Gender and judging in Tunisia and the intersections of penalty and privilege
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1204Gako-hitzak:
Tunisia, female judges, intersectionality theoryLaburpena
The international community encourages countries to increase the number of women in the judiciary. This is partly based on the hypothesis that female judges make the bench representative of society. However, the question arises as to which women we are referring to. While the experiences of women are different from men because of their sex, experiences of lower-class women are also different from those from the middle and upper classes, as experiences of women belonging to a minority are different from those belonging to the majority. Using the intersectionality grid of “penalty and privilege” proposed by Patricia Hill Collins (2000), this article aims to look beyond the gender-binary in the study of judges in Muslim contexts by bringing in an intersectional approach, using Tunisia as a case study. Focusing on two female judges functioning under the Tunisian authoritarian regime, this study hopes to show how different women bring different experiences to the bench.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Metrics
Downloads:
13(3)_Voorhoeve_OSLS (English) 211
XML_13(3)_Voorhoeve_OSLS (English) 58
Erreferentziak
Ammar, M., 2010. Femmes, droit de la famille, et système judiciaire dans les États du Maghreb: le statut et le rôle des femmes dans l’ordre judiciaire en Tunisie. In: S.S. Zoy, ed., Femmes, droit de la famille et système judiciaire en Algérie, au Maroc et en Tunisie. Rabat: UNESCO, pp. 113–202.
Ben Achour, S., 2007. La féminisation de la magistrature en Tunisie entre émancipation féminine et autoritarisme politique. L’Année du Maghreb [online], 3, pp. 55–74. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.353 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.353
Ben Achour, S., 2003. Tunisie. Journal de droit international, 4, p. 1207.
Bogoch, B., 2003. Lawyers in the Courtroom: gender, trials and professional performance in Israel. In: U. Schultz and G. Shaw, eds., Women in the World's Legal Professions. Oxford: Hart, pp. 247–267.
Boigeol, A., 2003. Male Strategies in the Face of the Feminisation of a Profession: The Case of the French Judiciary. In: U. Schultz and G. Shaw, eds., Women in the World's Legal Professions. Oxford: Hart, pp. 401–418.
Botiveau, B., 1993. Loi islamique et droit dans les sociétés arabes. Paris: Karthala. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.iremam.430
Cardinal, M., 2008. Women and the judiciary in Syria: appointment process, training and career paths. International Journal of the Legal Profession [online], 15(1–2), pp. 123–139. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950802439718 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950802439718
Collins, P.H., 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Crenshaw, K., 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum [online], nº 1, pp. 139–167. Available from: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf [Accessed 30 March 2021].
Desrues, T., and Hernando de Larramendi, M., 2009. S’opposer au Maghreb. L’Année du Maghreb [online], 5, pp. 7–36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.483 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.483
Geisser, V., and Gobe, E., 2007. La question de « l’authenticité tunisienne » : valeur refuge d’un régime à bout de souffle ? L’Année du Maghreb [online], 3, pp. 371–408. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.387 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.387
Ghamroun, S., 2016. A qui s’adressent les juges ? Les magistrats tunisiens et égyptiens face aux aléas de la représentation professionnelle. In: E. Gobe, ed., Des justices en transition dans le monde arabe ? Contributions à une réflexion sur les rapports entre justice et politique [online]. Rabat: Centre Jacques Berque, pp. 169–188. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.cjb.770 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.cjb.770
Gherib, B., 2011. Les classes moyennes tunisiennes entre mythe et réalité. Éléments pour une mise en perspective historique. L’Année du Maghreb [online], 7, pp. 419–435. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.1296 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.1296
Gobe, E., 2011. Les avocats tunisiens dans la Tunisie de Ben Ali: économie politique d’une profession juridique. Droit et société [online], 3(79), pp. 733–757. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3917/drs.079.0733 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/drs.079.0733
Gobe, E., 2015. Penser les relations avocats-magistrats dans la Tunisie indépendante : conflictualité professionnelle et dynamique politique. Politique africaine [online], 2(138), pp. 115–134. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3917/polaf.138.0115 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/polaf.138.0115
Gobe, E., and Béchir Ayari, M., 2007. Les avocats dans la Tunisie de Ben Ali: une profession politisée? L’Année du Maghreb [online], 3, pp. 105–132. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.359 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.359
Hasso, F.S., 2005. Problems and promise in Middle East and North Africa gender research. Feminist Studies [online], 31(3), pp. 653–678. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/20459056 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20459056
Hélin, E., 1995. Les femmes magistrats en Tunisie. Implantation professionnelle et intégration sociale. Droit et Cultures, 30, pp. 91–105.
Hélin, E., 1997. La magistrature: de la marginalisation à la restructuration. Maghreb Machrek, 157, pp. 40–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/machr1.157.0040
Hibou, B., 2005. Economie politique de la répression : le cas de la Tunisie. Raisons politiques [online], 4(20), pp. 9–36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.020.0009 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.020.0009
Hibou, B., 2006. La force de l’obéissance. Paris: La Découverte. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.hibou.2006.01
hooks, b., 1984. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.
Hunter, R., 2008. Can feminist judges make a difference? International Journal of the Legal Profession [online], 15(1–2), pp. 7–36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950802439759 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950802439759
ILOSTAT, 2017. Country Profiles [online]. Geneva: International Labour Organization. Available from: https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/country-profiles/ [Accessed 21 January 2021].
International Development Law Organization (IDLO), 2017. Tunisia workshop promotes pathways for women justice professionals [online]. Press release. 18 December. Available from: https://www.idlo.int/news/highlights/tunisia-workshop-promotes-pathways-women-justice-professionals [Accessed 29 May 2019].
International Development Law Organization (IDLO), 2019. Women’s professional participation in Tunisia’s justice sector: Pathways and opportunities [online]. 30 October. Available from: https://www.idlo.int/publications/womens-professional-participation-tunisias-justice-sector-pathways-and-opportunities [Accessed 30 March 2021].
Junqueira, E.B, 2003. Women in the Judiciary: A Perspective from Brazil. In: U. Schultz and G. Shaw, eds., Women in the World's Legal Professions. Oxford: Hart, pp. 437–450.
Kenney, S.J., 2008. Thinking about gender and judging. International Journal of the Legal Profession [online], 15(1–2), pp. 87–110. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950802461837 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950802461837
Klibi, S., 2016. A new Constitution and more women judges. In: G. Bauer and J. Dawuni, eds., Gender and the Judiciary in Africa: From Obscurity to Parity? New York: Routlegde, pp. 80–92.
Lagarde, C., 2019. A global imperative. Empowering women is critical for the world’s economy and people. Finance & Development [online], 56(1), pp. 4–5. Available from: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2019/03/empowering-women-critical-for-global-economy-lagarde.htm [Accessed 30 March 2021].
Levin, A., and Alkoby, A., 2018. Shouldn’t the bench be a mirror? The diversity of the Canadian judiciary. International Journal of the Legal Profession [online], 26/1, pp. 69–88. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2018.1489818 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2018.1489818
Maher, V., 1974. Divorce and property in the Middle Atlas of Morocco, Man 9/1, pp. 103-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2800039
Moghadam, V., 2017. Foreword: making the case for women judges in the Muslim world. In: M. Lindbekk and N. Sonneveld, eds., Women Judges in the Muslim World: A Comparative Study of Discourse and Practice [online]. Leiden: Brill, pp. xi–xviii. Available from: https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/37794/9789004342200_webready_content_text.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Accessed 30 March 2021].
Moors, A., 2008. Registering a token dower: the multiple meanings of a legal practice. In: B. Dupret, B. Drieskens and A. Moors, eds., Narratives of Truth in Islamic Law. London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 85-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755609635.ch-004
OECD, 2017. Key charts on governance [online]. Data sets. Paris: OECD. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/gender/data/governance/ [Accessed 19 June 2019].
OECD, 2018. Women in the Judiciary: Working towards a legal system reflective of society [online]. Paris: OECD. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/gender/data/women-in-the-judiciary-working-towards-a-legal-system-reflective-of-society.htm [Accessed 29 May 2019].
Peirce, L., 1997. Seniority, sexuality and social order: the vocabulary of gender in early modern Ottoman society. In: M.C. Zilfi, ed., Women in the Ottoman Empire. Middle Eastern Women in the Early Modern Era. Leiden: Brill, pp. 173-196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004661080_014
Peresie, J., 2005. Female judges matter: gender and collegial decisionmaking in the Federal Appellate Courts. The Yale Law Journal [online], 114, pp. 1758–1790. Available from: https://www.yalelawjournal.org/note/female-judges-matter-gender-and-collegial-decisionmaking-in-the-federal-appellate-courts [Accessed 30 March 2021].
Schäfer, H.W., et al., 2016. Towards a praxeology of religious life: tools of observation. In: F. Wijsen and K. von Stuckrad, eds., Making Religion: Theory and Practice in the Discursive Study of Religion. Leiden: Brill, pp. 173–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004309180_010
Schultz, U., 2003. Introduction: Women in the world’s legal professions. Overview and synthesis. In: U. Schultz and G. Shaw, eds., Women in the World's Legal Professions. Oxford: Hart, pp. xxv–lxii.
Schultz, U., 2017. Do female judges judge differently? Empirical realities of a theoretical debate. In: M. Lindbekk and N. Sonneveld, eds., Women Judges in the Muslim World: A Comparative Study of Discourse and Practice [online]. Leiden: Brill, pp. 23–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004342200_003 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004342200_003
Schultz, U., and Shaw, G., eds., 2003a. International Journal of the Legal Profession [online], 10(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950410001691988 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950410001691988
Schultz, U., and Shaw, G., eds., 2003b. Women in the World’s Legal Professions. Oxford: Hart.
Schultz, U., and Shaw, G., eds., 2008. International Journal of the Legal Profession [online], 15(1–2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950802536166 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950802536166
Silius, H., 2003. Making sense of gender in the study of legal professions. International Journal of the Legal Profession [online], 10/2, pp. 135–148. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950410001691663 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950410001691663
UNICEF, 2011a. Iraq. MENA Gender Equality Profile [online]. October, p. 3. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/gender/files/Iraq-Gender-Eqaulity-Profile-2011.pdf [Accessed 30 March 2021].
UNICEF, 2011b. Regional Overview for the Middle East and North Africa, MENA Gender Equality Profile, Status of Girls and Women in the Middle East and North Africa [online]. October, p. 4. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/gender/files/REGIONAL-Gender-Eqaulity-Profile-2011.pdf [Accessed 30 March 2021].
UNICEF, 2011c. Yemen. MENA Gender Equality Profile. October, p. 3. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/gender/files/Yemen-Gender-Eqaulity-Profile-2011.pdf [Accessed 30 March 2021].
Voorhoeve, M., 2014. Gender and Divorce Law in North Africa: Sharia, custom and the Personal Status Law in Tunisia. London: I.B. Tauris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755608249
Voorhoeve, M., 2017. Female judges in Tunisia and the “emancipative potential of Tunisian family law”. In: N. Sonneveld and M. Lindbekk, eds., Women Judges in the Muslim World: A Comparative Study of Discourse and Practice [online]. Leiden: Brill, pp. 178–204. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004342200_008 [Accessed 30 March 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004342200_008
Würth, A., 1995. A Sana’a court: the family and the ability to negotiate. Islamic Law and Society [online], 2/3, pp. 320-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1568519952599277
##submission.downloads##
Argitaratuta
##submission.howToCite##
Zenbakia
Atala
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
