A participative method to build bridges between sustainability science and anticipatory governance at Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve (Basque Country)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1391Palabras clave:
Reserva de la Biosfera, estudio de conocimientos financieros, gobernanza anticipatoria, participación pública, exploración de horizontes compartidosResumen
Un objetivo clave de la gobernanza es la traducción del conocimiento en planificación. Para ello, reclutamos a 125 representantes de la sociedad, de la comunidad técnico-política y de la científica, para que tomaran parte en un proceso de participación centrado en la Reserva de la Biosfera de Urdaibai. Analizamos sus testimonios utilizando métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos, incluido el Análisis de Contenidos Cualitativos Asistido por Ordenador. Validamos consensos para la gestión futura y detallamos criterios para una gobernanza sostenible, colaborativa y anticipatoria. Los consensos que los participantes han destacado como más importantes han sido los siguientes: 1. Urdaibai debe trabajar por el bienestar y la prosperidad de sus habitantes. 2. Son necesarias sinergias entre las instituciones y la sociedad a través de estrategias de participación. 3. Es importante contar con un liderazgo político que oriente la gobernanza. Podemos afirmar que el proceso participativo llevado a cabo ha permitido a los participantes expresar horizontes compartidos sobre estrategias de futuro. Presentamos la metodología de este proceso, así como, sus resultados, ya que consideramos que ambos pueden ser de utilidad para los gestores de las áreas protegidas.
Descargas
Metrics
Estadísticas globales ℹ️
|
601
Visualizaciones
|
393
Descargas
|
|
994
Total
|
|
Citas
Ahedo, I., and Telleria, I., 2020. Neoliberalismo. In: J. Anton and X. Torrens, eds. Ideologías y movimientos políticos contemporáneos. Madrid: Tecnos, 370–419.
Ahedo, I., 2022. When the Cinderellas unite. International Journal of Action Research [online], 18(1), 28–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v18i1.04 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v18i1.04
Alberdi, J., Arreskurrinaga, E., and Oianguren, M., 2020. Explorando visiones compartidas y procesos alternativos en la reserva de la biosfera de Urdaibai (País Vasco). Ecosistemas, revista científica de ecología y medio ambiente [online], 29(1),1940. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7818/ECOS.1940 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7818/ECOS.1940
Arnanz, L., 2018. Metodologías de la democracia participativa para la coproducción de políticas públicas locales: hacia un sistema de gestión participativo [online]. Thesis (PhD). Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Available from: https://eprints.ucm.es/
/1/T40950.pdf [Access 19 July 2022].
Basque Government, 2015. Plan para la interpretación, investigación, capacitación y educación para el desarrollo sostenible en la Reserva de la Biosfera de Urdaibai 2015–2025 [Plan for the Interpretation, Research, Training and Education for the Sustainable Development of the Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve 2015–2025] (online). Vitoria-Gasteiz: Department of Environment and Territorial Policy. Available from: https://issuu.com/ingurumena/docs/pice [Access 19 July 2022].
Bevir, M., and Rhodes, R., 2016. Rethinking Governance. Ruling, Rationales, and Resistance. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315712949
Blanco, I., Gomà, R., and Subirats, J., 2018. El nuevo municipalismo: derecho a la ciudad y comunes urbanos. Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas [online], 10(20), 14–28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.v0i20.10491 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.v0i20.10491
Boston, J., 2019. Enhancing anticipatory governance: strategies for mitigating political myopia in environmental planning and policy-making. In: S. Davoudi et al., eds., Routledge companion to environmental planning. London: Routledge, 130–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315179780-14
Bowen, G.A., 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal [online], 9(2), 27–40. Available from: https://doi.org/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
3316/QRJ0902027 [Access 19 July 2022].
Brenner, N., 1998. Global cities, global states: Global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe. Review of international political economy [online], 5(1), 1–37. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347633 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347633
Chowdhury, M.F., 2014. Coding, sorting and sifting of qualitative data analysis: debates and discussion, Quality and Quantity [online], 49, 1135–1143. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0039-2 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0039-2
Dobbin, K., and Lubell, M., 2019. Collaborative governance and environmental justice: disadvantaged community representation in California sustainable groundwater management. Policy Studies Journal [online], 49(2), 562–590. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12375 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12375
Döös, M., and Wilhelmson, L., 2012. Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team, Quality and Quantity [online], 48, 1089–1106. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y
Dunsire, A., 1993. Modes of Governance. In: J. Kooiman, ed., Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. London: Sage, 21–35.
Flick, U., Von Kardoff, E., and Steinke, I., eds., 2004. A companion to qualitative research. London: Sage.
Font, J., and Galais, C., 2011. The Qualities of Local Participation: The Explanatory Role of Ideology, External Support and Civil Society as Organizer. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research [online], 35(5), 932–948. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01018.x [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01018.x
Fuerth, L., 2009. Foresight and anticipatory governance. Foresight [online], 11(4), 14–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680910982412 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680910982412
Ganuza, E., et al., 2010. Democracia en acción. Una visión desde las metodologías participativas [online]. Madrid: Antígona. Available from: http://hdl.handle.
net/10261/79311 [Access 19 July 2022].
García-Espín, P., and Jiménez, M., 2017. Los procesos participativos como potenciadores de la democracia. Explorando los efectos, mecanismos y evidencias en la sociedad-civil. Revista de Estudios Políticos [online], 177, 113–146. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.177.04 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.177.04
Gómez-Baggethun, E., et al., 2009. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes, Ecological Economics [online], 69(6), 1209–1218. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007
j.ecolecon.2009.11.007 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2009/11/007
González Medina, M., and Huete García, M., 2018. Procesos de agenda y políticas de desarrollo urbano: centrando la cuestión. Gestión y análisis de políticas públicas [online], 10(20), 6–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.v0i20.10594 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.v0i20.10594
Granjou, C., Walker, J., and Salazar, J., 2017. The politics of anticipation: on knowing and governing environmental futures. Futures [online], 92, 5–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.007 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.007
Guston, D., 2014. Understanding “anticipatory governance. Social Studies of Science [online], 44(2), 218–242. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713508669 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713508669
Hanafi, S., 2020. Global sociology revisited: Towards new directions. Current Sociology [online], 68(1), 3–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392119869051 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392119869051
Hart, S.L., 2010. Capitalism at the crossroads: Next generation business strategies for a post-crisis world. London: Pearson.
Heikkila, T., and Gerlak, A.K., 2005. The formation of large-scale collaborative resource management institutions: clarifying the roles of stakeholders, science, and institutions. Policy Studies Journal [online], 33(4), 583–612. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00134.x [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00134.x
Helbing, D., 2013. Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature [online], 497(7447), 51–59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12047 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12047
Hoffmann, A., and Sgrò, C., 2011. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature [online] 470, 479–485. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09670 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09670
Ibarra, P., 2011. Democracia relacional. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
Innerarity, D., 2020. Una teoría de la democracia compleja: Gobernar en el siglo XXI. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg.
Irwin, A., 2001. Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science [online], 10(1), 1–18. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3109/a036852 [Access 19 July 2022].
Isaksen, L.W., Devi, S.U., and Hochschild, A.R., 2008. Global Care Crisis: A Problem of Capital, Care Chain, or Commons? American Behavioral Scientist [online], 52(3), 405–425. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764208323513 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764208323513
Jessop, B., 1998. The Rise of Governance and the Risk of Failure: The Case of Economic Development. International Social Science Journal [online], 50(155), 29–45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12186 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00107
Jessop, B., 2016. The state: Past, present, future. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ji, H., 2019. How do different types of local governments sustainability programs relate to their environmental outcomes. Policy Studies Journal [online], 48(4), 1023–1053. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12363 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12363
Kooiman, J., 1993. Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. London: Sage.
Krippendorff, K., 2004. Measuring the reliability of qualitative text analysis data. Quality and Quantity [online], 38, 787–800. Available from: https://doi.org/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-8107-7
1007/s11135-004-8107-7 [Access 19 July 2022].
Layzer, J., ed., 2008. Natural Experiments: Ecosystem-Based Management and the Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262122986.001.0001
Le Galès, P., 2010. Gouvernance. In: L. Boussaguet, ed., Dictionnaire des politiques publiques. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/scpo.bouss.2010.01.0299
Leach, W., et al., 2013. Fostering learning through collaboration: knowledge acquisition and belief change in marine aquaculture partnerships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory [online], 24(3), 591–622. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut011 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut011
Mackensen, K., and Wille, U., 1999. Qualitative text analysis supported by conceptual data systems. Quality and Quantity [online], 33, 135–156. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004305723553 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004305723553
Macnaghten P., et al., 2014. Resposible innovation across borders: tensions, paradoxes and possibilities. Journal of Responsible Innovation [online], 1(2), 191–199. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.922249 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.922249
Marchioni, M., 2018. Planificación social y organización de la comunidad: Alternativas avanzadas a la crisis. Madrid: Popular.
Martín-Lopez, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., and Montes, C., 2009. Un marco conceptual para la gestión de las interacciones naturaleza-sociedad en un mundo cambiante. Cuides: Cuaderno Interdisciplinar de desarrollo sostenible [online], vol. 3, 229–258. Available from: https://www.publicacionescajamar.es/publicaciones-periodicas/cuaderno-interdisciplinar-de-desarrollo-sostenible-cuides/3/478 [Access 19 July 2022].
Massaua, M., Thomas, C., and Klinger, T., 2016. The use of science in collaborative management of marine environments. Coastal Management [online], 44(6), 606–627. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2016.1233797 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2016.1233797
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C., 2001. The dynamics of contention. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805431
Morse, J.M., and Chung, S.E., 2003. Toward Holism: The Significance of Methodological Pluralism. International Journal of Qualitative Methods [online], 2(3), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200302 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200302
Muiderman, K., et al., 2020. Four approaches to anticipatory climate governance: Different conceptions of the future and implications for the present. Wires Climate Change [online], 11(6), 673. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.673 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.673
Onaindia, M., et al., 2013. Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation. Forest Ecology and Management [online], 289, 1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.010 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.010
Osborne, S., and Strokosch, K., 2013. It takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Co-production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives. British Journal of Management [online], 24(S1), 31–47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12010 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12010
Ostrom, E., 2009. A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series. 5095 [online]. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/4287 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5095
Ostrom, E., 2010. Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic Review [online], 100(3), 641–672. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641
Parés, F.M., 2017. Repensar la participación de la ciudadanía en el mundo local. Diputación de Barcelona.
Pérez Orozco, A., 2006. Perspectivas feministas en torno a la economía: el caso de los cuidados. Madrid: Consejo Económico y Social.
Peters, V., and Wester, F., 2006. How qualitative data analysis software may support the qualitative analysis process. Quality and Quantity [online], 41, 635–659. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9016-8 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9016-8
Pierre, J., 1999. Models of Urban Governance: The Institutional Dimension of Urban Politics. Urban Affairs Review [online], 34(3), 372–396. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922183988 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922183988
Pierre, J., 2000. Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198295143.001.0001
Poteete, A., Janssen, M., and Ostrom, E., 2010. Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835157
Rhodes, R., 1996. The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies [online], 44(4), 652–667. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
Rofes, J., et al., 2014. The long paleoenvironmental sequence of Santimamiñe (Bizkaia, Spain): 20,000 years of small mammal record from the latest Late Pleistocene to the middle Holocene. Quaternary International [online], vols. 339–340, 62–75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.05.048 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.05.048
Shrivastava, P., et al., 2020. Transforming Sustainability Science to Generate Positive Social and Environmental Change Globally. One Earth [online], 2(4), 329–340. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.010 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.010
Sintomer, Y., 2007. Le pouvoir au peuple: Jurys citoyens, tirage au sort et démocratie participative. Paris: La Découverte.
Steffen, W., et al., 2015. Sustainability. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science [online], 347(6223), 1259855. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
Stutzer, A., and Frey, B., 2006. Political participation and procedural utility: an empirical study. European Journal of Political Research [online], 45(3), 391–418. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00303.x [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00303.x
Subirats, J., 2016. El poder de lo próximo: Las virtudes del municipalismo. Madrid: Catarata.
Subirats, J., Parés, M., and Blanco, I., 2009. Calidad democrática y redes de gobernanza: evaluar la participación desde el análisis de las políticas públicas. In: M. Parés, ed., Evaluando las nuevas formas de democracia participativa. Barcelona: Ariel, pp. 367–398.
Swyngedouw, E., 1996. The city as a hybrid: On nature, society and cyborg urbanization. Capitalism Nature Socialism [online], 7(2), 65–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10455759609358679 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10455759609358679
Telleria, I., and Ahedo, I., 2016. Movimientos urbanos y democratización en la ciudad: una propuesta de análisis. Revista Española de Ciencia Política [online], 40, 91–115. Available from: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/recp/article/view/38534 [Access 19 July 2022].
Toimila, A., et al., 2020. Addressing the challenges of climate change risks and adaptation in coastal areas: A review. Coastal Engineering, vol. 156, 103611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103611
Van der Meer, T.W.G., and Van Ingen, E.J., 2008. Schools of democracy? Disentangling the relationship between civic participation and political action in 17 European countries. European Journal of Political Research [online], 48(2), 281–308. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00836.x [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00836.x
Zalasiewicz, J., et al., 2015. When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal. Quaternary International [online], vol. 383, 196–203. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.04.007
j.quaint.2014.11.045 [Access 19 July 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/11/045
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Manu Monge-Ganuzas, Igor Ahedo Gurrutxaga, Iraide Álvarez Muguruza, Imanol Telleria
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
