The programmatic-sociological frameworks and the multifaceted legal implications of the principle of personalization of administrative liability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2602Palavras-chave:
Proportionality;, administrative liability, punishment, reasonable guarantee, equityResumo
The precept of personalization has a unique historical and functional resonance, finding a fertile relational source across various legal domains. In an original manner, we have highlighted that this precept, through its synergistic dimension, brings about a welcome limitation within the generic notion of administrative liability, by conceptualizing certain requirements that are not only semantic in nature but also of profound factual relevance, inherent in the proper calibration of a just mechanism for engaging the legal liability of those at fault. Proportionality constitutes an inevitable dimension of the principle of legality, acting as a factor that facilitates the highlighting of the practical dimension of the issue, through the delineation of instruments that ensure equitable justice—namely, by calibrating, through an integrated and applied analysis, the means of shaping the administrative offense process so as to meet the demands for adaptability of repression in response to the social challenges of the modern world. We have proposed models of legal interpretation and formulated suggestions for improving the operational legal system, aimed at conferring flexibility and adaptability upon the act of administering justice.
Downloads
Metrics
Estatísticas globais ℹ️
|
157
Visualizações
|
67
Downloads
|
|
224
Total
|
|
Referências
Abdelaziz, D. K. A., 2024. The crisis of the modern penal systems and the excessive provision of the prison sentence — The negative implications and the solution. Journal of Infrastructure. Policy and Development [online], 8(15), 9618. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9618
Ashworth, A., and Wasik, M., eds., 2004. Fundamentals of sentencing theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Berebon, C., 2025. Justice, truth, and legal rationality: A Leibnizian perspective on modern jurisprudence. Law and Social Justice in Society [online], 1(1), 14–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35723/lsjs.v1i1.51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35723/lsjs.v1i1.51
Condello, A., Di Nunzio, G., and Vezzani, F., 2026. Language and terminology. Challenges of Generative AI. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10430-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10430-z
Dos Santos, B., 2026. Legal norms as artistic painting: Hermeneutics and impressionism in law’s interpretation. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10427-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10427-8
Earl, J., 2009. When bad things happen: Toward a sociology of troubles. In: L. R. Sandefur, ed., Sociology of crime, law and deviance. Access of justice [online]. Vol. 12, Leeds: Emerald, 231-254. Available at: doi.org/10.1108/S1521-6136(2009)0000012013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1521-6136(2009)0000012013
Halliday, S., and Morgan B., 2013. We fought the law and the law won? Legal consciousness and the critical imagination. Current Legal Issues [online], 66(1), 1–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cut002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cut002
Handler, J. F., 1966. Controlling official behavior in welfare administration. California Law Review, 54(2), 479-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3479416
Hirschl, R., 2014. Comparative matters. The renaissance of comparative constitutional law. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781002704.00020
Hirschl, R., 2019. Comparative methodologies. In: R. Masterman and R. Schütze, eds., The Cambridge companion to comparative constitutional law [online]. Cambridge University Press, 11-39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316716731.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316716731.002
Iwowo, A. I., Imosemi, A. F., and Iwowo, M. A., 2026. Victims of justice administration in Nigeria: Lessons to be learnt from Finland. International Journal of Law and Clinical Legal Education, 7, 137.
Kim, S., Park, A., and Wagner, S. M., 2024. Owner-operator experience and violations in trucking: The mixed role of perceived justice. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review [online], 188(August). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103642
Kolb, P., and Leturmy, L., 2019-2020. Cours de Droit pénal général. 5th ed. Paris: Gaulino.
Kobilov, U., 2025. Analysis of modern approaches to the progressive system of execution of punishments. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Bulletin [online], 3(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14901290
Li, E., 2023. Risk, political security and extra-judicial penality under Xi. Theoretical Criminology and Criminal Justice [online], 27(4), 638-639. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806231189266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806231189266
Lidén, M., 2026. Evidence-based evaluations of criminal evidence - the role of evaluation structures for guilt determinations. Law, Probability and Risk [online], 25(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgaf014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgaf014
Mears, D. P., and Cochran, J. C., 2018. Progressively tougher sanctioning and recidivism: Assessing the effects of different types of sanctions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency [online], 55(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427817739338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427817739338
Montesquieu, 2011. Despre spiritul legilor [On the Spirit of the Laws]. Bucharest: Antent Revolution.
Pin, X., 2018. Droit pénal général. 10th ed. Paris: Dalloz.
Popa, N., et al., 2023. Teoria generală a dreptului. Caiet de seminar [General Theory of Law. Seminar Workbook]. 4th ed. Bucharest: C.H. Beck.
Prabhu, S., Kocsis, D., and Lew, T. Y., 2025. Beyond the direct impact of sanction and subjective norms in cybersecurity. Information and Computer Security [online], 33(5), 807-825. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-04-2025-0148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-04-2025-0148
Schwartz, R. D., and Skolnick, J. H., 1970. Society and the legal order. Cases and materials in the sociology of law. New York: Basic Books.
Singh, S., 2024. Comparative analysis of rights of victim in the criminal proceedings in India: Need for improving victim justice. Legal Research & Analysis [online], 1(2), 37-41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.69971/jksrvn06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69971/jksrvn06
Ulariu, C. C., 2025. Procedure for engaging contraventional liability. Bucharest: C.H. Beck.
Vedinaș, V., 2025. Drept administrativ. Doctrină. Practică. Jurisprudență. Curs universitar [Administrative Law. Doctrine, practice, case law. University course], 15th rev. and enl. ed. Bucharest: Universul Juridic.
Vogel, G., 2017. Les Pandectes. Criminal law. Paris: Larcier Luxembourg.
Wahyudi, R. A., Amirullah, R. M., and Mattulanreng A. S., 2026. The role of sociology of law in realizing social justice: A socio-legal perspective. Agency Journal of Management and Business [online], 6(1), 2. Available at: https://pusdig.web.id/manajemen/article/view/471/692
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Claudia Cliza, Ana Iancu, Iulia Boghirnea, Claudiu Ulariu
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence and it regulates how others can use your work. Further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
