Claims-making in court cases on children
Religion, ethnicity, and culture in cases of Dutch minority families against the state
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1209Palabras clave:
reclamaciones ante los tribunales, defensa culturalResumen
Este artículo se centra en los argumentos culturales, religiosos o étnicos presentados por miembros de familias en casos judiciales contra instituciones del Estado, en Holanda. Basándome en un análisis de las sentencias judiciales, estudio la presentación de argumentos en casos relacionados con niños de familias de minorías en varios campos jurídicos. En la literatura, dichos argumentos suelen comentarse en el contexto de la así denominada defensa cultural, donde los autores de delitos presentan argumentos culturales para eludir o disminuir el castigo. Sin embargo, también los miembros de familias pueden presentar argumentos para excepciones de políticas estatales, para solicitar la aceptación de determinadas prácticas, o para aducir discriminación por parte de instituciones del Estado. El artículo muestra cómo los tribunales holandeses son reacios a aceptar esos argumentos, y a menudo los excluyen totalmente de las sentencias. Aduzco que esta falta de implicación con argumentaciones culturales, religiosas o étnicas debería entenderse en el contexto de los discursos generales de Holanda sobre la asimilación de minorías migrantes.
Descargas
Metrics
Estadísticas globales ℹ️
|
531
Visualizaciones
|
338
Descargas
|
|
869
Total
|
|
Citas
Bano, S., 2012. Muslim Women, Divorce and Shari’ah Councils in Britain. In: R. Mehdi, W. Menski and J.S. Nielsen, eds., Interpreting divorce law in Islam. Copenhagen: DJØF, 181–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283856_7
Bergman, S., 2004. Collective organizing and claim making on child care in Norden: Blurring the boundaries between the inside and the outside. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 11(2), 217-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxh033
Bonjour, S. 2006. Who's in and Who's Out? The Postwar Politics and Policies of Family Migration in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: ESSHC Conference, 22-25 March.
Chávez, A.E., 2017. Intimacy at stake: Transnational migration and the separation of family. Latino Studies, 15, 50-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41276-017-0045-3
Cichowski, R., 2010. Civil society and the European court of human rights. In: J. Christoffersen and M.R. Madsen, eds., The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694495.003.0005
Cole, J., 2014. Working mis/understandings: The tangled relationship between kinship, Franco-Malagasy binational marriages, and the French state. Cultural Anthropology [online], 29(3), 527-551. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14506/ca29.3.05 [Access 10 July 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14506/ca29.3.05
Cooke, T., 2017. Seeing Past the Liberal Legal Subject. Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society [online], 42(3), 23-40. Available from: https://journal.fi/suomenantropologi/article/view/60988 [Access 10 July 2021].
D’Hondt, S., 2010. The Cultural Defense as Courtroom Drama: The Enactment of Identity, Sameness, and Difference in Criminal Trial Discourse. Law & Social Inquiry [online], 35(1), 67-98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01178.x [Access 10 July 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01178.x
Drotbohm, H., 2020. Care and reunification in a Cape Verdean family: Changing articulations of family and legal ties. Ethnography [online], 21(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138118774071 [Access 10 July 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138118774071
Feinberg, J., and Narveson, J., 1970. The nature and value of rights. The Journal of Value Inquiry [online], 4, 243-260. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137935 [Access 10 July 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137935
Foblets, M.C., and Renteln, A.D., eds., 2009. Multicultural jurisprudence: Comparative perspectives on the cultural defense. Oxford: Hart.
Gleeson, S., 2009. From Rights to Claims: The Role of Civil Society in Making Rights Real for Vulnerable Workers. Law & Society Review [online], 43(3), 669-700. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00385.x [Access 10 July 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00385.x
Hellgren, Z., 2012. Negotiating Social Membership: Immigrant Claims-making Contesting Borders and Boundaries in Multi-ethnic Europe. PhD thesis, Stockholm University. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis.
Hobson, B., and Lindholm, M., 1997. Collective identities, women's power resources, and the making of welfare states. Theory and Society, 26, 475-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006827814138
Koopmans, R., and Statham, P., 1999. Challenging the liberal nation-state? Postnationalism, multiculturalism, and the collective claims making of migrants and ethnic minorities in Britain and Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 652-696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/210357
Kulk, F., 2013. Laverend langs grenzen. Transnationale gezinnen en Nederlands en islamitisch familie- en nationaliteitsrecht. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal.
Larsson, G., and Lindekilde, L., 2009. Muslim claims-making in context: Comparing the Danish and the Swedish Muhammad cartoons controversies. Ethnicities [online], 9(3), 361-382. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796809337426 [Access 10 July 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796809337426
Leinonen, J., and Pellander, S., 2014. Court decisions over marriage migration in Finland: a problem with transnational family ties. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(9), 1488-1506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.846825
Okin, S.M., 1999. Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840991-002
Prins, B., and Saharso, S., 2008. In the spotlight. A blessing and a curse for immigrant women in the Netherlands. Ethnicities, 8(3), 365-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796808092448
Prins, B., and Saharso, S., 2010. From toleration to repression: the Dutch backlash against multiculturalism. In: S. Vertovec and S. Wessendorf, eds., The Multiculturalist Backlash: European Discourses, Policies and Practices. London: Routledge, 92-110.
Renteln, A.D., 2010. Corporal punishment and the cultural defense. Law and Contemporary Problems, 73, 253-279.
Rietveld-Van Wingerden, M., Sturm, J.C., and Miedema, S., 2003. Vrijheid van onderwijs en sociale cohesie in historisch perspectief. Pedagogiek, 23(2), 97-108.
Roggeband, C., and Verloo, M., 2007. Dutch Women are Liberated, Migrant Women are a Problem: The Evolution of Policy Frames on Gender and Migration in the Netherlands, 1995-2005. Social Policy & Administration, 41(3), 271-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00552.x
Rutten, S., 2010. Protection of spouses in informal marriages by human rights. Utrecht Law Review [online], 6(2), 77-92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.125 [Access 10 July 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.125
Rutten, S., 2013. The Netherlands. Applying Shari'a to family law issues in the Netherlands. In: M.S. Berger, M. Rohe and B.S. Turner, eds., Applying shari'a in the West: Facts, fears and the future of Islamic rules on family relations in the West. Leiden University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9789400601055-006
Shah, P., 2007. Rituals of Recognition: Ethnic Minority Marriages in British Legal Systems. In: P. Shah, ed., Law and Ethnic Plurality. Socio-Legal Perspectives. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 177-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004162457.i-241.62
Simon, C., Truffin, B., and Wyvekens, A., 2019. Between norms, facts and stereotypes: the place of culture and thnicity in Belgian and French family justice. Studies in Law Politics and Society, 78, 113-129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-433720190000078007
Soysal, Y., 1998. Identity, Rights and Claims-making: Changing dynamics of citizenship in postwar Europe. Metropolis International Workshops Proceedings. Lisbon: Luso-American Development Foundation.
Sportel, I., 2020. Moroccan Family Law: Discussions and Responses from the Netherlands. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs [online], 40(1), 67-83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2020.1741167 [Access 10 July 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2020.1741167
Sportel, I., Hart, B.D., and Kulk, F., 2019. Transnational Families Navigating the Law: Marriage, Divorce and Wellbeing. In: M. Tiilikainen, M. Al-Sharmani and S. Mustasaari, eds., Wellbeing of Transnational Muslim Families: Marriage, Law and Gender. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315231976-6
Van Broeck, J., 2001. Cultural defence and culturally motivated crimes (cultural offences). European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 9, 1-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718170120519282
Wekker, G., 2016. White innocence: Paradoxes of colonialism and race. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822374565
Willsher, K., 2017. Non-pork meals must be available for school lunch, rules French court. The Guardian [online], 28 August. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/28/non-pork-meals-must-be-available-for-school-lunch-rules-french-court [Access 10 July 2021].
Zivi, K., 2011. Making rights claims: A practice of democratic citizenship. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199826414.001.0001
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Iris Sportel
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores conservan el copyright de sus trabajos, que se publicarán en OSLS bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial SinObraDerivada. Puede consultar más detalles en: http://es.creativecommons.org/licencia/. Si no está de acuerdo con esta licencia, por favor, póngase en contacto con nosotros.
El autor concede los permisos necesarios para difundir la información bibliográfica del artículo, incluyendo el resumen, y autorizar a otros, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas, de índices y servicios de alerta de contenidos, a copiar y comunicar esta información.
Para más información sobre los permisos para distribuir su artículo en cada fase de la producción, por favor, lea nuestra Política de Autoarchivo y Divulgación (en inglés).
Las condiciones de copyright con el nombre de autores y co-autores, y la licencia Creative Commons se mostrarán en el artículo. Estas condiciones se deben aceptar como parte del proceso de envío de un artículo a la revista. Por favor, asegúrese de que todos los co-autores se mencionan correctamente, y que entienden y aceptan estos términos.
