The Practice of Immigration and Nationality Law: Setting Boundaries of Specialization at the Margins
Keywords:
Specialization, Legal Profession, ImmigrationAbstract
Drawing on literature on professions and specialization, both within the legal profession and outside of it – in disciplines such as medicine, teaching, and scientific research – this paper looks at immigration and nationality law practice as a specialist area established through boundary setting in England. It analyses the boundaries placed on knowledge and authorised practice of law by examining how these lead to new specializations. Situated at the margins of legal practice, immigration law represents a low status area of practice which is not just influenced by market forces. Driven by external factors and internal motivations, the process of specialization operates to create niche areas of knowledge and expertise within immigration law. We find that the process of specialization can have contradictory effects: both consolidating professional values as well as leading potentially to de-professionalization.Aprovechando la literatura existente sobre profesiones y especialización tanto en la profesión jurídica como fuera de ella, este artículo aborda la práctica jurídica sobre inmigración y nacionalidad como un área de especialización que se ha establecido sobre la fijación de fronteras en Inglaterra. Analiza los límites fijados al conocimiento y la práctica jurídica autorizada a través de un análisis de cómo esas fronteras provocaron el surgimiento de especializaciones nuevas. En el margen de la práctica jurídica, el derecho migratorio representa un área de bajo nivel en la práctica, área que no se ve influida por las fuerzas del mercado. El proceso de especialización está dirigido por factores externos y motivaciones internas, y opera para crear nichos de conocimiento y especialización dentro del derecho migratorio. Hemos descubierto que el proceso de especialización puede tener efectos contradictorios, puesto que puede consolidar valores profesionales a la vez que, potencialmente, conducir a la desprofesionalización.
DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER FROM SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=3057483
Downloads
Downloads:
PDF 263
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Devyani Prabhat, Jessica Hambly
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.