The Symbolic Efficiency and the Symbolization
: Perspectives to Think the Judiciary Ritualization
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0944Gako-hitzak:
Judiciary Ritualization, symbolization, symbolic efficiency, pragmaticLaburpena
The article treats the question of judiciary ritualization in relation to the concepts of symbolization and symbolic efficiency specific to the psychoanalytic field and anthropology. It is therefore a theoretical contribution that sustains that ritualization in the juridical field would benefit from thinking pragmatically and not semantically to grasp its effectiveness. Rather than interpreting the setting of juridical ritual or the signs of justice with a hermeneutic approach, the article proposes the interest of grasping what is done through signs and words, the act that is accomplished. This act would be in the foundation of the efficiency of judiciary ritualization. The argument suggests that in a juridical process it is possible to say things with sentences, but also it is possible to make sentences with words.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 621
Erreferentziak
Adam, J.M., 1990. Aspects du récit en anthropologie. Dans: J.M. Adam et al., Le discours anthropologique. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.
Aristote, La Rhétorique.
Augé, M., 1979. Symbole, Fonction, Histoire: les interrogations de l’anthropologie. Paris: Hachette.
Austin, J.L., 1962. Performatif-Constatif. Dans: La philosophie analytique. Cahiers de Royaumont, vol. 4, pp. 271-304. Paris: Minuit.
Austin, J.L., 1970. Quand dire c’est faire. Paris: Seuil.
Benveniste, E., 1996. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
Bettelheim, B., 1971. Les blessures symboliques. Trans. : C. Monod. Paris: Gallimard.
Bourdieu, P., 1982. Ce que parler veut dire. Paris: Fayard.
Brecht, B., 1997. La décision. Trad. Édouard Pfrimmer. Dans: Théâtre complet. Vol. 2. Paris: L’Arche.
Davidson, D., 1993a. Ce que signifient les métaphores. Dans: Enquêtes sur la vérité et l’interprétation Nîmes: Jacqueline Chambon.
Davidson, D., 1993b. Vérité et Signification. Dans: Enquêtes sur la vérité et l’interprétation. Nîmes: Jacqueline Chambon.
De Saussure, F., 1972. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
Dolto, F., 1984. L’image inconsciente du corps. Paris: Seuil.
Ducrot, O. et Todorov, T., 1972. Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage. Paris: Seuil.
Eco, U., 1988. Le signe. Bruxelles: Labor.
Florence, J., 1997. Symboliser ou l’homme à l’œuvre. Dans: Art et thérapie, liaison dangereuse? Bruxelles: Publications des Facultés Universitaires Saint Louis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pusl.25271
Forester, J., 1980. Le langage aux origines de la psychanalyse. Paris: Gallimard.
Freud, S., 1900/2003. L’interprétation du rêve. Dans: Œuvres Complètes. Psychanalyse. Vol. IV. Trad.: J. Altounian et al. Paris: P.U.F.
Garapon, A., 2001. Bien juger. Essai sur le rituel judiciaire. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Godelier, M., 2015. L’imaginé, l’imaginaire & le symbolique. Paris: CNRS.
Green, A., 1971. De la bisexualité au gynocentrisme. Dans: B. Bettelheim, ed., Les blessures symboliques. Trans. : C. Monod. Paris: Gallimard.
Jakobson, R., 1963. Essais de linguistique générale. Paris: Minuit.
Laplanche, J., 1980., Problématiques II. Castration – symbolisations. Paris: PUF.
Le Breton, D., 1991. Corps et Anthropologie: de l’efficacité symbolique. Diogène, 153, pp. 92-107.
Lenclud, G.,1991. Le monde selon Sahlins. Gradivia, 9, pp. 49-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/gradh.1991.1373
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1958. L’efficacité symbolique, dans: Anthropologie Structurale. Paris: Plon.
Pouillon, J., 1971. Une petite différence? Dans: B. Bettelheim, ed., Les blessures symboliques. Trans. : C. Monod. Paris: Gallimard.
Ricoeur, P., 1990. Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Seuil.
Ricoeur, P., 1997. La métaphore vivante. Paris: Seuil.
Rivano, J., 1986. Perspectivas sobre la metáfora. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
Searle, J., 1972. Les actes du langage. Paris: Hermann.
Todorov, T., 1977. Théories du symbole. Paris: Seuil.
van De Kerchove, M., 2005. Quand dire c’est punir. Essai sur le jugement pénal. Bruxelles: Publications des Facultés Universitaires Saint Louis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pusl.21531
Zizek, S., 2011. Gestes vides et performatifs: Lacan face au complot de la CIA, dans: Comment lire Lacan. Paris: Nous, pp. 13-29.
##submission.downloads##
Argitaratuta
##submission.howToCite##
Zenbakia
Atala
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
