Acceso a la justicia: Una revisión conceptual de sus componentes
(Access to justice: A conceptual review of its components)
Gako-hitzak:
Acceso a la justicia, necesidades jurídicas, cursos de acción, problemas justiciables, Access to justice, legal needs, courses of action, legal problemsLaburpena
Estudios sobre acceso a la justicia utilizan categorías conceptuales como problemas justiciables, necesidades jurídicas y cursos de acción. Este estudio analiza los estándares actuales de estudios empíricos de acceso a la justicia y ofrece una perspectiva dinámica, centrada de la autonomía de las personas y comprehensiva de estos conceptos. Propone que los problemas justiciables deben entenderse de manera dinámica e introduce los conceptos de problemas coligados, clústeres de problemas, supraproblemas y problemas secundarios. También distingue entre los componentes de conocimiento, voluntad y recursos económicos en la configuración de necesidades jurídicas instrumentales, sistémicas y sustantivas. Finalmente, ofrece una definición dinámica de las trayectorias de acceso a la justicia en contraposición a la idea de etapas exclusivas e independientes. El entendimiento dinámico, centrado en la autonomía y comprehensivo del acceso a la justicia fortalecen el análisis del acceso a la justicia en acción.
Studies on access to justice use conceptual categories such as judiciable problems, legal needs, and courses of action. This study analyzes current standards in empirical studies on Access to justice and offers a dynamic, centered in people’s autonomy and comprehensive perspective of these concepts. It proposes that judiciable problems should be understood in a dynamic way and introduces the concepts of linked problems, clusters of problems, superproblems and secondary problems. It also distinguishes between the components of knowledge, will and economic resources in the configuration of instrumental, systemic and substantive legal needs. Finally, it offers a dynamic definition of the trajectories of access to justice in contrast to the idea of exclusive and independent stages. The dynamic, autonomic and comprehensive understanding of access to justice strengthens the analysis of access to justice in action.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1220
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Downloads:
PDF_12_2_Carvacho_et_al_OSLS (English) 700
XML_12_2_Carvacho_et_al_OSLS (English) 730
##submission.downloads##
Argitaratuta
##submission.howToCite##
Zenbakia
Atala
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
