Feminist Judging in the 'Real World'
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0995Keywords:
Feminist judging, judicial interviews, judicial studies, feminist methods, feminist judgment projectsAbstract
The various feminist judgment projects (FJPs) have explored through the imagined rewriting of judgments a range of ways in which a feminist perspective may be applied to the practice of judging. But how do these imagined judgments compare to what actual feminist judges do? This article presents the results of the author’s empirical research to date on ‘real world’ feminist judging. Drawing on case study and interview data it explores the how, when and where of feminist judging, that is, the feminist resources, tools and techniques judges have drawn upon, the stages in the hearing and decision-making process at which these resources, tools and techniques have been deployed, and the areas of law in which they have been applied. The article goes on to consider observed and potential limits on feminist judicial practice, before drawing conclusions about the comparison between ‘real world’ feminist judging and the practices of FJPs.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF 790
References
Auchmuty, R., 2010. Judgment: Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Etridge (No 2). In: R. Hunter, C. McGlynn and E. Rackley, eds., Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart, 155-169.
Bartlett, K.T., 1990. Feminist legal methods. Harvard law review, 103 (4), 829-888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1341478
Berns, S., 1999. To Speak as a Judge: Difference, Voice and Power. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Boyle, C., 1985. Sexual assault and the feminist judge. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 1 (1), 93-107.
Buckley, M., 2006. Symes v Canada. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 18 (1), 27-66.
Burns, K., 2014. Judgment: Cattanach v Melchior. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 160-171.
Cain, P.A., 1988. Good and bad bias: a comment on feminist theory and judging. Southern California law review [online], 61 (6), 1945-1955. Available from: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1274&context=facpubs [Accessed 18 June 2018].
Carr, H., and Hunter, C., 2010. Judgment: YL v Birmingham City Council. In: R. Hunter, C. McGlynn and E. Rackley, eds., Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart, 318-328.
Conaghan, J., 2017. Judgment: McKinley v Minister for Defence. In: M. Enright, J. McCandless and A. O’Donoghue, eds., Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart, 506-513.
Cossins, A., 2014. Judgment: Phillips v R. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 295-305.
Davies, M., 2012. The law becomes us: rediscovering judgment. Feminist legal studies, 20, 167-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9204-y
Douglas, H., 2016. Sexual violence, domestic abuse and the feminist judge. Journal of international and comparative law, 3 (2), 317-343.
Douglas, H., and Bartlett, F., 2016. Practice and persuasion: women, feminism and judicial diversity. In: R. Ananian-Welsh and J. Crowe, eds,. Judicial Independence in Australia: Contemporary Challenges, Future Directions. Sydney: Federation Press, 76-88.
Douglas, H., et al., eds., 2014a. Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474201292
Douglas, H., et al., 2014b. Reflections on rewriting the law. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 19-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474201292.ch-002
Enright, M., 2017. ‘Involuntary patriotism’: judgment, women and national identity on the island of Ireland. In: M. Enright, J. McCandless and A. O’Donoghue, eds., Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart, 27-48.
Enright, M., McCandless, J., and O’Donoghue, A., eds., 2017. Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart.
Etherton, T., 2010. Liberty, the archetype and diversity: a philosophy of judging. Public Law [online], October, 727-746. Available from: https://www.ka.edu.pl/download/gfx/ksw/pl/defaultaktualnosci/1162/5/1/judicial_precedence.pdf [Accessed 18 June 2018].
Feenan, D., 2009. Editorial introduction: women and judging. Feminist legal studies [online], 17 (1), 1-9. Available from: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10691-009-9116-7.pdf [Accessed 18 June 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-009-9116-7
Fox, M., 2017. Judgment: Barnes v Belfast City Council. In: M. Enright, J. McCandless and A. O’Donoghue, eds., Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart, 612-621.
Gilligan, C., 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Godden, L., 2014. Judgment: Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland Proserpine/Whitsunday Branch Inc v Minister for the Environment and Heritage. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 138-150.
Graycar, R., 1995. The gender of judgments: an introduction. In: M. Thornton, ed., Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 262-282.
Hale, B., 2005. Making a difference? Why we need a more diverse judiciary. Northern Ireland legal quarterly, 56 (3), 281-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v56i3.801
Hale, B., 2008. A minority opinion? Proceedings of the British Academy, 154, 319-336.
Hunter, R., 2008. Can feminist judges make a difference? International journal of the legal profession, 15 (1-2), 7-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950802439759
Hunter, R., 2010. An account of feminist judging. In: R. Hunter, C. McGlynn and E. Rackley, eds., Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart, 30-43.
Hunter, R., 2012. The power of feminist judgments? Feminist legal studies, 20 (2), 135-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9202-0
Hunter, R., 2013. Justice Marcia Neave: case study of a feminist judge. In: U. Schultz and G. Shaw, eds., Gender and Judging. Oxford: Hart, 399-418.
Hunter, R., 2015a. More than just a different face? Judicial diversity and decision-making. Current legal problems [online], 68 (1), 119-141. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuv001 [Accessed 18 June 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuv001
Hunter, R., 2015b. The Feminist Judgments Project: legal fiction as critique and praxis. International critical thought, 5 (4), 501-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2015.1102075
Hunter, R., and Rackley, E., 2018. Judicial leadership on the UK Supreme Court. Legal studies [online], 23 May. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2017.19 [Accessed 18 June 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2017.19
Hunter, R., and Tyson, D., 2017a. The implementation of feminist law reforms: the case of post-provocation sentencing. Social and legal studies, 26 (2), 129-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663916666628
Hunter, R., and Tyson, D., 2017b. Justice Betty King: a study of feminist judging in action. University of New South Wales law journal [online], 40 (2), 778-805. Available from: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLJ/2017/28.html [Accessed 18 June 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53637/YWKR2894
Hunter, R., et al., 2017. Introducing the feminist and mana wahine judgments. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 25-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509909766.ch-003
Hunter, R., McGlynn, C., and Rackley, E., 2010. Feminist judgments: an introduction. In: R. Hunter, C. McGlynn and E. Rackley, eds., Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart, 3-29.
Hunter, R., Roach Anleu, S., and Mack, K., 2016. Judging in lower courts: conventional, procedural, therapeutic and feminist approaches. International journal of law in context, 12 (3), 337-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552316000240
Johnston, K., and Hori Te Pa, M., 2017. Judgment: Bruce v Edwards. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 334-344.
Kalu, M., 2010. Judicial profiles: Baroness Hale of Richmond. UKSC blog [online], 13 August. Available from: http://ukscblog.com/judicial-profiles-baroness-hale-of-richmond/ [Accessed 18 June 2018].
Kenney, S.J., 2013. Gender and Justice: Why Women in the Judiciary Really Matter. New York: Routledge.
Majury, D., 2006. Introducing the Women’s Court of Canada. Canadian journal of women and the law, 18 (1), 1-12.
Malleson, K., 2003. Justifying gender equality on the bench: why difference won’t do. Feminist legal studies, 11 (1), 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023231006909
McCandless, J., 2017. Judgment: A and B (by C) v A (Health and Social Services Trust). In: M. Enright, J. McCandless and A O’Donoghue, eds., Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart, 630-643.
McCandless, J., Enright, M., and O’Donoghue, A., 2017. Introduction: troubling judgment. In: M. Enright, J. McCandless and A. O’Donoghue, eds., Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart, 3-26.
McDonald, E., et al., eds., 2017. Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509909766
Mulcahy, L., and Andrews, C., 2010. Judgment: Baird Textile Holdings v Marks & Spencer Pty Ltd. In: R. Hunter, C. McGlynn and E. Rackley, eds., Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart, 189-202.
O’Rourke, M., 2017. Judgment: O’Keeffe v Hickey. In: M. Enright, J. McCandless and A. O’Donoghue, eds., Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart, 334-344.
Rackley, E., 2012. Why feminist legal scholars should write judgments: reflections on the Feminist Judgments Project in England and Wales. Canadian journal of women and the law, 24 (2), 389-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.24.2.389
Rackley, E., 2013. Women, Judging and the Judiciary: from Difference to Diversity. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203098189
Rathus, Z., and Alexander, R., 2014. Judgment: Goode and Goode. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 379-388.
Resnik, J., 1988. On the bias: feminist reconsiderations of the aspirations for our judges. Southern California law review [online], 61 (6), 1877-1944. Available from: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/914?utm_source=digitalcommons.law.yale.edu%2Ffss_papers%2F914&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages [Accessed 18 June 2018].
Rubenstein, K., 2014. Judgment: R v Pearson; ex parte Sipka. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 61-68.
Rush, S.E., 1993. Feminist judging: an introductory essay. Southern California review of law and women’s studies, 2 (2), 609-632.
Sadiq, K., 2014. Judgment: Lodge v Federal Commissioner of Taxation. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 90-97.
San Roque, M., 2014. Locating consent in similar-fact cases: Phillips v R. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 291-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474201292.ch-018
Sheehy, E., ed., 2004. Adding Feminism to Law: the Contributions of Justice Claire L’Heureux-Dubé. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law.
Sherry, S., 1986. Civic virtue and the feminine voice in constitutional adjudication. Virginia law review [online], 72 (3), 543-616. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1803/6459 [Accessed 18 June 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1072973
Shine Thompson, M., 2017. Doing feminist judgments. In: M. Enright, J. McCandless and A. O’Donoghue, eds., Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart, 49-74.
Stace, V., 2017. Judgment: Stephens v Barron. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 314-321.
Stanchi, K.M., Berger, L.M., and Crawford, B.J., 2016a. Feminist judgments: rewritten opinions of the United States Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316411254
Stanchi, K.M., Berger, L.M., and Crawford, B.J., 2016b. Introduction to the US feminist judgments project. In: K.M. Stanchi, L.M. Berger and B.J. Crawford, eds., Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press, 3-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316411254.003
Toki, V., 2017. Judgment: R v Shashana Lee Te Tomo. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 512-519.
Van Rijswijk, H. and Townley, L., 2014. Judgment: R v Webster. In: H. Douglas et al., eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart, 316-324.
Van Wagner, E., 2017. Judgment: West Coast ENT Inc v Buller Coal Ltd. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 394-412.
Wheen, N., 2017. Judgment: Squid Fishery Management Company Ltd v Minister of Fisheries. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 368-383.
Wilson, B., 1990. Will women judges really make a difference? Osgoode Hall law journal [online], 28 (3), 507-522. Available from: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol28/iss3/1 [Accessed 18 June 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1764
Women’s Court of Canada, 2006. Special issue: rewriting equality. Canadian journal of women and the law, 18 (1), 1-372.
Yarwood, L., and Pirini, M., 2017. Judgment: Taylor v Attorney-General. In: E. McDonald et al., eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart, 62-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509909766.ch-004a
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Rosemary Hunter
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
