Looking at the right to care through the lens of gender
Uma perspetiva de género
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1218Keywords:
care, gender equality, unpaid work, right to careAbstract
This article aims to identify the conditions under which a right to care is likely to promote gender equality in the context of long-term care. The first section describes the transformations of the relationship between care and gender (as equality between men and women became a major goal of democratic societies). The second section stresses the tensions thus generated, especially the “care crisis”. Drawing on previous recent empirical studies on different public policy models in the domain of long-term care in various European Union countries, this article identifies the conditions under which a right to care is likely to promote gender equality.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF_12_1_Rocha_OSLS 375
XML_12_1_Rocha_OSLS 133
References
Abellan, A., et al., 2017. Partner care, gender equality, and ageing in Spain and Sweden. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life [em linha], 11(1), 69–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.16-305
Adams, R.B., e Kirchmaier, T., 2016. Women on Boards in Finance and STEM Industries. American Economic Review, 106(5), 277–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161034
Agacinski, S., 1998. Politique des sexes. Paris: Seuil.
Anarte, L.F., 2020. From Wollstonecraft’s dilemma to Nancy Fraser’s theory of gender justice: a proposal for the analysis of gender equality policies. UNIO – EU Law Journal [em linha], 6(1), 12–30. Disponível em: https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/unio/article/view/2708 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21814/unio.6.1.2708
Antonopoulos, R., 2011. The Unpaid Care Work-Paid Work Connection. Levy Economics Institute Working Papers Series [em linha]. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1176661 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1176661
Auth, D., Hergenhan, J., e Holland-Cunz, B., 2017. Introduction: Rethinking Gender Equality Since the Turn of the Millennium. Em: D. Auth, J. Hergenhan e B. Holland-Cunz, eds., Gender and Family in European Economic Policy. Cham: Springer International, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41513-0_1
Bakker, I., 2007. Social Reproduction and the Constitution of a Gendered Political Economy. New Political Economy, 12(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460701661561
Barigozzi, F., Cremer, H., e Roeder, K., 2020. Caregivers in the family: Daughters, sons and social norms. European Economic Review, 130(103589), 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103589
Bartha, A., e Zentai, V., 2020. Long-Term Care and Gender Equality: Fuzzy-Set Ideal Types of Care Regimes in Europe. Social Inclusion [em linha], 8(4), 92–102. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.2956 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.2956
Bergeron, S., 2016. Formal, Informal and Care Economies. Em: L. Disch e M. Hawkesworth, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 179–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.013.10
Bettio, F., 2016. Can we call it a revolution? Women, the labour market, and European policy. Em: D. Auth, J. Hergenhan, e B. Holland-Cunz, eds., Gender and Family in European Economic Policy: Developments in the New Millennium [em linha]. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 15–39. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41513-0_2 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41513-0_2
Bock, G., 2002. Women in European History. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brinkley, J.L., 2019. Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Examining Her Path to the High Court Bench and Its Intersection with the ACLU. Lincoln Memorial University Law Review, 6(1), 1–31.
Carlier, J., 2010. Forgotten Transnational Connections and National Contexts: An “entangled history” of the political transfers that shaped Belgian feminism, 1890–1914. Women’s History Review, 19(4), 503–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2010.502396
Carrasco, C., Borderías, C., e Torns, T., 2019. Introducción. El trabajo de cuidados: antecedentes históricos y debates actuales. Em: C. Carrasco, C. Borderías, e T. Torns, eds., El trabajo de cuidados: Historia, teoría y políticas. Madrid: Los Libros de La Catarata.
Casanova, G., Lamura, G., e Principi, A., 2017. Valuing and Integrating Informal Care as a Core Component of Long-Term Care for Older People: A Comparison of Recent Developments in Italy and Spain. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 29(3), 201–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2016.1236640
Charmes, J., 2019. The Unpaid Care Work and the Labour Market. An analysis of time use data based on the latest World Compilation of Time-use Surveys [em linha]. 19 dezembro. Geneva: International Labour Organization. Disponível em: https://www.ilo.org/gender/Informationresources/Publications/WCMS_732791/lang--en/index.htm [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021].
Chung, H., Hrast, M.F., e Rakar, T., 2018. The Provision of Care: Whose Responsibility and Why? Em: P. Taylor-Gooby e B. Leruth, eds., Attitudes, Aspirations and Welfare: Social Policy Directions in Uncertain Times. Cham: Springer International, 183–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75783-4_6
Cortes, P., e Pan, J., 2017. Occupation and gender: IZA Discussion Papers. IZA DP [em linha], no. 10672. March. Disponível em: https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/10672/occupation-and-gender [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. Bonn: IZA Institute of Labor Economics.
Cova, A., 2013. Feminisms and Associativism: The national councils of women in France and Portugal, a comparative historical approach, 1888–1939. Women’s History Review, 22(1), 19–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2012.726421
Daly, M., e Lewis, J., 2000. The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states. British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 281–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00281.x
Dauphin, C., 2002. Femmes seules. Em: G. Duby e M. Perrot, eds., Histoire des femmes en Occident: IV. Le XIXe siècle. Paris: Perrin, 513–531.
Directorate-General for Employment Social Affairs and Inclusion, 2020. Peer Review on Work-Life Balance: promoting gender equality in informal long-term care provision. Synthesis report [em linha]. 3–4 dezembro. Brussels: European Commission, DG. Disponível em: https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=23804&langId=en [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021].
Eggers, T., et al., 2018. Re-conceptualising the relationship between de-familialisation and familialisation and the implications for gender equality-the case of long-term care policies for older people. Ageing and Society [em linha], 40(4), 869–895. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18001435 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18001435
England, P., Budig, M., e Folbre, N., 2002. Wages of Virtue: The Relative Pay of Care Work. Social Problems, 49(4), 455–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2002.49.4.455
Esping-Andersen, G., 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198742002.001.0001
Esping-Andersen, G., 2009. The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Estrada Fernández, M.E., et al., 2019. Informal care. European situation and approximation of a reality. Health Policy, 123(12), 1163–1172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.09.007
European Commission, 2013. Long-term care in ageing societies - Challenges and policy options. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Towards Social Investment for Growth and Cohesion – including implementing the European Social Fund 2014–2020 (SWD/2013/041 final) [em linha], 20 de fevereiro. Disponível em: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52013SC0041&from=EN [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021].
European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE), 2019a. Gender Equality Index 2019: Work-life balance [em linha]. European Institute for Gender Equality, 11 de outubro. Luxemburgo: Serviço de Publicações da União Europeia. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2839/319154 [Com acesso 18 junho 2021].
European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE), 2019b. Tackling the gender pay gap: Not without a better work-life balance [em linha], 16 de maio. Luxemburgo: Serviço de Publicações da União Europeia. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2839/725703 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021].
Eurostat, 2021. Gender pay gap statistics - Statistics Explained [em linha]. Última atualização: março 2021. Disponível em: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Gender_pay_gap_statistics [Com acesso 26 de novembro de 2020].
Ferrant, G., e Thim, A., 2019. OECD Policy Paper: Measuring Women’s Economic Empowerment. OECD Development Policy Papers, February [em linha], no. 6. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/dev/development-gender/MEASURING-WOMENS-ECONOMIC-EMPOWERMENT-Gender-Policy-Paper-No-16.pdf [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021].
Ferrant, G., Pesando, L.M., e Nowacka, K., 2014. Unpaid Care Work: The missing link in the analysis of gender gaps in labour outcomes [em linha]. Dezembro. Paris: OECD Development Centre. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/dev/development-gender/Unpaid_care_work.pdf [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021].
Fineman, M.A., 2000. Cracking the Foundational Myths: Independence, Autonomy, and Self-Sufficiency. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & The Law, 8, 13–29.
Folbre, N., 2006. Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 183–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880600768512
Folbre, N., e Nelson, J.A., 2000. For Love or Money - Or Both? The Journal of Economic Perspectives [em linha], 14(4), 123–140. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.4.123 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.4.123
Froehlich, L., et al., 2020. Gender at Work Across Nations: Men and Women Working in Male‐Dominated and Female‐Dominated Occupations are Differentially Associated with Agency and Communion. Journal of Social Issues, 76(3), 484–511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12390
Goldin, C., 2006. The Quiet Revolution That Transformed Women’s Employment, Education, and Family. NBER Working Paper Series [em linha], 11953. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3386/w11953 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w11953
Gomes, C., 2017. Os “naturais” salários inferiores das mulheres. XXI Ter Opinião [em linha], nº 8(Igualdade. É possível? E é desejável?), pp. 106–115. Disponível em: https://www.ffms.pt/artigo/2266/os-naturais-salarios-inferiores-das-mulheres [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021].
Grant, G., et al., 1998. Rewards and gratifications among family caregivers: Towards a refined model of caring and coping. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research [em linha], 42(1), 58–71. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00079.x [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00079.x
Grover, S., et al., 2017. Positive Aspects of Caregiving Experience among Caregivers of Patients with Dementia. East Asian Archives of Psychiatry [em linha], 27(2), 71–78. Disponível em: https://www.easap.asia/index.php/component/k2/item/774-1703-v27n2-p71 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021].
Hrženjak, M., e Scambor, E., 2019. Why do research into men’s care work? (editorial). Teorija in Praksa, 56(4), 969–984.
International Labour Organization (ILO) e OECD, 2019. Women at Work in G20 countries: Progress and policy action. Paper prepared for the G20 Employment Working Group Saudi Arabia’s G20 Presidency 2020 [em linha]. Disponível em: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---cabinet/documents/publication/wcms_756334.pdf [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021].
Jarman, J., Blackburn, R.M., e Racko, G., 2012. The Dimensions of Occupational Gender Segregation in Industrial Countries. Sociology [em linha], 46(6), 1003–1019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511435063 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511435063
Kalmijn, M., e Saraceno, C., 2008. A Comparative Perspective on Intergenerational Support: Responsiveness to parental needs in individualistic and familialistic countries. European Societies, 10(3), 479–508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690701744364
Käppeli, A.M., 2002. Scènes féministes. Em: G. Duby e M. Perrot, eds., Histoire des femmes en Occident: IV. Le XIXe siècle. Paris: Perrin, 575–613.
Kaufman-Osborn, T., et al., 2018. 25th Anniversary of Moral Boundaries by Joan Tronto. Politics and Gender, 14(2018), 1–28.
Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., et al., 2018. Evaluations of Men in Domestic Roles in Canada, Norway, Poland, and India. Journal of Men’s Studies, 26(2), 143–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1060826517734379
Koslowski, A., et al., eds., 2020. 16th International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 2019. Research report [em linha]. Agosto. FernUniversität in Hagen. Disponível em: https://ub-deposit.fernuni-hagen.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/mir_derivate_00002067/Koslowski_et_al_Leave_Policies_2020.pdf [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021].
Le Bihan, B., Da Roit, B., e Sopadzhiyan, A., 2019. The turn to optional familialism through the market: Long‐term care, cash‐for‐care, and caregiving policies in Europe. Social Policy & Administration, 53(4), 579–595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12505
Leira, A., e Saraceno, C., 2002. Care: actors, relationships and contexts. Em: B. Hobson, J. Lewis, e B. Siim, eds., Contested Concepts in Gender and Social Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 55–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781950340.00007
Leitner, S., 2003. Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5(4), 353–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000127642
Leitner, S., 2014. Varieties of Familialism: Developing Care Policies in Conservative Welfare States. Em: P. Sandermann, ed., The End of Welfare as We Know It? [em linha]. Leverkusen-Opladen: Barbara Budrich, 37–51. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvddzzk8.5 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvddzzk8.5
Lera, J., Pascual-Sáez, M., e Cantarero-Prieto, D., 2021. Socioeconomic Inequality in the Use of Long-Term Care among European Older Adults: An Empirical Approach Using the SHARE Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [em linha], 18(1), 1–14. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010020 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010020
Lomazzi, V., Israel, S., e Crespi, I., 2018. Gender equality in Europe and the effect of work-family balance policies on gender-role attitudes. Social Sciences [em linha], 8(1). Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8010005 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8010005
Marrades, A., 2016. Los nuevos derechos sociales: el derecho al cuidado como fundamento del pacto constitucional. Revista de Derecho Político [em linha], 1(97), 209–242. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.97.2016.17623 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.97.2016.17623
Murphy, C., e Turner, T., 2017. Formal and informal long term care work: policy conflict in a liberal welfare state. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 37 (3/4), 134–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-06-2015-0069
OECD, 2017. The Pursuit of Gender Equality. 4 October. Paris: OECD.
OECD, 2020. Who Cares? Attracting and Retaining Elderly Care Workers. 22 June. Paris: OECD.
Ophir, A., e Polos, J., 2021. Care Life Expectancy: Gender and Unpaid Work in the Context of Population Aging. Population Research and Policy Review [em linha], 15 fevereiro. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-021-09640-z [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-021-09640-z
Pateman, C., 1988. The Sexual Contract. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Pfau-Effinger, B., 2004. Socio-historical paths of the male breadwinner model - An explanation of cross-national differences. British Journal of Sociology [em linha], 55(3), 377–399. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00025.x [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00025.x
Pfau-Effinger, B., 2005. Welfare State Policies and the Development of Care Arrangements. European Societies [em linha], 7(2), 321–347. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690500083592 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690500083592
PORDATA, 2018. Índice de envelhecimento [em linha]. Disponível em: https://www.pordata.pt/Europa/Índice+de+envelhecimento-1609 [Com acesso 3 de novembro de 2020].
Rechel, B., et al., 2013. Ageing in the European Union. The Lancet, 381(9874), 1312–1322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62087-X
Ribeiro, J.S., 2005. Processos de envelhecimento: a construção de um direito emancipatório. Em: G. de Oliveira, ed., Direito da Infância, da Juventude e do Envelhecimento. Coimbra Editora, 203–231.
Rocha, M., 2021. Promoting gender equality through regulation: the case of parental leave. Theory and Practice of Legislation [em linha], 9(1), 35–57. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2020.1830565 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2020.1830565
Rodríguez Ruiz, B., e Rubio-Marín, R., 2008. The gender of representation: On democracy, equality, and parity. International Journal of Constitutional Law [em linha], 6(2), 287–316. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mon007 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mon007
Rubio-Marín, R., 2014. The achievement of female suffrage in Europe: On women’s citizenship. International Journal of Constitutional Law [em linha], 12(1), 4–34. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot067 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot067
Rubio-Marín, R., 2015. The (dis)establishment of gender: Care and gender roles in the family as a constitutional matter. International Journal of Constitutional Law [em linha], 13(4), 787–818. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov059 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov059
Saraceno, C., 2016. Varieties of familialism: Comparing four southern European and East Asian welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(4), 314–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928716657275
Schmid, T., Brandt, M., e Haberkern, K., 2012. Gendered support to older parents: Do welfare states matter? European Journal of Ageing, 9(1), 39–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-011-0197-1
Scott, J.W., 2002. La Travailleuse. Em: G. Duby e M. Perrot, eds., Histoire des femmes en Occident: IV. Le XIXe siècle. Paris: Perrin, 479–511.
Sohn, A.M., 2002. Entre Deux Guerres. Em: G. Duby e M. Perrot, eds., Histoire des femmes en Occident: V. Le XXe siècle. Paris: Perrin, 165–195.
Suwada, K., 2017. “It was Necessary at the Beginning to Make This Whole Revolution”: Men’s Attitudes to Parental Leaves in Sweden and Poland. Men and Masculinities, 20(5), 570–587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17727571
Taylor Allen, A., Cova, A., e Purvis, J., 2010. International Feminisms. Women’s History Review, 19 (4), 493–501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2010.502395
Thébaud, F., 2002. La Grande Guerre. Em: G. Duby e M. Perrot, eds., Histoire des femmes en Occident: V. Le XXe siècle. Paris: Perrin, 85–144.
Thomas, C., 1993. De-Constructing Concepts of Care. Sociology, 27(4), 649–669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038593027004006
Torella, E.C. di, 2016. Shaping and Re-Shaping the Caring Relationship in European Law: A Catalogue of Rights for Informal Carers. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 28(3), 261–280.
Tronto, J.C. e Fisher, B., 1990. Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring. Em: E. Abel e M. Nelson, eds., Circles of Care. Albany: SUNY Press, 36–54.
Tronto, J.C., 1993. Moral Boundaries. Nova Iorque: Routledge.
Tronto, J.C., 2013. Caring Democracy. New York University Press.
UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2020. World’s Women 2020 [em linha]. Disponível em: https://worlds-women-2020-data-undesa.hub.arcgis.com/ [Com acesso 12 de novembro de 2020].
UN Women, 2020. Progress of the world’s women 2019–2020: Families in a changing world [em linha]. O Cairo: UN Women. Disponível em: https://arabstates.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2020/01/progress-of-the-worlds-women-report [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021].
United Nations Economic and Social Council, 2020. Review and appraisal of the implementation of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action and the outcomes of the twenty-third special session of the General Assembly: Report of the Secretary General (E/CN.6/2020/3) [em linha]. Nova Iorque: Nações Unidas. Disponível em: https://undocs.org/E/CN.6/2020/3 [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021].
United Nations General Assembly, 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Preamble (UN A/RES/70/1) [em linha]. Nova Iorque: Nações Unidas. Disponível em: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf [Com acesso 18 de junho de 2021].
Verbakel, E., 2018. How to understand informal caregiving patterns in Europe? The role of formal long-term care provisions and family care norms. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health [em linha], 46(4), 436–447. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817726197 [Nova Iorque: Nações Unidas.]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817726197
Veyne, P., 2002. L’Empire romain. Em: P. Ariès e G. Duby, eds., Histoire de la vie privée. 1. De l’Empire romain à l’an mil. Paris: Seuil, 17–213.
Zigante, V., 2018. Informal care in Europe: Exploring Formalisation, Availability and Quality [em linha]. Comissão Europea. Disponível em: https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=8106&furtherPubs=yes [Nova Iorque: Nações Unidas.].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Miriam Rocha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence and it regulates how others can use your work. Further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
