Friend or foe?
International environmental law and its structural complicity in the Anthropocene’s climate injustices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1140Palabras clave:
Derecho ambiental internacional, Antropoceno, cambio climático, injusticia climáticaResumen
En este artículo, nos centramos en la complicidad estructural del derecho ambiental internacional (DAI) en el origen y la exacerbación de injusticias climáticas. Pretendemos mostrar que, pese a que las intenciones detrás del DAI puedan ser buenas, frecuentemente de forma inadvertida, pero a veces también deliberadamente, desempeña un papel en el origen, el mantenimiento y el agravamiento de muchos paradigmas que dirigen la injusticia climática en el Antropoceno. Nos centramos en tres aspectos: el antropocentrismo neoliberal del DAI; su implicación con el (neo)colonialismo; y su reforzamiento del derecho soberano a explotar recursos energéticos. Concluimos con una llamada a una reforma integral y urgente del DAI.
Descargas
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF (English) 990
Citas
Adelman, S., 2018. The Sustainable Development Goals, anthropocentrism and neoliberalism. In: D. French and L. Kotzé, eds., Sustainable Development Goals: Law, Theory and Implementation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 15–40.
Agius, J., 1998. International environmental law and state sovereignty. Asia Pacific journal of environmental law, 3, 269–283.
Alam, S., et al., eds., 2015. International Environmental Law and the Global South. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Alvaredo, F., et al., 2018. World Inequality Report [online]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674984769 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Angus, I., 2016. Facing the Anthropocene: Fossil Capitalism and the Crisis of the Earth System. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Atapattu, S., 2015. The significance of international environmental law principles in reinforcing or dismantling the North–South divide. In: S. Alam, et al., eds. International Environmental Law and the Global South. New York: Cambridge University Press, 74-108.
Austin, G., and Bochkarev, D., 2007. Energy sovereignty and security: Restoring confidence in a cooperative international system. In: G. Austin and M. Schellekens-Gaiffe, eds., Energy and Conflict Prevention. Brussels: Madariaga European Foundation, 35–65.
Barnosky, A., 2015. Transforming the global energy system is required to avoid the sixth mass extinction. MRS Energy and Sustainability [online], 2(E10), 1–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1557/mre.2015.11 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Baxi, U., 2016. Towards a climate change justice theory? Journal of human rights and the environment [online], 7(1), 7–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2016.01.01 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Beyerlin, U., and Marauhn, T., 2011. International Environmental Law. Oxford: Hart.
Bodansky, D., 2010. The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bonneuil, C., and Fressoz, J., 2016. The Shock of the Anthropocene. Trans.: D. Fernbach. London/New York: Verso.
Brand, U., and Wissen, M., 2018. What kind of great transformation? The imperial mode of living as a major obstacle to sustainability politics. GAIA [online], 27(3), 287–292. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.3.8 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Brown, B., and Spiegel, S.J., 2019. Coal, climate justice, and the cultural politics of the energy transition. Global environmental politics [online], 19(2), 149–168. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00501 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Ceballos, G., et al., 2015. Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science advances [online], 1(5), 1–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Clark, N., and Yusoff, K., 2014. Combustion and society: A fire-centred history of energy use. Theory, culture and society [online], 31(5) 203–226. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414536929 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
De Vos, J., et al., 2014. Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction. Conservation biology [online], 29(2), 452–462. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12380 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Dehm, J., 2016. Carbon colonialism or climate justice? Interrogating the international climate regime from a TWAIL perspective. Windsor yearbook of access to justice [online], 33(3), 129–161. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4893 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Devall, B., 2001. The deep, long-range ecology movement: 1960-2000 – A review. Ethics & the environment [online], 6(1), 18–41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1353/een.2001.0004 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Dupoy, P., and Viñuales, J., 2018. International Environmental Law. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
French, D., and Rajamani, L., 2013. Climate change and international environmental law: musings on a journey to somewhere. Journal of Environmental Law [online], 25(3), 437-461. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqt022 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Gillespie, A., 2014. International environmental law, policy, and ethics. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.
Glikson, A., 2013. Fire and human evolution: The deep-time blueprints of the Anthropocene. Anthropocene [online], 3, 89–92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2014.02.002 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Gonzalez, C., 2015. Bridging the North-South divide: International environmental law in the Anthropocene. Pace environmental law review, 32(2), 407–434. Available from: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr/vol32/iss2/3/ [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Grear, A., 2014. Towards “climate justice”? A critical reflection on legal subjectivity and climate injustice: Warning signals, patterned hierarchies, directions for future law and policy. Journal of human rights and the environment [online], 5, 103–133. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2429289 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Grear, A., 2015. Deconstructing Anthropos: A critical legal reflection on “anthropocentric” law and Anthropocene “humanity”. Law and critique [online], 26(3), 225–249. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-015-9161-0 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Grear, A., 2017a. “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulucene”: Re-encountering environmental law and its “subject” with Haraway and new materialism. In: L. Kotzé, ed., Environmental Law and Governance for the Anthropocene. Oxford: Hart, 77–96.
Grear, A., 2017b. Foregrounding vulnerability: Materiality’s porous affectability as a methodological platform. In: A. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos and V. Brooks, eds., Research Methods in Environmental Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1–28.
Grear, A., 2018. Human rights and new horizons? Thoughts toward a new juridical ontology. Science, technology, and human values [online], 43(1), 129–145. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917736140 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Harari, Y., 2014. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. Toronto: McClelland and Stuart.
Harris, A., 2014. Vulnerability and power in the age of the Anthropocene. Washington and Lee journal of energy, climate, and the environment [online], 6(1), 98–161. Available from: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/jece/vol6/iss1/5 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Healy, N., and Barry, J., 2017. Politicizing energy justice and energy system transitions: Fossil fuel divestment and a “just transition”. Energy policy [online], 108, 451–459. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.014 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Hoffman, A., and Jennings, P.D., 2018. Re-engaging with Sustainability in the Anthropocene Era. Cambridge University Press.
Hornborg, A., 2019. Colonialism in the Anthropocene: The political ecology of the money-energy-technology complex. Journal of human rights and the environment [online], 10(1), 7–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2019.01.01 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Houston, D., 2013. Crisis is where we live: Environmental justice for the Anthropocene. Globalizations [online], 10(3), 439–450. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2013.787771 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Islam, M.R., 2015. History of the North-South divide in international law: Colonial discourses, sovereignty, and self-determination. In: S. Alam, et al., eds., International Environmental Law and the Global South. New York: Cambridge University Press, 23–49.
Jafry, T., ed., 2019. Routledge Handbook of Climate Justice. Oxford /New York: Routledge.
Jonsson, F., 2012. The Industrial Revolution in the Anthropocene. Journal of modern history [online], 84(3), 679–696. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/666049 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Jonsson, F., 2015. Anthropocene blues: Abundance, energy, limits. RCC Perspectives [online], nº 2, 55–64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc/7147 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Kim, R., and Bosselmann, B., 2013. International environmental law in the Anthropocene: Towards a purposive system of multilateral environmental agreements. Transnational environmental law [online], 2(2), 285–309. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102513000149 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Kolbert, E., 2014. The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Kotzé, L.J., 2012. Global Environmental Governance: Law and Regulation for the 21st Century. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kotzé, L.J., 2014. Rethinking global environmental law and governance in the Anthropocene. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law [online], 32(2), 121-156. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2014.11435355 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Kotzé, L.J., 2019a. A global environmental constitution for the Anthropocene? Transnational Environmental Law [online], 8(1), 11-33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102518000274 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Kotzé, L.J., 2019b. International environmental law and the Anthropocene’s energy dilemma. Environmental and Planning Law Journal 36, 437-458.
Kotzé, L.J., 2019c. The Anthropocene, earth system vulnerability and socio-ecological injustice in an age of human rights, Journal of Human Rights and the Environment [online], 10(1), 62-85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2019.01.04 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Kotzé, L.J., and French, D., 2018. The anthropocentric ontology of international environmental law and the Sustainable Development Goals: Towards an ecocentric rule of law in the Anthropocene. Global Journal of Comparative Law [online], 7(1), 5-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906X-00701002
Kotzé, L.J., and Villavicencio Calzadilla, P., 2017. Somewhere between rhetoric and reality: environmental constitutionalism and the rights of nature in Ecuador. Transnational Environmental Law [online], 6(3), 401–433. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000061 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Leal-Areas, R., and Wouters, J., eds., 2017. Research Handbook on EU Energy Law and Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Lewis, S., and Maslin, M., 2015. Defining the Anthropocene. Nature [online], 519(12 March), 171–180. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Louka, E., 2006. International Environmental Law: Fairness, Effectiveness, and World Order. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Malm, A., and Hornborg, A., 2014. The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene review [online], 1(1), 62–69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019613516291 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Mavhunga, C.C., 2014. Introduction. In: C.C. Mavhunga and H. Trischler, eds., Energy (and) Colonialism, Energy (In)Dependence: Africa, Europe, Greenland, North America. RCC Perspectives [online], nº 5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc/6554 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
May, J.R., and Daly, E., 2014. Global Environmental Constitutionalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McGregor, J., 1999. Property rights and environmental protection: Is this land made for you and me? Arizona State law journal, 31(2), 391–437.
Mickelson, K., 2000. South, North, international environmental law, and international environmental lawyers. Yearbook of international environmental law [online], 11(1), 52–81. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/yiel/11.1.52 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Moore, J.W., ed., 2016a. Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland: PM Press.
Moore, J.W., 2016b. The rise of cheap nature. In: J.W. Moore, ed., Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland: PM Press, 78–115.
Oguamanam, C., 2015. Sustainable development in the era of bioenergy and agricultural land grab. In: S. Alam, et al., eds., International Environmental Law and the Global South. New York: Cambridge University Press, 237–255.
Ostrom, E., 2000. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of economic perspectives [online], 14(3), 137–158. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.137 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Philpott, D., 1995. Sovereignty: An introduction and brief history. Journal of international affairs [online], 48(2), 353–368. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i24356845 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Rajagopal, B., 2003. International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance. Cambridge University Press.
Raworth, K., 2014. Must the Anthropocene be a Manthropocene? The Guardian [online], 20 October. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/20/anthropocene-working-group-science-gender-bias [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Richardson, B., 2011. A damp squib: Environmental law from a human evolutionary perspective. Osgoode Hall Law School comparative research in law and political economy paper series [online], 7(3), 1–42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1760043 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Rickards, L., 2015. Metaphor and the Anthropocene: Presenting humans as a geological force. Geographical research [online], 53(3), 280–287. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12128 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Roberts, J.T., and Parks, B.C., 2007. A Climate of Injustice: Global Inequality, North-South Politics, and Climate Policy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Robinson, M., 2014. Social and legal aspects of climate change. Journal of human rights and the environment, 5, 15–17.
Sands, P., and Peel, J., 2012. Principles of International Environmental Law. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press.
Scheidel, A., and Sorman, A., 2012. Energy transitions and the global land rush: Ultimate drivers and persistent consequences. Global environmental change [online], 22(3), 588–595. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.12.005 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Shue, H., 2014. Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. Oxford University Press.
Simons, P., 2015. Selectivity in law-making: Regulating extraterritorial environmental harm and human rights violations by transnational extractive corporations. In: A. Grear and L.J. Kotzé, eds., Research Handbook on Human Rights and the Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 473–507.
Smil, V., 2017. Energy and Civilization: A History. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Steffen, W., et al., 2011. The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society [online], 369, 842–867. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0327 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Steffen, W., et al., 2015. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene review [online], 2(1), 81–98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2053019614564785 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Stephens, L., et al., 2019. Archaeological assessment reveals Earth’s early transformation through land use. Science [online], 365(6456), 897–902. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1192 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Stivers, C., 2007. “So poor and so black”: Hurricane Katrina, public administration, and the issue of race. Public administration review [online], 67, 48–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00812.x [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Sutter, J., and Davidson, L., 2018. Teen tells climate negotiators they aren’t mature enough. CNN [online], 17 December. Available from: https://edition.cnn.com/2018/12/16/world/greta-thunberg-cop24/index.html. [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Talus, K., 2014. Internationalization of energy law. In: K. Talus, ed., Research Handbook on International Energy Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 3–17.
Taylor, P., 1998. An Ecological Approach to International Law: Responding to Challenges of Climate Change. Oxford: Routledge.
Taylor, P., and Grinlinton, D., 2011. Property rights and sustainability: Toward a new vision of property. In: D. Grinlinton and P. Taylor, eds., Property Rights and Sustainability: The Evolution of Property Rights to Meet Ecological Challenges. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1–20.
Tuck, E., and McKenzie, M., 2015. Place in Research: Theory, Methodology, and Methods. New York/Oxford: Routledge.
Villavicencio Calzadilla, P., and Kotzé, L.J., 2018. Living in harmony with nature? A critical appraisal of the rights of mother Earth in Bolivia. Transnational Environmental Law [online], 7(3), 397-424. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102518000201 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Waters, C.N., et al., 2016. The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science [online], 351(6269), aad2622-1–aad2622-10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2622 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Youatt, R., 2014. Interspecies relations, international relations: Rethinking anthropocentric politics. Millennium: Journal of international studies [online], 43(1), 207–223. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814536946 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Yusuf, H., 2008. Oil on troubled waters: Multinational corporations and realising human rights in the developing world, with specific reference to Nigeria. African human rights law journal, 8(1), 79–107.
Zalasiewicz, J., et al., 2017. The Working Group on the Anthropocene: Summary of evidence and interim recommendations. Anthropocene [online], 19, 55–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2017.09.001 [Accessed 6 July 2020].
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Louis J. Kotzé, Louise Du Toit, Duncan French
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
