Remembering Sally Engle Merry: Her scholarship and her legacy

Anne Griffiths

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1234

Egileak

Anne Griffiths Edinburgh Law School, University of Edinburgh

##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1234

Gako-hitzak:

Sally Engle Merry, Anthropology of Law, interdisciplinary collaboration, ethnography, human rights and gender violence, quantitative knowledge

Laburpena

This article reviews the scholarship and legacy of Sally Engle Merry who died on 8^th September, 2020. If focuses on a number of research fields and themes that are central to her work and collaborative engagement with other scholars, primarily across the disciplines of anthropology, law, sociology and socio-legal studies. These research domains include neighbourhood justice and mediation, law and colonialism, human rights and transnational governance, gender violence, the quantification of knowledge globally, and the relationship between law, society and power.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Metrics

Views 523
Downloads:
PDF_11_6_Griffiths_OSLS (English) 175
XML_11_6_Griffiths_OSLS (English) 412

##submission.authorBiography##

##submission.authorWithAffiliation##

Anne Griffiths, Professor Emeritus, Anthropology of Law, School of Law, Edinburgh University and also Research affiliate at the International Research Centre on Work and the Human Lifecycle in Global history, Humboldt University, Berlin.

Erreferentziak

Abel, R.L., 1973. A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869–896.

Abel, R.L., ed., 1982. The Politics of Informal Justice: The American Experience (Vol. 1). The Politics of Informal Justice: Comparative Studies (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.

Bernstorff, J. von, 2004. The Structural Limitation of Network Governance: ICAN as a case in point. In: C. Joerges, I.J. Sand and G. Teubner, eds., Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism, 257–281. Oxford: Hart.

Engle, K., 2001. From Skepticism to Embrace: Human Rights and the American Anthropological Association from 1947–1999. Human Rights Quarterly [online], 23(3), 536–559. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/13785 [Access 1 October 2021].

Merry, S.E., 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working Class Americans. University of Chicago Press.

Merry, S.E., 2000. Colonizing Hawai’i: The Cultural Power of Law. Princeton University Press.

Merry, S.E., 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. University of Chicago Press.

Merry, S.E., 2011. Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights and Global Governance. Current Anthropology [online], 52(S3), S85–S95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/657241 [Access 1 October 2021].

Merry, S.E., 2016. The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking. University of Chicago Press.

Merry, S.E., and Goodale, M., eds., 2007. The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local. Cambridge University Press.

Merry, S.E., and Milner, N., eds., 1993. The Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of Community Mediation in the United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Merry, S.E., Davis, K., and Kingsbury, B., eds., 2015. The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption and the Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press.

Merry, S.E., et al., eds. 2012. Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Classification and Rankings. Oxford University Press.

Merry, S.E., Rottenburg, R., et al., eds., 2015. The World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification. Cambridge University Press.

Morison, J., 2003. Modernising Government and the E-Government Revolution: Technologies of Government and Technologies of Democracy. In: N. Bamforth and P. Leyland, eds., Public Law in a Multilayered Constitution. Oxford: Hart, 157–188.

Nader, L., 1965. Choices in Legal Procedure: Shia Moslem and Mexican Zapotec. American Anthropologist [online], 67(2), 394–399. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1965.67.2.02a00060 [Access 1 October 2021].

Nader, L., and Todd, H.F. Jr., eds., 1978. The Disputing Process - Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia University Press.

Strathern, M., ed., 2000. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability. London: Routledge.