The juridification of vulnerability in the European legal culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1314Palabras clave:
cultura jurídica, vulnerabilidad, no discriminación, derechos humanos, juridificaciónResumen
Pese a no ser un concepto jurídico codificado, la vulnerabilidad ha sido cada vez más utilizada en los últimos años en el razonamiento del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. Para ejemplificar esta tendencia, se presentan retrospectivamente algunos casos relevantes que abordan la multifacética noción de vulnerabilidad, considerando dos aspectos. En primer lugar, el artículo explora el proceso de juridificación de la vulnerabilidad en la jurisprudencia del TEDH desde la perspectiva de la sociología del derecho. A través de la noción emergente de vulnerabilidad no codificada, se pretende indagar en la relación de la juridificación y la cultura jurídica centrándonos en la respuesta legal a las necesidades sociales que surgen del uso de la vulnerabilidad. En segundo lugar, el documento conceptualiza la vulnerabilidad examinando su interacción con diferentes violaciones de los derechos humanos. En última instancia, el documento pretende volver a teorizar el papel de la cultura jurídica como catalizador de la juridificación, tomando las condiciones de vulnerabilidad y su relevancia para el derecho como ejemplo paradigmático del cambio social.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
12_6_Catanzariti_OSLS (English) 384
XML_12_6_Catanzariti_OSLS (English) 424
Citas
Anderson, J., and Honneth, A., 2009. Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice. In: J. Christman and J. Anderson, eds., Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, 127–149.
Arnardottir, O.M., 2017. Vulnerability under Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oslo Law Review [online], 4(3), 150. Available from: https://www.idunn.no/doi/pdf/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2017-03-03 [Accessed 10 June 2022].
Baumgärtel, M., 2020. Facing the challenge of migratory vulnerability in the European Court of Human Rights. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 38/2020, 12–29.
Besson, S., 2005. The Principle of Non-Discrimination in the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The International Journal of Children’s Rights [online], 13/2005, 433–461. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/20656988.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2022].
Besson, S., 2014. La vulnérabilité et la structure des droits de l’homme. L’exemple de la jurisprudence de la Cour Europeenne des Droits de l’homme. In : L. Burgourgue-Larsen, ed., La vulnérabilité saisie par les juges en Europe [online]. Paris : Pedone, 59–85. Available from: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02555909/document [Accessed 10 June 2022].
Blichner, L.C., and Molander, A., 2005. What is juridification? [online]. Oslo: Arena Centre for European Studies. Working paper nº 14. March. Available from: https://www.svuio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-working-papers/2001-2010/2005/wp05_14.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2022].
Bossuyt, M., 2016. Categorical Rights and Vulnerable Groups: Moving Away from the Universal Human Being. The George Washington International Law Review [online], 48(4), 717–42. Available from: http://www.gwilr.org/?page_id=18 [Accessed 10 June 2022].
Callegari, A., 2018. Il paradigma della vulnerabilità: brevi riflessioni per una riconfigurazione del dilemma equality-difference. Questione giustizia [online], 23 January. Available from: https://www.questionegiustizia.it/articolo/il-paradigma-della-vulnerabilita_brevi-riflessioni-per-una-riconfigurazione-del-dilemma-equality-difference_23-01-2018.php [Accessed 10 June 2022].
Carlier, J.Y., 2017. Des droits de l’homme vulnérable à la vulnérabilité des droits de l’homme, la fragilité des équilibres. Revue interdisciplinaire des études juridiques [online], 79(2), 175–204. Available from: https://www.cairn.info/revue-interdisciplinaire-d-etudes-juridiques-2017-2-page-175.htm [Accessed 10 June 2022].
Chenal, R., 2018. La definizione della nozione di vulnerabilità e la tutela dei diritti fondamentali. Ars intepretandi, 2/2018, 35–56.
Cole, A., 2016. All of Us Are Vulnerable, But Some Are More Vulnerable Than Others: The Political Ambiguity of Vulnerability Studies, an Ambivalent Critique. Critical Horizons, 17(2), pp. 260, 262.
Coyle, S., 2013. Vulnerability and the Liberal Order. In: M.A. Fineman and A. Grear, eds., Vulnerability: Reflections on a New Ethical Foundation for Law. Farnham: Ashgate.
Diciotti, E., 2018. La vulnerabilità nelle sentenze della Corte Europea dei diritti dell’uomo. Ars interpretandi, 2/2018, 13–34.
Ferrarese, E., 2016. Il geometra e i vulnerabili. Sugli usi del concetto di vulnerabilità nelle scienze sociali. Periódico do Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Gênero e Direito Centro de Ciências Jurídicas, 5(3), 152–173.
Fineman, M.A. 2010. The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State. Emory Law Journal [online], 60. Available from: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/
viewcontent.cgi?article=1333&context=elj [Accessed 13 June 2022].
Fineman, M.A., 2014. Equality and Difference: The restrained State. Alabama Law Review [online], 66(3), 609–625. Available from: https://www.law.ua.edu/pubs/
lrarticles/Volume%2066/Issue%203/Fineman%20Online.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2022].
Fineman, M.A., 2017. Vulnerability and Inevitable Inequality. Oslo Law Review [online], 4(3), 133–149. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2017-03-02 [Accessed 10 June 2022].
Fineman, M.A., 2018. Injury in the Unresponsive State. Writing the Vulnerable Subject into Neo-Liberal Legal Culture. In: A. Bloom, D.M. Engel and M. McCann, eds., Injury and Injustice: The Cultural Politics of Harm and Redress. Cambridge University Press, 53.
Flegar, V., 2016. Vulnerability and the Principle of Non-refoulement in the European Court of Human Rights: Towards an Increase Scope of Protection from Persons Fleeing from Extreme Poverty? Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 8(2), 148–169.
Fredman, S., 2011. Discrimination Law (Second Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Friedman, L. 1975. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.
Friedman, L., 1990. The concept of the Self in Legal Culture. Cleveland State Law Review [online], 38(4), 517. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/
pdf [Accessed 10 June 2022].
Friedman, L., 1993. Sociologia giuridica. In: L. Friedman and L. Nader, eds., Enciclopedia delle scienze sociali, Diritto e società [online]. Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana. Available from: https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/
diritto-e-societa_%28Enciclopedia-delle-scienze-sociali%29/ [Accessed 10 June 2022].
Friedman, L., 1994. Is There a Modern Legal Culture? Ratio Juris, 7(2), 117–131.
Fuchs, S., and Thaler, T., eds., 2018. Vulnerability and Resilience to Natural Hazards. Cambridge University Press.
Goodin, R., 1985. Vulnerabilities and Responsibilities: An Ethical Defense of the Welfare State. The American Political Science Review, 79(3), 775–787.
Gordon-Bouvier, E., 2020. Relational Vulnerability: Theory, Law and the Private Family. Heidelberg: Springer.
Heri, C., 2021. Responsive Human Rights: Vulnerability, Ill-Treatment and the ECtHR. Oxford: Hart.
Herring, J., 2018. Vulnerability, Childhood and the Law. Heidelberg: Springer.
Kim, S.Y., 2021. Les vulnérables: evaluating the vulnerability criterion in Article 14 cases by the European Court of Human Rights. Legal Studies [online], 41(4), 617–632. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2021.21 [Accessed 10 June 2022].
Kittay, E.F., 2018. Dipendenza. In: M.G. Bernardini et al., eds., Vulnerabilità: etica, politica e diritto. Rome: IF Press, 201–210.
Luhmann, N., 1986. The Self-Reproduction of Law and Its Limits. In: G. Teubner, ed., Dylemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Berlin: De Gruyter, 111–128.
Michaels, R., 2012. Legal Culture. In: J. Basedow, K.J. Hopt and R. Zimmermann, eds., The Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law. Oxford University Press, 1060.
Nelken, D., 2004. Using the Concept of Legal Culture. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy [online], 29, 1–26. Available from: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au
/journals/AUJlLegPhil/2004/11.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2022].
O’Boyle, M., 2016. The notion of “vulnerable groups” in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (CDL-LA(2016)003) [online]. Report. European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission) in co-operation with the Constitutional Tribunal of Chile. Presented at the Conference on the Constitutional Protection of Vulnerable Groups: A Judicial Dialogue. Santiago, 4–5 December. Available from: https://www.venice.coe.
int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-LA(2016)003-e [Accessed 10 June 2022].
Pariotti, E., 2013. I diritti umani: concetto, teoria, evoluzione. Padua: CEDAM.
Pariotti, E., 2019. Vulnerabilità ontologica e linguaggio dei diritti. Ars interpretandi, 2/2019, 155–170.
Pastore, B., 2018. Soggettività giuridica e vulnerabilità. In: O. Giolo and B. Pastore, eds., Vulnerabilita: Analisi multidisciplinare di un concetto. Rome: Carocci, 127–145.
Pellizzoni, L., 2017. I rischi della resilienza. In: A. Mela, S. Mugnano and D. Olori, eds., Territori vulnerabili: Verso una sociologia dei disastri italiana. Milan: Franco Angeli, pp. 28–41.
Peroni, L., and Timmer, A., 2013. Vulnerable groups: The promise of an emerging concept in European Human Rights Convention law. I•CON, 11(4), 1056–1085.
Ranci, C., 2002. Fenomenologia della vulnerabilità sociale. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 4, 521–555.
Re, L., 2018. Introduzione: La vulnerabilità fra etica, politica e diritto. In: M.G. Bernardini et al., eds., Vulnerabilità: etica, politica e diritto. Rome: IF Press, 21, 24 and 25.
Resta, G., 2019. How to Do Things with Words. Three Uses of Human Dignity. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del diritto, 67-80.
Ricoeur, P., 2004. Parcours de la reconnaissance : Trois Etudes. Paris : Stock.
Romano, A., 2021. Vulnerability Assessment as an Instrument to Enhance Human Rights? A First Balance of the ECtHR’S Approach in the Field of Migration and Asylum. In: D. Moya and G. Milios, eds., Aliens before the European Court of Human Rights: Ensuring Minimum Standards of Human Rights Protection. Leiden: Brill, 277–294.
Ruet, C., 2014. La vulnérabilité dans la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme. RTDH, 102, 317–340.
Searle, J.R., 1975. A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Tarello, G., 1976. Storia della cultura giuridica moderna. Vol. I : Assolutismo e codificazione del diritto. Bologna : Il Mulino.
Teubner, G., 1983. Substantive and reflexive elements in modern law. Law and Society Review, 17(2), 239–286.
Teubner, G., 1987. Juridification of Social Spheres: A comparative analysis in the areas of labor, corporate, antitrust and social welfare law. Berlin: De Gruyter, 3–48.
Wieacker, F., 1990. Foundations of European Legal Culture. American Journal of Comparative Law [online], 38(1), 1–30. Available from: https://www.pravo.unizg.hr/_download/repository/Foundations_of_European_Legal_Culture.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2022].
Zimmermann, N., 2015. Legislating for the Vulnerable? Special Duties under the European Convention on Human Rights. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für internationales und europäisches Recht, 25(4), 539–562.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Mariavittoria Catanzariti
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
