El privilegio de acceder a contenidos culturales digitales: un estudio cualitativo sobre las experiencias de minorías étnicas y migrantes de la Unión Europea
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1401Gako-hitzak:
derechos culturales, opresión, migración, minorías étnicas, democratización de la cultura, acceso a la cultura digital, igualdadLaburpena
Las personas migrantes y pertenecientes a minorías étnicas dentro de la Unión Europea están sujetas a formas únicas de discriminación y las barreras que enfrentan en sus derechos civiles y sociales, provoca una restricción cada vez mayor del disfrute de la cultura. El acceso y derecho a la cultura en la era digital se agrieta entre grupos privilegiados y desventajados. Este artículo explora las barreas que impactan en estas dos comunidades sobre el acceso a los bienes culturales digitales. Esta búsqueda se ilustra a través de un estudio cualitativo en 12 jurisdicciones de la Unión Europea.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Metrics
Downloads:
13(5)_Serra_OSLS (English) 242
XML_13(5)_Serra_OSLS (English) 28
Erreferentziak
Accenture, 2014. Generation D: An emerging and important investor segment [en línea]. Disponible en: https://na.eventscloud.com/file_uploads/24a05c2fc4523b1e9698b921ab67cac8_Accenture-CM-AWAMS-POV.pdf
Arts Council England, 2016. Audience development and marketing, and Grants for the Arts [en línea]. Disponible en: https://www.artscouncil.org.uk
Bjørnsen, E., 2013. The limitations of audience development. Arts and Audiences [en línea], 27 de julio. Disponible en: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/18342149/the-limitations-of-audience-development-arts-and-audiences
Bollo, A., et al., 2017. Study on audience development: how to place audiences at the centre of cultural organisations: final report [en línea]. Comisión Europea, Dirección General de Educación, Juventud, Deporte y Cultura. Luxemburgo: Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea. Disponible en: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/711682
Collins, P.H., 2000. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Nueva York: Routledge.
Collins, P.H., 2019. Intersectionality as a critical social theory. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478007098
Comisión Europea, 2022. EU Code of Conduct against online hate speech [en línea]. Nota de prensa. 24 de noviembre. Bruselas: Comisión Europea. Disponible en: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_7109
Cuenca-Amigo, M., 2014. La democratización cultural como antecedente del desarrollo de audiencias culturales. Quaderns Animació i Educació Socia, nº 19.
Cuenca-Amigo, M., y Makua, A., 2017. Audience development: a cross-national comparison. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 30(2), 156–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-06-2015-0155
Da Milano, C., y Righolt, N., 2015. Mapping of practices in the EU Member States on promoting access to culture via digital means [en línea]. EENC Report. Bruselas. Disponible en: https://www.interarts.net/descargas/interarts2539.pdf
De Witte, B., 2010. European Minority Rights. En: M.C. Foblets, J.F. Gaudreault-Desbiens y A. Dundes Renteln, eds., Cultural Diversity and the Law – State Responses from Around the World. Bruselas: Bruylant, 717–735.
Dirección General de Educación, Juventud, Deporte y Cultura, 2017. How culture and the arts can promote intercultural dialogue in the context of the migratory and refugee crisis: report with case studies, by the working group of EU Member States [en línea]. Bruselas: Comisión Europea. Disponible en: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/468525
Dirección General de Justicia y Consumidores y Fredman, S., 2016. Intersectional discrimination in EU gender equality and non-discrimination law [en línea]. Bruselas: Comisión Europea. Disponible en: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2838/241520
Dutton, W.H., y Reisdorf, B.C., 2019. Cultural divides and digital inequalities: attitudes shaping Internet and social media divides. Information, Communication & Society, 22(1), 18–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1353640
Ferri, D., et al., 2021. Interim report on barriers experienced by vulnerable groups. Zenodo [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5067718
Ferri, D., et al., 2022. Report on barriers experienced by vulnerable groups. Zenodo [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6793172
Fredman, S., 2016. Substantive equality revisited. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14(3), 712–738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow043
Gorski, P., y Clark, C., 2001. Multicultural Education and the Digital Divide: Focus on Race. Multicultural Perspectives, 3(4), 15–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327892MCP0304_5
Hadley, S., 2017. European Commission final report: study on audience development – how to place audiences at the centre of cultural organisations. Cultural Trends, 26(3), 275–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2017.1345739
Hargittai, E., y Hsieh, Y.P., 2013. Digital Inequality. En: W.H. Dutton, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0007
Hilbert, M., 2011. The end justifies the definition: the manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policymaking. Telecommunications Policy, 35(8), 715–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.06.012
Kawashima, N., 2006. Audience Development and Social Inclusion in Britain. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 12(1), 55–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630600613309
Leavy, P., 2014. Introduction. En: P. Leavy, ed., The Oxford handbook of qualitative Research. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.033
Malloy, T.H., y Gazzola, M., 2006. The Aspect of Culture in the Social Inclusion of Ethnic Minorities: A report undertaken for the European Commission [en línea]. Diciembre. Flensburg: European Centre for Minority Issues. Disponible en: https://www.ecmi.de/fileadmin/redakteure/publications/pdf/Report_60_OMC_Evaluation.pdf
Mandel, B.R., 2019. Can Audience Development Promote Social Diversity in German Public Arts Institutions? The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 49(2), 121–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2018.1517064
Mangset, P., 2018. The end of cultural policy? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26(2), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2018.1500560
Matarasso, F., 2004. L’état, c’est nous: arte, sussidi e stato nei regimi democratici. Economia della Cultura, nº4, 491–498.
Patton, M.Q., 2015. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Londres: Sage.
Recommendation CM/Rec(2017)8 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States On Big Data For Culture, Literacy And Democracy. Appendix II to Recommendation. 27 de septiembre de 2017, Comité de Ministros del Consejo de Europa.
Roller, M.R., y Lavrakas, P.J., 2015. Applied Qualitative Research Design: A total quality Framework Approach. Nueva York: Guilford Press.
Serra, M.L., 2017. Mujeres con discapacidad: Sobre la discriminación y opresión interseccional. Madrid: Dykinson. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1zgwhjv
Steering Committee for Culture, Heritage and Landscape (CDCPP), 2022. Culture in times of Covid-19 or how we discovered we cannot live without culture and creativity: Impressions and lessons learnt from Covid-19. CDCPP Newsroom [en línea]. Disponible en: https://www.coe.int/en/web/cdcpp-committee/-/culture-in-times-of-covid-19-or-how-we-discovered-we-cannot-live-without-culture-and-creativity-impressions-and-lessons-learnt-from-covid-19
Symonides, J., 1998. Derechos culturales: una categoría descuidada de derechos humanos. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (RICS), nº 158.
van Dijk, J., 2020. The Digital Divide. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Young, I.M., 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press.
##submission.downloads##
Argitaratuta
##submission.howToCite##
Zenbakia
Atala
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
