Considering a different model for the Family and Children Courthouse Building: Reflections on the Portuguese experience

Patrícia Branco

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0940

Autores/as

Patrícia Branco Centro de Estudos Sociais, Universidade de Coimbra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0940

Palabras clave:

Portugal, derecho y justicia de familia, palacios de justicia, arquitectura

Resumen

Los palacios de justicia no suelen desempeñar un rol significativo en la mayor parte de las investigaciones sociojurídicas sobre el derecho y los juzgados; y allí donde esos edificios se han tomado en consideración, los autores han solido dar por hecho que existe la necesidad de un proceso adjudicativo ritualizado en un cierto tipo de edificio, normalmente uno pomposo y destacado. Mi objetivo, sin embargo, es reflexionar sobre los palacios de justicia donde se imparte la justicia de familia y sobre menores de edad en Portugal, y sobre su configuración interna. El artículo tomará en consideración las discrepancias entre los palacios de justicia en los libros y los palacios de justicia en acción, o cómo están diseñados jurídicamente y cómo se estructuran de forma concreta, y cómo son habitados, dando la palabra a profesionales del derecho (jueces y fiscales) y usuarios del juzgado, señalando los problemas o necesidades que han identificado y las reclamaciones que presentan al respecto.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Metrics

Estadísticas globales

314 Visualizaciones	170 Descargas
484 Total

Citas

Anthony, T. and Grant, E., 2016. Courthouse Design Principles to Dignify Spaces for Indigenous Users: Preliminary Observations. International Journal for Court Administration [online], 8 (1), 43-59. Available from: https://www.iacajournal.org/articles/10.18352/ijca.217/galley/219/download/ [Accessed 7 February 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.217

Arrieta, V., 2014. Diversos escenarios judiciales y su impacto en la victimización secundaria. Eguzkilore [online], 28, 287-320. San Sebastian: UPV/EHU. Available from: https://www.ehu.eus/documents/1736829/3498354/17-veronica+arrieta+p.pdf [Accessed 18 January 2018].

Asma, D., 1997. Genuflecting at the bench: rituals of power and power of rituals in American courts. Critical criminology [online], v. 5. Available from: http://www.critcrim.org/redfeather/journal-pomocrim/Vol-5-Dramaturgy/genuflecting%20at%20the%20bench.htm [Accessed 25 September 2017].

Branco, P., 2015. Os Tribunais como Espaços de Reconhecimento, de Funcionalidade e de Acesso à Justiça. Oporto: Vida Económica.

Branco, P., 2016. Courthouses as Spaces of Recognition, Functionality and Access to Law and Justice: A Portuguese Reflection. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 6 (3), 426-441. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2812699 [Accessed 8 February 2018].

Branco, P.et al., 2011. Entre a forma e a função: arquitectura judiciária e acesso ao direito e à justiça nos tribunais com competência em família e menores. Lex Familiae, 15, 33-56.

Brigham, J., 2009. Material Law: A Jurisprudence of What’s Real. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Brownlee, D.B., 1984. The Law Courts: The Architecture of George Edmund Street. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Bybee, K.J., 2012. Judging in Place: Architecture, Design, and the Operation of Courts. Law & Social Inquiry [online] 37 (4), 1014-1028. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01327.x [Accessed 8 February 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01327.x

Carmo, R., 2014. A Nova Organização do Sistema Judiciário e a Jurisdição de Família e Menores. Revista do Ministério Público, 140, 9-32.

Chase, O.G. and Thong, J., 2012. Judging Judges: The Effect of Courtroom Ceremony on Participant Evaluation of Process Fairness-Related Factors. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities [online], 24 (1), 221-245. Available from: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh/vol24/iss1/10 [Accessed 8 February 2018].

Clark, J., 2009. Reflection. Justice. Architecture Australia [online], 98 (5), September. Available from: https://architectureau.com/articles/reflection-8/ [Accessed 7 February 2018].

Commaille, J., 2013. O espaço da justiça como questão política entre necessidades e desafios – uma abordagem de sociologia política do direito. In: P. Branco, ed., Sociologia do(s) Espaço(s) da Justiça: Diálogos Interdisciplinares. Coimbra, Portugal: CES / Almedina, 21-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8235.v108i0p929-933

Correia, T., 2016. (Exclusivo) Beja: Novo Palácio da Justiça vai começar a ser construído no segundo trimestre de 2017. Lidador notícias [online], 16 May. Available from: http://www.lidadornoticias.pt/exclusivo-beja-novo-palacio-da-justica-vai-comecar-a-ser-construido-no-segundo-trimestre-de-2017/ [Accessed 18 January 2018].

Council of Europe, 2010. Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on child-friendly justice. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice, 2014. Guidelines on the organization and accessibility of court premises [online]. Document adopted by the CEPEJ at its 24th Plenary Meeting. Strasbourg, 11-12 December. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/16807482cb [Accessed 18 January 2018].

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, 2015. Child-friendly justice – Perspectives and experiences of professionals on children’s participation in civil and criminal judicial proceedings in 10 EU Member States. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Fischer Taylor, K., 1993. In the Theatre of Criminal Justice: The Palais de Justice in Second Empire Paris. NJ: Princeton University Press.

Garapon, A., 1997. Bem julgar. Ensaio sobre o ritual judiciário. Lisbon: Instituto Piaget.

Garapon, A., 2013. Imaginer le Palais De Justice Du XXIe Siècle. Notes de L’IHEJ [online], 5, 1-22. Available from: http://ihej.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Antoine_Garapon_Palais_de_justice_NoteIHEJ5_062013.pdf [Accessed 18 January 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.gara.2013.01.0001

Gélinas, F. et al., 2015. Architecture, Rituals, and Norms in Civil Procedure. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice [online], 32 (2), 213-232. Available from: https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/WYAJ/article/download/4711/3975 [Accessed 8 February 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4711

Goltsman, S., 1992. Recognizing children and families in the design of a children’s court. Children’s Environments, 9 (1), 72-76.

Goodrich, P., 2008. Visive Powers: Colours, Trees and Genres of Jurisdiction. Law and Humanities [online], 2 (2), 213-231. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter_Goodrich3-YU/publication/263370239_Visive_Powers_Colours_Trees_and_Genres_of_Jurisdiction/links/58f49ee7aca27289c21c8c92/Visive-Powers-Colours-Trees-and-Genres-of-Jurisdiction.pdf [Accessed 8 February 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17521483.2008.11423752

Lucien, A., 2010. Staging and the Imaginary Institution of the Judge. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 23 (2), 185-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-010-9150-4

Marella, M.R. and Marini, G., 2014. Di cosa parliamo quando parliamo di famiglia. Le relazioni familiari nella globalizzazione del diritto. Rome / Bari: Laterza.

McNamara, M.J., 2004. From tavern to courthouse. Architecture & ritual in American Law, 1658-1860. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mulcahy, L., 2011. Legal Architecture. Justice, due process and the place of law. London / New York: Routledge.

Mulcahy, L., 2013. Back to the Future? The Challenge of the Past for Courthouses of Tomorrow. In: J. Simon, N. Temple and R. Tobe, eds. Architecture and Justice. Judicial Meanings in the Public Realm. Surrey: Ashgate, 71-83.

Ngwa-Suh, M., 2006. Facility Facelifts: How Courthouses Are Accommodating Children and Youth. Children’s Voice, 15 (1), 29-31.

Nunes, A.M., 2013. «Levante-se o Réu». Os Tribunais de Menores em Portugal entre 1911 e 1974. In: P. Branco, ed. Sociologia do(s) Espaço(s) da Justiça: Diálogos Interdisciplinares. Coimbra: CES / Almedina, 147-160.

Ordem dos Advogados, 2015. Um ano de novo "mapa judiciário". Boletim da Ordem dos Advogados [online], 130 (september), 6-21. Available from: https://portal.oa.pt/media/117987/n%C2%BA130-set2015.pdf [Accessed 18 January 2018].

Papke, D.R., 1999. The American Courtroom Trial: Pop Culture, Courthouse Realities, and the Dream World of Justice. South Texas Law Review, 40, 919 932.

Pedroso, J. et al., 2010. A(s) Justiça(s) da Família e das Crianças em Portugal no início do século XXI: uma nova relação entre o judicial e o não judicial. Lex Familiae, 13, 101-119.

Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A., 2016. Flesh of the Law: Material Legal Metaphors, Journal of Law and Society, 43 (1), 45-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2016.00740.x

Pound, R., 1910. Law in Books and Law in Action. American Law Review, 44, 12-36.

Resnik, J. and Curtis, D., 2011. Representing Justice. Invention, Controversy, and Rights in City-States and Democratic Courtrooms. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Rowden, E. and Jones, D., 2015. Design, Dignity and Due Process: The Construction of the Coffs Harbour Courthouse. Law, Culture and the Humanities, first published 15 November, 1-20.

Rowden, E., 2013. As instalações à distância para crianças e testemunhas vulneráveis: novas perspetivas a propósito de uma tipologia espacial emergente. In: P. Branco, ed. Sociologia do(s) Espaço(s) da Justiça: Diálogos Interdisciplinares. Coimbra: CES / Almedina, 161-184.

Rowden, E., 2015. Distributed Courts and Legitimacy: What do we Lose When we Lose the Courthouse? Law, Culture and the Humanities, first published November 5, 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872115612966

Scheppele, K.L., 2012. Judges as Architects. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities [online], 24 (1), 345-396. Available from: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1391&context=yjlh [Accessed 18 January 2018].

Serra, E., 1955. O novo direito criminal de menores. Princípios enformadores. Os tribunais de menores e a especialização da respectiva magistratura. Infância e Juventude, 3, 3-8.

Spaulding, N.W., 2012. The Enclosure of Justice. Courthouse Architecture, Due Process, and the Dead Metaphor of Trial. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities [online], 24 (1), 101 133. Available from: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1390&context=yjlh [Accessed 18 January 2018].

Tait, D. and Kennedy, L., 1999. Court perspectives: architecture, psychology and law reform in Western Australia. Western Australian Law Commission, 1017-1100.

Traldi, L., 2017. L’Olanda ha un non-problema. La Repubblica, 11 February.

Wardle, B., 2017. Legal Façades. Griffith Law Review [online], 25 (4), 525-551. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2016.1273080. [Accessed 18 January 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2016.1273080