Feminist Judgments
Comparative Socio-Legal Perspectives on Judicial Decision Making and Gender Justice
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0999Mots-clés :
Feminist judgments, feminist methodology, jurisprudence, judgingRésumé
This collection of essays is the product of the workshop Feminist Judgments: Comparative Socio-Legal Perspectives on Judicial Decision Making and Gender Justice held at the International Institute for the Sociology of Law (Oñati, Spain) in May, 2017. The papers explain and explore the multiple global projects that attempt to rewrite judicial opinions by incorporating feminist legal reasoning or methods. Each essay grows out of the authors’ experiences working with projects based in a particular socio-political, geographical, historical and jurisprudential context: Canada, England, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, Scotland, and a multi-jurisdictional international law project. Collectively, the essays bring new insights, methods and challenges to the study of the feminist project of equal justice across the boundaries of culture, race, nation and gender.
Téléchargements
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 991
Références
Douglas, H., et al., eds., 2014. Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474201292
Enright, M., McCandless, J., and O’Donoghue, A., eds., 2017. Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart.
Hunter, R., McGlynn, C., and Rackley, E., eds., 2010. Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart.
Majury, D., 2006. Introducing the Women’s Court of Canada. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], 18 (1), 1-26. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/230237 [Accessed 14 May 2018].
McDonald, E., et al., eds., 2017. Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509909766
Stanchi, K., Berger, L., and Crawford, B., eds., 2016. Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316411254
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Linda L. Berger, Bridget J. Crawford, Kathryn M. Stanchi 2018
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
