Feminist Judging in the 'Real World'
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0995Palabras clave:
tribunal feminista, entrevistas judiciales, estudios judiciales, métodos feministas, proyectos de sentencias feministasResumen
Los proyectos de sentencias feministas, a través de la reelaboración imaginaria de sentencias judiciales, han explorado multitud de vías en las que las perspectivas feministas se podrían aplicar a la práctica judicial. Pero ¿qué resulta de la comparación entre dichas sentencias y la práctica real de las juezas feministas? Este artículo presenta los resultados de la investigación empírica de la autora. Se analiza el cómo, el cuándo y el dónde de la labor judicial feminista, es decir, los recursos, herramientas y técnicas feministas que las juezas han utilizado, las fases de audiencia y toma de decisión en las que se han utilizado y las áreas del derecho en que se han aplicado. Además, se toman en consideración los límites observados y potenciales de la práctica judicial feminista, y se extraen conclusiones sobre la comparación entre la labor judicial feminista en el “mundo real” y la práctica de los proyectos de tribunales feministas.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 790
Citas
Auchmuty, R., 2010. Judgment: Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Etridge (No 2). In: R. Hunter, C. McGlynn and E. Rackley, eds., Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart, 155-169.
Bartlett, K.T., 1990. Feminist legal methods. Harvard law review, 103 (4), 829-888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1341478
Berns, S., 1999. To Speak as a Judge: Difference, Voice and Power. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Boyle, C., 1985. Sexual assault and the feminist judge. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 1 (1), 93-107.
Buckley, M., 2006. Symes v Canada. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 18 (1), 27-66.
Burns, K., 2014. Judgment: Cattanach v Melchior. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 160-171.
Cain, P.A., 1988. Good and bad bias: a comment on feminist theory and judging. Southern California law review [online], 61 (6), 1945-1955. Available from: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1274&context=facpubs [Accessed 18 June 2018].
Carr, H., and Hunter, C., 2010. Judgment: YL v Birmingham City Council. In: R. Hunter, C. McGlynn and E. Rackley, eds., Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart, 318-328.
Conaghan, J., 2017. Judgment: McKinley v Minister for Defence. In: M. Enright, J. McCandless and A. O’Donoghue, eds., Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart, 506-513.
Cossins, A., 2014. Judgment: Phillips v R. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 295-305.
Davies, M., 2012. The law becomes us: rediscovering judgment. Feminist legal studies, 20, 167-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9204-y
Douglas, H., 2016. Sexual violence, domestic abuse and the feminist judge. Journal of international and comparative law, 3 (2), 317-343.
Douglas, H., and Bartlett, F., 2016. Practice and persuasion: women, feminism and judicial diversity. In: R. Ananian-Welsh and J. Crowe, eds,. Judicial Independence in Australia: Contemporary Challenges, Future Directions. Sydney: Federation Press, 76-88.
Douglas, H., et al., eds., 2014a. Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474201292
Douglas, H., et al., 2014b. Reflections on rewriting the law. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 19-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474201292.ch-002
Enright, M., 2017. ‘Involuntary patriotism’: judgment, women and national identity on the island of Ireland. In: M. Enright, J. McCandless and A. O’Donoghue, eds., Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart, 27-48.
Enright, M., McCandless, J., and O’Donoghue, A., eds., 2017. Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart.
Etherton, T., 2010. Liberty, the archetype and diversity: a philosophy of judging. Public Law [online], October, 727-746. Available from: https://www.ka.edu.pl/download/gfx/ksw/pl/defaultaktualnosci/1162/5/1/judicial_precedence.pdf [Accessed 18 June 2018].
Feenan, D., 2009. Editorial introduction: women and judging. Feminist legal studies [online], 17 (1), 1-9. Available from: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10691-009-9116-7.pdf [Accessed 18 June 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-009-9116-7
Fox, M., 2017. Judgment: Barnes v Belfast City Council. In: M. Enright, J. McCandless and A. O’Donoghue, eds., Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart, 612-621.
Gilligan, C., 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Godden, L., 2014. Judgment: Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland Proserpine/Whitsunday Branch Inc v Minister for the Environment and Heritage. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 138-150.
Graycar, R., 1995. The gender of judgments: an introduction. In: M. Thornton, ed., Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 262-282.
Hale, B., 2005. Making a difference? Why we need a more diverse judiciary. Northern Ireland legal quarterly, 56 (3), 281-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v56i3.801
Hale, B., 2008. A minority opinion? Proceedings of the British Academy, 154, 319-336.
Hunter, R., 2008. Can feminist judges make a difference? International journal of the legal profession, 15 (1-2), 7-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950802439759
Hunter, R., 2010. An account of feminist judging. In: R. Hunter, C. McGlynn and E. Rackley, eds., Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart, 30-43.
Hunter, R., 2012. The power of feminist judgments? Feminist legal studies, 20 (2), 135-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9202-0
Hunter, R., 2013. Justice Marcia Neave: case study of a feminist judge. In: U. Schultz and G. Shaw, eds., Gender and Judging. Oxford: Hart, 399-418.
Hunter, R., 2015a. More than just a different face? Judicial diversity and decision-making. Current legal problems [online], 68 (1), 119-141. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuv001 [Accessed 18 June 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuv001
Hunter, R., 2015b. The Feminist Judgments Project: legal fiction as critique and praxis. International critical thought, 5 (4), 501-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2015.1102075
Hunter, R., and Rackley, E., 2018. Judicial leadership on the UK Supreme Court. Legal studies [online], 23 May. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2017.19 [Accessed 18 June 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2017.19
Hunter, R., and Tyson, D., 2017a. The implementation of feminist law reforms: the case of post-provocation sentencing. Social and legal studies, 26 (2), 129-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663916666628
Hunter, R., and Tyson, D., 2017b. Justice Betty King: a study of feminist judging in action. University of New South Wales law journal [online], 40 (2), 778-805. Available from: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLJ/2017/28.html [Accessed 18 June 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53637/YWKR2894
Hunter, R., et al., 2017. Introducing the feminist and mana wahine judgments. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 25-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509909766.ch-003
Hunter, R., McGlynn, C., and Rackley, E., 2010. Feminist judgments: an introduction. In: R. Hunter, C. McGlynn and E. Rackley, eds., Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart, 3-29.
Hunter, R., Roach Anleu, S., and Mack, K., 2016. Judging in lower courts: conventional, procedural, therapeutic and feminist approaches. International journal of law in context, 12 (3), 337-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552316000240
Johnston, K., and Hori Te Pa, M., 2017. Judgment: Bruce v Edwards. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 334-344.
Kalu, M., 2010. Judicial profiles: Baroness Hale of Richmond. UKSC blog [online], 13 August. Available from: http://ukscblog.com/judicial-profiles-baroness-hale-of-richmond/ [Accessed 18 June 2018].
Kenney, S.J., 2013. Gender and Justice: Why Women in the Judiciary Really Matter. New York: Routledge.
Majury, D., 2006. Introducing the Women’s Court of Canada. Canadian journal of women and the law, 18 (1), 1-12.
Malleson, K., 2003. Justifying gender equality on the bench: why difference won’t do. Feminist legal studies, 11 (1), 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023231006909
McCandless, J., 2017. Judgment: A and B (by C) v A (Health and Social Services Trust). In: M. Enright, J. McCandless and A O’Donoghue, eds., Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart, 630-643.
McCandless, J., Enright, M., and O’Donoghue, A., 2017. Introduction: troubling judgment. In: M. Enright, J. McCandless and A. O’Donoghue, eds., Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart, 3-26.
McDonald, E., et al., eds., 2017. Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509909766
Mulcahy, L., and Andrews, C., 2010. Judgment: Baird Textile Holdings v Marks & Spencer Pty Ltd. In: R. Hunter, C. McGlynn and E. Rackley, eds., Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart, 189-202.
O’Rourke, M., 2017. Judgment: O’Keeffe v Hickey. In: M. Enright, J. McCandless and A. O’Donoghue, eds., Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart, 334-344.
Rackley, E., 2012. Why feminist legal scholars should write judgments: reflections on the Feminist Judgments Project in England and Wales. Canadian journal of women and the law, 24 (2), 389-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.24.2.389
Rackley, E., 2013. Women, Judging and the Judiciary: from Difference to Diversity. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203098189
Rathus, Z., and Alexander, R., 2014. Judgment: Goode and Goode. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 379-388.
Resnik, J., 1988. On the bias: feminist reconsiderations of the aspirations for our judges. Southern California law review [online], 61 (6), 1877-1944. Available from: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/914?utm_source=digitalcommons.law.yale.edu%2Ffss_papers%2F914&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages [Accessed 18 June 2018].
Rubenstein, K., 2014. Judgment: R v Pearson; ex parte Sipka. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 61-68.
Rush, S.E., 1993. Feminist judging: an introductory essay. Southern California review of law and women’s studies, 2 (2), 609-632.
Sadiq, K., 2014. Judgment: Lodge v Federal Commissioner of Taxation. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 90-97.
San Roque, M., 2014. Locating consent in similar-fact cases: Phillips v R. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 291-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474201292.ch-018
Sheehy, E., ed., 2004. Adding Feminism to Law: the Contributions of Justice Claire L’Heureux-Dubé. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law.
Sherry, S., 1986. Civic virtue and the feminine voice in constitutional adjudication. Virginia law review [online], 72 (3), 543-616. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1803/6459 [Accessed 18 June 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1072973
Shine Thompson, M., 2017. Doing feminist judgments. In: M. Enright, J. McCandless and A. O’Donoghue, eds., Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart, 49-74.
Stace, V., 2017. Judgment: Stephens v Barron. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 314-321.
Stanchi, K.M., Berger, L.M., and Crawford, B.J., 2016a. Feminist judgments: rewritten opinions of the United States Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316411254
Stanchi, K.M., Berger, L.M., and Crawford, B.J., 2016b. Introduction to the US feminist judgments project. In: K.M. Stanchi, L.M. Berger and B.J. Crawford, eds., Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press, 3-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316411254.003
Toki, V., 2017. Judgment: R v Shashana Lee Te Tomo. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 512-519.
Van Rijswijk, H. and Townley, L., 2014. Judgment: R v Webster. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 316-324.
Van Wagner, E., 2017. Judgment: West Coast ENT Inc v Buller Coal Ltd. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 394-412.
Wheen, N., 2017. Judgment: Squid Fishery Management Company Ltd v Minister of Fisheries. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 368-383.
Wilson, B., 1990. Will women judges really make a difference? Osgoode Hall law journal [online], 28 (3), 507-522. Available from: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol28/iss3/1 [Accessed 18 June 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1764
Women’s Court of Canada, 2006. Special issue: rewriting equality. Canadian journal of women and the law, 18 (1), 1-372.
Yarwood, L., and Pirini, M., 2017. Judgment: Taylor v Attorney-General. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 62-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509909766.ch-004a
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2018 Rosemary Hunter
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
