Conceptualising strategic litigation

Kris van der Pas

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1226

Egileak

Kris van der Pas Radboud University

##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1226

Gako-hitzak:

Strategic litigation, conceptualisation, definition, legal mobilisation, database research

Laburpena

This article conceptualises the term “strategic litigation” in order to provide for a definition of it. Strategic litigation is a tool increasingly used in Europe by individuals and organisations to attain different objectives. Next to that, there is increasing academic attention for the topic. Nevertheless, the exact definition of “strategic litigation” remains unclear. Therefore, this article uses the research method of conceptualisation as well as a database research and additional literature to provide for a definition. It looks firstly at the background concept, involving the range of meanings associated with the term “strategic litigation”, after which a systematised concept is formed. Thereby, use is made of the “necessary and sufficient conditions” (NSC) approach, to develop the conditions necessary and/or sufficient for a case to fit within the category of strategic litigation. Moreover, the external conceptual relations of the term are explored.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Metrics

Views 1692
Downloads:
PDF_11_6S_Van_der_Pas_OSLS (English) 1356
XML_11_6S_Van_der_Pas_OSLS (English) 682

##submission.authorBiography##

##submission.authorWithAffiliation##

PhD Candidate Radboud University, affiliated with the Centre for Migration law, the department of international and European law, and the Institute for Management Research. Postal address: Grotiusgebouw, Radboud University, Montessorilaan 10, 6525 HR Nijmegen. Email address: k.vanderpas@jur.ru.nl

Erreferentziak

Adcock, A., and Collier, D., 2001. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546.

Baumgärtel, M., 2019. Demanding Rights: Europe’s Supranational Courts and the Dilemma of Migrant Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press.

Burstein, P., 1991. Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity. American Journal of Sociology, 96(5), 1201–1225.

Chen, A., and Cummings, S., 2013. Public Interest Lawyering: A Contemporary Perspective. New York: Aspen.

Cummings, S., 2012. The Pursuit of Legal Rights – And Beyond. UCLA Law Review [online], 59, 506–549. Available from: https://www.uclalawreview.org/pdf/59-3-2.pdf [Access 22 July 2021].

Cummings, S., and Trubek, L., 2008. Globalizing Public Interest Law. UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs [online], 13, 1–53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1338304 [Access 22 July 2021].

de Wit, B., 2017. Strategy: An International Perspective. 6th ed. Andover: Cengage Learning EMEA.

Deva, S., 2009. Public interest litigation in India: a critical review. Civil Justice Quarterly [online], 28(1), 19–40. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1424236 [Access 22 July 2021].

Duffy, H., 2018. Strategic Human Rights Litigation. Oxford: Hart.

Fuchs, G., 2013. Strategic Litigation for Gender Equality in the Workplace and Legal Opportunity Structures in Four European Countries. Canadian Journal of Law and Society [online], 28(2), 189–208. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2013.21 [Access 22 July 2021].

Goertz, G., 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton University Press.

Lehoucq, E., and Taylor, W.K., 2020. Conceptualizing Legal Mobilization: How Should We Understand the Deployment of Legal Strategies? Law & Social Inquiry [online], 45(1), 166. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2019.59 [Access 22 July 2021].

Lemley, M., and Weiser, P., 2007. Should Property or Liability Rules Govern Information? Texas Law Review [online], 85(4). Available from: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1346&context=articles [Access 22 July 2021].

McCann, M., ed., 2006. Law and Social Movements. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Mintzberg, H., 1987. The Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy. California Management Review, 30(1), 11–24.

O’Neill, A., 2015. Strategic litigation before the European Courts. ERA Forum, 16(4), 495–508.

Prakken d’Oliveira, 2019a. Court of Appeal: The Dutch State is not obliged to actively help repatriate Dutch children and mothers from Syria. Prakken d’Oliveira [online], 6 December. Available from: https://www.prakkendoliveira.nl/en/news/2019/court-of-appeal-the-dutch-state-is-not-obliged-to-actively-help-repatriate-dutch-children-and-mothers-from-syria [Access 24 August 2021].

Prakken d’Oliveira, 2019b. Sea-Watch also wins appeal against the Dutch State. Prakken d’Oliveira [online], 1 August. Available from: https://www.prakkendoliveira.nl/en/news/2019/sea-watch-also-wins-appeal-against-the-dutch-state [Access 24 August 2021].

Pring, G., 1989. SLAPPs: Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation. Pace Environmental Law Review [online], 7(1). Available from: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr/vol7/iss1/11 [Access 22 July 2021].

Ramsden, M., and Gledhill, K., 2019. Defining Strategic Litigation. Civil Justice Quarterly, 4, 407-426.

Scheingold, S., and Sarat, A., 2004. Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

Shepard, L.A., 1993. Evaluating Test Validity. In: L. Darling-Hammon, ed., Review of Research in Education. Washington, DC: AERA, 405–450.

Southworth, A., 2005. Conservative Lawyers and the Contest over the Meaning of Public Interest Law. UCLA Law Review [online], 52(4), 1223–1278. Available from: https://www.uclalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/30_52UCLALRev12232004-2005.pdf [Access 22 July 2021].

Zemans, F., 1983. Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System. The American Political Science Review, 77(3), 690–703.