Conceptualising strategic litigation

Kris van der Pas

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1226

Autores/as

Kris van der Pas Radboud University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1226

Palabras clave:

litigio estratégico, conceptualización, definición, movilización jurídica, investigación de bases de datos

Resumen

Este artículo conceptualiza el término “litigio estratégico” para proporcionar una definición. El litigio estratégico es un instrumento cada vez más usado en Europa por parte de personas y organizaciones para conseguir diversos objetivos, y hay un interés académico creciente por el tema. Sin embargo, la definición exacta de “litigio estratégico” sigue siendo poco clara. Por tanto, el artículo emplea el método de investigación de la conceptualización junto con una investigación de bases de datos y literatura adicional, y propone una definición. En primer lugar, se fija en el concepto de fondo, que incluye el abanico de significados relacionados con el término “litigio estratégico”; a continuación, se forma un concepto sistemático. De este modo, se parte del enfoque de “condiciones necesarias y suficientes” (CNS) para desarrollar las condiciones necesarias y/o suficientes para que un caso encaje en la categoría de litigio estratégico. Por añadidura, se examinan las relaciones conceptuales externas del término.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Metrics

Views 2420
Downloads:
PDF_11_6S_Van_der_Pas_OSLS (English) 1801
XML_11_6S_Van_der_Pas_OSLS (English) 782

Biografía del autor/a

Kris van der Pas, Radboud University

PhD Candidate Radboud University, affiliated with the Centre for Migration law, the department of international and European law, and the Institute for Management Research. Postal address: Grotiusgebouw, Radboud University, Montessorilaan 10, 6525 HR Nijmegen. Email address: k.vanderpas@jur.ru.nl

Citas

Adcock, A., and Collier, D., 2001. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546.

Baumgärtel, M., 2019. Demanding Rights: Europe’s Supranational Courts and the Dilemma of Migrant Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press.

Burstein, P., 1991. Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity. American Journal of Sociology, 96(5), 1201–1225.

Chen, A., and Cummings, S., 2013. Public Interest Lawyering: A Contemporary Perspective. New York: Aspen.

Cummings, S., 2012. The Pursuit of Legal Rights – And Beyond. UCLA Law Review [online], 59, 506–549. Available from: https://www.uclalawreview.org/pdf/59-3-2.pdf [Access 22 July 2021].

Cummings, S., and Trubek, L., 2008. Globalizing Public Interest Law. UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs [online], 13, 1–53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1338304 [Access 22 July 2021].

de Wit, B., 2017. Strategy: An International Perspective. 6th ed. Andover: Cengage Learning EMEA.

Deva, S., 2009. Public interest litigation in India: a critical review. Civil Justice Quarterly [online], 28(1), 19–40. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1424236 [Access 22 July 2021].

Duffy, H., 2018. Strategic Human Rights Litigation. Oxford: Hart.

Fuchs, G., 2013. Strategic Litigation for Gender Equality in the Workplace and Legal Opportunity Structures in Four European Countries. Canadian Journal of Law and Society [online], 28(2), 189–208. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2013.21 [Access 22 July 2021].

Goertz, G., 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton University Press.

Lehoucq, E., and Taylor, W.K., 2020. Conceptualizing Legal Mobilization: How Should We Understand the Deployment of Legal Strategies? Law & Social Inquiry [online], 45(1), 166. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2019.59 [Access 22 July 2021].

Lemley, M., and Weiser, P., 2007. Should Property or Liability Rules Govern Information? Texas Law Review [online], 85(4). Available from: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1346&context=articles [Access 22 July 2021].

McCann, M., ed., 2006. Law and Social Movements. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Mintzberg, H., 1987. The Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy. California Management Review, 30(1), 11–24.

O’Neill, A., 2015. Strategic litigation before the European Courts. ERA Forum, 16(4), 495–508.

Prakken d’Oliveira, 2019a. Court of Appeal: The Dutch State is not obliged to actively help repatriate Dutch children and mothers from Syria. Prakken d’Oliveira [online], 6 December. Available from: https://www.prakkendoliveira.nl/en/news/2019/court-of-appeal-the-dutch-state-is-not-obliged-to-actively-help-repatriate-dutch-children-and-mothers-from-syria [Access 24 August 2021].

Prakken d’Oliveira, 2019b. Sea-Watch also wins appeal against the Dutch State. Prakken d’Oliveira [online], 1 August. Available from: https://www.prakkendoliveira.nl/en/news/2019/sea-watch-also-wins-appeal-against-the-dutch-state [Access 24 August 2021].

Pring, G., 1989. SLAPPs: Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation. Pace Environmental Law Review [online], 7(1). Available from: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr/vol7/iss1/11 [Access 22 July 2021].

Ramsden, M., and Gledhill, K., 2019. Defining Strategic Litigation. Civil Justice Quarterly, 4, 407-426.

Scheingold, S., and Sarat, A., 2004. Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

Shepard, L.A., 1993. Evaluating Test Validity. In: L. Darling-Hammon, ed., Review of Research in Education. Washington, DC: AERA, 405–450.

Southworth, A., 2005. Conservative Lawyers and the Contest over the Meaning of Public Interest Law. UCLA Law Review [online], 52(4), 1223–1278. Available from: https://www.uclalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/30_52UCLALRev12232004-2005.pdf [Access 22 July 2021].

Zemans, F., 1983. Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System. The American Political Science Review, 77(3), 690–703.