Programmatic legal mechanisms and the multifaceted social inferences of the principle of proportionality in Romanian legislation, integrated into the international context

Marta-Claudia Cliza; Claudiu-Constantin Ulariu; Elena-Ana Iancu; Iulia Boghirnea

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl.2602

Autores/as

Marta-Claudia Cliza “Nicolae Titulescu” University of Bucharest https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7021-8249
Claudiu-Constantin Ulariu “Nicolae Titulescu” University of Bucharest, https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3063-6601
Elena-Ana Iancu ”Aurel Vlaicu“ University of Arad, Romania, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences/”Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, Doctoral School of Social and Human Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5921-2222
Iulia Boghirnea National University of Science and TehnologyPOLITEHNICA Bucharest, Romania https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1634-1681

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2602

Palabras clave:

Proporcionalidad, responsabilidad administrativa, sanción, garantía razonable, equidad

Resumen

El principio de individualización tiene una resonancia histórica y funcional única, y encuentra un terreno fértil en diversos ámbitos jurídicos. De manera original, hemos puesto de relieve que este principio, a través de su dimensión sinérgica, introduce una limitación positiva en el concepto genérico de responsabilidad administrativa, al conceptualizar ciertos requisitos que no solo son de naturaleza semántica, sino que también revisten una profunda relevancia fáctica, inherente a la adecuada calibración de un mecanismo justo para atribuir la responsabilidad jurídica a los culpables. La proporcionalidad constituye una dimensión ineludible del principio de legalidad, actuando como un factor que facilita el resaltado de la dimensión práctica de la cuestión, a través de la delimitación de instrumentos que garantizan una justicia equitativa —es decir, calibrando, mediante un análisis integrado y aplicado, los medios para configurar el proceso de infracción administrativa de modo que satisfaga las exigencias de adaptabilidad de la represión en respuesta a los retos sociales del mundo moderno. Hemos propuesto modelos de interpretación jurídica y formulado sugerencias para mejorar el sistema jurídico operativo, con el objetivo de conferir flexibilidad y adaptabilidad al acto de administrar justicia.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Metrics

Estadísticas globales

301 Visualizaciones	112 Descargas
413 Total

Descargas por formato:

16(4)_Cliza_et_al_OSLS (English) 12 First_Online_Cliza_et_al_OSLS (English) 100

Biografía del autor/a

Marta-Claudia Cliza, “Nicolae Titulescu” University of Bucharest

Associate Professor PhD (Law). “Nicolae Titulescu” University of Bucharest, Faculty of Law, Romania. E-mail claudia_cliza@yahoo.com

Claudiu-Constantin Ulariu, “Nicolae Titulescu” University of Bucharest,

Lecturer PhD (Law). “Nicolae Titulescu” University of Bucharest, Faculty of Law, Romania. E-mail: claudiu_ulariu@yahoo.ro

Elena-Ana Iancu, ”Aurel Vlaicu“ University of Arad, Romania, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences/”Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, Doctoral School of Social and Human Sciences

Habilitated Professor PhD. (Law). “Aurel Vlaicu” University of Arad, Romania, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences/ “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, Doctoral School of Social and Human Sciences/ Romanian Academy of Legal Sciences. E-mail: elena.iancu@uav.ro

Iulia Boghirnea, National University of Science and TehnologyPOLITEHNICA Bucharest, Romania

Associate Professor PhD (Law). The National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Science and Law, Romania. E-mail: iulia.boghirnea@upb.ro

Citas

Abdelaziz, D. K. A., 2024. The crisis of the modern penal systems and the excessive provision of the prison sentence — The negative implications and the solution. Journal of Infrastructure. Policy and Development [online], 8(15), 9618. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9618

Ashworth, A., and Wasik, M., eds., 2004. Fundamentals of sentencing theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Berebon, C., 2025. Justice, truth, and legal rationality: A Leibnizian perspective on modern jurisprudence. Law and Social Justice in Society [online], 1(1), 14–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35723/lsjs.v1i1.51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35723/lsjs.v1i1.51

Condello, A., Di Nunzio, G., and Vezzani, F., 2026. Language and terminology. Challenges of Generative AI. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10430-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10430-z

Dos Santos, B., 2026. Legal norms as artistic painting: Hermeneutics and impressionism in law’s interpretation. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10427-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10427-8

Earl, J., 2009. When bad things happen: Toward a sociology of troubles. In: L. R. Sandefur, ed., Sociology of crime, law and deviance. Access of justice [online]. Vol. 12, Leeds: Emerald, 231-254. Available at: doi.org/10.1108/S1521-6136(2009)0000012013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1521-6136(2009)0000012013

Halliday, S., and Morgan B., 2013. We fought the law and the law won? Legal consciousness and the critical imagination. Current Legal Issues [online], 66(1), 1–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cut002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cut002

Handler, J. F., 1966. Controlling official behavior in welfare administration. California Law Review, 54(2), 479-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3479416

Hirschl, R., 2014. Comparative matters. The renaissance of comparative constitutional law. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781002704.00020

Hirschl, R., 2019. Comparative methodologies. In: R. Masterman and R. Schütze, eds., The Cambridge companion to comparative constitutional law [online]. Cambridge University Press, 11-39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316716731.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316716731.002

Iwowo, A. I., Imosemi, A. F., and Iwowo, M. A., 2026. Victims of justice administration in Nigeria: Lessons to be learnt from Finland. International Journal of Law and Clinical Legal Education, 7, 137.

Kim, S., Park, A., and Wagner, S. M., 2024. Owner-operator experience and violations in trucking: The mixed role of perceived justice. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review [online], 188(August). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103642

Kolb, P., and Leturmy, L., 2019-2020. Cours de Droit pénal général. 5th ed. Paris: Gaulino.

Kobilov, U., 2025. Analysis of modern approaches to the progressive system of execution of punishments. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Bulletin [online], 3(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14901290

Li, E., 2023. Risk, political security and extra-judicial penality under Xi. Theoretical Criminology and Criminal Justice [online], 27(4), 638-639. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806231189266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806231189266

Lidén, M., 2026. Evidence-based evaluations of criminal evidence - the role of evaluation structures for guilt determinations. Law, Probability and Risk [online], 25(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgaf014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgaf014

Mears, D. P., and Cochran, J. C., 2018. Progressively tougher sanctioning and recidivism: Assessing the effects of different types of sanctions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency [online], 55(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427817739338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427817739338

Montesquieu, 2011. Despre spiritul legilor [On the Spirit of the Laws]. Bucharest: Antent Revolution.

Pin, X., 2018. Droit pénal général. 10th ed. Paris: Dalloz.

Popa, N., et al., 2023. Teoria generală a dreptului. Caiet de seminar [General Theory of Law. Seminar Workbook]. 4th ed. Bucharest: C.H. Beck.

Prabhu, S., Kocsis, D., and Lew, T. Y., 2025. Beyond the direct impact of sanction and subjective norms in cybersecurity. Information and Computer Security [online], 33(5), 807-825. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-04-2025-0148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-04-2025-0148

Schwartz, R. D., and Skolnick, J. H., 1970. Society and the legal order. Cases and materials in the sociology of law. New York: Basic Books.

Singh, S., 2024. Comparative analysis of rights of victim in the criminal proceedings in India: Need for improving victim justice. Legal Research & Analysis [online], 1(2), 37-41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.69971/jksrvn06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69971/jksrvn06

Ulariu, C. C., 2025. Procedure for engaging contraventional liability. Bucharest: C.H. Beck.

Vedinaș, V., 2025. Drept administrativ. Doctrină. Practică. Jurisprudență. Curs universitar [Administrative Law. Doctrine, practice, case law. University course], 15th rev. and enl. ed. Bucharest: Universul Juridic.

Vogel, G., 2017. Les Pandectes. Criminal law. Paris: Larcier Luxembourg.

Wahyudi, R. A., Amirullah, R. M., and Mattulanreng A. S., 2026. The role of sociology of law in realizing social justice: A socio-legal perspective. Agency Journal of Management and Business [online], 6(1), 2. Available at: https://pusdig.web.id/manajemen/article/view/471/692