A Sociological Perspective on Emotion Work and Judging
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1032Gako-hitzak:
Emotions, emotion work, courts, judges, judgingLaburpena
Judicial work requires judicial officers to manage their own emotions and related conduct, as well as to anticipate, interpret, respond to and manage emotions and behaviours of others, most visibly in the interaction order of the courtroom. A detailed, sociological analysis of judicial interview data reveals the ways judicial officers themselves understand, manage and use emotion in their everyday work. Judicial emotion work is more than a purely individual or personal enterprise. It operates in accordance with explicit and implicit feeling and display rules, cultural scripts and legal norms that shape the relation between emotion and judging. The ways judicial officers articulate their understanding of emotion in their everyday work reveals their reproduction and potential transformation of the boundaries between emotion and their status as judge. These findings reposition emotion work as central to judicial performance and enable emotion itself to be recognised as a positive judicial resource.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 791
Erreferentziak
Abbott, A., 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001
American Bar Association, 2011. ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct [online]. Available from: http://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_code_of_judicial_conduct.html [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Bandes, S.A., 2009. Empathetic judging and the rule of law. Cardozo Law Review De Novo [online], 133-148. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1431230 [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Bandes, S.A., and Blumenthal, J.A., 2012. Emotion and the law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science [online], 8, 161-181. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173825 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173825
Bandes, S.A., ed., 2001. The Passions of Law. New York / London: New York University Press.
Barbalet, J., 2011. Emotions beyond regulation: Backgrounded emotions in science and trust. Emotion Review [online], 3(1), 36-43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910380968 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910380968
Barrett, L.F., 2006a. Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science [online], 1(1), 28-58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.x [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.x
Barrett, L.F., 2006b. Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review [online], 10(1), 20-46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_2 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_2
Becker, W., et al., 2017. Crying is in the eyes of the beholder: an attribution theory framework of crying at work. Emotion Review [online], 10(1), 125-137. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917706766 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917706766
Bolton, S.C., and Boyd, C., 2003. Trolley dolly or skilled emotion manager? Moving on from Hochschild’s Managed Heart. Work, Employment & Society [online], 17(2), 289-308. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017003017002004 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017003017002004
Burkitt, I., 2012. Emotional reflexivity: feeling, emotion and imagination in reflexive dialogues. Sociology [online], 48(3), 458-472. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511422587 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511422587
Burkitt, I., 2014. Emotions and Social Relations. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473915060
Burkitt, I., 2018. Decentring emotion regulation: From emotion regulation to relational emotion. Emotion Review [online], 10(2), 167-173. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917712441 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917712441
Clay-Warner, J., and Robinson, D.T., 2015. Infrared thermography as a measure of emotion response. Emotion Review [online], 7(2), 157-162. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914554783 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914554783
Cottingham, M.D., 2016. Theorizing emotional capital. Theory and Society [online], 45(5), 451-470. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-016-9278-7 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-016-9278-7
Craciun, M., 2018. Emotions and knowledge in expert work: A comparison of two psychotherapies. American Journal of Sociology [online], 123(4), 959-1003. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/695682 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/695682
Davies, M., 2017. Asking the Law Question. 4th ed. Sydney: Lawbook.
Dixon, T., 2012. The tears of Mr Justice Willes. Journal of Victorian Culture [online], 17(1), 1-23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13555502.2011.611696 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13555502.2011.611696
Douglas, M., 1970. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Penguin.
Ekman, P., and Cordaro, D., 2011. What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emotion Review [online], 3(4), 364-370. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911410740 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911410740
Flam, H., and Kleres, J., 2015. Methods of Exploring Emotions. Abingdon / New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315756530
Flower, L., 2018. Doing loyalty: Defense lawyers’ subtle dramas in the courtroom. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography [online], 47(2), 226-254. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241616646826 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241616646826
Gendron, M., and Barrett, L.F., 2019. A Role for Emotional Granularity in Judging. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 9(5-this issue). Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1087 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1087
Geyh, C.G., 2013. The dimensions of judicial impartiality. Florida Law Review [online], 65(2), 493-551. Available from: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1138&context=flr [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Godbold, N., 2015. Researching emotions in interactions: Seeing and Analysing Live Processes. Emotion Review [online], 7(2), 163-168. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914554779 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914554779
Goffman, E., 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
Goffman, E., 1981. Forms of Talk. University of Philadelphia Press.
Goffman, E., 1983. The interaction order. American Sociological Review [online], 48(1), 1-17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141
Goodrum, S., 2013. Bridging the gap between prosecutors’ cases and victims’ biographies in the criminal justice system through shared emotions. Law & Social Inquiry [online], 38(2), 257-287. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12020 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12020
Gorman, E., and Sandefur, R.L., 2011. “Golden Age”, quiescence, and revival: How the sociology of professions became the study of knowledge-based work. Work and Occupations [online], 38(3), 275-302. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888411417565 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888411417565
Gross, J.J., 2015. Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry [online], 26(1), 1-26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781
Harris, L.C., 2002. The emotional labour of barristers: An exploration of emotional labour by status professionals. Journal of Management Studies [online], 39(4), 553-584. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00303 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00303
Hochschild, A.R., 1979. Emotion work, feeling rules and social structure. American Journal of Sociology [online], 85(3), 551-575. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/227049 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/227049
Hochschild, A.R., 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Holmes, M., 2010. The emotionalization of reflexivity. Sociology [online], 44(1), 139-154. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509351616 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509351616
Holmes, M., 2015. Researching emotional reflexivity. Emotion Review [online], 9(1), 61-66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914544478 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914544478
Judicial Group on Strengthening Judicial Integrity, 2002. The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct [online]. The Hague, November 25-26. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/corruption/judicial_group/Bangalore_principles.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Kadowaki, J., 2015. Maintaining professionalism: Emotional labor among lawyers as client advisors. International Journal of the Legal Profession [online], 22(3), 323-345. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2015.1071257 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2015.1071257
Karstedt, S., 2016. The emotion dynamics of transitional justice: An emotion sharing perspective. Emotion Review [online], 8(1), 50-55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915601214 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915601214
Lamont, M., and Molnár, V., 2002. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology [online], 28, 167-195. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
Lamont, M., and Swidler, A., 2014. Methodological pluralism and the possibilities and limits of interviewing. Qualitative Sociology [online], 37(3), 153-171. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014-9274-z [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014-9274-z
Leys, R., 2011. The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry [online], 37(3), 343-472. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/659353 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/659353
Lief, H.I., and Fox, R.C., 1963. Training for “detached concern” in medical students. In: H.I. Lief and N.R. Lief, eds., The Psychological Basis of Medical Practice. New York: Harper & Row, 12-35.
Lively, K.J., 2000. Reciprocal emotion management: Working together to maintain stratification in private law firms. Work and Occupations [online], 27(1), 32-63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888400027001003 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888400027001003
Lively, K.J., 2002. Client contact and emotional labor: Upsetting the balance and evening the field. Work and Occupations [online], 29(2), 198-225. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888402029002004 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888402029002004
Lively, K.J., 2008. Status and emotional expression: The influence of “others” in hierarchical work settings. In: J. Clay-Warner and D.T. Robinson, eds., Social Structure and Emotion. New York: Elsevier / Academic Press, 287-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374095-3.00016-1
Lively, K.J., and Heise, D.R., 2014. Emotions in affect control theory. In: J.E. Stets and J.H. Turner, eds., Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions (vol. II). Dordrecht: Springer, 51-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9130-4_4
Lively, K.J., and Weed, E.A., 2014. Emotion management: Sociological insight into what, how, why, and to what end? Emotion Review [online], 6(3), 202-207. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914522864 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914522864
Maroney, T.A., 2011a. Emotional regulation and judicial behavior. California Law Review [online], 99(6), 1485-1555. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1785616 [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Maroney, T.A., 2011b. The persistent cultural script of judicial dispassion. California Law Review [online], 99(2), 629-82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38K98M [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Maroney, T.A., 2012. Angry judges. Vanderbilt Law Review [online], 65(5), 1207-1284. Available from: https://www.vanderbiltlawreview.org/2012/10/angry-judges/ [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Maroney, T.A., and Gross, J.J., 2014. The ideal of the dispassionate judge: An emotion regulation perspective. Emotion Review [online], 6(2), 142-151. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913491989 [Accessed 5 September 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913491989
Moran, L.J., and Skeggs, B., 2004. Sexuality and the Politics of Violence and Safety. London / New York: Routledge.
Morris, S., 2015. Becky Watts murder trial judge cries as he passes sentence. The Guardian [online], 13 November. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/nov/13/becky-watts-trial-judge-cries-nathan-matthews-shauna-hoare [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Mulcahy, L., 2010. Legal Architecture: Justice, Due Process and the Place of Law. New York: Routledge.
Olson, R., et al., 2015. Introduction: Methodological Innovations in the Sociology of Emotions Part Two – Methods. Emotion Review [online], 7(2), 143-144. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914555276 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914555276
Parsons, T., 1951. The Social System. New York: Free Press.
Parsons, T., 1954. Essays in Sociological Theory. New York: Free Press.
Patulny, R., 2015. Exposing the “Wellbeing gap” between American Men and Women: Revelations from the sociology of emotion surveys. Emotion Review [online], 7(2), 169-174. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914554785 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914554785
Presser, L., 2004. Violent offenders, moral selves: Constructing identities and accounts in the research interview. Social Problems [online], 51(1), 82-101. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2004.51.1.82 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2004.51.1.82
Reddy, W.M., 2009. Historical research on the self and emotions. Emotion Review [online], 1(4), 302-315. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2004.51.1.82 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073909338306
Resnik, J., and Curtis, D.E., 2011. Representing Justice: Invention, Controversy, and Rights in City-States and Democratic Courtrooms. New Haven, CT / London: Yale University Press.
Ridgeway, C.L., 2006. Linking social structure and interpersonal behavior: A theoretical perspective on cultural schemas and social relations. Social Psychology Quarterly [online], 69(1), 5-16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900102 [14 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900102
Rimé, B., 2009. Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review [online], 1(1), 60-85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908097189 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908097189
Roach Anleu, S., and Mack, K., 2017. Performing Judicial Authority in the Lower Courts. London: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52159-0
Roach Anleu, S., and Mack, K., 2019. Impartiality and emotion in everyday judicial practice. In: R. Patulny et al., eds., Emotions in Late Modernity. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351133319-22
Roach Anleu, S., et al., 2015. Researching emotion in courts and the judiciary: A tale of two projects. Emotion Review [online], 7(2), 145-150. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914554776 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914554776
Rock, P., 1998. Rules, boundaries and the courts: Some problems in the neo-durkheimian sociology of deviance. British Journal of Sociology [online], 49(4), 586-601. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/591290 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/591290
Rossner, M., and Meher, M., 2014. Emotions in ritual theories. In: J.E. Stets and J.H. Turner, eds., Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions (vol. II). Dordrecht: Springer, 199-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9130-4_10
Scheer, M., 2012. Are emotions a kind of practice (and is that what makes them have a history)? A Bourdieuan approach to understanding emotion. History and Theory [online], 51(2), 193-220. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00621.x [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00621.x
Schultz, U., and Shaw, G., eds., 2013. Gender and Judging. Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/1866-377X-2013-3-133
Schuster, M.L., and Propen, A., 2010. Degrees of emotion: Judicial responses to victim impact statements. Law, Culture and the Humanities [online], 6(1), 75-104. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872109349104 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872109349104
Sewell, W.H., 1992. A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation. American Journal of Sociology [online], 98(1), 1-29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/229967 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/229967
Silverman, D., 2013. Doing Qualitative Research. 4th ed. London: Sage.
Smart, A., 2018. It’s OK to cry in the courtroom even if you’re a judge, law professors say. The Canadian Press/CBC [online], 2 August. Available from: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/it-s-ok-to-cry-in-the-courtroom-even-if-you-re-a-judge-law-professors-say-1.4769694 [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Stets, J.E., 2015. Comment on “Methodological Innovations from the Sociology of Emotions – Theoretical Advances”. Emotion Review [online], 7(1), 79-80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914544479 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914544479
The Council of Chief Justices of Australia and New Zealand, 2017. Guide to Judicial Conduct [online]. 3rd ed. November. Melbourne: Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration. Available from: https://aija.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/GUIDE-TO-JUDICIAL-CONDUCT-3rd-Edition.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2018].
Tyler, T.R., 2000. Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology [online], 35(2), 117-125. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/002075900399411 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/002075900399411
Tyler, T.R., 2003. Procedural justice, legitimacy and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice [online], 30, 283-357. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/652233 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/652233
Weber, M., 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wetherell, M., 2015. Trends in the turn to affect: A social psychological critique. Body & Society [online], 21(2), 139-166. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X14539020 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X14539020
Wettergren, Å., and Bergman Blix, S., 2016. Empathy and objectivity in the legal procedure: The case of Swedish prosecutors. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention [online], 17(1), 19-35. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14043858.2015.1136501 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14043858.2015.1136501
Wharton, A.S., 1993. The affective consequences of service work: Managing emotions on the job. Work and Occupations [online], 20(2), 205-232. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888493020002004 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888493020002004
Wharton, A.S., 1999. The psychosocial consequences of emotional labor. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science [online], 561, 158-176. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629956100111 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716299561001011
Wharton, A.S., 2009. The sociology of emotional labor. Annual Review of Sociology [online], 35(1), 147-165. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115944 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115944
White, E.K., 2014. Till human voices wake us: The role of emotion in the adjudication of dignity claims. Journal of Law, Religion and State [online], 3(3), 201-239. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1163/22124810-00303001 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22124810-00303001
Wilson, T.P., et al., 1984. Models of turn taking in conversational interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology [online], 3(3), 159-183. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8400300301 [Accessed 6 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8400300301
##submission.downloads##
Argitaratuta
##submission.howToCite##
Zenbakia
Atala
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
