurance Counsel Journal, 50, 411.
OGF, 2019. Podgotovlena rezoljucija kruglogo stola “Kompensacija moral'nogo ushherba za prichinenie vreda zhizni i zdorov'ju cheloveka”. OGF [online], 30 May. Available from: https://civil-forum.ru/news/podgotovlena-rezolyutsiya-kruglogo-stola-kompensatsiya-moralnogo-ushcherba-za-prichinenie-vreda-zhiz.html?sphrase_id=7417 [Accessed 23 June 2020].
Osakwe, C., 1979. Examination of the Modern Soviet Law of Torts. Tulane Law Review, 54, 1.
Priel, D., 2014. Tort law for cynics. The Modern Law Review [online], 77(5), 703–731. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12087 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Rogovich, L., 2005. O vozmeshhenii vreda prichinennogo zhizni i zdorov'ju rabotniku rabotodatelem istoricheskij aspect [On compensation for harm caused to life and health of the employee by the employer historical aspect]. In: A. Shevchenko, Deliktnye objazatel'stva po rossijskomu grazhdanskomu pravu [Tortious obligations according to Russian civil law]. Far Eastern University, 81–108.
Ross, H.L., 1980. Settled Out of Court: The Social Process of Insurance Claims Adjustment. London: Aldine.
Rudden, B., 1967. Soviet Tort Law. New York University Law Review, 42, 583.
Santore, R., and Viard, A.D., 2001. Legal fee restrictions, moral hazard, and attorney rents. The Journal of Law and Economics [online], 44(2), 549–572. Available from: https://www.dallasfed.org/assets/documents/research/papers/1999/wp9912.pdf [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Sebok, A.J., 2009. Punitive damages in the United States. In: E. Koziol and V. Wilcox, eds., Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives. Vienna: Springer, 155–196.
Shavell, S., 2004. Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shershenevich, G.F., 1911. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava [Russian civil law textbook]. Moscow: Izdanie Br. Bashmakovyh.
Shevchuk, V., and Pleshkov, A., 2001. Avtotransportnoe Strahovanie (ot Istokov do Sovremennosti) [Motor vehicle insurance (from origins to the present)]. Moscow: Ansel-Press.
Siegelbaum, L., 2008. Cars for Comrades: The Life of the Soviet Automobile. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Smith, H., 1980. Book Review: Ráspunderea Civilá pentru Daunele Morale [Civil Responsibility for Moral Damages]. By Ioan Albu and Victor Ursa. [Cluj-Napoca: Editura Dacia. 1979]. International and Comparative Law Quarterly [online], 29(2–3), 535–536. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/29.2-3.535 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Solyom, L., 1981. Recent Tendencies in the Law of Tort in Hungary. Acta Juridica, 23, 201.
Sugarman, S.D., 2006. A Comparative Law Look at Pain and Suffering Awards. DePaul Law Review [online], 55(2), 399. Available from: http://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol55/iss2/7 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Szpunar, A., 1967. The Law of Tort in the Polish Civil Code. International & Comparative Law Quarterly [online], 16(1), 86–102. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/16.1.86 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
TASS, 2018. Sud’ja Verhovnogo suda schitaet, chto razmery kompensacij moral’nogo vreda dolzhny byt’ vyshe. TASS [online], 20 March. Available from: https://tass.ru/obschestvo/5050216 [Accessed 23 June 2020].
Tay, A.E.S., 1969. The Foundation of Tort Liability in a Socialist Legal System: Fault Versus Social Insurance in Soviet Law. The University of Toronto Law Journal [online], 19, 1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/824972 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Thompson, C., 1996. Insuring a Brighter Future: The Emerging System of Russian Insurance Law. Houston Journal of International Law, 19, 863.
Vidmar, N., Gross, F., and Rose, M., 1998. Jury awards for medical malpractice and post-verdict adjustments of those awards. DePaul Law Review [online], 48(2), 265. Available from: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol48/iss2/6 [Accessed 1 July 2020].
Viscusi, W.K., 2002. Punitive Damages: How Jurors Fail to Promote Efficiency. Harvard Journal on Legislation [online], 39, 139. Available from: https://law.vanderbilt.edu/files/archive/229_Punitive_Damages.pdf [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Wilcox, V., 2009. Punitive damages in England. In: E. Koziol and V. Wilcox, eds., Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives. Vienna: Springer, 7–53.
Wissler, R.L., Hart, A.J., and Saks, M.J., 1999. Decision-making about general damages: A comparison of jurors, judges, and lawyers. Michigan Law Review [online], 98(3), 751–826. Available from: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol98/iss3/3 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Zeits, A., 1927. Vozmeschenie moralnogo vreda po sovetskomu pravu [Compensation of moral damages according to Soviet law]. Ezhenedelnik sovetskoy yustitsii, 47, 1465–1466.
Zweigert, K., and Kötz, H., 1998. Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford University Press.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Timur Bocharov 2021
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
