Remembering Sally Engle Merry: Her scholarship and her legacy

Anne Griffiths

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1234

Autores/as

Anne Griffiths Edinburgh Law School, University of Edinburgh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1234

Palabras clave:

Sally Engle Merry, antropología del derecho, colaboración interdisciplinar, etnografía, derechos humanos y violencia de género, conocimiento cuantitativo

Resumen

Este artículo revisa la contribución académica y el legado de Sally Engle Merry, que falleció el 8 de septiembre de 2020. Nos centramos en una serie de campos y temas de investigación que son centrales en su trabajo y en su colaboración comprometida con otros investigadores, sobre todo en las áreas de la antropología, el derecho, la sociedad y los estudios socio-jurídicos. Esos dominios investigativos incluyen la justicia y la mediación vecinales, el derecho y el colonialismo, los derechos humanos y la gobernanza trasnacional, la violencia de género, la cuantificación global del conocimiento y la relación entre derecho, sociedad y poder.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Metrics

Estadísticas globales

685 Visualizaciones	763 Descargas
1448 Total

Descargas por formato:

PDF_11_6_Griffiths_OSLS (English) 231 XML_11_6_Griffiths_OSLS (English) 532

Biografía del autor/a

Anne Griffiths, Edinburgh Law School, University of Edinburgh

Anne Griffiths, Professor Emeritus, Anthropology of Law, School of Law, Edinburgh University and also Research affiliate at the International Research Centre on Work and the Human Lifecycle in Global history, Humboldt University, Berlin.

Citas

Abel, R.L., 1973. A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869–896.

Abel, R.L., ed., 1982. The Politics of Informal Justice: The American Experience (Vol. 1). The Politics of Informal Justice: Comparative Studies (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.

Bernstorff, J. von, 2004. The Structural Limitation of Network Governance: ICAN as a case in point. In: C. Joerges, I.J. Sand and G. Teubner, eds., Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism, 257–281. Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472563002.ch-014

Engle, K., 2001. From Skepticism to Embrace: Human Rights and the American Anthropological Association from 1947–1999. Human Rights Quarterly [online], 23(3), 536–559. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/13785 [Access 1 October 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2001.0034

Merry, S.E., 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working Class Americans. University of Chicago Press.

Merry, S.E., 2000. Colonizing Hawai’i: The Cultural Power of Law. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691221984

Merry, S.E., 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226520759.001.0001

Merry, S.E., 2011. Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights and Global Governance. Current Anthropology [online], 52(S3), S85–S95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/657241 [Access 1 October 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/657241

Merry, S.E., 2016. The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226261317.001.0001

Merry, S.E., and Goodale, M., eds., 2007. The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local. Cambridge University Press.

Merry, S.E., and Milner, N., eds., 1993. The Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of Community Mediation in the United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.13313

Merry, S.E., Davis, K., and Kingsbury, B., eds., 2015. The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption and the Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139871532

Merry, S.E., et al., eds. 2012. Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Classification and Rankings. Oxford University Press.

Merry, S.E., Rottenburg, R., et al., eds., 2015. The World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316091265

Morison, J., 2003. Modernising Government and the E-Government Revolution: Technologies of Government and Technologies of Democracy. In: N. Bamforth and P. Leyland, eds., Public Law in a Multilayered Constitution. Oxford: Hart, 157–188.

Nader, L., 1965. Choices in Legal Procedure: Shia Moslem and Mexican Zapotec. American Anthropologist [online], 67(2), 394–399. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1965.67.2.02a00060 [Access 1 October 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1965.67.2.02a00060

Nader, L., and Todd, H.F. Jr., eds., 1978. The Disputing Process - Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/nade93322

Strathern, M., ed., 2000. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability. London: Routledge.