The right to care in the workplace
In favour of open search processes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2677Keywords:
labour law, care work, legal theoryAbstract
A sustainable society within planetary limits requires structural changes. A right to care can be an important contribution for this transition. This article analyses how labour law could contribute to recognising and implementing a right to care. It focuses on individual rights to flexibility in the workplace. Examples from German law are used to demonstrate how legal theories of the juridical form help to explain the conceptual problems in aligning these individual rights with collective bargaining and representation. The article discusses how supplementing individual rights with positive duties to establish open search processes could foster open-ended processes involving a variety of stakeholders, putting all existing infrastructures and routines up for a discussion of possible options, modifications, or alternatives. Finally, it defends this utopian approach in view of the realisation that the world we live in makes it hard to imagine that such fundamental steps to emancipation can really be realised.
Downloads
Metrics
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
14
Views
|
8
Downloads
|
|
22
Total
|
|
References
Adams, Z., 2021. Labour law, capitalism and the juridical form: Taking a critical approach to questions of labour law reform. Industrial Law Journal [online], 50(3), 434–467. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwaa024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwaa024
Barmes, L., 2016. Bullying and behavioural conflict at work: The duality of individual rights [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691371.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691371.001.0001
Battersby, C., 1998. The phenomenal woman: Feminist metaphysics and the patterns of identity. London: Routledge.
Becker, A., and Claus, F., 2024. Social security and the right to laziness beyond just basic income. In: N. Bueno, B. ter Haar and N. Zekic, eds., Labour law utopias: Post-growth and post-productive work approaches [online]. Oxford University Press, 201–220. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198889755.003.0011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198889755.003.0011
Binder, B., and Kocher, E., 2025. Recht – Geschlecht – Kollektivität: Das umkämpfte Allgemeine und das neue Gemeinsame. In: Forschungsgruppe „Recht – Geschlecht – Kollektivität”, ed., Recht umkämpft: Feministische Perspektiven auf ein neues Gemeinsames [online]. Leverkusen: Verlag Barbara Budrich, 7–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.27775874.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.27775874.3
Blackham, A., 2022. Reforming age discrimination law: Beyond individual enforcement [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198859284.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198859284.001.0001
Boll, F., 2025. Geschlechtervielfalt anerkennen, Gleichstellung gestalten: Rechtliche Grundlagen und Handlungsräume für Geschlechtervielfalt in der Gleichstellungsarbeit. Bundesstiftung Gleichstellung.
Brown, W., 2000. Suffering rights as paradoxes. Constellations [online], 7(2), 230–241. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00183
Buckel, S., 2016. Rechtskritik. Kritische Justiz [online], 49(3), 289–304. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/0023-4834-2016-3-289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0023-4834-2016-3-289
Bücker, T., 2022. Alle_Zeit: Eine Frage von Macht und Freiheit. Ullstein.
Bude, H., 2019. Solidarität: Die Zukunft einer großen Idee. Hanser.
Bueno, N., Haar, B. ter, and Zekic, N., eds., 2024. Labour law utopias: Post-growth and post-productive work approaches [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198889755.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198889755.001.0001
Busby, N., 2011. A right to care? Unpaid work in European employment law [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579020.003.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579020.003.0001
Collier, R., 2013. “Feminising” the workplace? Law, the “good parent” and the “problem of men”. In: A. Morris and T. O’Donnell, eds., Feminist perspectives on employment law. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 161–181.
Conaghan, J., 2005. Work, family, and the discipline of labour law. In: J. Conaghan and K. Rittich, eds., Labour law, work, and family: Critical and comparative perspectives [online]. Oxford University Press, 19–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199287031.003.0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199287031.003.0002
Conaghan, J., 2006. Time to dream? Flexibility, families, and the regulation of working time. In: J. Fudge and R. J. Owens, eds., Precarious work, women and the new economy: The challenge to legal norms. Oxford: Hart, 101–129.
Conaghan, J., 2013a. Feminism and labour law: Contesting the domain. In: A. Morris and T. O’Donnell, eds., Feminist Perspectives on Employment Law. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 13–41.
Conaghan, J., 2013b. Law and gender [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592920.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592920.001.0001
Crain, M. G., 1991. Feminizing unions: Challenging the gendered structure of wage labour. Michigan Law Review [online], 89, 1155–1221. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1289551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1289551
Day, S., and Brodsky, G., 1996. The duty to accommodate: Who will benefit? The Canadian Bar Review, 75, 433–473.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Zeitpolitik, et al., 2020. Memorandum “The right to time, an urgent topic on the European Agenda”.
Deutscher Juristinnenbund (DJB), 2016. Konzeption für ein Wahlarbeitszeitgesetz. Berlin.
Deutscher Juristinnenbund (DJB), 2021/2025. Wege zur Diskriminierungsfreiheit in Unternehmen: Konzeption für ein Gleichstellungsgesetz in der Privatwirtschaft und Handlungshinweise für Unternehmen. Berlin.
Dias-Abey, M., 2022. Mobilizing for recognition: Indie unions, migrant workers, and strategic equality act litigation. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations [online], 38(2), 137–156. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/IJCL2022007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/IJCL2022007
Dinner, D., 2018. Equal by what measure? The lost struggle for universal state protective labor standards. In: M. A. Fineman and J. W. Fineman, eds., Gender in law, culture, and society. Vulnerability and the legal organization of work [online]. London: Routledge, 283–304. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315518572-20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315518572-20
European Network of Legal Experts in Gender Equality and Non-Discrimination, 2025. A comparative analysis of gender equality law in Europe 2024: The 27 EU Member States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and the United Kingdom compared. Brussels: EU Commission.
Federici, S., 2012. Wages against housework. In: S. Federici, ed., Revolution at point zero: Housework, reproduction, and feminist struggle. Common Notions, 26–33.
Fredman, S., 2022. Discrimination law. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.
Fredman, S., and Fudge, J., 2013. The legal construction of personal work relations and gender. Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies [online], 7(1), 112–122. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrls/jlt019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrls/jlt019
Fudge, J., 2005. A new gender contract? Work/life balance and working-time flexibility. In: J. Conaghan and K. Rittich, eds., Labour law, work, and family: Critical and comparative perspectives [online]. Oxford University Press, 261–287. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199287031.003.0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199287031.003.0012
Fudge, J., 2017. The future of the standard employment relationship: Labour law, new institutional economics and old power resource theory. Journal of Industrial Relations [online], 59(3), 374–392. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185617693877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185617693877
Gamillscheg, F., 1973. Die Solidarität als Rechtsbegriff. In: G. Wannagat and W. Gitter, eds., Festschrift für Erich Fechner. Mohr Siebeck, 135–153.
Gerhard, U., 2018. Für eine andere Gerechtigkeit: Dimensionen feministischer Rechtskritik. Campus.
Grabham, E., 2016. Brewing legal times: Things, form, and the enactment of law [online]. University of Toronto Press. Available at: https://utppublishing.com/doi/book/10.3138/9781442646056
Hark, S., 2021. Gemeinschaft der Ungewählten. Umrisse eines politischen Ethos der Kohabitation. Ein Essay. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Hark, S., et al., 2015. Das umkämpfte Allgemeine und das neue Solidarität ohne Identität. Feministische Studien [online], 33(1), 99-103. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/fs-2015-0111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fs-2015-0111
Haug, F., 2022. Die Vier-in-einem-Perspektive: Politik von Frauen für eine neue Linke. 4th ed. Argument.
Hayes, L., 2014. “Women’s voice” and equal pay: Judicial regard for the gendering of collective bargaining. In: A. Bogg and T. Novitz, eds., Voices at work: Continuity and change in the common law world [online]. Oxford University Press, 35–54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683130.003.0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683130.003.0002
Hensel, I., 2020. Recht und Geschlecht als gewerkschaftliche Strategien: Mit Hilfe der Geschlechterkategorie in der mittelbaren Diskriminierung zu einer Höherbesoldung von Grundschullehrer*innen? Arbeit | Grenze | Fluss - Work in Progress Interdisziplinärer Arbeitsforschung No. 4. Frankfurt (Oder): Europa-Universität Viadrina.
Hensel, I., 2022. Recht gegen Diskriminierung: Die djb-Konzeption für ein Gleichstellungsgesetz in der Privatwirtschaft. Arbeit und Recht, 70(11), 465–469.
Honneth, A., and Fraser, N., 2003. Redistribution or recognition / Umverteilung oder Anerkennung? A political-philosophical controversy. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
International Labour Organization (ILO), 2018. Care work and care jobs for the future of decent work. International Labour Organization.
International Labour Organization (ILO), 2019. Work for a brighter future: Global commission on the future of work. International Labour Office.
Kapur, R., 2018. Gender, alterity and human rights: Freedom in a fishbowl [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112536
Kocher, E., 2007. Gestaltungs- und Verhandlungsrechte von Beschäftigten. WSI-Mitteilungen [online], 60(8), 434–440. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/0342-300X-2007-8-434 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0342-300X-2007-8-434
Kocher, E., 2016. Das andere des Arbeitsrechts. Arbeit und Recht(8-9), 334–338.
Kocher, E., et al., 2013. Das Recht auf eine selbstbestimmte Erwerbsbiographie: Arbeits- und sozialrechtliche Regulierung für Übergänge im Lebenslauf [online]. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845248639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845248639
Kollmer, N., 2025. Betriebliches Eingliederungsmanagement: Aktuelle Rechtsprobleme in der Praxis. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 1841–1848.
Kotiswaran, P., 2014. Abject labors, informal markets: Revisiting the law’s (re)production boundary. Employee Rights and Employment Journal, 18, 111-140.
Kotiswaran, P., 2022. Toward a model of universal care, one manifesto at a time. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society [online], 28(4), 854–864. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxab040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxab040
Lindbach, R., 2025. Die Erörterungspflicht des Arbeitgebers gem. § 7 Abs. 2 S. 1 TzBfG und die EU-Vereinbarkeitsrichtlinie. Arbeit und Recht, 73(12), 462-467.
Loick, D., 2017. Juridismus: Konturen einer kritischen Theorie des Rechts. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Mayer-Ahuja, N., 2025. Klassengesellschaft akut: Warum Lohnarbeit spaltet - und wie es anders gehen kann [online]. Munich: C.H. Beck. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406840326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406840326
McCann, M., 1994. Rights at work: Pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization. University of Chicago Press.
Möhring-Hesse, M., 2007. Wie Rechtsbrechern zu ihrem Recht verhelfen? Arbeitsrecht unter den Bedingungen subjektivierter Arbeit. Kritische Justiz [online], 40(4), 347–357. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/0023-4834-2007-4-347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0023-4834-2007-4-347
Morris, A., 2013. Workers first, women second? Trade unions and the equality agenda. In: A. Morris and T. O’Donnell, eds., Feminist perspectives on employment law [online]. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 183–201. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843142713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843142713
Mückenberger, U., et al., 2012. Lebensqualität durch Zeitpolitik: Wie Zeitkonflikte gelöst werden können. Baden-Baden: Nomos. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845270036
Mundlak, G., 2011. The third function of labour law: Distributing labour market opportunities among workers. In: G. Davidov and B. Langille, eds., The idea of labour law [online]. Oxford University Press, 315–328. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693610.003.0020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693610.003.0020
Nebe, K., 2008. (Re-) Integration von Arbeitnehmer: Stufenweise Wiedereingliederung und Betriebliches Eingliederungsmanagement - ein neues Kooperationsverhältnis. Der Betrieb(33), 1801–1805.
Nebe, K., 2024. Familiengerechte Arbeitsorganisation: Lückenhafter Rechtsrahmen und Herausforderungen fairer (kollektiver) Verteilung. Soziales Recht, 14(5), 161–181.
Nedelsky, J., 2011. Law’s relations: A relational theory of self, autonomy, and law [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147964.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147964.001.0001
Nedelsky, J., and Malleson, T., 2021. Part-time for all: A care manifesto. Oxford University Press.
Pfarr, H. M., 2001. Ein Gesetz zur Gleichstellung der Geschlechter in der Privatwirtschaft. Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.
Porter, N. B., 2023. The workplace reimagined: Accommodating our bodies and our lives. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009347440
Ramm, D., et al., 2012. Betriebliches Eingliederungsmanagement in Klein- und Mittelbetrieben. Die Rehabilitation [online], 51(01), 10–17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1299690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1299690
Rodgers, L., 2024. Labour law and the person: An agenda for social justice. Bristol University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529223163.001.0001
Rose, E., 2017. Workplace temporalities: A time-based critique of the flexible working provisions. Industrial Law Journal [online], 46(2), 245–267. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dww039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dww039
Rüb, S., 2024. Kollegialität, Solidarität und Loyalität: Konzeptionelle Überlegungen zum Zusammenhalt in der Arbeitswelt. In: B. Vogel and H. Wolf, eds., Gesellschaftlicher Zusammenhalt. Weinheim: Campus Verlag, 27–48.
Schiek, D., 1996. Lifting the ban on women’s night work in Europe: A straight road to equality in employment? Cardozo Women’s Law Journal, 3(2), 309–333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135822919600200202
Schmidt, W., 2024. Betrieblicher Universalismus: Sozialintegration und Unterschichtung. In: A. L. Carstensen et al., eds., Geteilte Arbeitswelten: Konflikte um Migration und Arbeit. Juventa Verlag, 288–303.
Schultz, V., 2010. Feminism and workplace flexibility. Connecticut Law Review, 42(4), 1203–1222.
Schultz, V., and Hoffman, A., 2006. The need for a reduced workweek in the United States. In: J. Fudge and R. J. Owens, eds., Precarious work, women and the new economy: The challenge to legal norms. Oxford: Hart, 131–151.
Silbaugh, K. B., 2010. Sprawl, family rhythms, and the four-day work week. Connecticut Law Review, 42(4), 1267–1284.
Silbaugh, K., 1996. Turning labor into love: Housework and the law. Northwestern University Law Review, 91(1), 1–86.
Somek, A., 2017. The legal relation: Legal theory after legal positivism. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182096
Stone, K. V., 2004. From widgets to digits: Employment regulation for the changing workplace [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617089
Sturm, S., 2001. Second generation employment discrimination: A structural approach. Columbia Law Review [online], 101(3), 458–568. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1123737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1123737
Sturm, S., 2007. Conclusion to responses: The architecture of inclusion: Interdisciplinary insights on pursuing institutional citizenship. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 30, 409–424.
Sturm, S., 2008. Designing the architecture for integrating accommodation: An institutionalist commentary. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157, 11–20.
Supiot, A., 2015. Der Rechtsgrundsatz der Solidarität. Soziales Recht, 133–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845263564-165
The Green New Deal for Europe (GNDE), 2019. A blueprint for Europe’s just transition: Edition II [online]. Available at: https://report.gndforeurope.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Blueprint-for-Europes-Just-Transition-2nd-Ed.pdf
UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), UN Women and ILO, 2025. The right to care in Latin America and the Caribbean: Progress on the regulatory front. Santiago. Gender Equality Observatory for Latin America and the Caribbean.
Veltman, A., 2016. Meaningful work [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190618179.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190618179.001.0001
Waddington, L., and Hendriks, A., 2002. The expanding concept of employment discrimination in Europe: From direct and indirect discrimination to reasonable accommodation discrimination. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations [online], 18(4), 403–428. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/5113464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/5113464
Weeks, K., 2011. The problem with work: Feminism, marxism, antiwork politics and postwork imaginaries [online]. Durham: Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394723
Weldon-Johns, M., 2013. EU work-family policies: Challenging parental roles or reinforcing gendered stereotypes? European Law Journal [online], 19(5), 662–681. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12022
Welti, F., et al., 2010. Betriebliches Eingliederungsmanagement in Klein- und Mittelbetrieben: Rechtliche Anforderungen und Voraussetzungen ihrer erfolgreichen Umsetzung. Schriftenreihe der Hochschule Neubrandenburg.
Wenckebach, J., 2014. Individuelle Arbeitszeitgestaltung und kollektive Interessen: Alle für Eine oder alle gegen Einen? Kritische Justiz [online], 47(4), 405–413. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/0023-4834-2014-4-405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0023-4834-2014-4-405
Wenckebach, J., and Kocher, E., 2013. § 12 AGG als Grundlage für Ansprüche auf angemessene Vorkehrungen. Soziales Recht, 17–28.
Wihl, T., 2019. Aufhebungsrechte: Form, Zeitlichkeit und Gleichheit der Grund- und Menschenrechte [online]. Velbrück Wissenschaft. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748920571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748920571
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eva Kocher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence and it regulates how others can use your work. Further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
